Effect of temperature on tertiary nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater in a PHBV/PLA-supported denitrification system
- 33 Downloads
In this study, a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/poly(lactic acid) (PHBV/PLA)–supported denitrification system was built to remove nitrogen from municipal wastewater treatment plant secondary effluent, and the influence of operating temperature on nitrogen removal was further investigated. Results indicated that a PHBV/PLA-supported denitrification system could effectively fulfill the tertiary nitrogen removal. The nitrogen removal efficiency gradually declined with the operating temperature decreasing, and the denitrification rate at 30 °C was 5 times higher than that at 10 °C. Meanwhile, it was found that a slight TOC accumulation only occurred at 30 °C (with an average of 2.03 mg/L) and was avoided at 10~20 °C. The reason for effluent TOC variation was further explained through the consumption and generation pathways of TOC in this system. Furthermore, the temperature coefficient was about 0.02919, indicating that the PHBV/PLA-supported denitrification system was a little sensitive to temperature. A better knowledge of the effect of operating temperature will be significant for the practical application of the solid-phase denitrification system.
KeywordsTertiary nitrogen removal PHBV/PLA polymer Denitrification Temperature coefficient
This work was financially supported by the National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2017ZX07202002-05).
- Agency SEP (2002): Discharge standard of pollutants for municipal wastewater treatment plantGoogle Scholar
- Carrera J, Vicent T, Lafuente F (2003) Influence of temperature on denitrification of an industrial high-strength nitrogen wastewater in a two-sludge system. Water SA 29:11–16Google Scholar
- Ye L, Yu G, Zhou S, Zuo S, Fang C (2017) Denitrification of nitrate−contaminated groundwater in columns packed with PHBV and ceramsites for application as a permeable reactive barrier. Water Sci Tech−W Sup 17:1241−1248Google Scholar