Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 26, pp 27542–27550 | Cite as

Industrial environmental efficiency assessment for China’s western regions by using a SBM-based DEA

  • Si-Dai Guo
  • Hang Li
  • Rui ZhaoEmail author
  • Xiao Zhou
Short Research and Discussion Article
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

This study employed a data envelopment analysis (DEA) by using slacks-based measure (SBM) with undesirable outputs to assess the industrial environmental efficiency of western China during the period of 2001–2015. The Malmquist index was further used to examine the changes in the industrial environmental efficiency of the analyzed region. The result showed that western China presented a low industrial environmental efficiency throughout the period of 2001–2015. Chongqing City was the only province that exhibited strong economic and environmental coordination. The level of technical development was identified as a key determinant of industrial environmental efficiency. This study provided policy implications on emissions reduction and the improvement of industrial efficiency. Limitations of the approach were provided to lay foundation for future studies.

Keywords

Western China Industrial environmental efficiency DEA SBM Malmquist index 

Notes

Funding information

This study is sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41571520), Sichuan Provincial Key Technology Support (No. 2019JDJQ0020), Sichuan Province Circular Economy Research Center Fund (No. XHJJ-1802), and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics (No. 17-259-16-11).

References

  1. Apergis N, Aye GC, Barros CP, Gupta R, Wanke P (2015) Energy efficiency of selected OECD countries: a slacks based model with undesirable outputs. Energy Econ 51:45–53Google Scholar
  2. Cecchini L, Venanzi S, Pierri A, Chiorri M (2018) Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO2 abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): A SBM-DEA model with undesirable output. J Clean Prod 197:895–907Google Scholar
  3. Chang YT, Zhang N, Danao D, Zhang N (2013) Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: a non-radial DEA approach. Energ Policy 58:277–283Google Scholar
  4. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1978) Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444Google Scholar
  5. Chen L, Jia G (2017) Environmental efficiency analysis of China’s regional industry: a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based approach. J Clean Prod 142:846–853Google Scholar
  6. Chen J, Song M, Xu L (2015) Evaluation of environmental efficiency in China using data envelopment analysis. Ecol Indic 52:577–583Google Scholar
  7. Cook WD, Seiford LM (2009) Data envelopment analysis (DEA)–Thirty years on. Eur J Oper Res 192(1):1–17Google Scholar
  8. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M et al (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84(3):66–83Google Scholar
  9. He F, Zhang Q, Lei J, Fu W, Xu X (2013) Energy efficiency and productivity change of China’s iron and steel industry: accounting for undesirable outputs. Energ Policy 54:204–213Google Scholar
  10. He Q, Han J, Guan D, Mi Z, Zhao H, Zhang Q (2018) The comprehensive environmental efficiency of socioeconomic sectors in China: an analysis based on a non-separable bad output SBM. J Clean Prod 176:1091–1110Google Scholar
  11. Hong L, Shi JF (2014) Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: an improved Super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. J Clean Prod 65(4):97–107Google Scholar
  12. Iftikhar Y, Wang Z, Zhang B, Wang B (2018) Energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of major economies: a network DEA approach. Energy 147:197–207Google Scholar
  13. Kang YQ, Xie BC, Wang J, Wang YN (2018) Environmental assessment and investment strategy for China’s manufacturing industry: a non-radial DEA based analysis. J Clean Prod 175:501–511Google Scholar
  14. Laner D, Feketitsch J, Rechberger H, Fellner J (2016) A novel approach to characterize data uncertainty in material flow analysis and its application to plastics flows in Austria. J Ind Ecol 20(5):1050–1063Google Scholar
  15. Li H, Shi J (2014) Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: an improved Super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. J Clean Prod 65:97–107Google Scholar
  16. Li H, Fang K, Yang W, Wang D, Hong X (2013) Regional environmental efficiency evaluation in China: analysis based on the Super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Math Comput Model 58(5-6):1018–1031Google Scholar
  17. Li H, Zhang J, Wang C, Wang Y, Coffey V (2018) An evaluation of the impact of environmental regulation on the efficiency of technology innovation using the combined DEA model: a case study of Xi’an, China. Sustain Cities Soc 42:355–369Google Scholar
  18. Lin B, Wang X (2014) Exploring energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel industry: a stochastic frontier approach. Energ Policy 72:87–96Google Scholar
  19. Lu C, Zhang X, He J (2010) A CGE analysis to study the impacts of energy investment on economic growth and carbon dioxide emission: a case of Shaanxi Province in western China. Energy 35(11):4319–4327Google Scholar
  20. Lu CC, Chiu YH, Shyu MK, Lee JH (2013) Measuring CO2 emission efficiency in OECD countries: application of the hybrid efficiency model. Econ Model 32:130–135Google Scholar
  21. Lyu K, Bian Y, Yu A (2018) Environmental efficiency evaluation of industrial sector in China by incorporating learning effects. J Clean Prod 172:2464–2474Google Scholar
  22. Mardani A, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D, Jusoh A, Khoshnoudi M (2017) A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1298–1322Google Scholar
  23. Oh D (2010) A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. J Prod Anal 34(3):183–197Google Scholar
  24. Park YS, Lim SH, Egilmez G, Szmerekovsky J (2018) Environmental efficiency assessment of US transport sector: a slack-based data envelopment analysis approach. Transp Res Part D-Transp Environ 61:152–164Google Scholar
  25. Piao SR, Li J, Ting CJ (2019) Assessing regional environmental efficiency in China with distinguishing weak and strong disposability of undesirable outputs. J Clean Prod 227:748–759Google Scholar
  26. Rödder W, Reucher E (2012) Advanced X-efficiencies for CCR-and BCC-models–towards peer-based DEA controlling. Eur J Oper Res 219(2):467–476Google Scholar
  27. Shermeh HE, Najafi SE, Alavidoost MH (2016) A novel fuzzy network SBM model for data envelopment analysis: a case study in Iran regional power companies. Energy 112:686–697Google Scholar
  28. Shui H, Jin X, Ni J (2015) Manufacturing productivity and energy efficiency: a stochastic efficiency frontier analysis. Int J Energy Res 39(12):1649–1663Google Scholar
  29. Song M, Wang J (2018) Environmental efficiency evaluation of thermal power generation in China based on a slack-based endogenous directional distance function model. Energy 161:325–336Google Scholar
  30. Song M, Zhang L, An Q, Wang Z, Li Z (2013) Statistical analysis and combination forecasting of environmental efficiency and its influential factors since China entered the WTO: 2002–2010–2012. J Clean Prod 42:42–51Google Scholar
  31. Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509Google Scholar
  32. Vaninsky A (2018) Energy-environmental efficiency and optimal restructuring of the global economy. Energy 153:338–348Google Scholar
  33. Wang Z, Feng C (2015) A performance evaluation of the energy, environmental, and economic efficiency and productivity in China: an application of global data envelopment analysis. Appl Energy 147:617–626Google Scholar
  34. Wang F, Zhang B (2016) Distributional incidence of green electricity price subsidies in China. Energ Policy 88:27–38Google Scholar
  35. Wang W, Jiang D, Chen D, Chen Z, Zhou W, Zhu B (2016) A material flow analysis (MFA)-based potential analysis of eco-efficiency indicators of China’s cement and cement-based materials industry. J Clean Prod 112:787–796Google Scholar
  36. Wang X, Zhang M, Nathwani J, Yang F (2019) Measuring environmental efficiency through the lens of technology heterogeneity: a comparative study between China and the G20. Sustainability 11(2):461Google Scholar
  37. Woo C, Chung Y, Chun D, Seo H, Hong S (2015) The static and dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy: a Malmquist index analysis of OECD countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 47:367–376Google Scholar
  38. Wu J, An Q, Yao X, Wang B (2014) Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 74:96–104Google Scholar
  39. Yang L, Yang Y (2019) Evaluation of eco-efficiency in China from 1978 to 2016: based on a modified ecological footprint model. Sci Total Environ 662:581–590Google Scholar
  40. Yang L, Zhang X (2018) Assessing regional eco-efficiency from the perspective of resource, environmental and economic performance in China: a bootstrapping approach in global data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 173:100–111Google Scholar
  41. Yang T, Chen W, Zhou K, Ren M (2018) Regional energy efficiency evaluation in China: a super efficiency slack-based measure model with undesirable outputs. J Clean Prod 198:859–866Google Scholar
  42. Yao X, Feng W, Zhang X, Wang W, Zhang C, You S (2018) Measurement and decomposition of industrial green total factor water efficiency in China. J Clean Prod 198:1144–1156Google Scholar
  43. Zhang T (2009) Frame work of data envelopment analysis—a model to evaluate the environmental efficiency of China's industrial sectors. Biomed Environ Sci 22(1):8–13Google Scholar
  44. Zhang B, Bi J, Fan Z, Yuan Z, Ge J (2008) Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecol Econ 68(1-2):306–316Google Scholar
  45. Zhang XP, Cheng XM, Yuan JH, Gao XJ (2011) Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energ Policy 39(2):644–650Google Scholar
  46. Zhang J, Zeng W, Shi H (2016) Regional environmental efficiency in China: analysis based on a regional slack-based measure with environmental undesirable outputs. Ecol Indic 71:218–228Google Scholar
  47. Zhang J, Zeng W, Wang J, Yang F, Jiang H (2017) Regional low-carbon economy efficiency in China: analysis based on the Super-SBM model with CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 163:202–211Google Scholar
  48. Zhang C, Zhou B, Wang Q (2019) Effect of China’s western development strategy on carbon intensity. J Clean Prod 215:1170–1179Google Scholar
  49. Zhao X, Zhang S, Fan C (2014) Environmental externality and inequality in China: current status and future choices. Environ Pollut 190:176–179Google Scholar
  50. Zhao R, Zhou X, Han J, Liu C (2016) For the sustainable performance of the carbon reduction labeling policies under an evolutionary game simulation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 112:262–274Google Scholar
  51. Zhao R, Min N, Geng Y, He Y (2017) Allocation of carbon emissions among industries/sectors: an emissions intensity reduction constrained approach. J Clean Prod 142:3083–3094Google Scholar
  52. Zhao R, Geng Y, Liu Y, Tao X, Xue B (2018) Consumers’ perception, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for carbon-labeled products: a case study of Chengdu in China. J Clean Prod 171:1664–1671Google Scholar
  53. Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Econ 30(1):1–14Google Scholar
  54. Zhou Y, Liang D, Xing X (2013) Environmental efficiency of industrial sectors in China: an improved weighted SBM model. Math Comput Model 58(5-6):990–999Google Scholar
  55. Zhu J (2004) Imprecise DEA via standard linear DEA models with a revisit to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Oper Res 52(2):323–329Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sichuan Province Cyclic Economy Research CentreSouthwest University of Science and TechnologyMianyangChina
  2. 2.Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.School of Geography and Ocean ScienceNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations