Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 26, pp 27494–27504 | Cite as

Evaporation and concentration of desulfurization wastewater with waste heat from coal-fired power plants

  • Hao Zheng
  • Chenghang ZhengEmail author
  • Xiang Li
  • Shiguo Xu
  • Shaojun Liu
  • Youngxin Zhang
  • Weiguo Weng
  • Xiang Gao
Research Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

The reduction of wet desulfurization wastewater is one of the important tasks of coal-fired power plants, and it is important for achieving “zero emissions.” Evaporation and concentration (E&C) with waste heat is an effective way to reduce wastewater. Here, two typical types of industrial desulfurization wastewater are used to study the change rule of pH and total dissolved solids during wastewater concentration in a circulating evaporation tower. The results indicate that with the increase of concentration ratio, the pH of desulfurization wastewater is decreased rapidly and then is gradually stabilized at 2–3 when SO2 or SO3 is contained in flue gas, and the increase in conductivity is less for wastewater with higher SO42− content. The characteristics of various ions are also analyzed, and the composition and microscopic morphology of the precipitates are characterized during concentration. The growth pattern of Ca2+ concentration is dependent on the ratio of Ca2+ and SO42− in raw wastewater. When the concentration ratio is 7.21, the insoluble and slightly soluble substances undergo precipitation and the solid content is approximately 20%, which can help realize the concentration and reduction of desulfurization wastewater.

Keywords

WFGD Desulfurization wastewater Ion characteristic Precipitate composition 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1609212, 51621005)

References

  1. Belloulid MO, Hamdi H, Mandi L, Ouazzani N (2017) Solar drying of wastewater sludge: a case study in Marrakesh. Morocco Environmental Technology:1. ProcessesGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogacki J, Marcinowski P, Majewski M, Zawadzki J, Sivakumar S (2018) Alternative approach to current EU BAT recommendation for coal-fired power plant flue gas desulfurization wastewater treatment. Processes 6:229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng CM, Hack P, Chu P, Chang YN, Lin TY, Ko CS, Chiang PH, He CC, Lai YM, Pan WP (2009) Partitioning of mercury, arsenic, selenium, boron, and chloride in a full-scale coal combustion process equipped with selective catalytic reduction, electrostatic precipitation, and flue gas desulfurization systems†. Energy Fuel 23:4805–4816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conidi C, Macedonio F, Ali A, Cassano A, Criscuoli A, Argurio P, Drioli E (2018a) Treatment of flue gas desulfurization wastewater by an integrated membrane-based process for approaching zero liquid discharge. Membranes 8:117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conidi C, Macedonio F, Argurio P, Cassano A, Drioli E (2018b) Performance of reverse osmosis membranes in the treatment of flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewaters. Environments 5:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ericsson B, Hallmans B (1996) Treatment of saline wastewater for zero discharge at the Debiensko coal mines in Poland. Desalination 105:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gingerich DB, Grol EJ, Mauter MS (2018) Fundamental challenges and engineering opportunities in flue gas desulfurization wastewater treatment at coal-fired power plants. Environmental Science Water Research & Technology 4:909–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gostomczyk MA, Grochulska-Segal EM, Sozanski MM (1991) Disposal of wastewater from flue gas desulphurization (FGD). Iwa Publishing. 24(7):207–215Google Scholar
  9. Hu B, Yi Y, Yang C, Zhang L, Yang L (2016) Improving the electrostatic precipitation removal efficiency by desulfurized wastewater evaporation. RSC Adv 6Google Scholar
  10. Huang Y, Chen Y, Guo X, Zheng CG (2017) Experimental study on the stability of the ClHgSO3 − in desulfurization wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jia F, Wang J (2017) Treatment of flue gas desulfurization wastewater with near-zero liquid discharge by nanofiltration-membrane distillation process. Sep Sci Technol 53Google Scholar
  12. Li Y, Chang J, Dong Y, Huan Q, Ma C (2016a) Policy and case study on heat and power cogeneration and industrial centralized heat supply in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 121:S092134491630091XGoogle Scholar
  13. Li Y, Min Y, Zhang L, Chen G, Lin C, Song Z, Chang J, Ma C (2016b) Method of flash evaporation and condensation – heat pump for deep cooling of coal-fired power plant flue gas: Latent heat and water recovery. Appl Energy 172:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin C, Lin LI, Hong-Liang MA, Zhang JM, Yong D, Chun-Yuan MA (2011) Analysis of the scale characteristics in salt sludge wet FGD system. J China Coal Soc 36:1554–1558Google Scholar
  15. Lin C, Yue L, Yuzhou T, Yifei S, Qingsong W, Xueliang Y, Jon K (2018) Integrated assessment of the environmental and economic effects of an ultra-clean flue gas treatment process in coal-fired power plant. J Clean Prod 199:359–368Google Scholar
  16. Ma S, Chai J, Chen G, Yu W, Zhu S (2016) Research on desulfurization wastewater evaporation: present and future perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:1143–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pakzadeh B (2016) Comparing biological process and evaporation for flue gas desulfurization wastewater treatment. Proc Water Environ Fed 2016:3985–4005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schantz AB, Xiong B, Dees E, Moore DR, Yang X, Kumar M (2018) Emerging investigators series: prospects and challenges for high-pressure reverse osmosis in minimizing concentrated waste streams. Environ Sci-Wat Res Technol 4:894–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Senior CL, Tyree CA, Meeks ND, Acharya C, Mccain JD, Cushing KM (2015) Selenium partitioning and removal across a wet FGD Scrubber at a coal-fired power plant. Environ Sci Technol 49:14376–14382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shi Y, Wang X (2015) Research progress in the wastewater treatment of wet flue gas desulfurization. Industrial Water Treatment. 12Google Scholar
  21. Stein J, Kind M, Schlünder EU (2002) The influence of HCl on SO2 absorption in the spray dry scrubbing process. Chem Eng J 86:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tanaka Y (2003) Mass transport and energy consumption in ion-exchange membrane electrodialysis of seawater. J Membr Sci 215:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tanaka Y (2006) Irreversible thermodynamics and overall mass transport in ion-exchange membrane electrodialysis. J Membr Sci 281:517–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang C, Zhang Y, Shi Y, Liu H, Zou C, Wu H, Kang X (2017a) Research on collaborative control of Hg, As, Pb and Cr by electrostatic-fabric-integrated precipitator and wet flue gas desulphurization in coal-fired power plants. Fuel 210:527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang L, Zheng C, Zhang Y, Yue T, Weng W, Zhao H, Zhou J, Gao X (2017b) Speciation characteristics and mobility of trace elements across ultralow emission air pollution control devices. Energy Fuel 31:13963–13971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yan D, Li Y, Zhang L, Lin C, Bo Z (2017) Novel method of ultralow SO2 emission for CFB boilers: combination of limestone injection and activated carbon adsorption. Energy Fuel 31:acs.energyfuels.7b01895Google Scholar
  27. Yang Z, Zheng C, Liu S, Guo Y, Liang C, Wang Y, Hu D, Gao X (2018a) A combined wet electrostatic precipitator for efficiently eliminating fine particle penetration. Fuel Process Technol 180:122–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang Z, Zheng C, Zhang X, Zhou H, Silva AA, C (Tommy) L, Snyder B, Wang Y, Gao X (2018b) Challenge of SO3 removal by wet electrostatic precipitator under simulated flue gas with high SO3 concentration. Fuel 217:597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yılmaz İH, Söylemez MS (2012) Design and computer simulation on multi-effect evaporation seawater desalination system using hybrid renewable energy sources in Turkey. Desalination 291:23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao S, Duan Y, Lei C, Li Y, Yao T, Shuai L, Meng L, Lu J (2017) Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury. Environ Pollut 229:863–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zheng C, Zheng H, Yang Z, Liu S, Li X, Zhang Y, Weng W, Gao X (2019) Experimental study on the evaporation and chlorine migration of desulfurization wastewater in flue gas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:4791–4800CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao Zheng
    • 1
  • Chenghang Zheng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiang Li
    • 1
  • Shiguo Xu
    • 2
  • Shaojun Liu
    • 1
  • Youngxin Zhang
    • 1
  • Weiguo Weng
    • 1
  • Xiang Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, National Environmental Protection Coal-fired Air Pollution Control Engineering Technology CenterZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Zhongyou Ruisi Technology Development Co., LtdTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations