Advertisement

Phytoplankton functional groups in a monomictic reservoir: seasonal succession, ecological preferences, and relationships with environmental variables

  • Memet VarolEmail author
Research Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

The seasonal succession of phytoplankton functional groups (PFGs), their ecological preferences, relationships between environmental variables and PFGs, and ecological status were investigated in the Batman Dam Reservoir, a warm monomictic reservoir, located in the Tigris River basin of Turkey. Altogether 60 species, 19 functional groups, and 10 prevailing functional groups were identified, and prevailing functional groups showed strong seasonal changes. Centric diatoms Cyclotella ocellata (group B) and Aulacoseira granulata (group P) were dominant in the spring, with water mixing and low temperature. Groups F (Elakatothrix gelatinosa, Elakatothrix gelatinosa, and Sphaerocystis schroeteri), J (Pediastrum simplex and Coelastrum reticulatum), G (Eudorina elegans and Volvox aureus), LM (Ceratium and Microcystis), and H1 (Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and Anabaena spiroides) dominated the phytoplankton community from summer to mid-autumn, with thermal stratification. Groups H1 and P became dominant in the late autumn, with the breakdown of stratification. With the deepening of the mixing zone, groups P and T (Mougeotia sp.) were dominant in the winter. The reservoir was meso-eutrophic according to trophic state index values based on total phosphorus (TP), chlorophyll a, Secchi depth and total nitrogen, habitat preferences of PFGs, and diversity indices of phytoplankton. Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that NO3–N, SiO2, TP, pH, and water temperature (WT) were the most important environmental factors controlling PFGs in the BDR. Weighted averaging regression results indicated that among PFGs, groups F and T had a narrower tolerance range for WT, pH, and SiO2, while groups G and T had a narrower tolerance range for TP and NO3–N.

Keywords

Phytoplankton Functional groups Environmental variables Seasonal succession Warm monomictic reservoir 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are given to the editor Prof. Philippe Garrigues and the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions for improving this manuscript.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_5354_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

References

  1. Abrantes N, Antunes SC, Pereira MJ, Gonçalves F (2006) Seasonal succession of cladocerans and phytoplankton and their interactions in a shallow eutrophic lake (Lake Vela, Portugal). Acta Oecol 29:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albay M, Akçaalan R (2003) Factors influencing the phytoplankton steady state assemblages in a drinking-water reservoir (Ömerli Reservoir, Istanbul). Hydrobiologia 502:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (1995) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Baykal T, Açıkgöz Ü, Yıldız K, Bekleyen A (2004) A study on algae in Devegeçidi Dam Lake. Turk J Bot 28:457–472Google Scholar
  5. Becker V, Caputo L, Ordonez J, Marce R, Armengol J, Crossetti LO, Huszar VLM (2010) Driving factors of the phytoplankton functional groups in a deep Mediterranean reservoir. Water Res 44:3345–3354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergström AK (2010) The use of TN:TP and DIN:TP ratios as indicators for phytoplankton nutrient limitation in oligotrophic lakes affected by N deposition. Aquat Sci 72:277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao J, Hou Z, Li Z, Chu Z, Yang P, Zheng B (2018) Succession of phytoplankton functional groups and their driving factors in a subtropical plateau lake. Sci Total Environ 631–632:1127–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson RE (1977) A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 22:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Çelekli A, Öztürk B (2014) Determination of ecological status and ecological preferences of phytoplankton using multivariate approach in a Mediterranean reservoir. Hydrobiologia 740:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Çelekli A, Albay M, Dügel M (2007) Phytoplankton (except Bacillariophyceae) flora of Lake Gölköy (Bolu). Turk J Bot 31:49–65Google Scholar
  11. Çelik K, Sevindik TO (2015) The phytoplankton functional group concept provides a reliable basis for ecological status estimation in the Çaygören Reservoir (Turkey). Turk J Bot 39:588–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Codd GA (2000) Cyanobacterial toxins, the perception of water quality, and the prioritisation of eutrophication control. Ecol Eng 16:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crossetti LO, Becker V, Cardoso LS, Rodrigues LR, Costa LS, Motta-Marques D (2013) Is phytoplankton functional classification a suitable tool to investigate spatial heterogeneity in a subtropical shallow lake? Limnologica 43:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demir AN, Fakıoğlu Ö, Dural B (2014) Phytoplankton functional groups provide a quality assessment method by the Q assemblage index in Lake Mogan (Turkey). Turk J Bot 38:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grower JP, Chrzanowski TH (2006) Seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton in two warm temperate reservoirs: association of taxonomic composition with temperature. J Plankton Res 28:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guildford SJ, Hecky RE (2000) Total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nutrient limitation in lakes and oceans: is there a common relationship? Limnol Oceanogr 45:1213–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Happey-Wood CM (1988) Ecology of freshwater planktonic green algae. In: Sandgren CD (ed) Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 175–226Google Scholar
  18. Hartley B (1996) An atlas of British diatoms. Biopress Limited, BristolGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoyer AB, Moreno-Ostos E, Vidal J, Blanco JM, Palomino-Torres RL, Basanta A, Escot C, Rueda FJ (2009) The influence of external perturbations on the functional composition of phytoplankton in a Mediterranean reservoir. Hydrobiologia 636:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huszar V, Kruk C, Caraco N (2003) Steady-state assemblages of phytoplankton in four temperate lakes (NE USA). Hydrobiologia 502:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchinson GE (1944) Limnological studies in Connecticut. VII. A critical examination of the supposed relationship between phytoplankton periodicity and chemical changes in lake waters. Ecology 25:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ISO (1986) Water quality determination of nitrate. In: Part 1: 2,6-dimethylphenol spectrometric method. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. Jarnefelt H (1952) Plankton als Indikator der Trophiegruppen der Seen. Ann Acad Sci Fenn A IV Biol 18:1–29Google Scholar
  24. Jiang YJ, He W, Liu WX, Qin N, Ouyang HL, Wang QM, Kong XZ, He QS, Yang C, Yang B, Xu FL (2014) The seasonal and spatial variations of phytoplankton community and their correlation with environmental factors in a large eutrophic Chinese lake (Lake Chaohu). Ecol Indic 40:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. John DM, Whitton BA, Brook AJ (2002) The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles: an identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Juggins S (2007) C2 version 15 user guide software for ecological and palaeoecological data analysis and visualisation. Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Komarek J, Komarkova J (2002) Review of the European Microcystis morphospecies (cyanoprokaryotes) from nature. Czech Phycol 2:1–24Google Scholar
  28. Komarek J, Komarkova J (2006) Diversity of Aphanizomenon-like cyanobacteria. Czech Phycol 6:1–32Google Scholar
  29. Komarek J, Zapomelova E (2007) Planktic morphospecies of the cyanobacterial genus Anabaena = subg. Dolichospermum – 1. part: coiled types. Fottea 7:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krammer K (2002) Diatoms of Europe. Cymbella. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., RuggellGoogle Scholar
  31. Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1986) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Bacillariophyceae, Teil 1. Naviculaceae. Gustav Fischer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  32. Kratzer CR, Brezonik PL (1981) A Carlson-type trophic state index for nitrogen in Florida lakes. Water Resour Bull 17:713–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maraşlıoğlu F, Gönülol A (2014) Phytoplankton community, functional classification and trophic state ındices of Yedikır Dam Lake (Amasya). J Biol Environ Sci 8:133–141Google Scholar
  34. Maraslioglu F, Soylu EN (2017) Relationship of epilithic diatom communities to environmental variables in Yedikır Dam Lake (Amasya, Turkey). Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 17:1347–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moreno-Ostos E, Cruz-Pizarro L, Basanta A, George DG (2008) The spatial distribution of different phytoplankton functional groups in a Mediterranean reservoir. Aquat Ecol 42:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morris DP, Lewis WM (1988) Phytoplankton nutrient limitation in Colorado Mountain lakes. Freshw Biol 20:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naselli-Flores L (2013) Morphological analysis of phytoplankton as a tool to assess ecological state of aquatic ecosystems: the case of Lake Arancio, Sicily, Italy. Inland Waters 4:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Negro AI, De Hoyos C (2005) Relationships between diatoms and the environment in Spanish reservoirs. Limnetica 24:133–144Google Scholar
  39. Negro AI, De Hoyos C, Vega JC (2000) Phytoplankton structure and dynamics in Lake Sanabria and Valparaiso reservoir (NW Spain). Hydrobiologia 424:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Padedda BM, Sechi N, Lai GG, Mariani MA, Pulina S, Sarria M, Satta CT, Virdis T, Buscarinu P, Luglie A (2017) Consequences of eutrophication in the management of water resources in Mediterranean reservoirs: a case study of Lake Cedrino (Sardinia, Italy). Glob Ecol Conserv 12:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Padisak J, Borics G, Grigorszky I, Soroczki-Pinter E (2006) Use of phytoplankton assemblages for monitoring ecological status of lakes within the Water Framework Directive: the assemblage index. Hydrobiologia 553:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Padisak J, Crossetti LO, Naselli-Flores L (2009) Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: a critical review with updates. Hydrobiologia 621:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pasztaleniec A, Poniewozik M (2010) Phytoplankton based assessment of the ecological status of four shallow lakes (Eastern Poland) according to Water Framework Directive—a comparison of approaches. Limnologica 40:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patrick R, Reimer CW (1966) The diatoms of the United States, exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii, vol volume I. Monographs of the Academy of National Sciences, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  45. Patrick R, Reimer CW (1975) The diatoms of the United States, exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii, volume II. Part I. Monographs of the Academy of National Sciences, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  46. Reynolds CS (1997) In: Kinne O (ed) Vegetation process in the pelagic: a model for ecosystem theory. Excellence in ecology. ECI, OldendorfGoogle Scholar
  47. Reynolds CS (2006) Ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reynolds CS, Huszar VLM, Kruk C, Nasseli-Flores L, Melo S (2002) Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. J Plankton Res 24:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rolland A, Bertrand F, Maumy M, Jacquet S (2009) Assessing phytoplankton structure and spatio-temporal dynamics in a freshwater ecosystem using a powerful multiway statistical analysis. Water Res 43:3155–3168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salmaso N (2002) Ecological patterns of phytoplankton assemblages in Lake Garda: seasonal spatial and historical features. J Limnol 61:95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salmaso N, Naselli-Flores L, Padisak J (2015) Functional classifications and their application in phytoplankton ecology. Freshw Biol 60:603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schlegel I, Scheffler W (1999) Seasonal development and morphological variability of Cyclotella ocellata (Bacillariophyceae) in the eutrophic Lake Dagow (Germany). Int Rev Hydrobiol 84:469–478Google Scholar
  53. Sevindik TO (2010) Phytoplankton composition of Çaygören Reservoir, Balikesir-Turkey. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 10:295–304Google Scholar
  54. Sevindik TO, Çelik K, Naselli-Flores L (2017) Spatial heterogeneity and seasonal succession of phytoplankton functional groups along the vertical gradient in a mesotrophic reservoir. Ann Limnol Int J Limnol 53:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith VH (1983) Low nitrogen to phosphorus ratios favor dominance by blue- green algae in lake phytoplankton. Science 221:669–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sommer U, Gliwicz ZM, Lampert W, Duncan A (1986) The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Arch Hydrobiol 106:433–471Google Scholar
  57. Soylu EN, Gönülol A (2010) Functional classification and composition of phytoplankton in Liman Lake. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 10:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Soylu EN, Maraşlıoğlu F, Gönülol A (2007) Phytoplankton seasonality of a shallow turbid lake. Algol Stud 123:95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Teneva I, Gecheva G, Cheshmedjiev S, Stoyanov P, Mladenov R, Belkinova D (2014) Ecological status assessment of Skalenski Lakes (Bulgaria). Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 28:82–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Teneva I, Mladenov R, Belkinova D, Dimitrova-Dyulgerova I, Dzhambazov B (2010) Phytoplankton community of the drinking water supply reservoir Borovitsa (South Bulgaria) with an emphasis on cyanotoxins and water quality. Cent Eur J Biol 5:231–239Google Scholar
  61. Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 45). Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  62. Tilman D, Kiesling R, Sterner R, Kilham SS, Johnson FA (1986) Green, blue-green and diatom algae: taxonomic differences in competitive ability for phosphorus, silicon and nitrogen. Arch Hydrobiol 106:473–485Google Scholar
  63. Udovic MG, Zutinic P, Borojevic KK, Plenkovic-Moraj A (2015) Co-occurrence of functional groups in phytoplankton assemblages dominated by diatoms, chrysophytes and dinoflagellates. Fundam Appl Limnol 187:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Utermöhl H (1958) Zur vervollkommnung der quantitativen phytoplankton methodik. Mitt Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol 9:1–38Google Scholar
  65. Varol M (2016) External morphological variations and temporal distribution of the dinoflagellate Ceratium hirundinella in two dam reservoirs in the Tigris River basin (Turkey). Turk J Bot 40:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Varol M, Şen B (2016) New records of Euglenophyceae for Turkish freshwater algae. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 16:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Varol M, Şen B (2018) Abiotic factors controlling the seasonal and spatial patterns of phytoplankton community in the Tigris River, Turkey. River Res Appl 34:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Varol M, Gokot B, Bekleyen A, Şen B (2012) Spatial and temporal variations in surface water quality of the dam reservoirs in the Tigris River basin, Turkey. Catena 92:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Varol M, Blanco S, Alpaslan K, Karakaya G (2018) New records and rare taxa for the freshwater algae of Turkey from the Tatar Dam Reservoir (Elazığ). Turk J Bot 42:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang XL, Lu YL, He GZ, Han JY, Wang TY (2007) Exploration of relationships between phytoplankton biomass and related environmental variables using multivariate statistic analysis in a eutrophic shallow lake: a 5-year study. J Environ Sci 19:920–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang L, Cai Q, Tan L, Kong L (2011) Phytoplankton development and ecological status during a cyanobacterial bloom in a tributary bay of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Sci Total Environ 409:3820–3828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wehr JD, Sheath RG (2003) Freshwater algae of North America. Academic, BostonGoogle Scholar
  73. Wisniewska M, Luscinska M (2012) Long-term changes in the phytoplankton of Lake Charzykowskie. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 41:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Xiao LJ, Wang T, Hu R, Han BP, Wang S, Qian X, Padisak J (2011) Succession of phytoplankton functional groups regulated by monsoonal hydrology in a large canyon-shaped reservoir. Water Res 45:5099–5109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Xu Y, Li AJ, Qin J, Li Q, Ho JG, Li H (2017) Seasonal patterns of water quality and phytoplankton dynamics in surface waters in Guangzhou and Foshan, China. Sci Total Environ 590–591:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang NN, Zang SY (2015) Characteristics of phytoplankton distribution for assessment of water quality in the Zhalong Wetland, China. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3657–3664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zutinic P, Udovic MG, Borojevic KK, Plenkovic-Moraj A, Padisak J (2014) Morpho-functional classifications of phytoplankton assemblages of two deep karstic lakes. Hydrobiologia 740:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of FisheriesMalatya Turgut Özal UniversityMalatyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations