Advertisement

Regional environmental regulation efficiency: spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors

  • Yu TuEmail author
  • Benhong PengEmail author
  • Guo Wei
  • Ehsan Elahi
  • Tongrui Yu
Research Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Research regarding the regional environmental regulation efficiency (ERE) and influencing factors can provide theoretical guidance for regions to improve their ERE effectively. By employing a two-step approach, the data envelopment analysis (DEA) CCR-BCC model is built with the inclusion of scale changes, and a Tobit model is developed to explore the influencing factors for the regional ERE, followed by an application to analyze the spatiotemporal variations of ERE in Jiangsu province from 2005 to 2015. It is found that in time dimension, the ERE lies generally in a weak effective interval of [0.5, 1) and displays a shock upward trend. In the spatial dimension, the ERE presents an obvious “bilateral effect”, namely, the efficiency is high for both the southern and northern of Jiangsu province but lower for the middle area. Besides, GDP per capital, industrial structure, trade openness, and population growth are among the main influencing factors of ERE. The findings revealed that temporary short-term policies have noticeable impact on the regional ERE, and “matching effect” between the ERE and regional economic development does not present.

Keywords

Environmental regulation efficiency CCR-BCC model Spatiotemporal analysis Tobit model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The thesis was financially supported by HRSA, US DHHS (No. H49MC00068), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71850410541, No. 71263040), the Key Project of National Social and Scientific Fund Program (No. 18ZDA052), the Project of National Social and Scientific Fund Program (No. 17BGL142), the Key Meteorological Soft Science Projects of China Meteorological Administration (No. 2019ZDIANXM25), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX18_1041), the Practical Innovation Training Program for College Students in Jiangsu Province (No. 201810300063Y). Authors highly acknowledged to Associate Professor Ehsan Elahi who helped for technical review and data analysis of the thesis.

References

  1. Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman E, Linda B (2001) Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. Rev Econ Stat 88(3):498–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilgen S, Sarıkaya İ (2015) Exergy for environment, ecology and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:1115–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bone PF (1995) Word-of-mouth effects on short-term and long-term product judgments. J Bus Res 32(3):213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J Environ Econ Manag 45(2):278–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byun J, Jang SC (2015) Effective destination advertising: matching effect between advertising language and destination type. Tour Manag 50:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chi CSF, Ruuska I, Xu J (2015) Environmental impact assessment of infrastructure projects: a governance perspective. J Environ Plan Manag 149(3):1–21Google Scholar
  8. Cole MA (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shanshan WU (2008) Industrial activity and the environment in China: an industry-level analysis. China Econ Rev 19(3):393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16(1):147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erdogan AM (2014) Foreign direct investment and environmental regulations: a survey. J Econ Surv 28(5):943–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamamoto M (2006) Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 28(4):299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang HP (2012) Eco-efficiency-based evaluation of the resource and environmental performances of Jiangxi Province, China. Adv Mater Res 599(36):175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Operational compliance levers, environmental performance, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 14(2):186–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Z, Tang D, Han M, Bethel BJ (2018) Comprehensive evaluation of regional sustainable development based on data envelopment analysis. Sustainability. 10(11):3897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Long X, Oh K, Cheng G (2013) Are stronger environmental regulations effective in practice? The case of China’s accession to the WTO. J Clean Prod 2013(39):161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Macpherson AJ, Principe PP, Mehaffey M (2013) Using Malmquist indices to evaluate environmental impacts of alternative land development scenarios. Ecol Indic 34(34):296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mandal SK (2010) Do undesirable output and environmental regulation matter in energy efficiency analysis? Evidence from Indian cement industry. Energy Policy 38(10):6076–6083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016) Annual review of ecological civilization construction in 2016. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201712/t20171226_1566827.html. (Accessed 26 December 2017)
  20. Peng B, Tu Y, Wei G (2018) Governance of electronic waste recycling based on social capital embeddedness theory. J Clean Prod 187:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83(35):288–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smulders S, Tsur Y, Zemel A (2012) Announcing climate policy: can a green paradox arise without scarcity? J Environ Econ Manag 64(3):364–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Statistics Bureau for Jiangsu Province (2005-2015a) Jiangsu Statistical Year Book 2005-2015. China Statistic Press: Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Statistics Bureau for Jiangsu Province (2005-2015b) Jiangsu environmental situation communique in 2005-2015. China Statistic Press: Beijing (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Statistics Bureau for Jiangsu Province (2017) Jiangsu Statistical Year Book 2017. China Statistic Press, Beijing (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Stern DI, Jotzo F (2010) How ambitious are China and India’s emissions intensity targets? Energy Policy 38(11):6776–6783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang D, Tang J, Xiao Z, Ma T, Bethel BJ (2017) Environmental regulation efficiency and total factor productivity: effect analysis based on Chinese data from 2003 to 2013. Ecol Indic 73:312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tang D, Zhang Y, Bethel BJ (2019) An analysis of disparities and driving factors of carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Sustainability. 11:2362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsen WH, Furuoka F (2005) The relationship between population and economic growth in Asian economies. ASEAN Econ Bull 22(3):314–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang D (2008) Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei technological innovation under the backgrand of international industrial transfer trend. Can Soc Sci 4(4):9–15Google Scholar
  32. Wang XN, Bi J, Liu BB, Yang J, Shi L (2006) Performance-based study on institutional capacity of local environmental protection bureau. Chin Environ Sci 26(3):380–384 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Wang Y, Bian Y, Xu H (2015) Water use efficiency and related pollutants’ abatement costs of regional industrial systems in China: a slacks-based measure approach. J Clean Prod 101:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang J, Wang S, Li S, Cai Q, Gao S (2019) Evaluating the energy-environment efficiency and its determinants in Guangdong using a slack-based measure with environmental undesirable outputs and panel data model. Sci Total Environ 672:150–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Were AN, Isabirye M, Poesen J, Maertens M, Deckers J, Mathijs E (2013) Decentralised governance of wetland resources in the Lake Victoria Basin of Uganda. Nat Resourc 4(1):55–64Google Scholar
  36. World Bank (2015) Market opportunities for decentralized wastewater treatment systems in South-East Asia. (https://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/408612/market-opportunities-for-decentralized-wastewater-treatment-systems-in-south-east-asia/) Accessed March 31 2015
  37. World Bank (2009) Strengthening decentralization and devolution. (https://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/281476/strengthening-decentralization-and-devolution/) Accessed June 1 2009
  38. Wu AM (2013) How does decentralized governance work? Evidence from China. J Contemp China 22(81):379–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu J, An Q, Yao X, Wang B (2014) Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 74(7):96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang F, Yang M, Nie H (2013) Productivity trends of Chinese regions: A perspective from energy saving and environmental regulations. Appl Energy 110(1):82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu C, Shi L, Wang Y, Chang Y, Cheng B (2016) The eco-efficiency of pulp and paper industry in China: an assessment based on slacks-based measure and Malmquist-Luenberger index. J Clean Prod 127:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang P, Su F, Li H, Sang Q (2008) Coordination degree of urban population, economy, space, and environment in Shenyang since 1990. China Popul Resourc Environ 18(2):115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang H, Xu Z, Sun C, Elahi E (2018) Targeted poverty alleviation using photovoltaic power: Review of Chinese policies. Energy Policy 120:550–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou H (2007) Factor endowment, the choice of technology, and the volume of trade. Int Econ J 21(4):593–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou P, Ang BW (2008) Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy 36(8):2911–2916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Econ 30(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Binjiang CollegeNanjing University of Information Science & TechnologyWuxiChina
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.School of Management Science and EngineeringNanjing University of Information Science & TechnologyNanjingChina
  4. 4.Department of Mathematics & Computer ScienceUniversity of North Carolina at PembrokePembrokeUSA
  5. 5.School of BusinessNanjing University of Information Science & TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations