Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 30, pp 31062–31076 | Cite as

Introduction of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles: prospects and challenges for Malaysia’s transition to a low-carbon economy

  • Abul Quasem Al-AminEmail author
  • Brent Doberstein
Research Article
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

Alternative energy policies targeting the adoption of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs) could have significant positive impacts on Malaysia’s ability to meet both its carbon reduction goal and its energy security needs. The transport sector generally contributes heavily to carbon emissions, and is also difficult to decarbonize because of the costs associated with many greener options. This study explores the possibility of decarbonizing the Malaysian transport sector by promoting the use of hydrogen vehicles, and analyzes the adoption challenges and economic obstacles (especially public acceptance) associated with introducing HFCVs. This study contends that the adoption challenges of this new technology can be overcome through the use of development strategies outlined. This study also addresses the regulatory framework that Malaysia (and other countries) might use to overcome common policy adoption challenges of HFCVs.

Keywords

Low carbon society Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles Economic barriers Policy Renewable energy Transportation 

Abbreviations

AWAR

Awareness

BEHAV

Behavior

COP

Conference on Climate Change

EIA

Energy Information Administration (United States)

EV

Electric vehicles

GHG

Greenhouse gases

HFCV

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles

INDCs

Intended Nationally Determined Contributions

KNW

Knowledge

OECD

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

PB

Purchase behavior

PI

Purchase intention

R&D

Research and development

SEM

Structural equation modelling

SN

Subjective norms

TPB

Theory of planned behavior

UNFCCC

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Notes

References

  1. Adams BD, Chen A (2011) The role of palladium in a hydrogen economy. Mater Today 14(6):282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed A, Al-Amin AQ, Ambrose AF, Saidur R (2016) Hydrogen fuel and transport system: a sustainable and environmental future. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(3):1369–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajanovic A, Haas R (2018) Economic prospects and policy framework for hydrogen as fuel in the transport sector. Energy Policy 123:280–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen I (2002) Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. Available at: www-unix.oit.umass.edu. Accessed 14 Dec 2018
  5. Akhatar MN, Singh MK, Kumar S (2014) Non-conventional energy resources and technology. Int J Adv Res Technol 2:10–14Google Scholar
  6. Albayrak T, Aksoy Ş, Caber M (2013) The effect of environmental concern and scepticism on green purchase behaviour. Mark Intell Plan 31(1):27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ambrose AF, Al-Amin AQ, Rasiah R, Saidur R, Amin N (2017) Prospects for introducing hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Malaysia. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(14):9125–9134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ambrose AF, Rasiah R, Al-Amin AQ, Chen Z (2018) Introducing hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Malaysia. J Asia Pac Econ 23(2):263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Andres RJ, Boden TA, Bréon FM, Ciais P, Davis S, Erickson D et al (2012) A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion. Biogeosciences 9(5):1845–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arun B, Pai D, Chethan KN (2018) Review on alternative propulsion in automotives-hybrid vehicles. Int J Eng Technol 7(3):1311–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Axsen J, Kurani KS (2013) Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—what do car buyers want? Energy Policy 61:532–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bae JH, Cho GL (2010) A dynamic general equilibrium analysis on fostering a hydrogen economy in Korea. Energy Econ 32:S57–S66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baland JM, Bardhan P, Bowles S (eds) (2018) Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Ball M, Wietschel M (eds) (2009) The hydrogen economy: opportunities and challenges. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Barber N, Kuo PJ, Bishop M, Goodman R Jr (2012) Measuring psychographics to assess purchase intention and willingness to pay. J Consum Mark 29(4):280–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bataille C, Åhman M, Neuhoff K, Nilsson LJ, Fischedick M, Lechtenböhmer S, ... & Sartor O (2018) A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement. J Clean Prod 187, 960-973Google Scholar
  17. Beeton D, Meyer G (2014) Electric vehicle business models. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  18. Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bonnafous A, Raux C (2003) Transport energy and emissions: rail. Handbook of transport and the environment 1:293-307Google Scholar
  20. Bulkeley H, Newell P (2015) Governing climate change. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen Y, Perez Y (2018) Business model design: lessons learned from Tesla Motors. In: Towards a Sustainable Economy. Springer, Cham, pp 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen TY, Huang DR, Huang AYJ (2016) An empirical study on the public perception and acceptance of hydrogen energy in Taiwan. Int J Green Energy 13(15):1579–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chinna K (2009) Structural equation modeling using AMOS. Kuala Lumpur: MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  24. Christoff P (2016) The promissory note: COP 21 and the Paris Climate Agreement. Environ Polit 25(5):765–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. COP21 (2015) 21st conference of the parties on climate change 2015, Paris. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/past-conferences/parisclimate-change-conference-november-2015/cop-21/cop-21-documents. Accessed 12 Dec 2018
  26. Cropper MA, Geiger S, Jollie DM (2004) Fuel cells: a survey of current developments. J Power Sources 131(1-2):57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Jesus A, Mendonça S (2018) Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy. Ecol Econ 145:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Den Elzen M, Admiraal A, Roelfsema M, van Soest H, Hof AF, Forsell N (2016) Contribution of the G20 economies to the global impact of the Paris agreement climate proposals. Clim Chang 137(3-4):655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Devine-Wright P (2007) Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical reviewreview. School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  30. Dia H, Taylor M, Stone J, Somenahalli S, Cook S (2019) Low carbon urban mobility. In: Decarbonising the built environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, pp 259–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dinse G (1999) Wasserstoffahrzeuge und ihr Funktionsraum – Eine Analyse der technischen, politisch-rechtlichen und sozialen Dimensionen (Hydrogen vehicles and their ambiance – an analysis of the technical, political and social dimensions), vol 43. Institut für Mobilitätsforschung Charlottenstr, Berlin, p 10117Google Scholar
  32. DOS (2017) Economic and various dataset. Department of Statistics, PutrajayaGoogle Scholar
  33. Eberle U, Müller B, von Helmolt R (2012) Fuel cell electric vehicles and hydrogen infrastructure: status 2012. Energy Environ Sci 5(10):8780–8798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Economic Planning Unit (2015) Malaysia, Eleventh Malaysia plan (11th MP), Putrajaya, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  35. EIA (2017) Transportation sector energy consumption, vol 2016. EIA energy outlook. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/0484(2016).pdf. Accessed 15 2018
  36. Ekins P (2010) Hydrogen energy: economic and social challenges. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Emonts B, Schiebahn S, Görner K, Lindenberger D, Markewitz P, Merten F, Stolten D (2017) Re-energizing energy supply: electrolytically-produced hydrogen as a flexible energy storage medium and fuel for road transport. J Power Sources 342:320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. European Parliament (2016) Outcomes of COP22 Climate Change Conference. donwloaded from file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/EPRS_ATA(2016)593547_EN %20(1).pd. (Access date on April 4, 2017).Google Scholar
  39. Fankhauser S, Jotzo F (2018) Economic growth and development with low-carbon energy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 9(1):e495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fast S (2013) Social acceptance of renewable energy: trends, concepts, and geographies. Geogr Compass 7(12):853–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fenn K, & Byrne M (2013) The key principles of cognitive behavioural therapy. InnovAiT 6(9):579–585Google Scholar
  42. Fridahl M, Linnér BO (2016) Perspectives on the Green Climate Fund: possible compromises on capitalization and balanced allocation. Clim Dev 8(2):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gnann T, Funke S, Jakobsson N, Plötz P, Sprei F, Bennehag A (2018) Fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles: today’s situation and future needs. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 62:314–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gordon D, Sperling D, Livingston D (2012) Policy priorities for advancing the US electric vehicle market, vol 17. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  45. Gutiérrez F, Méndez F (2012) Entropy generation minimization for the thermal decomposition of methane gas in hydrogen using genetic algorithms. Energy Convers Manag 55:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hair JF, Black WC, & Babin BJ (2010) Anderson. RE, 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey, Pearson Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  47. Hair JF, Ringle CM, & Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice 19(2):139–152Google Scholar
  48. Hannan MA, Azidin FA, Mohamed A (2014) Hybrid electric vehicles and their challenges: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Heffner RR, Kurani KS, Turrentine TS (2007) Symbolism in California’s early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 12(6):396–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hensher DA (2008) Climate change, enhanced greenhouse gas emissions and passenger transport–what can we do to make a difference? Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 13(2):95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. IEA (2015) Technology roadmap hydrogen fuel cells. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/ publications/freepublications/publication/TechnologyRoadmapHydrogenandFuelCells.pdf
  52. Kline RB (2010) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd edn. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Li Y, Zhan C, de Jong M, Lukszo Z (2016) Business innovation and government regulation for the promotion of electric vehicle use: lessons from Shenzhen, China. J Clean Prod 134:371–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lomax RG, Schumacker RE (2004) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology press, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  55. MacLean HL, Lave LB, Griffin WM (2004) Alternative transport fuels for the future. Int J Veh Des 35(1-2):27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Manthiram A (2016) Electrical energy storage: materials challenges and prospects. MRS Bull 41(8):624–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marbán G, Valdés-Solís T (2007) Towards the hydrogen economy? Int J Hydrog Energy 32(12):1625–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moliner R, Lázaro MJ, Suelves I (2016) Analysis of the strategies for bridging the gap towards the Hydrogen Economy. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(43):19500–19508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moriarty P, Honnery D (2019) Prospects for hydrogen as a transport fuel. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(31):16029–16037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Narayanan SR, Prakash GS, Manohar A, Yang B, Malkhandi S, Kindler A (2012) Materials challenges and technical approaches for realizing inexpensive and robust iron–air batteries for large-scale energy storage. Solid State Ionics 216:105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nian V, Hari MP, Yuan J (2019) A new business model for encouraging the adoption of electric vehicles in the absence of policy support. Appl Energy 235:1106–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nowotny J, Dodson J, Fiechter S, Gür TM, Kennedy B, Macyk W, ... & Rahman KA (2018). Towards global sustainability: education on environmentally clean energy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81, 2541-2551.Google Scholar
  63. O’Dwyer E, Pan I, Acha S, Shah N (2019) Smart energy systems for sustainable smart cities: current developments, trends and future directions. Appl Energy 237:581–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oh TH, Hasanuzzaman M, Selvaraj J, Teo SC, Chua SC (2018) Energy policy and alternative energy in Malaysia: issues and challenges for sustainable growth–an update. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:3021–3031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Preuster P, Papp C, Wasserscheid P (2016) Liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs): toward a hydrogen-free hydrogen economy. Acc Chem Res 50(1):74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Randolph J, Masters GM (2018) Energy for sustainability: foundations for technology, planning, and policy. Island Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  67. Rasiah R, Al-Amin AQ, Ahmed A, Leal Filho W, Calvo E (2016) Climate mitigation roadmap: assessing low carbon scenarios for Malaysia. J Clean Prod 133:272–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rasiah R, Al-Amin AQ, Habib NM, Chowdhury AH, Ramu SC, Ahmed F, Leal Filho W (2017) Assessing climate change mitigation proposals for Malaysia: Implications for emissions and abatement costs. J Clean Prod 167:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rasiah R, Al-Amin AQ, Chowdhurry AH, Ahmed F, Zhang C (2018) Climate change mitigation projections for ASEAN. J Asia Pac Econ 23(2):195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Raslavičius L, Azzopardi B, Keršys A, Starevičius M, Bazaras Ž, Makaras R (2015) Electric vehicles challenges and opportunities: Lithuanian review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:786–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reckien D, Salvia M, Heidrich O, Church JM, Pietrapertosa F, De Gregorio-Hurtado S et al (2018) How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. J Clean Prod 191:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Roberts C, Geels FW, Lockwood M, Newell P, Schmitz H, Turnheim B, Jordan A (2018) The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: towards a new research agendaGoogle Scholar
  73. Roche MY, Mourato S, Fischedick M, Pietzner K, Viebahn P (2010) Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: a review of the evidence and methodological implications. Energy Policy 38(10):5301–5310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sarkar MSK, Al-Amin AQ, Leal Filho W (2019) Revisiting the social cost of carbon after INDC implementation in Malaysia: 2050. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6000–6013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Silva CM, Ferreira AF, Bento JPC (2014) Impact of hydrogen in the road transport sector for Portugal 2010-2050. Energy Procedia 58:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Singh S, Jain S, Venkateswaran PS, Tiwari AK, Nouni MR, Pandey JK, Goel S (2015) Hydrogen: a sustainable fuel for future of the transport sector. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smith F (2019) Environmental sustainability: practical global applications. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  78. Staffell I, Scamman D, Abad AV, Balcombe P, Dodds PE, Ekins P, ... Ward KR (2019). The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ Sci 12(2), 463-491.Google Scholar
  79. Stobart RK (1999) Fuel cell power for passenger cars-what barriers remain? SAE Technical Paper, No. 1999-01-0321. SAE International, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  80. Thiele L (2019) Ceteris paribus ideology: the green economy, technology and the future of work. Lammert C, Vormann B (Eds.) Contours of the Illiberal State: Governing Circulation in the Smart Economy. Campus Verlag, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  81. Timilsina GR, Shrestha A (2009) Transport sector CO2 emissions growth in Asia: underlying factors and policy options. Energy Policy 37(11):4523–4539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tollefson J, Weiss KR (2015) Nations approve historic global climate accord. Nat News 528(7582):315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tolliver C, Keeley AR, Managi S (2019) Green bonds for the Paris agreement and sustainable development goals. Environ Res Lett 14(6):064009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. UNFCCC (2017) Joint statement issued at the conclusion of the 25th BASIC Ministerial Meeting on Climate Change – Headquarters of the UNFCCC, 13. Bonn, Germany. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/BASIC-25-Statement-as-adopted-13-Nov-2017.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2017
  85. VanGelder K (2017) Fundamentals of automotive technology. Jones & Bartlett Learning, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  86. Wang JH, Chiang WL, Shu JP (2000) The prospects—fuel cell motorcycle in Taiwan. J Power Sources 86(1-2):151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wanitschke A, Hoffmann S (2019) Are battery electric vehicles the future? An uncertainty comparison with hydrogen and combustion engines. Environ Innov Soc Trans.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.03.003
  88. Whittingham MS (2008) Materials challenges facing electrical energy storage. MRS Bull 33(4):411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. World Bank (2016) CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita). WB, USAGoogle Scholar
  90. Zambrano-Gutiérrez JC, Nicholson-Crotty S, Carley S, Siddiki S (2018) The role of public policy in technology diffusion: the case of plug-in electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 52(19):10914–10922CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban Studies & PlanningMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyBostonUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Energy Policy and Research (IEPRe)Universiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Geography and Environmental ManagementUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  4. 4.Institut Sultan IskandarUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaSkudaiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations