Advertisement

Enhanced capacity of fluoride scavenging from contaminated water by nano-architectural reorientation of cerium-incorporated hydrous iron oxide with graphene oxide

  • Kankan Mukhopadhyay
  • Uday Chand Ghosh
  • Palani SasikumarEmail author
Research Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

An in situ wet chemical deposition method has been applied for the successful surface modification of Ce (IV)-incorporated hydrous Fe(III) oxide (CIHFO) with a hydrophilic graphene precursor, graphene oxide (GO). The surface area of as-prepared composite (GO-CIHFO) has enhanced (189.57 m2 g−1) compared with that of pristine CIHFO (140.711 m2 g−1) and has irregular surface morphology consisting of microcrystals (~ 2–3 nm) and mesoporous (3.5486 nm) structure. The GO-CIHFO composite shows enhanced fluoride scavenging capacity (136.24 mg F g−1) than GO (3 mg F g−1) and pristine CIHFO (32.62 mg F g−1) at pH 7.0. Also, in acidic pH range and at 323 K temperature, the Langmuir capacity of as-prepared composite is 190.61 mg F g−1. It has been observed that fluoride removal by GO–CIHFO occurs from solutions obeying pseudo-second-order kinetics and multilayer adsorption process. The film/boundary layer diffusion process is also the rate-determining step. The nature of the adsorption reaction is reasonably spontaneous and endothermic in thermodynamic sense. It was observed that 1.2 g.L−1 of GO-CIHFO dosage can effectively optimise the fluoride level of natural groundwater samples (9.05 mg L−1) to the desirable permissible limit. Reactivation of used material up to a level of 73.77% with a solution of alkaline pH has proposed reusability of nanocomposites ensuring sustainability of the proposed material as fluoride scavenger in future.

Keywords

Iron–cerium oxide Graphene oxide Fluoride Field validation Reusable 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Department of Geology and also to the Department of Chemistry including the Authority of Presidency University, Kolkata, India, for providing the laboratory facility for carry out this work. The author (K. M.) is grateful to the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India, for providing the financial support in the form of a Woman Scientist-B (DST/Disha/SoRF-PM/064/2013/C dated 14/09/2015). P.S. is thankful to Presidency University for the financial support through a FRPDF grant.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_5756_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21.3 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 21820 kb)

References

  1. Adeno F, Mulugeta E, Zewge F, Chebude Y (2014) Adsorptive removal of fluoride from water using nanoscale aluminium oxide hydroxide (AlOOH). Bull Chem Soc Ethiop 28:215–227.  https://doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v28i2.6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alagumuthu G, Rajan M (2008) Monitoring of fluoride concentration in ground water of Kadayam block of Tirunelveli district, India. Rasayan J Chem 1:920–928Google Scholar
  3. Baltrusaitis J, Cwiertny DM, Grassian VH (2007) Adsorption of sulfur dioxide on hematite and goethite particle surfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:5542–5554.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b709167b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee S, Chattopadhyaya MC (2017) Adsorption characteristics for the removal of a toxic dye, tartrazine from aqueous solutions by a low cost agricultural by-product. Arab J Chem 10:S1629–S1638.- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barathi M, Santhana Krishna Kumar A, Rajesh N (2013) Efficacy of novel Al–Zr impregnated cellulose adsorbent prepared using microwave irradiation for the facile defluoridation of water. J Environ Chem Eng 1:1325–1335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.09.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barathi M, Krishna Kumar AS, Kumar CU, Rajesh N (2014) Graphene oxide–aluminium oxyhydroxide interaction and its application for the effective adsorption of fluoride. RSC Adv 4:53711–53721.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA10006A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu T, Ghosh UC (2013) Nano-structured iron(III)–cerium(IV) mixed oxide: Synthesis, characterization and arsenic sorption kinetics in the presence of co-existing ions aiming to apply for high arsenic groundwater treatment. Appl Surf Sci 283:471–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhatnagar A, Kumar E, Sillanpää M (2011) Fluoride removal from water by adsorption—A review. Chem Eng J 171:811–840.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biswas K, Gupta K, Ghosh UC (2009) Adsorption of fluoride by hydrous iron(III)–tin(IV) bimetal mixed oxide from the aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 149:196–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.09.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biswas K, Gupta K, Goswami A, Ghosh UC (2010) Fluoride removal efficiency from aqueous solution by synthetic iron(III)–aluminum(III)–chromium(III) ternary mixed oxide. Desalination 255:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.01.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Briggs D (ed) (1978) Handbook of x-ray and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy. Heyden, London [usw.], RheineGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakrabarti S, Bhattacharya HN (2013) Inferring the hydro-geochemistry of fluoride contamination in Bankura district, West Bengal: A case study. J Geol Soc India 82:379–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0165-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen L, He B-Y, He S, Wang TJ, Su CL, Jin Y (2012) Fe―Ti oxide nano-adsorbent synthesized by co-precipitation for fluoride removal from drinking water and its adsorption mechanism. Powder Technol 227:3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen L, Zhang K, He J, Cai XG, Xu W, Liu JH (2016a) Performance and mechanism of hierarchically porous Ce–Zr oxide nanospheres encapsulated calcium alginate beads for fluoride removal from water. RSC Adv 6:36296–36306.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA01337F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen P, Zhang W, Li M, Ai P, Tian L, Jiang H (2016b) Facile synthesis of magnetic La–Zr composite as high effective adsorbent for fluoride removal. RSC Adv 6:35859–35867.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA27929A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng S, Liu H, Zhou W, Huang J, Yu G (2011) Mn–Ce oxide as a high-capacity adsorbent for fluoride removal from water. J Hazard Mater 186:1360–1366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drewniak S, Muzyka R, Stolarczyk A, Pustelny T, Kotyczka-Morańska M, Setkiewicz M (2016) Studies of reduced graphene oxide and graphite oxide in the aspect of their possible application in gas sensors. Sensors 16:103.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dubinin MM, Radushkevich LV (1947) The Equation of the Characteristic Curve of Activated Charcoal. Proc Acad Sci USSR Phys Chem Sect 55:331–337Google Scholar
  19. Freundlich HMF (1906) Over the Adsorption in Solution. Z Phys Chem 57:385–470Google Scholar
  20. Gao C, Yu X-Y, Luo T, Jia Y, Sun B, Liu JH, Huang XJ (2014) Millimeter-sized Mg–Al-LDH nanoflake impregnated magnetic alginate beads (LDH-n-MABs): a novel bio-based sorbent for the removal of fluoride in water. J Mater Chem A 2:2119–2128.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA13526H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghosh A, Chakrabarti S, Biswas K, Ghosh UC (2014) Agglomerated nanoparticles of hydrous Ce(IV)+Zr(IV) mixed oxide: preparation, characterization and physicochemical aspects on fluoride adsorption. Appl Surf Sci 307:665–676.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamayun M, Mahmood T, Naeem A et al (2014) Equilibrium and kinetics studies of arsenate adsorption by FePO. Chemosphere 99:207–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hummers WS, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339–1339.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01539a017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jagtap S, Yenkie MK, Labhsetwar N, Rayalu S (2012) Fluoride in drinking water and defluoridation of water. Chem Rev 112:2454–2466.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2002855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanrar S, Debnath S, De P et al (2016) Preparation, characterization and evaluation of fluoride adsorption efficiency from water of iron-aluminium oxide-graphene oxide composite material. Chem Eng J 306:269–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuang L, Liu Y, Fu D, Zhao Y (2017) FeOOH-graphene oxide nanocomposites for fluoride removal from water: Acetate mediated nano FeOOH growth and adsorption mechanism. J Colloid Interface Sci 490:259–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Langevoort JC, Sutherland I, Hanekamp LJ, Gellings PJ (1987) On the oxide formation on stainless steels AISI 304 and incoloy 800H investigated with XPS. Appl Surf Sci 28:167–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(87)90062-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li Y, Zhang P, Du Q et al (2011) Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by graphene. J Colloid Interface Sci 363:348–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Y, Du Q, Wang J et al (2013) Defluoridation from aqueous solution by manganese oxide coated graphene oxide. J Fluor Chem 148:67–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.01.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu H, Deng S, Li Z, Yu G, Huang J (2010) Preparation of Al–Ce hybrid adsorbent and its application for defluoridation of drinking water. J Hazard Mater 179:424–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKay G, Otterburn MS, Sweeney AG (1981) Surface mass transfer processes during colour removal from effluent using silica. Water Res 15:327–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(81)90036-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meenakshi, Maheshwari RC (2006) Fluoride in drinking water and its removal. J Hazard Mater 137:456–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mohan S, Kumar V, Singh DK, Hasan SH (2016a) Synthesis and characterization of rGO/ZrO 2 nanocomposite for enhanced removal of fluoride from water: kinetics, isotherm, and thermodynamic modeling and its adsorption mechanism. RSC Adv 6:87523–87538.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA15460C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohan S, Kumar V, Singh DK, Hasan SH (2016b) Synthesis and characterization of rGO/ZrO 2 nanocomposite for enhanced removal of fluoride from water: kinetics, isotherm, and thermodynamic modeling and its adsorption mechanism. RSC Adv 6:87523–87538.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA15460C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mohammadian S, Ghanemi K, Nikpour Y (2016) Competitive adsorption of phthalate esters on marine surface sediments: kinetic, thermodynamic, and environmental considerations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:24991–25002.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7723-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mukhopadhyay K, Ghosh A, Das SK, Show B, Sasikumar P, Chand Ghosh U (2017b) Synthesis and characterisation of cerium(IV)-incorporated hydrous iron(III) oxide as an adsorbent for fluoride removal from water. RSC Adv 7:26037–26051.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra00265c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Novoselov KS (2004) Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 306:666–669.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Podder MS, Majumder CB (2016) Application of granular activated carbon/MnFe2O4 composite immobilized on C. glutamicum MTCC 2745 to remove As(III) and As(V): Kinetic, mechanistic and thermodynamic studies. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 153:298–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ranjan D, Talat M, Hasan SH (2009) Biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using agricultural residue ‘rice polish’. J Hazard Mater 166:1050–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reichenberg D (1953) Properties of Ion-Exchange Resins in Relation to their Structure. III. Kinetics of Exchange. J Am Chem Soc 75:589–597.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01099a022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saha I, Ghosh A, Nandi D et al (2015) ß-Cyclodextrin modified hydrous zirconium oxide: Synthesis, characterization and defluoridation performance from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 263:220–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharma YC, Weng CH (2007) Removal of chromium(VI) from water and wastewater by using riverbed sand: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. J Hazard Mater 142:449–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.08.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh DK, Mohan S, Kumar V, Hasan SH (2016) Kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies of adsorption behaviour of CNT/CuO nanocomposite for the removal of As(iii) and As(v) from water. RSC Adv 6:1218–1230.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA20601D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Singh DK, Kumar V, Mohan S, Hasan SH (2017) Polylysine Functionalized Graphene Aerogel for the Enhanced Removal of Cr(VI) through Adsorption: Kinetic, Isotherm, and Thermodynamic Modeling of the Process. J Chem Eng Data 62:1732–1742.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.7b00188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tang D, Zhang G (2016) Efficient removal of fluoride by hierarchical Ce–Fe bimetal oxides adsorbent: Thermodynamics, kinetics and mechanism. Chem Eng J 283:721–729.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomar V, Prasad S, Kumar D (2013) Adsorptive removal of fluoride from water samples using Zr–Mn composite material. Microchem J 111:116–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2013.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wan Z, Wang J (2016) Ce-Fe-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as an efficient catalyst for sulfamethazine degradation in aqueous solution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:18542–18551.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7051-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wen S, Wang Y, Dong S (2015) Performance and characteristics of fluoride adsorption using nanomagnetite graphite-La adsorbent. RSC Adv 5:89594–89602.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra15215a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang K, Wu S, Wang X, He J, Sun B, Jia Y, Luo T, Meng F, Jin Z, Lin D, Shen W, Kong L, Liu J (2015) Wide pH range for fluoride removal from water by MHS-MgO/MgCO3 adsorbent: Kinetic, thermodynamic and mechanism studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 446:194–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang C, Li Y, Wang T-J, Jiang Y, Fok J (2017) Synthesis and properties of a high-capacity iron oxide adsorbent for fluoride removal from drinking water. Appl Surf Sci 425:272–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao B, Zhang Y, Dou X, Wu X, Yang M (2012a) Granulation of Fe–Al–Ce trimetal hydroxide as a fluoride adsorbent using the extrusion method. Chem Eng J 185–186:211–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao B, Zhang Y, Dou X, Wu X, Yang M (2012b) Granulation of Fe-Al-Ce trimetal hydroxide as a fluoride adsorbent using the extrusion method. Chem Eng J 185-186:211–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu J, Lin X, Wu P, Zhou Q, Luo X (2015) Fluoride removal from aqueous solution by Al(III)–Zr(IV) binary oxide adsorbent. Appl Surf Sci 357:91–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyPresidency UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryPresidency UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations