Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 26, pp 27372–27384 | Cite as

Hyperbranched polyamide–functionalized sodium alginate microsphere as a novel adsorbent for the removal of antimony(III) in wastewater

  • Lili Wang
  • Heng Li
  • Deyou Yu
  • Yijia Wang
  • Wei Wang
  • Minghua WuEmail author
Research Article
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

In order to enhance the removal of Sb(III) in wastewater, hyperbranched polyamide–functionalized sodium alginate (HA@SA) microsphere was prepared by grafting of hyperbranched polyamide (HA) on the surface of sodium alginate (SA) microsphere. Adsorption properties of Sb(III) were investigated via static and dynamic adsorption tests. The cycling reusability of HA@SA microspheres was explored through adsorption-desorption tests. The changes of HA@SA microspheres before and after adsorption were characterized by FT-IR, SEM-EDS, and XPS. Results showed that the maximum Sb(III) adsorption capacity of HA@SA microspheres reached up to 195.7 mg/g, improved by 1.16 times in comparison with SA microspheres. The Sb(III) adsorption processes of HA@SA microspheres were depicted by pseudo-second-order kinetics and the Langmuir isotherm models with accuracy. It covered a homogeneous single-layer adsorption controlled by chemisorption along with exotherm spontaneously. After recycling for 8 times, the adsorption capacity of HA@SA microspheres still retained higher than 90% of the original value.

Keywords

Hyperbranched polyamide Sodium alginate Adsorbent Adsorption Antimony ion 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51703202), Key Research and Development Program of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (No. 2018C03004), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M621975), and Zhejiang Postdoctoral Science Preferred Funding Project.

References

  1. Aarstad O, Strand BL, Klepp-Andersen LM, Skjåk-Bræk G (2013) Analysis of G-block distributions and their impact on gel properties of in vitro epimerized mannuronan. Biomacromolecules 14:3409–3416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas BK, Inoue JI, Kawakita H, Ohto K, Inoue K (2009) Effective removal and recovery of antimony using metal-loaded saponified orange waste. J Hazard Mater 172:721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conde E, Moure A, Domínguez H (2017) Recovery of phenols from autohydrolysis liquors of barley husks: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Ind Crop Prod 103:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Council of the European Union (1998) Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Off J Eur Communities 330:32–54Google Scholar
  5. Fan HT, Sun Y, Tang Q, Li WL, Sun T (2014) Selective adsorption of antimony(III) from aqueous solution by ion-imprinted organic–inorganic hybrid sorbent: kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamics. J Taiwan I Chem Eng 45:2640–2648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan HT, Sun W, Jiang B, Wang QJ, Li DW, Huang CC, Wang KJ, Zhang ZG, Li WX (2016) Adsorption of antimony(III) from aqueous solution by mercapto-functionalized silica-supported organic–inorganic hybrid sorbent: mechanism insights. Chem Eng J 286:128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo XY, Wu ZJ, He MC (2019) Removal of antimony(V) and antimony(III) from drinking water by coagulation–flocculation–sedimentation (CFS). Water Res 43:4327–4335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. He J, Lu YC, Luo GS (2014) Ca(II) imprinted chitosan microspheres: an effective and green adsorbent for the removal of Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 244:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He XY, Min XB, Luo XB (2017) Efficient removal of antimony (III, V) from contaminated water by amino modification of a zirconium metal-organic framework with mechanism study. J Chem Eng Data 62:1519–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang Y, Kim D (2013) Synthesis and selective adsorption behavior of Pd(II)-imprinted porous polymer particles. Chem Eng J 232:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang M, Kawasaki M, Tamada S, Kamei T, Magara Y (2000) Effect of pH on the removal of arsenic and antimony using reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 131:293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leng YQ, Guo WL, Su SN, Yi CL, Xing LT (2012) Removal of antimony(III) from aqueous solution by graphene as an adsorbent. Chem Eng J 211-212:406–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li ML, Zhang ZQ, Li RH, Wang JJ, Ali A (2016) Removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution by thiosemicarbazide modified chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 86:876–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li J, Li XD, Hayat T, Chen CL (2017) Screening of zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks for efficiently simultaneous removal of antimonite (Sb(III)) and antimonate (Sb(V)) from aqueous solution. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:11496–11503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li WB, Fu FL, Ding ZC, Tang B (2018) Zero valent iron as an electron transfer agent in a reaction system based on zero valent iron/magnetite nanocomposites for adsorption and oxidation of Sb(III). J Taiwan I Chem Eng 85:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin H, Han S, Dong YB, He YH (2017) The surface characteristics of hyperbranched polyamide modified corncob and Its adsorption property for Cr(VI). Appl Surf Sci 412:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu T, Xiang T, Huang XL, Li C, Zhao WF, Zhang Q, Zhao CS (2015) Post-crosslinking towards stimuli-responsive sodium alginate beads for the removal of dye and heavy metals. Carbohydr Polym 133:587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luo XB, Wang CC, Wang LC, Deng F, Luo SL, Tu XM, Au CT (2013) Nanocomposites of graphene oxide-hydrated zirconium oxide for simultaneous removal of As(III) and As(V) from water. Chem Eng J 220:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mishra S, Sankararamakrishnan N (2018) Characterization, evaluation, and mechanistic insights on the adsorption of antimonite using functionalized carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:12686–12701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Monier M, Abdel-Latif DA, Mohammed HA (2015) Synthesis and characterization of uranyl ion-imprinted microspheres based on amidoximated modified alginate. Int J Biol Macromol 75:354–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ozdemir N, Soylak M, Elci L, Dogan M (2004) Speciation analysis of inorganic Sb(III)and Sb(V) ions by using mini column filled with amberlite XAD-8 resin. Anal Chim Acta 505:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pakade V, Cukrowska E, Darkwa J, Torto N, Chimuka L (2011) Selective removal of chromium(VI) from sulphates and other metal anions using an ion-imprinted polymer. Water SA 37:529–538Google Scholar
  23. Qi X, Gao S, Ding GS, Tang AN (2017) Synthesis of surface Cr(VI)-imprinted magnetic nanoparticles for selective dispersive solid-phase extraction and determination of Cr(VI) in water samples. Talanta 162:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salam MA, Mohamed RM (2013) Removal of antimony (III) by multi-walled carbon nanotubes from model solution and environmental samples. Chem Eng Res Des 91:1352–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sari A, Sahinoglu G, Tuzen M (2012) Antimony(III) adsorption from aqueous solution using raw perlite and Mn-modified perlite: equilibrium, thermodynamic, and kinetic studies. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:6877–6886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sari A, Tuzen M, Kocal İ (2017) Application of chitosan-modified pumice for antimony adsorption from aqueous solution. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36:1587–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shakerian F, Dadfarnia S, Shabani AMH, Abadi MNA (2014) Synthesis and characterisation of nano-pore antimony imprinted polymer and its use in the extraction and determination of antimony in water and fruit juice samples. Food Chem 145:571–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shan C, Ma ZY, Tong MP (2014) Efficient removal of trace antimony(III) through adsorption by hematite modified magnetic nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 268:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shao PH, Tian JY, Yang F, Duan XG, Gao SS, Shi WX, Luo XB, Cui FY, Luo SL, Wang SB (2018) Identification and regulation of active sites on nanodiamonds: establishing a highly efficient catalytic system for oxidation of organic contaminants. Adv Funct Mater 28:1705295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shao PH, Tian JY, Duan XG, Yang Y, Shi WX, Luo XB, Cui FY, Luo SL, Wang SB (2019) Cobalt silicate hydroxide nanosheets in hierarchical hollow architecture with maximized cobalt active site for catalytic oxidation. Chem Eng J 359:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang YY, Ji HY, Lu HH, Yang SM (2018) Simultaneous removal of Sb(III) and Cd(II) in water by adsorption onto a MnFe2O4–biochar nanocomposite. RSC Adv 8:3264–3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xi JH, He MC, Lin CY (2011) Adsorption of antimony(III) and antimony(V) on bentonite: kinetics, thermodynamics and anion competition. Microchem J 97:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu W, Wang HJ, Liu RP, Zhao X, Qu J (2011) The mechanism of antimony(III) removal and its reactions on the surfaces of Fe–Mn Binary Oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 363:320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yan YZ, An QD, Xiao ZY, Zheng W, Zhai SR (2017) Flexible core-shell/bead-like alginate@PEI with exceptional adsorption capacity, recycling performance toward batch and column sorption of Cr(VI). Chem Eng J 313:475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang KL, Zhou JS, Lou ZM, Zhou XR, Liu YL, Li YZ, Baig SA, Xu XH (2018) Removal of Sb(V) from aqueous solutions using Fe-Mn binary oxides: the influence of iron oxides forms and the role of manganese oxides. Chem Eng J 354:577–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. You D, Min XY, Liu LL, Ren Z, Xiao X, Pavlostathis SG, Luo JM, Luo XB (2018) New insight on the adsorption capacity of metallogels for antimonite and antimonate removal: from experimental to theoretical study. J Hazard Mater 346:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang L, Zeng YX, Cheng ZJ (2016) Removal of heavy metal ions using chitosan and modified chitosan: a review. J Mol Liq 214:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zou JP, Liu HL, Luo JM, Xing QJ, Du HM, Jiang XH, Luo XB, Luo SL, Suib SL (2016) Three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide coupled with Mn3O4 for highly efficient removal of Sb(III) and Sb(V) from water. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:18140–18149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Research Center for Eco-Dyeing and Finishing of Textiles, Ministry of Education, College of Materials and TextilesZhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Saintyear Holding Group Co., Ltd.HangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations