Advertisement

The impact of electric generation capacity by renewable and non-renewable energy in Brazilian economic growth

  • Maiara de Oliveira NoronhaEmail author
  • Roselaine Ruviaro Zanini
  • Adriano Mendonça Souza
Research Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Renewable sources are relevant in a country’s energy planning because they are linked to the creation of opportunities for technological, economic, and productive development guided by the principles of sustainability. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the relation between electric generation capacity by renewable and non-renewable energies and Brazilian socioeconomic variables. The analysis of the interrelationships between electricity generation capacity and economic growth in Brazil, from April 2009 to March 2017, was carried out by the vector autoregressive and autoregressive distributed lag methodologies. It was verified that the variance of employment is explained by renewable sources: hydroelectric in 7.71%, biomass in 1.99%, wind energy in 3.13%, and solar energy in 10.58%. While, the GDP variance is explained in 3.15% by hydroelectric energy, 0.06% by biomass, 1.70% by wind energy, and 17.38% by solar energy. The export variance is explained by renewable sources: hydroelectric 2.48%, biomass 0.39%, wind energy 2.34%, and solar energy 17.58%. Finally, the variance of the minimum wage is explained by hydroelectric energy in 1.48%, biomass in 5.09%, wind energy in 9.09%, and solar energy in 10.67%. An ARDL (1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 3, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2) model was also adjusted for natural gas, with AIC (13.082) and BIC (13.739), and the ARDL (1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 4) model adjusted for hydroelectric power, with AIC (13.633) and BIC (14.189), considering the variables’ order cited above. Through the adjustment of the ARDL model, it was verified that there is a long-term influence of socioeconomic variables on electricity production variables, both renewable and non-renewable ones. The analysis of the impulse response function and the variance decomposition allowed us to verify that the installed capacity for production of electric energy exerts influence on Brazilian socioeconomic variables considered in this study.

Keywords

Renewable energy Non-renewable energies Economic growth Socioeconomic development Granger causality Vector autoregressive model Response impulse function Variance decomposition 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank Philippe Garrigues (editor) and an anonymous referee for their contributions.

Funding Information

This study was financially supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), which included a research scholarship, and the Laboratory of Analysis and Statistical Modeling (LAME) of the Federal University of Santa Maria.

References

  1. Al-Mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JY, Sab CNBC (2013) Examining the bi-directional long run relationship between renewable energy consumption and GDP growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.005
  2. Al-Mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JYM (2014) Electricity consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources and economic growth: evidence from Latin American countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 30:290–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-mulali U, Tang CF, Ozturk I (2015) Does financial development reduce environmental degradation? Evidence from a panel study of 129 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4726-x
  4. Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sust Energ Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.105
  5. Apergis N, Payne JE (2009) Communication renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.002
  6. Apergis N, Payne JE (2010) Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia. Energy Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.06.001
  7. Aquila G, Pamplona EO, de Queiroz AR, Rotela P Jr, Fonseca MN (2017) An overview of incentive policies for the expansion of renewable energy generation in electricity power systems and the Brazilian experience. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70(August 2016):1090–1098.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Owusu PA (2016) Carbon dioxide emissions, GDP, energy use, and population growth: a multivariate and causality analysis for Ghana, 1971–2013. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(13):13508–13520.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6511-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Attiaoui I, Toumi H, Ammouri B, Gargouri I (2017) Causality links among renewable energy consumption, CO 2 emissions, and economic growth in Africa: evidence from a panel ARDL-PMG approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8850-7
  10. Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R (2018) The biomass distribution on Earth. PNAS 115:6506–6511.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711842115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ben Mbarek M, Abdelkafi I, Feki R (2018) Nonlinear causality between renewable energy, economic growth, and unemployment: evidence from Tunisia. J Knowl Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0357-9
  12. Berg A, Ostry JD, Zettelmeyer J (2012) What makes growth sustained? J Dev Econ 98(2):149–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradshaw A (2017) Regulatory change and innovation in Latin America: the case of renewable energy in Brazil.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.01.006
  14. Bridge G, Bouzarovski S, Bradshaw M, Eyre N (2013) Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy 53:331–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burford G, Hoover E, Velasco I, Janoušková S, Jimenez A, Piggot G, Harder MK (2013) Bringing the “Missing Pillar” into sustainable development goals: towards intersubjective values-based indicators. Sustain (Switzerland) 5(7):3035–3059.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su5073035 Google Scholar
  16. Calvillo CF, Sánchez-Miralles A, Villar J (2015) Energy management and planning in smart cities.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.133
  17. Charenza WW, Deadman DF (1997) New directions in econometric practice.Google Scholar
  18. Chien T, Hu JL (2008) Renewable energy: an efficient mechanism to improve GDP. Energy Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.012
  19. Chris B (2008) Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambrige University, CambrigeGoogle Scholar
  20. Chu S, Majumdar A (2012) Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488(7411):294–303.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Andrade Guerra JBSO, Dutra L, Schwinden NBC, De Andrade SF (2015) Future scenarios and trends in energy generation in Brazil: supply and demand and mitigation forecasts. J Clean Prod 103:197–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Melo CA, Jannuzzi GDM, Bajay SV (2016) Nonconventional renewable energy governance in Brazil: lessons to learn from the German experience. Renew Sust Energ Rev 61:222–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Souza L, Gilmanova A (2017) Concentrated solar power deployment in emerging countries: the cases of China and Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1094–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Souza Ramser CA, Souza AM, Souza FM, da Veiga CP, da Silva WV (2019) The importance of principal components in studying mineral prices using vector autoregressive models: evidence from the Brazilian economy. Res Policy 62(January):9–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dickey DA, Power of Unit Root Tests (1984) Proceedings of business and economic statistics sections. Am Stat Assn 74:489–493Google Scholar
  26. Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(11):10846–10854.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8786-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dos Santos HTM, Balestieri JAP (2018) Spatial analysis of sustainable development goals: a correlation between socioeconomic variables and electricity use. Renew Sust Energ Rev 97(August):367–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Electrical Energy Research Center (2001) Atlas of the Brazilian wind potential. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  29. Enders W (2008) Applied econometric time series. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  30. Energy Research Company (2007). National Energy Matrix 2030. Available at: http://www.mme.gov.br/web/guest/publicacoes-e-indicadores/matriz-energetica-nacional-2030. Accessed 04 Apr 2016
  31. Energy Research Company (2011) Ten-year energy expansion plan 2020. Brasília: MME/EPE, 2011. Available at: http://www.epe.gov.br/pdee/forms/epeestudo.aspx. Accessed 05 Apr 2016
  32. Energy Research Company (2015) National energy balance 2015: base year 2014. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  33. Evans A, Strezov V, Evans TJ, Evans A, Vladimir Strezov TJE (2014) Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass. Biomass Process Technol 14:33–52.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b17093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fertel C, Bahn O, Vaillancourt K, Waaub J-P (2013) Canadian energy and climate policies: a SWOT analysis in search of federal/provincial coherence. Energy Policy 63:1139–1150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fosu AK (2017) Growth, inequality, and poverty reduction in developing countries: recent global evidence. Res Econ 71(2):306–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2016.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fukuda-Parr S (2016) From the millennium development goals to the sustainable development goals: shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gend Dev 24(1):43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1145895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goldemberg J (2007) Energy choices toward a sustainable future. Environment 49(10):7–17.  https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.49.10.7-17 Google Scholar
  38. Goldemberg J, Lucon O (2007) Energias renováveis: um futuro sustentável. Rev USP 72:6–15.  https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i72p6-15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goldemberg J, Moreira JR (2005) Política energética no Brasil. Estudos Avançados 19(55):215–228.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142005000300015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gonçalves P, Sampaio V, Orestes M, González A (2017) Photovoltaic solar energy: conceptual framework.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.081
  41. González MOA, Gonçalves JS, Vasconcelos RM (2017) Sustainable development: case study in the implementation of renewable energy in Brazil. J Clean Prod 142:461–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Granger CW (1988) Causality, cointegration, and control. J Econ Dyn Control 12(2–3):551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Griggs D, Smith MS, Rockström J, Öhman MC, Gaffney O, Glaser G, Shyamsundar P (2014) An integrated framework for sustainable development goals. Ecol Soc 19(4).  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07082-190449
  44. Gujarati DN (2003) Basic Econometrics, 4th edn. McGraw-HiII/lrwin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Hák T, Janoušková S, Moldan B (2016) Sustainable development goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecol Indic 60:565–573.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. He Y, Xu Y, Pang Y, Tian H, Wu R (2016) A regulatory policy to promote renewable energy consumption in China: review and future evolutionary path\r\n. Renew Energy 89:695–705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.renene.2015.12.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heidenreich S, Foscolo PU (2015) New concepts in biomass gasification. Prog Energy Combust Sci 46:72–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2014.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hussain A, Arif SM, Aslam M (2017) Emerging renewable and sustainable energy technologies: State of the art.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.033
  49. Institute of Applied Economic Research (2018). Available at: http://www.ipeadata.gov.br. Accessed 02 March 2016
  50. Kabir E, Kumar P, Kumar S, Adelodun AA, Kim K-H (2017) Solar energy: potential and future prospects. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:894–900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kar S, Pritchett L, Raihan S, Sen K (2013) Looking for a break: identifying transitions in growth regimes. J Macroecon 38(PB):151–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.09.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA (2005) What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment 47(3):8–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444 Google Scholar
  53. Kaygusuz K (2012) Energy for sustainable development: a case of developing countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(2):1116–1126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kumar A, Sah B, Singh AR, Deng Y, He X, Kumar P, Bansal RC (2017) A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew Sust Energ Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191
  55. Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PC, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econ 44Google Scholar
  56. Law 10.438, of 26 April 2002 (2002) Provides for the expansion of the supply of emergency electric power, extraordinary tariff recomposition, creates the Program of Incentive to Alternative Sources of Electric Power (Proinfa), the Energy Development Account (CDE), provides for the universalization of the public service of electric power. Law 10.438. Brasília, DF. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2002/L10438.htm. Accessed 11 May 2016
  57. Law 10.762, of 11 November 2003 (2003) Provides for the creation of the emergency and exceptional support programme for concessionaires of public services for the distribution of electric energy. Law 10.762. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2003/L10.762.htm>. Accessed 11 May 2016
  58. Law 673, of 04 August 2015 (2015) Establishes the requirements and procedures for obtaining authorization to explore the use of hydraulic potential with characteristics of small hydroelectric plant - PCH. Resolution Aneel 673. Brasília, DF, Available at: http://www2.aneel.gov.br/cedoc/ren2015673.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2016
  59. Lewis NS (2016) Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization. Rev Summ Solar Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad1920
  60. Li K, Bian H, Liu C, Zhang D, Yang Y (2014) Comparison of geothermal with solar and wind power generation systems.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.049
  61. Liu YY, Van Dijk AIJM, De Jeu RA. M, Canadell JG, Mccabe MF, Evans JP, Wang G (2015) Recent reversal in loss of global terrestrial biomass. Nat Clim Chang 5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2581
  62. Manzano-Agugliaro F, Alcayde A, Montoya FG, Zapata-Sierra A, Gil C (2013) Scientific production of renewable energies worldwide: an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:134–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moran EF, Lopez MC, Moore N, Müller N, Hyndman DW (2018) Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(47):11891–11898.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809426115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moriarty P, Honnery D (2016) Can renewable energy power the future?  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.051
  65. National Electric Energy Agency (2002) Atlas of electric energy of Brazil. BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  66. Nguyen HT (2011) Exports, imports, FDI and economic growth. Discussion papers in economics. Work Paper (11-03), 1–47.Google Scholar
  67. Omer AM (2008) Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12:2265–2300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Oree V, Sayed Hassen SZ, Fleming PJ (2017) Generation expansion planning optimisation with renewable energy integration: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:790–803.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pao HT, Fu HC (2013) Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and economic growth in Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:381–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Paramati SR, Sinha A, Dogan E (2017) The significance of renewable energy use for economic output and environmental protection: evidence from the Next 11 developing economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8985-6
  71. Payne JE (2009) On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US. Appl Energy 86(4):575–577.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pereira EB, Martins FR, de Abreu SL, Rüther R (2006) Atlas brasileiro de energia solar. São José dos CamposGoogle Scholar
  73. Pereira AO, Pereira AS, La Rovere EL, Barata MMEDL, Villar SDC, Pires SH (2011) Strategies to promote renewable energy in Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(1):681–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pereira MG, Camacho CF, Freitas MAV, Da Silva NF (2012) The renewable energy market in Brazil: current status and potential. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(6):3786–3802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pereira S, Ferreira P, Vaz AIF (2017) Generation expansion planning with high share of renewables of variable output.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.025
  76. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(3):335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sachs I (2007) A revolução energética do século XXI. Estudos Avançados 21(59):21–38.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142007000100004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sachs JD (2012) From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. Lancet 379(9832):2206–2211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60685-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sadeghi H, Rashidinejad M, Abdollahi A (2016) A comprehensive sequential review study through the generation expansion planning A R T I C L E I N F O. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:1369–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Santoyo-Castelazo E, Azapagic A (2014) Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061
  82. Sen S, Ganguly S (2017) Opportunities, barriers and issues with renewable energy development – a discussion.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.137
  83. Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017
  84. Singh Sikarwar V, Zhao M, Clough P, Yao J, Zhong X, Memon MZ et al (2016) An overview of advances in biomass gasification. Energy Environ Sci 9:2939.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ee00935b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Reyers B, Kanie N, … O’Connell D (2017) Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci 12(6):911–919.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
  86. Terrados J, Almonacid G, Hontoria L (2007) Regional energy planning through SWOT analysis and strategic planning tools. Impact on renewables development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11:1275–1287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tolmasquim M (2012) Energia 26(74):247–260Google Scholar
  88. Vera I, Langlois L (2007) Energy indicators for sustainable development. Energy 32:875–882.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yildirim E, Saraç Ş, Aslan A (2012) Energy consumption and economic growth in the USA: evidence from renewable energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.004
  90. Zhao H, Wu Q, Hu S, Xu H, Rasmussen CN (2015) Review of energy storage system for wind power integration support.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.103

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal University of Santa MariaSanta MariaBrazil

Personalised recommendations