A modified Ester-branched thickener for rheology and wettability during CO2 fracturing for improved fracturing property

  • Qiang LiEmail author
  • Yanling Wang
  • Augustus Boadi Owusu
Research Article


The thickening performance of CO2 fracturing fluid was poor because of the low apparent viscosity. In this paper, the thickening performance of a modified silicone on liquid CO2 is measured, and a rheology was investigated according to the consistency coefficient K and rheological index n. Meanwhile, a reservoir model was established to evaluate the fracturing property. Results showed that the modified silicone contributes to improve the apparent viscosity of liquid CO2 and decrease the rheology of liquid CO2. With the thickener content or pressure increase, the apparent viscosity of liquid CO2 increases, and the rheological index n decreased obviously. A reduced apparent viscosity is shown as the flow rate or temperature rises, but the rheology increased gradually. The fracturing simulation herein shows that thickened CO2 fracturing fluid could improve obviously the fracture property. This modified thickener possesses the potential as a thickener and could be a reliable alternative to the thickener in CO2 fracturing technology, and the large contact angle improved the backflow property of this CO2 thickener from rock surfaces. The development of CO2 fracturing technology provides basic data for the improvement of greenhouse effect and clean mining of energy.


CO2 fracturing technology CO2 thickener Capillary viscometer Fracturing simulation evaluation Silicone polymer 


Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1762212) and Shandong Province foam fluid efficient exploitation of oil and gas engineering research center in China University of Petroleum (East China). Moreover, we should be grateful for Binfei Li and Hao Bai due to the technical support of the capillary viscometer.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_5386_MOESM1_ESM.docx (214 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 214 kb)


  1. Adamson AW, Gast AP (1997) Physical chemistry of surfaces, 6th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Oweini R, El-Rassy H (2009) Synthesis and characterization by FTIR spectroscopy of silica aerogels prepared using several Si (OR) 4 and R′′ Si (OR′) 3 precursors. J Mol Struct 919:140–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aycaguer AC, Lev-On M, Winer AM (2001) Reducing carbon dioxide emissions with enhanced oil recovery projects: a life cycle assessment approach. Energy Fuel 15(2):303–308. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry AJ (1946) Viscometric investigation of dimethylsiloxane polymers. J Appl Phys 17(12):1020–1024. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blatchford MA, Raveendran P, Wallen SL (2002) Raman spectroscopic evidence for cooperative C− H---O interactions in the acetaldehyde− CO2 complex. J Am Chem Soc 124(50):14818–14819. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen D, Yao Y, Fu G, Meng H, Xie S (2016) A new model for predicting liquid loading in deviated gas wells. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 34:178–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Ruijter M, Kölsch P, Voué M, De Coninck J, Rabe JP (1998) Effect of temperature on the dynamic contact angle. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 144(1–3):235–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Della Bona A, Shen C, Anusavice KJ (2004) Work of adhesion of resin on treated lithia disilicate-based ceramic. Dent Mater 20(4):338–344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Detournay E (2004) Propagation regimes of fluid-driven fractures in impermeable rocks. Int J Geomech 4:35–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo DJ, Han HM, Xiao SJ, Dai ZD (2007) Surface-hydrophilic and protein-resistant silicone elastomers prepared by hydrosilylation of vinyl poly (ethylene glycol) on hydrosilanes-poly (dimethylsiloxane) surfaces. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 308:129–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris PC, Pippin PM (2000) High-rate foam fracturing: fluid friction and perforation erosion. SPE Prod Facil 15(1):27–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirby CF, McHugh MA (1999) Phase behavior of polymers in supercritical fluid solvents. Chem Rev 99:565–602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuo ACM (1999) Polymer data handbook. Oxford University Press, Oxford shireGoogle Scholar
  14. Li Z, Dong M, Li S, Huang S (2006) CO2, sequestration in depleted oil and gas reservoirs—caprock characterization and storage capacity. Energy Convers Manag 47:1372–1382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Z, Jin Z, Firoozabadi A (2014) Phase behavior and adsorption of pure substances and mixtures and characterization in nanopore structures by density functional theory. SPE J 19(06):1096–1109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li QC, Cheng Y, Li Q, Zhang C, Ansari U, Song B (2018) Establishment and evaluation of strength criterion for clayey silt hydrate-bearing sediments. Energ Source Part A 40(6):742–750. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Q, Wang Y, Wang X, Yu H, Li Q, Wang F, Bai H, Kobina F (2019) An application of thickener to increase viscosity of liquid CO2 and the assessment of the reservoir geological damage and CO2 utilization. Energ Source Part A 41(3):368–377. Google Scholar
  18. Liu L, Zhu W, Wei C, Elsworth D, Wang J (2018) Microcrack-based geomechanical modeling of roc-gas interaction during supercritical CO2 fracturing. J Pet Sci Eng 164:91–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo X, Wang S, Wang Z, Jing Z, Lv M, Zhai Z, Han T (2015) Experimental investigation on rheological properties and friction performance of thickened CO2 fracturing fluid. J Pet Sci Eng 133:410–420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ni G, Kai D, Shang L, Qian S (2019) Gas desorption characteristics effected by the pulsating hydraulic fracturing in coal. Fuel 236:190–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pozrikidis C (2001) Numerical investigation of the effect of surfactants on the stability and rheology of emulsions and foam. J Eng Math 41(2–3): 237–258.
  22. Raveendran P, Wallen SL (2002) Cooperative C− H---O hydrogen bonding in CO2− Lewis Base complexes: implications for solvation in supercritical CO2. J Am Chem Soc 124(42):12590–12599. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Selvan SS, Pandian PS, Subathir A, Saravanan S (2018) Saraca asoca seeds–a novel candidature for biodiesel production: studies on yield optimization using ANN coupled GA and properties of biodiesel blends. Int J Green Energy 15(14–15):918–929. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shen Z, Zhao ZG, Kang WL (2012) Colloid and surface chemistry. Chemical Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  25. Shon MY, Kwon HS (2009) Comparison of surface modification with amino terminated polydimethylsiloxane and amino branched polydimethylsiloxane on the corrosion protection of epoxy coating. Corros Sci 51(3):650–657. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun X, Liang X, Wang S, Lu Y (2014) Experimental study on the rheology of CO2 viscoelastic surfactant foam fracturing fluid. J Pet Sci Eng 119:104–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tadros TF (1980) Thermodynamics of micellization of fluorocarbon surfactants. J Colloid Interface Sci 74(1):196–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tayyebi S, Hajjar Z (2019) An adaptive neuro–fuzzy inference model for prediction of coal char conversion in CO2 gasification. Energ Source Part A 41(1):21–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Varadaraj R, Bock J, Zushma S, Brons N (1991) Relationships between dynamic contact angle and dynamic surface tension properties for linear and branched ethoxylate, ethoxysulfate, and sulfate surfactants. J colloid Interf Sci 147(2):403–406. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang HY (2015) Numerical modeling of non-planar hydraulic fracture propagation in brittle and ductile rocks using XFEM with cohesive zone method. J Pet Sci Eng 135:127–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang J, Horton JH, Liu G, Lee SY, Shea KJ (2007) Polymethylene-block-poly (dimethyl siloxane)-block-polymethylene nanoaggregates in toluene at room temperature. Polymer. 48(14):4123–4129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang Y, Hong L, Tapriyal D, Kim IC, Paik IH, Crosthwaite JM, Hamilton AD, Thies MC, Beckman EJ, Enick RM, Johnson JK (2009) Design and evaluation of nonfluorous CO2-soluble oligomers and polymers. J Phys Chem B 113(45):14971–14980. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weaver JD, Nguyen PD, Loghry R (2011) Stabilizing fracture faces in water-sensitive shale formations. SPE eastern regional meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
  34. Wei B, Li Q, Ning J, Wang Y, Sun L, Wu W (2019) Macro-and micro-scale observations of a surface-functionalized nanocellulose based aqueous nanofluids in chemical enhanced oil recovery (C-EOR). Fuel. 236:1321–1333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams LL, Rubin JB, Edwards HW (2004) Calculation of Hansen solubility parameter values for a range of pressure and temperature conditions, including the supercritical fluid region. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:4967–4972. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wu HJ, Interrante LV (1989) Preparation of a polymeric precursor to silicon carbide via ring-opening polymerization: synthesis of poly [(methylchlorosilylene) methylene] and poly (silapropylene). Chem Mater 1:564–568. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu L, Xu L, Dai W, Tsuboi T, Xie H (2013) Preparation and characterization of a novel fluoro-silicone acrylate copolymer by semi-continuous emulsion polymerization. J Fluor Chem 153:68–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang X, Jeffrey RG, Thiercelin M (2007) Deflection and propagation of fluid-driven fractures at frictional bedding interfaces: a numerical investigation. J Struct Geol 29:396–410. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang S, She Y, Gu Y (2011) Evaluation of polymers as direct thickeners for CO2 enhanced oil recovery. J Chem Eng Data 56(4):1069–1107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zou J, Chen W, Jiao YY (2018) Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture initialization and deflection in anisotropic unconventional gas reservoirs using XFEM. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 55:466–475. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Petroleum EngineeringChina University of Petroleum (East China)QingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations