Advertisement

Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on modified zeolites coated with Mg-layered double hydroxides

  • Xiangling ZhangEmail author
  • Jingtian Gao
  • Shuangjie Zhao
  • Yu Lei
  • Ye Yuan
  • Chunyan He
  • Chenguang Gao
  • Lichu Deng
Research Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, MgAl-LDHs and MgFe-LDHs were synthesized via co-precipitation method and in situ coated on pre-washed zeolites through dipping process in beaker. The obtained modified zeolites and original zeolites were utilized as substrates of constructed rapid infiltration systems (CRIS) to remove hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) in wastewater. Micro-morphology features and chemical composition of zeolites before and after modification were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF). The SEM, XRD, and XRF results demonstrated the feasibility of LDHs coated on the surface of the original zeolites. Purification experiments in simulated CRIS showed that the Cr(VI) removal rates of zeolites/MgAl-LDHs increased by 110.03% on average every concentration (0.5–16 mg L−1) compared with the original zeolites under 24-h HRT. The adsorption capacity of zeolites/MgAl-LDHs reached 66.98 mg kg−1 at 32 mg L−1 initial Cr(VI) concentration, which is nearly twice that of the original zeolites (33.24 mg kg−1) and 1.5 times higher than that of zeolites/MgFe-LDHs (42.01 mg kg−1). Isothermal adsorption tests showed that the Freundlich isotherm equations gave better fitting to the adsorption process. And zeolites/MgAl-LDHs showed a best fit with pseudo-second-order model which meant that the adsorption of Cr(VI) by zeolites/MgAl-LDHs was dominated by chemisorption. Thermodynamic parameters showed that the process of adsorption for the three substrates was spontaneous and endothermic intrinsically. Zeolites/MgAl-LDHs also displayed nearly 60% desorption rate with low concentration eluent (0.01 mol L−1 NaCl). Therefore, zeolites/MgAl-LDHs were chosen out as an optimal substrate for removing Cr(VI) from wastewater in CRIS.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Layered double hydroxides Constructed rapid infiltration system Zeolites/MgAl-LDHs Cr(VI) removal Adsorption Desorption 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Material Research and Testing Center, Wuhan University of Technology, for their technical support of the characteristics of the original and modified substrates.

Funding information

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31670541, 31270573).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_6410_MOESM1_ESM.doc (227 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 227 kb)

References

  1. Ai ZH, Cheng Y, Zhang LZ, Qiu JR (2008) Efficient removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution with Fe@Fe2O3 Core-Shell Nanowires. Environ Sci Technol 42:6955–6960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awwad AM, Farhan AM (2012) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamics of biosorption of lead (II) copper (II) and cadmium (II) ions from aqueous solutions onto olive leaves powder. American J Chem 2(4):238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azizian S (2004) Kinetic models of sorption: a theoretical analysis. J Colloid Interface Sci 276:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babel S, Kurniawan TA (2003) Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. J Hazard Mater 97(1):219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrera-Díaz CE, Lugo-Lugo V, Bilyeu B (2012) A review of chemical, electrochemical and biological methods for aqueous Cr(VI) reduction. J Hazard Mater 223-224:1–12Google Scholar
  6. Deng L, Shi Z, Li B, Yang LF, Luo L, Yang XZ (2014) Adsorption of Cr(VI) and phosphate on Mg−Al hydrotalcite supported kaolin clay prepared by ultrasoundassisted coprecipitation method using batch and fixed-bed systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:7746–7757Google Scholar
  7. Du GX, Li ZH, Liao LB, Hanson R, Leick S, Hoeppner N, Jiang WT (2012) Cr(VI) retention and transport through Fe(III)-coated natural zeolite. J Hazard Mater 221-222:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan HT, Sun W, Jiang B, Wang QJ, Li DW, Huang CC, Wang KJ, Zhang ZG, Li WX (2016) Adsorption of Antimony (III) from aqueous solution by mercapto-functionalized silica-supported organic–inorganic hybrid sorbent: Mechanism insights. Chem Eng J 286:128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galán B, Castañeda D, Ortiz I (2005) Removal and recovery of Cr(VI) from polluted ground waters: a comparative study of ion-exchange technologies. Water Res 39(18):4317–4324Google Scholar
  10. Gao JM, Lu Y, Fang L, Wu F, Ling FL, Guan T, Shi LT, Hu BS, Meng FM (2018) Efficient removal of methyl orange and heavy metal ion from aqueous solution by NiFe-Cl-layered double hydroxide. Environ Eng Sci 35:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García-Sosa I, Cabral-Prieto A, Nava N, Navarrete J, Olguín MT, Escobar L, López-Castañares R, Olea-Cardoso O (2015) Sorption of chromium (VI) by Mg/Fe hydrotalcite type compounds. Hyperfine Interact 232(1):67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hao JG, Wu T, Wang XG, Wang HZ (2017) The anti-dripping synergistic effect of iron-containing LDH with intumescent flame retardant on the properties of polypropylene composites. J Funct Mater 48:85–91Google Scholar
  13. Iftekhar S, Srivastava V, Sillanpää M (2017) Synthesis and application of LDH intercalated cellulose nanocomposite for separation of rare earth elements (REEs). Chem Eng J 309:130–139Google Scholar
  14. Inacio J, Taviot-Guého C, Forano C, Besse JP (2001) Adsorption of MCPA pesticide by MgAl-layered double hydroxides. Appl Clay Sci 18(5):255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaiswal A, Mani R, Banerjee S, Gautam RK, Chattopadhyaya MC (2015) Synthesis of novel nano-layered double hydroxide by urea hydrolysis method and their application in removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution: Kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies. J Mol Liq 202:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang YL, Liu ZF, Zeng GM, Liu YJ, Shao BB, Li Z, Liu Y, Zhang W, He Q (2018) Polyaniline-based adsorbents for removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution: a mini review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(7):6158–6174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan AA, Singh RP (1987) Adsorption thermodynamics of carbofuran on Sn (IV) arsenosilicate in H+, Na+ and Ca2+ forms. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 24(1):33–42Google Scholar
  18. Khitous M, Salem Z, Halliche D (2016) Effect of interlayer anions on chromium removal using Mg–Al layered double hydroxides: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Chin J Chem Eng 24(4):433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li SF, Guo Y, Xiao M, Zhang T, Yao SH, Zang SY, Fan H, Shen Y, Zhang Z, Li W (2019) Enhanced arsenate removal from aqueous solution by Mn-doped MgAl-layered double hydroxides. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:12014–12024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li S, Qi F, Xiao M, Fan HT, Shen YM, Du KG ZZG, Li WX (2017) In situ synthesis of layered double hydroxides on γ-Al2O3 and its application in chromium (VI) removal. Water Sci Technol 75(6):1466–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li SF, Shen YM, Liu DB, Fan LH, Zhao YP (2015a) Novel nanomaterials of 2-benzoylbenzoic acid anions intercalated magnesium aluminum layered double hydroxides for UV absorption properties. Sci Adv Mater 7(4):756–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li SF, Shen YM, Xiao M, Zhang ZG, Li WX (2015b) Stable UV absorption material synthesized by intercalation of squaric acid anion into layered double hydroxides. Chem Pap 69(3):456–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li YJ, Gao BY, Wu T, Sun DJ, Li X, Wang B, Lu FJ (2009) Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on aluminum magnesium mixed hydroxide. Water Res 43(12):3067–3075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liang XT, Fan XY, Li RM, Li SR, Shen SK, Hu DD (2017) Efficient removal of Cr(VI) from water by quaternized chitin/branched polyethylenimine biosorbent with hierarchical pore structure. Bioresour Technol 250:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liao MF, Zhu WJ, Han CY, Shan X, Li XT, Chen HR, Luo YM (2016) On the preparation of MgAl-LDH and its adsorption properties for Chromium(VI). J Saf Environ 16:200–207 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Lin YJ, Fang QL, Chen BL (2014) Metal composition of layered double hydroxides (LDHs) regulating ClO4 - adsorption to calcined LDHs via the memory effect and hydrogen bonding. J Environ Sci 26(3):493–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin YS (1994) Comparison of Langmuir, Temkin and Freundlich equations applied to zinc adsorption in soils. Soils 1994(5):269–272 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Lyubchik SI, Lyubchik AI, Galushko OL, Tikhonova LP, Vital J, Fonseca IM, Lyubchik SB (2004) Kinetics and thermodynamics of the Cr(III) adsorption on the activated carbon from co-mingled wastes. Colloid Surface A 242(1-3):151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahmood-ul-Hassan M, Yasin M, Yousra M, Ahmad R, Sarwar S (2018) Kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamic studies of lead, chromium, and cadmium bio-adsorption from aqueous solution onto Picea smithiana sawdust. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:12570–12578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raji C, Anirudhan TS (1998) Batch Cr(VI) removal by polyacrylamide-grafted sawdust: kinetics and thermodynamics. Water Res 32:3772–3780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saf AO, Alpaydin S, Coskun A, Ersoz M (2011) Selective transport and removal of Cr(VI) through polymer inclusion membrane containing 5-(4-phenoxyphenyl)-6H-1,3,4-thiadiazin-2- amine as a carrier. J Membr Sci 377(1-2):241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salgado-Gómez N, Macedo-Miranda MG, Olguín MT (2014) Chromium VI adsorption from sodium chromate and potassium dichromate aqueous systems by hexadecyltrimethylammonium-modified zeolite-rich tuff. Appl Clay Sci 95(6):197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SEPA (2002) State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Water and wastewater monitoring analysis method China Environmental Science Press Beijing pp346-349. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Shah BA, Mistry CB, Shah AV (2014) Detoxification of hexavalent chromium using hydrothermally modified agricultural detritus into mesoporous zeolitic materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 196:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheng TC, Zhang Z, Hu YC, Tao YT, Zhang JY, Shen ZJ, Feng J, Zhang A (2019) Adsorption of phosphorus by using magnetic Mg–Al-, Zn–Al- and Mg–Fe-layered double hydroxides: comparison studies and adsorption mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:7102–7114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Su YL, Hou WG, Sun DJ, Liu SY, Zhang CG (1999) Studies on preparation and anion exchange capacity of Mg-Fe-LDHs nanoparticles. Chem J Chin Univ 20(7):1012–1016 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Sui MH, Zhou YF, Sheng L, Duan BB (2012) Adsorption of norfloxacin in aqueous solution by Mg-Al layered double hydroxides with variable metal composition and interlayer anions. Chem Eng J 210:451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun L, Yuan ZG, Gong WB, Zhang LD, Xu ZL, Su GB, Han DG (2015) The mechanism study of trace Cr(VI) removal from water using Fe0 nanorods modified with chitosan in porous anodic alumina. Appl Surf Sci 328:606–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tian WL, Kong XG, Jiang MH, Lei XD, Duan X (2016) Hierarchical layered double hydroxide epitaxially grown on vermiculite for Cr(VI) removal. Mater Lett 175:110–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Varadwaj GBB, Oyetade OA, Rana S, Martincigh BS, Jonnalagadda SB, Nyamori VO (2017) Facile synthesis of three-dimensional Mg-Al layered double hydroxide/partially reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for the effective removal of Pb2+ from aqueous solution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:17290–17305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang DB, Zhang ZY, Li XM, Zheng W, Yang Q, Ding Y, Zeng SJ, Cao JB, Yue X, Shen TT, Zeng GM, Deng JH (2010) A full-scale treatment of freeway toll-gate domestic sewage using ecology filter integrated constructed rapid infiltration. Ecol Eng 36:827–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang WW, Zhou JB, Achari G, Yu JG, Cai WQ (2014) Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solutions by hydrothermal synthetic layered double hydroxides: adsorption performance, coexisting anions and regeneration studies. Colloid Surface A 457:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu SF, Ni ZM, Xia SJ, Chen AM, Zhao SF (2009) The kinetics and thermodyanmics for Cr(VI) adsorption on Mg/Al layered double oxides. J Chin Ceram Soc 37:773–782 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  44. Yang HD, Zhao YP, Li SF, Fan X, Wei XY, Zong ZM (2016a) Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by calcined Zn/Al-LDHs. Water Sci Technol 74(1):229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang FC, Sun SQ, Chen XQ, Chang Y, Zha F, Lei ZQ (2016b) Mg–Al layered double hydroxides modified clay adsorbents for efficient removal of Pb2+, Cu2+ and Ni2+ from water. Appl Clay Sci 123:134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yoshida M, Koilraj P, Qiu XH, Hirajima T, Sasaki K (2015) Sorption of arsenate on MgAl and MgFe layered double hydroxides derived from calcined dolomite. J Environ Chem Eng 3(3):1614–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yuan XY, Wang YF, Wang J, Zhou C, Tang Q, Rao XB (2013) Calcined graphene/MgAl-layered double hydroxides for enhanced Cr(VI) removal. Chem Eng J 221:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yue X, Liu W, Chen Z, Lin Z (2017) Simultaneous removal of Cu(II) and Cr(VI) by Mg–Al–Cl layered double hydroxide and mechanism insight. J Environ Sci 53(3):16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang B, Luan LY, Gao RT, Li F, Li YJ, Wu T (2017) Rapid and effective removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using exfoliated LDH nanosheets. Colloid Surface A 520:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang H, Qi R, Duan X (2002) Studies on structures and properties of MgAl and MgFe layered double hydroxides. Chinese J Inorg Chem 18:833–838 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  51. Zhang XL, Guo L, Huang HL, Jiang YH, Li M, Leng YJ (2016) Removal of phosphorus by the core-shell bio-ceramic/Zn-layered double hydroxides (LDHs) composites for municipal wastewater treatment in constructed rapid infiltration system. Water Res 96:280–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zubair M, Daud M, McKay G, Shehzad F, Al-Harthi MA (2017) Recent progress in layered double hydroxides (LDH)-containing hybrids as adsorbents for water remediation. Appl Clay Sci 143:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiangling Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jingtian Gao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuangjie Zhao
    • 1
  • Yu Lei
    • 1
  • Ye Yuan
    • 1
  • Chunyan He
    • 1
  • Chenguang Gao
    • 1
  • Lichu Deng
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Energy and EnvironmentInner Mongolia University of Science & TechnologyBaotouChina

Personalised recommendations