Advertisement

Vulnerability, well-being, and livelihood adaptation under changing environmental conditions: a case from mountainous region of Pakistan

  • Laila Shahzad
  • Arifa Tahir
  • Faiza Sharif
  • Waqas Ud Din Khan
  • Muhammad Ansar FarooqEmail author
  • Azhar AbbasEmail author
  • Zulfiqar Ahmad Saqib
Research Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

Climatic changes pose serious risks to the rural community’s livelihoods of many developing countries whereas people in mountainous regions are exposed to multiple hazards with limited livelihood resources and heavy dependence on natural resources. The objective of the current study is to assess the livelihood practices and adaptive capacity of a mountainous region of Pakistan, the Balakot, where people are highly vulnerable to climatic changes. The study uses a triangulation method to explore various issues and options of climate change risks sand adaptation and impact of well-being on resilience capacity and livelihood strategies. For this purpose, ten focus group discussions (FGDs) with carefully selected key informants and structured interviews with randomly selected 200 local households are conducted to evaluate different hazards and their associated livelihood effects. It is observed that the changing climate has significantly influenced livelihoods of the local community in the recent past through resource degradation, gradual unavailability of sufficient basic services (quantity and quality of drinking water, crop food diversity, fuel wood, and non-timber forest products), low agricultural productivity, and social inequity viz. income distribution, health, education, and food storage. Such a brunt is felt disproportionately more by poor households due to their low adaptive capacity to climate change with constrained livelihood resources. The study emphasizes the need for targeted efforts to move from coping strategies to adaptations among people considering their social inequalities. Timely information sharing, livelihood diversification and preservation of livelihood resources such as crop and forest production, livestock grazing, creating awareness on the pace, and pattern of climate change in the region and subsequent role of adaptation options are major interventions that should be emphasized by the public bodies.

Keywords

Development Degradation Natural resources Mitigation Assessment Vulnerable 

Notes

References

  1. Aalst V, Cannon T, Burton I (2008) Community level adaptation to climate change: the potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Glob Environ Chang 18:165–179Google Scholar
  2. Abbas A, Amjath-Babu TS, Kächele H, Usman M, Amjed Iqbal M, Arshad M, Adnan Shahid M, Müller K (2018) Sustainable survival under climatic extremes: linking flood risk mitigation and coping with flood damages in rural Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(32):32491–32505Google Scholar
  3. Ainuddin S, Aldrich DP, Routray JK, Ainuddin S, Achkazai A (2013) The need for local involvement: decentralization of disaster management institutions in Baluchistan, Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 6:50–58Google Scholar
  4. Ali A, Erenstein O (2016) Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan. Clim Risk Manag 16:183–194Google Scholar
  5. Arias KB, Dorado JR, Mendoza MT, Ballaran VG, Maligaya H (2016) Vulnerability assessment to climate change of households from Mabacan, Sta. Cruz and Balanac Watersheds in Laguna, Philippines. J Environ Sci Manag 19(1):9–18Google Scholar
  6. Aryal S, Panthi J, Dhakal YR, Gaire NP, Karki K, Joshi NR (2018) Historically evolved practices of the Himalayan transhumant pastoralists and their implications for climate change adaptation. Int J Global Warm 14(3):356–371Google Scholar
  7. Aryal S, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN (2014) Vulnerability of Himalayan transhumant communities to climate change. Clim Chang 125(2):193–208Google Scholar
  8. Aryal S, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN (2017) Globalization and traditional social ecological systems: understanding impacts of tourism and labor migration to the transhumance systems in the Himalayas. Environ Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.09.001
  9. Babbie ER (2009) The practice of social research. Wadsworth Independence, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  10. Basharat M, Shah HR, Arab NH (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and weighted overlay method: a case study from NW Himalayas. Pakistan. J Geosci 9:292Google Scholar
  11. Boissiere M, Locatelli B, Sheil D, Padmanaba M, Sadjudin E (2013) Local perceptions of climate variability and change in tropical forests of Papua, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 18(4):13.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05822-180413 Google Scholar
  12. Brown K, Westaway E (2011) Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:321–342Google Scholar
  13. BTTP (2016) Billion Tree Tsunami Afforestation Project. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa KPK, PakistanGoogle Scholar
  14. Camp NG (2017) Tanzania’s community forests: their impact on human well-being and persistence in spite of the lack of benefit. Ecol Soc 22(1):37.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09124-220137 Google Scholar
  15. Chaudhary P, Bawa KS (2011) Local perceptions of climate change validated by scientific evidence in the Himalayas. Biol Lett 7(5):767–770.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0269 Google Scholar
  16. Choudhury MA, Abbas A (2017) Agriculture as social wellbeing system in food security: an epistemological study. Theor Econ Lett 7:429–447Google Scholar
  17. Chiwaka E, Yates R (2005) Participatory vulnerability analysis: a step-by-step guideline for field staff. Action Aid International, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  18. Choe H, Thorne JH, Hijmans R, Kim J, Kwon H, Seo C (2017) Meta-corridor solutions for climate vulnerable plant species groups in South Korea. J Appl Ecol 54:1742–1754.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12865 Google Scholar
  19. Daze A, Ambrose K, Ehrhart C (2009) Climate vulnerability and capacity analysis-handbook. CARE International, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  20. Fabinyi M, Evans L, Foale SJ (2014) Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecol Soc 19(4):28.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07029-190428 Google Scholar
  21. Furberg M, Hondula DM, Saha MV, Nilsson M (2018) In the light of change: a mixed methods investigation of climate perceptions and the instrumental record in northern Sweden. Popul Environ 40:47–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-018-0302-x Google Scholar
  22. Gentle P, Maraseni TN (2012) Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal. Environ Sci Pol 21:24–34Google Scholar
  23. Gentle P, Thwaites R, Race D, Alexander K (2014) Differential impacts of climate change on communities in the middle hills region of Nepal. Nat Hazards 74:815–836.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1218-0 Google Scholar
  24. Gould RK, Klain S, Ardoin NM, Woodside U, Hannahs N, Satterfield T, Chan KMA, Daily GC (2015) A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values using a cultural ecosystem services frame. Conserv Biol 29(2):575–586Google Scholar
  25. Halvorson SJ, Hamilton JP (2007) Vulnerability and the erosion of seismic culture in mountainous central Asia. Mt Res Dev 27(4):322–330Google Scholar
  26. Hartmann DL, Klein AMG, Rusticucci M, Alexander LV, Bronnimann S, Charabi Y, Dentener FJ et al (2013) Observations: atmosphere and surface. In: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. Hatt K (2013) Social attractors: a proposal to enhance ‘resilience thinking’ about the social. Soc Nat Resour 26(1):30–43Google Scholar
  28. Herman-Mercer NM, Matkin E, Laituri MJ, Toohey RC, Massey M, Elder K, Schuster PF, Mutter EA (2016) Changing times, changing stories: generational differences in climate change perspectives from four remote indigenous communities in Subarctic Alaska. Ecol Soc 21(3):28.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08463-210328 Google Scholar
  29. IFRC (2006a) How to do a VCA: a practical step-by-step guide for Red Cross Red crescent staff and volunteers. International Federation for Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  30. IFRC (2006b) VCA toolbox and tool reference sheets. International Federation for Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  31. IPCC (2007) Summary for policy makers. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. IPCC (2014) Fifth Assessment Report on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen Sk, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA, p 1535.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324
  34. Jonsson SA (2011) Virtue and vulnerability: discourses on women gender and climate change. Glob Environ Chang 21:744–751Google Scholar
  35. Joshi B, Weihong J, Narayan BJ (2017) Farm households’ perception on climate change and adaptation practices: a case from mountain district of Nepal. Int J Clim Chang Str 9:433–445.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2016-0099 Google Scholar
  36. Lim B, Siegfried ES, Burton I, Malone EL, Huq S (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Loic DL, Gaillard JC, Friesen W (2015) Academics doing participatory disaster research: how participatory is it? Environ Hazard 14(1):1–15Google Scholar
  38. Macchi M (2011) Framework for climate-based climate vulnerability and capacity assessment in mountain areas. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  39. Maitib S, Jhab SK, Garaib S, Nagc A, Beraa AK, Paula V, Upadhayad RC, Deba SM (2017) An assessment of social vulnerability to climate change among the districts of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Ecol Indic 77:105–113Google Scholar
  40. Malakar Y, Bhandari D (2012) Six steps to a quick hazards assessment at village level: a participatory assessment approach applied in Nawalparasi District, Nepal. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 3(5):1–19Google Scholar
  41. Maharjan A, Siegfried B, Beatrice K (2012) International migration, remittances and subsistence farming: evidence from Nepal. Int Migr 51:e249–e263.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2012.00767.x Google Scholar
  42. Marshall NA, Marshall P, Tamelander J, Obura D, King DM, Cinner J (2009) A framework for social adaptation to climate change: sustaining tropical coastal communities and industries. IUCN, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  43. Martello ML (2008) Arctic indigenous peoples as representations and representatives of climate change. Soc Stud Sci 38:351–376Google Scholar
  44. Mavhura E, Manyena SB, Collins AE, Mantasa D (2013) Indigenous knowledge, coping strategies and resilience to floods in Muzarabani, Zimbabwe. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 5:38–48Google Scholar
  45. Mendoza MT, The BD, Naret H, Ballaran VG, Arias JKB (2014) Assessing vulnerability to climate change impacts in Cambodia, the Philippines and Vietnam: an analysis at the commune and household level. J Environ Sci Manag 17(2):78–91Google Scholar
  46. MoLE (2014) Labour migration for employment: a status report for Nepal: 2013/2014. Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  47. Murphy BL (2007) Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management. Nat Hazards 41(2):297–315Google Scholar
  48. Osbahr H, Twyman C, Adger WN, Thomas DSG (2010) Evaluating successful livelihood adaptation to climate variability and change in Southern Africa. Ecol Soc 15(2):27Google Scholar
  49. Osbahr H, Twyman C, Thomas DSG, Adger WN (2008) Effective livelihood adaptation to climate change disturbance: scale dimensions of practice in Mozambique. Geoforum 39(6):1799–2132Google Scholar
  50. Pakistan Climate Change Act (2017) Pakistan Climate Change Authority, Govt. of PakistanGoogle Scholar
  51. Panthi J, Aryal S, Dahal P, Bhandari P, Krakauer NY, Pandey VP (2015) Livelihood vulnerability approach to assessing climate change impacts on mixed agro-livestock smallholders around the Gandaki river basin in Nepal. Reg Environ Chang 16:1121–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0833-y Google Scholar
  52. Pasteur K (2010) From vulnerability to resilience: a framework for analysis and action to build community resilience. Practical Action, UKGoogle Scholar
  53. PPPA (2003) Pakistan participatory poverty assessment: between hope and despair- Punjab report. Planning and Development Department, Government of the Punjab, PakistanGoogle Scholar
  54. Shah SA, Zeb A, Mahmood A (2010) The rainfall activity and temperature distribution over KPK during the winter season (January to March). Pak J Meteorol 7:13Google Scholar
  55. Shrestha UB, Gautam S, Bawa KS (2012) Widespread climate change in the Himalayas and associated changes in local ecosystems. PLoS One 7(5):e36741Google Scholar
  56. Shrestha AB, Agrawal NK, Alfthan B, Bajracharya SR, Maréchal J, van Oort B (eds) (2015) The Himalayan climate and water atlas: impact of climate change on water resources in five of Asia’s major river basins. ICIMOD, GRID-Arendal and CICEROGoogle Scholar
  57. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:282–292Google Scholar
  58. Sonwa DJ, Somorin OA, Jum C, Bele MY, Nkem JN (2012) Vulnerability, forest-related sectors and climate change adaptation: the case of Cameroon. Forest Policy Econ 23:1–9Google Scholar
  59. Soomro AS, Abbasi HU, Memon AG, Samo SR (2012) A conceptual model for identifying landslide risk: a case study Balakot, Pakistan. Sindh Univ Res J 44:203–208Google Scholar
  60. Soomro AS, Rajput AQK, Solangi SH (2010) The study of change after occurrence of earthquake induced landslide disaster in 2005 in Balakot, Pakistan. Mehran Univ Res J Eng Technol 31(3):461–468Google Scholar
  61. Thaker J, Leiserowitz A (2014) Shifting discourses of climate change in India. Clim Chang 123(2):107–119Google Scholar
  62. Thompson DW, Barnes JE, Deser C, Foust W, Phillips A (2015) Quantifying the role of internal climate variability in future climate trends. J Clim 28:6443–6456.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00830.1 Google Scholar
  63. Ullah W, Takaaki N, Muhammad N, Rahman Z, Muhammad A (2017) Understanding climate change vulnerability, adaptation and risk perceptions at household level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Int J Clim Chang Str.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2017-0038
  64. UNDP (2007) Building enabling governance and institutions for earthquake response (BEGIN-ER): Mansehra District Disaster Risk Management plan. United Nations Development Programme, Govt. of PakistanGoogle Scholar
  65. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Wiggins S (2009) CEDRA: Climate Change and Environmental Degradation Risk and Adaptation Assessment. Tearfund, UKGoogle Scholar
  67. Williamson T, Nelson HW, Macaulay C, Mahony C (2015) Assessing the potential for forest management practitioner participation in climate change adaptation. For Ecol Manag 360:388–399Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Science DepartmentLahore College Women UniversityLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Sustainable Development Study CenterGovernment College UniversityLahorePakistan
  3. 3.Tasmanian Institute of AgricultureUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  4. 4.Institute of Soil & Environmental SciencesUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  5. 5.Institute of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations