Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 30, pp 30782–30793 | Cite as

Quantifying dynamic desorption of 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in loamy farmland soils

  • Wenjuan Lei
  • Xiangyu TangEmail author
  • Xiangyang Zhou
Research Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Reliable estimate of the release of adsorbed pesticide from soil particles is crucial to evaluating the pesticide fate, mobility, efficacy, and remediation. In this study, the dynamics of TCP (3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol) desorption, the main degradation product of chlorpyrifos and triclopyr, is explored quantitatively by the breakthrough curve (BTC) experiment with the tracer of Br in the loamy farmland purple soil sampled from Sichuan Basin of southwestern China. TCP in the outflow originates from two sources: dissolved TCP in pore water and desorbed TCP from soil particles by infiltrating water. The dissolved TCP is considered proportional to the amount of Br- because both TCP and Br are dissolved in water uniformly. According to the mass balance equation, the desorbed TCP are estimated and the typical patterns of dynamic TCP desorption are revealed. Characteristics of TCP desorption are compared between packed and undisturbed soil columns as well as between different planting types. The dynamics of the proportion of desorbed TCP during the breakthrough process are characterized. In particular, the high heterogeneity of the undisturbed soil may be responsible for the observed fluctuation of desorbed TCP in the outflow. Additionally, the obtained increase-decrease pattern of the desorbed rate of TCP released from the soil shows that most models proposed to simulate the desorption processes are not appropriate, because these models display a monotone decreasing trend, such as the Noyes-Whitney Rule and other release kinetic models (zero order, first order, Higuchi and Korsmeyer-Peppas model, etc.). After a comparison among linear model, Gamma distribution and Weibull distribution, the CDF of gamma distribution is identified as a better method to describe the proportion of desorbed TCP in outflow. Therefore, this study provides an alternative method to measure the dynamic desorption process of TCP in different environment of the purple soil, and their affecting factors are also identified. These results are useful in quantifying the leaching of the TCP in the field, in support of the prevention of agricultural non-point pollution of pesticides.

Keywords

Desorption Bromide 3,5,6-trichloro-2- pyridinol Breakthrough curve Purple soil 

Notes

Funding information

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41701558, 41790431 and 41471268), the Science and Technology Funding of Water Resources Department of Guizhou Province (Grant No. KT201707), the Science and Technology Funding of Guizhou Province (Grant No. LH [2017]7290; [2018]5781-45; [2019]2875), and the 135 Strategic Program of the Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS (Grant No. SDS-135-1702).

References

  1. Achik J, Schiavon M, Jamet P (1991) Study of carbofuran movement in soils. Part I-soil structure. Environ Int 17:73–79Google Scholar
  2. Arthur JD, Mark NW, Taylor S, Šimunek J, Brusseau ML, Dontsova KM (2017) Batch soil adsorption and column transport studies of 2, 4-dinitroanisole (DNAN) in soils. J Contam Hydrol 199:14–23Google Scholar
  3. Báez ME, Espinoza J, Silva R, Fuentes E (2015) Sorption-desorption behavior of pesticides and their degradation products in volcanic and nonvolcanic soils: interpretation of interactions through two-way principal component analysis. Environ Sci Pollut R 22(11):8576–8585Google Scholar
  4. Báez ME, Espinoza J, Silva R, Fuentes E (2017) Influence of selected cyclodextrins in sorption-desorption of chlorpyrifos, chlorothalonil, diazinon, and their main degradation products on different soils. Environ. Sci Pollut R 24(26):20908–20921Google Scholar
  5. Baskaran S, Kookana RS, Naidu R (2003) Contrasting behaviour of chlorpyrifos and its primary metabolite, TCP (3, 5, 6-trichloro-2-pyridinol), with depth in soil profiles. Soil Res 41(4):749–760Google Scholar
  6. Bermúdez-Couso A, Fernández-Calviño D, Rodríguez-Salgado I, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M (2012) Comparison of batch, stirred flow chamber, and column experiments to study adsorption, desorption and transport of carbofuran within two acidic soils. Chemosphere 88(1):106–112Google Scholar
  7. Bourne DW (2002) Pharmacokinetics. In: Banker GS, Rhodes CT (eds) Modern pharmaceutics, 4th edn. Marcel Dekker Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cáceres T, He W, Naidu R, Megharaj M (2007) Toxicity of chlorpyrifos and TCP alone and in combination to Daphnia carinata: the influence of microbial degradation in natural water. Water Res 41:4497–4503Google Scholar
  9. Celis R, Koskinen WC (1999a) An isotopic exchange method for the characterization of the irreversibility of pesticide sorption-desorption in soil. J Agr Food Chem 47(2):782–790Google Scholar
  10. Celis R, Koskinen WC (1999b) Characterization of pesticide desorption from soil by the isotopic exchange technique. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(6):1659–1666Google Scholar
  11. Chapman RA, Harris CR (1980) Persistence of chlorpyrifos in a mineral and an organic soil. J Environ Sci Heal, B 15:39–46Google Scholar
  12. Chen W, Kan AT, Newell CJ, Moore E, Tomson MB (2002) More realistic soil cleanup standards with dual-equilibrium desorption. Ground Water 40(2):153–164Google Scholar
  13. Conrad K (2004) Probability distributions and maximum entropy. Entropy 6:10Google Scholar
  14. Cutillas-Barreiro L, Ansias-Manso L, Fernández-Calviño D, Arias-Estévez M, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Núñez-Delgado A (2014) Pine bark as bio-adsorbent for Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn: batch-type and stirred flow chamber experiments. J Environ Manage 144:258–264Google Scholar
  15. De Wilde T, Mertens J, Šimunek J et al (2009) Characterizing pesticide sorption and degradation in microscale biopurification systems using column displacement experiments. Environ Pollut 157:463–473Google Scholar
  16. Deng JC, Jiang X, Hu WP, Hu L (2010) Quantifying hysteresis of atrazine desorption from a sandy loam soil. J Environ Sci 22:1923–1929Google Scholar
  17. Fernández-Bayo JD, Nogales R, Romero E (2015) Winery vermicomposts to control the leaching of diuron, imidacloprid and their metabolites: role of dissolved organic carbon content. J Environ Sci Heal B 50:190–200Google Scholar
  18. Fernández-Calviño D, Bermúdez-Couso A, Arias-Estévez M, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Núñez-Delgado A (2015a) Competitive adsorption/desorption of tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline on two acid soils: stirred flow chamber experiments. Chemosphere 134:361–366Google Scholar
  19. Fernández-Calviño D, Bermúdez-Couso A, Arias-Estévez M, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Núñez-Delgado A (2015b) Kinetics of tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline adsorption and desorption on two acid soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(1):425–433Google Scholar
  20. Flury M (1996) Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils-a review. J Environ Qual 25(1):25–45Google Scholar
  21. Freitas MN, Marchetti JM (2005) Nimesulide PLA microspheres as a potential sustained release system for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Int J Pharm 295(1-2):201–211Google Scholar
  22. Goldsmith JA, Randall N, Ross SD (1978) On methods of expressing dissolution rate data. J Pharm Pharmacol 30(1):347–349Google Scholar
  23. Higuchi T (1963) Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci-US 52(12):1145–1149Google Scholar
  24. Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. II. Phys Rev 108:171–190Google Scholar
  25. Kachrimanis K, Malamataris S (2000) Release of ibuprofen from spherical crystal agglomerates prepared using the solvent-change technique in the presence of Eudragit polymers and from corresponding compacts. STP Pharm Sci 10(5):387–393Google Scholar
  26. Kladivko EJ, Brown LC, Baker JL (2001) Pesticide transport to subsurface tile drains in humid region of North America. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 31(1):1–62Google Scholar
  27. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA (1983) Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 15(1):25–35Google Scholar
  28. Langenbucher F (1988) Linearization of dissolution rate curves by the Weibull distribution. J Pharm Pharmacol 24:979–981Google Scholar
  29. Lei WJ, Zhou XJ (2017) Experiment and simulation on adsorption of 3, 5, 6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in typical farmland of purple soil, Southwestern China. Soil Sediment Contam 26(4):345–363Google Scholar
  30. Lei WJ, Tang XY, Zhou XY (2018) Transport of 3, 5, 6-trichloro-2-pyridionl (a main pesticide degradation product) in purple soil: experimental and modeling. Appl Geochem 88:179–187Google Scholar
  31. Lesan HM, Bhandari A (2003) Atrazine sorption on surface soils: time-dependent phase distribution and apparent desorption hysteresis. Water Res 37:1644–1654Google Scholar
  32. Lv YJ (2013) Soil hydraulic characteristics and response of soil water and runoff to rainfall on sloping farmland of purple soil. M.S. thesis. (In Chinese with English abstract.) Northwest A & F Univ, Yangling, China.Google Scholar
  33. Ma J, Guo H, Lei M, Wan X, Zhang H, Feng X, Wei R, Tian L, Han X (2016) Blocking effect of colloids on arsenate adsorption during co-transport through saturated sand columns. Environ Pollut 213:638–647Google Scholar
  34. Martyushev LM, Seleznev VD (2006) Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chemistry and biology. Phys Rep 426(1):1–45Google Scholar
  35. Maximilian KJ, Köhne S, Šimůnek J (2006) Multi-process herbicide transport in structured soil columns: experiments and model analysis. J Contam Hydrol 85(1-2):1–32Google Scholar
  36. Montoya JC, Costa JL, Liedl R, Bedmar F, Daniel P (2006) Effects of soil type and tillage practice on atrazine transport through intact soil cores. Geoderma 137:161–173Google Scholar
  37. Noyes AA, Whitney WR (1897) The rate of solution of solid substances in their own solutions. J Am Chem Soc 19(12):930–934Google Scholar
  38. OECD (2000) Adsorption–desorption using a batch equilibrium method. OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals 106Google Scholar
  39. Okada E, Costa JL, Bedmar F (2016) Adsorption and mobility of glyphosate in different soils under no-till and conventional tillage. Geoderma 263:78–85Google Scholar
  40. Olsson O, Khodorkovsky M, Gassmann M, Friedler E, Schneider M, Dubowski Y (2013) Fate of pesticides and their transformation products: first flush effects in a semi-arid catchment. Clean-Soil Air Water 41:134–142Google Scholar
  41. Park JY, Huwe B (2016a) Effect of pH and soil structure on transport of sulfonamide antibiotics in agricultural soils. Environ Pollut 213:561–570Google Scholar
  42. Park JY, Huwe B (2016b) Sulfadimethoxine transport in soil columns in relation to sorbable and non-sorbable tracers. Environ Sci Pollut. R 23(12):12456–12466Google Scholar
  43. Perez-Novo C, Fernandez-Calvino D, Bermúdez-Couso A et al (2011) Phosphorus effect on Zn adsorption-desorption kinetics in acid soils. Chemosphere 83:1028–1034Google Scholar
  44. Porfiri C, Montoya JC, Koskinen WC, Azcarate MP (2015) Adsorption and transport of imazapyr through intact soil columns taken from two soils under two tillage systems. Geoderma 251:1–9Google Scholar
  45. Racke KD, Coats JR, Titus KR (1988) Degradation of chlorpyrifos and its hydrolysis product 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol, in soil. J Enviro Sci Heal B 23:527–539Google Scholar
  46. Reemtsma T, Alder L, Banasiak U (2013) Emerging pesticide metabolites in groundwater and surface water as determined by the application of a multimethod for 150 pesticide metabolites. Water Res 47:5535–5545Google Scholar
  47. Rodríguez-Liébana JA, Mingorance MD, Peña A (2014) Pesticide mobility and leachate toxicity in two abandoned mine soils. Effect of organic amendments. Sci Total Environ 497-498:561–569Google Scholar
  48. Rodríguez-Liébana JA, Mingorance MD, Peña A (2018) Thiacloprid adsorption and leaching in soil: Effect of the composition of irrigation solutions. Sci Total Environ 610:367–376Google Scholar
  49. Scheidegger M, Sparks DL (1996) A critical assessment of sorption-desorption mechanisms at the soil mineral/water interface. Soil Sci 161:813–831Google Scholar
  50. Sinclair CJ, Boxall ABA, Parsons SA, Thomas MR (2006) Prioritization of pesticide environmental transformation products in drinking water supplies. Environ Sci Technol 40:7283–7289Google Scholar
  51. Sun BL (2011) Study on the soil environment behavior of the chlorpyrifos relevant-metabolite 3,5,6-TCP. PhD thesis. (In Chinese with English abstract) Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing.Google Scholar
  52. Thawatchai P, Tamotsu K, Garnpimol CR (2000) Chitosan citrate as film former: compatibility with water-soluble anionic dyes and drug dissolution from coated tablet. Int J Pharm 198:97–111Google Scholar
  53. Thevenot M, Dousset S (2015) Compost effect on diuron retention and transport in structured vineyard soils. Pedosphere 25(1):25–36Google Scholar
  54. Wang J, Wang JH, Zhu LS et al (2014) The enzyme toxicity and genotoxicity of chlorpyrifos and its toxic metabolite TCP to zebrafish Danio rerio. Ecotoxicology 10:1858–1869Google Scholar
  55. Wang HL, Tang XY, Zhang W et al (2015) Within-year change in hydraulic properties of a shallow entisol in farmland and forestland. Vadose Zone J 14:7Google Scholar
  56. Watts M (2012) Chlorpyrifos as a possible global POP, Pesticide Action Network North America, Oakland, CA. Available at www.pan-europe.info/News/PR/121009ChlorpyrifosasPOPfinal.Pdf.
  57. Wu CX, Zhang SZ, Nie G, Zhang Z, Wang J (2011) Adsorption and desorption of herbicide monosulfuron-ester in Chinese soils. J Environ Sci 23:1524–1532Google Scholar
  58. Xiong JF, Zhou GM, Guan Z, Tang XY, He Q, Wu LM (2014) Determination of chlorpyrifos and its main degradation product TCP in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet combined with high performance liquid chromatography. J Liq Chromatogr R T 37(11):1499–1512Google Scholar
  59. Yang H, Wu X, Zhou LX (2005) Effect of dissolved organic matter on chlorotoluron sorption and desorption in soils. Pedosphere 15:432–439Google Scholar
  60. Yue L, Ge C, Feng D, Yu H, Deng H, Fu B (2017) Adsorption-desorption behavior of atrazine on agricultural soils in China. J Environ Sci-China 57:180–189Google Scholar
  61. Zakari S, Liu H, Li YX, He X, Tong L (2016) Transport and sorption behavior of individual phthalate esters in sandy aquifer: column experiments. Environ Sci Pollut R 23(15):15749–15756Google Scholar
  62. Zhang P (2014) Multi-scale study on the response of stream flow and sediment transport to rainfalls in a catchment of purple soil. M.S. thesis. (In Chinese with English abstract.) Southwest Univ, Chongqing, China.Google Scholar
  63. Zhao Y, Wendling LA, Wang C, Pei Y (2017) Behavior of chlorpyrifos and its major metabolite TCP (3, 5, 6-trichloro-2-pyridinol) in agricultural soils amended with drinking water treatment residuals. J Soil Sediment 17(4):889–900Google Scholar
  64. Zhou X, Lei W, Ma J (2016) Entropy Base Estimation of Moisture Content of the Top 10-m Unsaturated Soil for the Badain Jaran Desert in Northwestern China. Entropy 18(9):323Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Tea ScienceGuizhou UniversityGuiyangChina
  2. 2.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CASChengduChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.College of Resource and Environment EngineeringGuizhou UniversityGuiyangChina

Personalised recommendations