Advertisement

Improvement and application research of the SRM in alpine regions

  • Gai-rui Hao
  • Jia-ke LiEmail author
  • Kang-bin Li
  • Kang Huang
  • Jia-bao Song
  • Huai-en Li
Research Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The simulation of snowmelt runoff in alpine mountainous areas is of great significance not only for the risk assessment of snowmelt flood in spring and summer, but also for the development and management of water resources in the basin. An improved snowmelt runoff model (SRM) is constructed based on the analysis of change characteristics of climate, runoff, and snow and ice cover in the middle and upper reaches of the Taxkorgan River in Xinjiang Province, China. Because of the large evaporation in the study basin, the evaporation loss is added to the model. The SRM and the improved SRM are calibrated and verified by using data such as temperature, precipitation, water vapor pressure, and snow-covered area (SCA) ratio in the study basin from 2002 to 2012. The results show that, compared with the SRM, the average Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) of annual runoff simulation increases from 0.80 to 0.86 in the calibration and increases from 0.74 to 0.83 in the validation through the improved model, and the average runoff error reduces from − 12.8 to 1.32% in the calibration and reduces from − 20.0 to − 11.51% in the validation. After adding the measured flow rate for real-time correction, the average NSE of annual runoff simulation increases from 0.91 to 0.93 and the average annual runoff error reduces from − 7.76 to − 3.91% in the calibration. The average NSE increases from 0.85 to 0.89 and the average runoff error reduces from − 12.35 to − 2.76% in the validation. It indicates that the SRM structure with increased evaporation loss is more in line with the actual situation. The short-term simulation effect of the model is greatly improved by adding the measured flow rate for real-time correction. At the same time, the improved SRM and the hypothetical climate change scenario are used to analyze the impact analysis of the snowmelt runoff simulation in the partial wet year. The results show that in the case of rising temperature, the ice and snow ablation period is prolonged, and the annual runoff also changes significantly in time distribution. It is of guiding significance for the influence of climate change on the runoff of recharged rivers with ice–snow meltwater in the other alpine regions.

Keywords

Alpine region Taxkorgan River Basin Snowmelt runoff model Climate change Elevation zone 

Notes

Funding information

This research was financially supported by the key research and development project of Shaanxi Province (2019ZDLSF06-01) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51879215).

References

  1. Abudu S, King JP, Bawazir AS (2011) Forecasting monthly streamflow of spring-summer runoff season in Rio Grande headwaters basin using stochastic hybrid modeling approach. J Hydrol Eng 16(4):384–390Google Scholar
  2. Chen R, Kang E, Ding Y (2014) Some knowledge on and parameters of China’s alpine hydrology. Adv Water Sci 25(3):307–317 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Cheng CT, Ou CP, Chau KW (2002) Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall–runoff model calibration. J Hydrol 268(1):72–86Google Scholar
  4. Devkota LP, Gyawali DR (2015) Impacts of climate change on hydrological regime and water resources management of the Koshi River Basin, Nepal. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 4:502–515Google Scholar
  5. Edwards AC, Scalenghe R, Freppaz M (2007) Changes in the seasonal snow cover of alpine regions and its effect on soil processes: a review. Quat Int 162(1):172–181Google Scholar
  6. Elias EH, Rango A, Steele CM, Mejia JF, Smith R (2015) Assessing climate change impacts on water availability of snowmelt-dominated basins of the upper Rio Grande Basin. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 3:525–546Google Scholar
  7. Fang S, Pei H, Liu Z, Beven K, Wei Z (2010) Water resources assessment and regional virtual water potential in the Turpan basin, China. Water Resour Manag 24(13):3321–3332Google Scholar
  8. Feng YS (2011) Research on flood forecast of inflow in Heihe River Jinpen Reservoir basin. Thesis for Degree of Master of Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Fang SF (2010) A study on snowmelt runoff forecasting and its uncertainty analysis in Xinjiang. Thesis for Degree of Doctor of Engineering, Xinjiang University.(in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Gao J (2011) Spatiotemporal distribution of snow and snowmelt modeling in alpine regions. Thesis for Degree of Doctor of Engineering, Tsinghua University. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Gao J, Williams MW, Fu X, Wang W, Gong T (2012) Spatiotemporal distribution of snow in eastern Tibet and the response to climate change. Remote Sens Environ 121(138):1–9Google Scholar
  12. Hao G, Li J, Song L, Li H, Li Z (2018) Comparison between the TOPMODEL and the Xin’anjiang model and their application to rainfall runoff simulation in semi-humid regions. Environ Earth Sci 77(7):279Google Scholar
  13. He ZL, Wang Z, Suen CJ, Ma XY (2013) Hydrologic sensitivity of the Upper San Joaquin River Watershed in California to climate change scenarios. Hydrol Res 44(4):723–736Google Scholar
  14. Hock R (2003) Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. J Hydrol 282(1):104–115Google Scholar
  15. Huang Y (2016) Spatio-temporal modeling of snow cover and snowmelt runoff modeling. Thesis for Degree of Doctor of Engineering, East China Normal University. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Huang Y, Yu B, Zhou J, Hu C, Tan W, Hu Z, Wu J (2013) Toward automatic estimation of urban green volume using airborne LiDAR data and high-resolution remote sensing images. Front Earth Sci 7(1):43–54Google Scholar
  17. Koivusalo H, Kokkonen T (2002) Snow processes in a forest clearing and in a coniferous forest. J Hydrol 262(1):145–164Google Scholar
  18. Li KB (2016) Research on basin distributed hydrological model improvement and application. Thesis for Degree of Doctor of Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Li K, Shen B (2011) Mutation analysis of snow cover based on the MODIS remote sensing image data. Int Conf Remote Sens Environ Transp Eng 24(11):1366–1369Google Scholar
  20. Li X, Williams MW (2010) Snowmelt runoff modelling in an arid mountain watershed, Tarim Basin, China. Hydrol Process 22(19):3931–3940Google Scholar
  21. Min Q (2005) Improvement of Dalton formula wind speed function. Hydrology 25(1):37–41 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Nagler T, Rott H, Malcher P, Müller F (2008) Assimilation of meteorological and remote sensing data for snowmelt runoff forecasting. Remote Sens Environ 112(4):1408–1420Google Scholar
  23. Sankey T, Donald J, Mcvay J, Ashley M, O’Donnell F, Lopez SRM, Springer A (2015) Multi-scale analysis of snow dynamics at the southern margin of the North American continental snow distribution. Remote Sens Environ 169(1):307–319Google Scholar
  24. Shen YJ, Shen Y, Fink M, Kralisch S, Chen Y, Brenning A (2018) Trends and variability in streamflow and snowmelt runoff timing in the southern Tianshan mountains. J Hydrol 557:173–181Google Scholar
  25. Shi HY, Fu XD, Wang YJ, Wang GQ, Gong TL (2012) Estimating potential evaporation in Lhasa River Basin: improved Dalton model. J Basic Sci Eng 20(2):219–227 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Tanasienko AA, Chumbaev AS (2008) Features of snowmelt runoff waters in the cis-Salair region in an extremely snow-rich hydrological year. Contemp Probl Ecol 1(6):687–696Google Scholar
  27. Tekeli AE, Akyürek Z, Şorman AA, Şensoy A, Şorman AÜ (2005) Using MODIS snow cover maps in modeling snowmelt runoff process in the eastern part of Turkey. Remote Sens Environ 97(2):216–230Google Scholar
  28. Vafakhah M, Nouri A, Alavipanah SK (2015) Snowmelt–runoff estimation using radiation SRM model in Taleghan watershed. Environ Earth Sci 73(3):993–1003Google Scholar
  29. Valeo C, Ho CLI (2004) Modelling urban snowmelt runoff. J Hydrol 299(3):237–251Google Scholar
  30. Wang H, Fu X, Wang G, Li T, Gao J (2011) A common parallel computing framework for modeling hydrological processes of river basins. Parallel Comput 37(6):302–315Google Scholar
  31. Wei ZC (2010) The study on snow melt processes simulation and snow characteristics analysis. Thesis for Degree of Master of Engineering, Xinjiang University. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Yang ZN, Liu XR, Zeng QZ, Chen ZT, Zhu SS, Wang Q (2000) China’s alpine hydrology. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Yang Q, Chen S, Lu P, Wang M, Wu Q, Zhou C, Liu Y (2013) Unmanned airship-based high-resolution image acquisition and the processing. Int J Adv Comput Technol 5(3):379–386Google Scholar
  34. Zhang JS, Liu LL, Cheng ZS, Chen RS, Jiao JY, Kang ES (2006) Statistical hydrology. The yellow river water conservancy Press, Zhengzhou (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Zhang YC, Li BL, Bao AM, Zhou CH, Chen X, Zhang XR (2007) Study on snowmelt runoff simulation in the Kaidu River Basin. Sci China 50(1):26–35Google Scholar
  36. Zhang G, Xie H, Yao T, Liang T, Kang S (2012) Snow cover dynamics of four lake basins over Tibetan Plateau using time series MODIS data (2001–2010). Water Resour Res 48:W10529Google Scholar
  37. Zhang F, Zhang H, Hagen SC, Ye M, Wang D, Gui D, Zeng C, Tian L, Liu J (2015) Snow cover and runoff modelling in a high mountain catchment with scarce data: effects of temperature and precipitation parameters. Hydrol Process 29(1):52–65Google Scholar
  38. Zhao J, Shi Y, Huang Y, Fu J (2015) Uncertainties of snow cover extraction caused by the nature of topography and underlying surface. J Arid Land 7(3):285–295Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of ChinaXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina
  2. 2.Xi’an Land Water and Electricity Measurement and Control CO.LTDXi’anChina
  3. 3.School of Architecture and Civil EngineeringXi’an University of Science and TechnologyXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations