The economic potential of activated carbon (AC) synthesis from walnut shell biomass for CO2 capture was evaluated in the present study. For this purpose, the chemical activation was employed to manufacture ACs and the effect of different impregnation ratios of activation agents, comprising KOH (KH) and H3PO4 (HP), onto the properties of fabricated ACs was examined. The obtained results demonstrated that the synthesized AC by HP activation with an impregnation ratio of 1:2.5, which was identified as HP2.5, possesses the highest surface area (1512.6 m2/g), micropore volume percentage (74.65%), and CO2 adsorption (3.55 mmol/g) at 1 bar and 30 °C. Moreover, the equilibrium CO2 adsorption data for HP2.5 were better fitted with the Freundlich model, indicating the multilayer CO2 adsorption onto the heterogeneous AC surface dominantly through a physisorption process. In addition, the economic estimations revealed a cost of about $1.83/kg for the ultimate production that was significantly lower than the most of available CACs in the market. Therefore, walnut shells can be considered as a cost-effective and promising biomass source from a scale-up point of view.
CO2 adsorption Activated carbon Walnut shells Cost estimation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The present research was funded by a grant from Iran National Science Foundation (INSF grant no. 97570, Iran), Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative Council-Iran, Tarbiat Modares University, and Guilan University Iran.
Ello AS, de Souza LK, Trokourey A, Jaroniec M (2013) Development of microporous carbons for CO2 capture by KOH activation of African palm shells. J CO2 Util 2:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel C, Kaur H, Bhunia H, Bajpai PK (2016) Carbon dioxide adsorption on nitrogen enriched carbon adsorbents: experimental, kinetics, isothermal and thermodynamic studies. J CO2 Util 16:50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidari A, Younesi H, Rashidi A, Ghoreyshi A (2014a) Adsorptive removal of CO2 on highly microporous activated carbons prepared from Eucalyptus camaldulensis wood: effect of chemical activation. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidari A, Younesi H, Rashidi A, Ghoreyshi AA (2014b) Evaluation of CO2 adsorption with eucalyptus wood based activated carbon modified by ammonia solution through heat treatment. Chem Eng J 254:503–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesas RH, Arami-Niya A, Daud WMAW, Sahu J (2013) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from apple waste by microwave-assisted phosphoric acid activation: application in methylene blue adsorption. BioResources 8:2950–2966Google Scholar
Jaroniec M (1975) Adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces: the exponential equation for the overall adsorption isotherm. Surf Sci 50:553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surface of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40:1361–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng C, Marshall WE, Rao RM, Bansode RR, Losso JN (2003) Activated carbon from pecan shell: process description and economic analysis. Ind Crop Prod 17:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowrouzi M, Behin J, Younesi H, Bahramifar N, Charpentier P, Rohani S (2017a) An enhanced counter-current approach towards activated carbon from waste tissue with zero liquid discharge. Chem Eng J 326:934–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowrouzi M, Younesi H, Bahramifar N (2017b) High efficient carbon dioxide capture onto as-synthesized activated carbon by chemical activation of Persian Ironwood biomass and the economic pre-feasibility study for scale-up. J Clean Prod 168:499–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowrouzi M, Younesi H, Bahramifar N (2018) Superior CO2 capture performance on biomass-derived carbon/metal oxides nanocomposites from Persian ironwood by H3PO4 activation. Fuel 223:99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozdemir I, Şahin M, Orhan R, Erdem M (2014) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from grape stalk by zinc chloride activation. Fuel Process Technol 125:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pal J, Deb MK (2014) Efficient adsorption of Congo red dye from aqueous solution using green synthesized coinage nanoparticles coated activated carbon beads. Appl Nanosci 4:967–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevilla M, Fuertes AB (2011) Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture. Energy Environ Sci 4:1765–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toles CA, Marshall WE, Johns MM, Wartelle LH, McAloon A (2000) Acid-activated carbons from almond shells: physical, chemical and adsorptive properties and estimated cost of production. Bioresour Technol 71:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valizadeh S, Younesi H, Bahramifar N (2016) Highly mesoporous K2CO3 and KOH/activated carbon for SDBS removal from water samples: batch and fixed-bed column adsorption process. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 6:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang J, Qiu K (2010) Preparation of activated carbons from walnut shells via vacuum chemical activation and their application for methylene blue removal. Chem Eng J 165:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang H, Gong M, Chen Y (2011) Preparation of activated carbons and their adsorption properties for greenhouse gases: CH4 and CO2. J Nat Gas Chem 20:460–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang R, Liu G, Li M, Zhang J, Hao X (2012) Preparation and N2, CO2 and H2 adsorption of super activated carbon derived from biomass source hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) stem. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 158:108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou X, Yi H, Tang X, Deng H, Liu H (2012) Thermodynamics for the adsorption of SO2, NO and CO2 from flue gas on activated carbon fiber. Chem Eng J 200:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar