Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 18, pp 18777–18789 | Cite as

Cost-effectiveness of boron (B) removal from irrigation water: an economic water treatment model (EWTM) for farmers to prevent boron toxicity

  • Onur Can TürkerEmail author
  • Anıl Yakar
  • Cengiz Türe
  • Çağdaş Saz
Research Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Protection of water sources which are used for irrigation has raised great interest in the last years among the environmental strategists due to potential water scarcity worldwide. Excessive boron (B) in irrigation water poses crucial environmental problems in the agricultural zones and it leads to toxicity symptoms in crops, as well as human beings. In the present research, economic water treatment models consist of dried common wetland plants (Lemna gibba, Phragmites australis, and Typha latifolia) and Lemna gibba accumulation was tested and assessed to create a simple, cost-effective, and eco-friendly method for B removal from irrigation water. Significant amount of B was removed from irrigation water samples by EWTMs and B concentrations decreased below < 1 mg L−1 when the components were exposed to 4 and 8 mg L−1 initial B concentrations. Moreover, the results from batch adsorption study demonstrated that dried L. gibba had a higher B loading capacity compare to other dried plants, and B sorption capacity of dried L. gibba was found as 2.23 mg/g. The optimum pH value for sorption modules was found as neutral pH (pH = 7) in the batch adsorption experiment. Boron sorption from irrigation water samples fitted the Langmuir model, mostly B removed from irrigation water during the first 2 h of contact time. Techno-economic analysis indicated that EWTM is a promising method that appears to be both economically and ecologically feasible, and it can also provide a sustainable and practical strategy for farmers to prevent B toxicity in their agricultural zones.

Keywords

Irrigation water Boron removal Dried plants Sorption Lemna gibba 

Notes

References

  1. Abourached C, English MJ, Liu H (2016) Wastewater treatment by microbial fuel cell (MFC) prior irrigation water reuse. J Clean Prod 137:144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al. Haddabi M, Ahmed M, Al Jebri Z, Vuthaluru H, Znad H, Al Kindi M (2016) Boron removal from seawater using date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) seed ash. Desalin Water Treat 57:5130–5137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA A (1998) WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19Google Scholar
  4. Association APH, Association AWW, Federation WPC, Federation WE (1915) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 2. American Public Health AssociationGoogle Scholar
  5. Bursalı EA, Seki Y, Seyhan S, Delener M, Yurdakoç M (2011) Synthesis of chitosan beads as boron sorbents. J Appl Polym Sci 122:657–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curtis TP (2010) Low-energy wastewater treatment: strategies and technologies. Environ Microbiol 2Google Scholar
  7. Demey H, Vincent T, Ruiz M, Nogueras M, Sastre A, Guibal E (2014) Boron recovery from seawater with a new low-cost adsorbent material. Chem Eng J 254:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolan FC, Cath TY, Hogue TS (2018) Assessing the feasibility of using produced water for irrigation in Colorado. Sci Total Environ 640:619–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gazi M, Shahmohammadi S (2012) Removal of trace boron from aqueous solution using iminobis-(propylene glycol) modified chitosan beads. React Funct Polym 72:680–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gür N, Türker OC, Böcük H (2016) Toxicity assessment of boron (B) by Lemna minor L. and Lemna gibba L. and their possible use as model plants for ecological risk assessment of aquatic ecosystems with boron pollution. Chemosphere 157:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haghverdi A, Yonts CD, Reichert DL, Irmak S (2017) Impact of irrigation, surface residue cover and plant population on sugarbeet growth and yield, irrigation water use efficiency and soil water dynamics. Agric Water Manag 180:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasenmueller EA, Criss RE (2013) Multiple sources of boron in urban surface waters and groundwaters. Sci Total Environ 447:235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilal N, Kim G, Somerfield C (2011) Boron removal from saline water: a comprehensive review. Desalination 273:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karahan S, Yurdakoç M, Seki Y, Yurdakoç K (2006) Removal of boron from aqueous solution by clays and modified clays. J Colloid Interface Sci 293:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kavak D (2011) Boron adsorption by clinoptilolite using factorial design. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 30:527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kehal M, Reinert L, Duclaux L (2010) Characterization and boron adsorption capacity of vermiculite modified by thermal shock or H2O2 reaction and/or sonication. Appl Clay Sci 48:561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kluczka J, Ciba J, Trojanowska J, Zolotajkin M, Turek M, Dydo P (2007) Removal of boron dissolved in water. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 26:71–77Google Scholar
  18. Kluczka J, Korolewicz T, Zołotajkin M, Simka W, Raczek M (2013) A new adsorbent for boron removal from aqueous solutions. Environ Technol 34:1369–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Köse TE, Demiral H, Öztürk N (2011) Adsorption of boron from aqueous solutions using activated carbon prepared from olive bagasse. Desalin Water Treat 29:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li H, Yang X, Chen H, Cui Q, Yuan G, Han X, Wei C, Zhang Y, Ma J, Zhang X (2018) Water requirement characteristics and the optimal irrigation schedule for the growth, yield, and fruit quality of watermelon under plastic film mulching. Sci Hortic 241:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Man HC, Chin WH, Zadeh MR, Yusof MRM (2012) Adsorption potential of unmodified rice husk for boron removal. BioResources 7:3810–3822Google Scholar
  22. Marín CMD-C, Oron G (2007) Boron removal by the duckweed Lemna gibba: a potential method for the remediation of boron-polluted waters. Water Res 41:4579–4584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Masindi V, Gitari MW, Tutu H, Debeer M (2016) Removal of boron from aqueous solution using magnesite and bentonite clay composite. Desalin Water Treat 57:8754–8764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miretzky P, Saralegui A, Cirelli AF (2006) Simultaneous heavy metal removal mechanism by dead macrophytes. Chemosphere 62:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Musvoto C, de Lange W (2019) A framework for selecting crops for irrigation using mining contaminated water: an example from the Olifants basin of South Africa. J Environ Manag 231:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oladipo AA, Gazi M (2014) Fixed-bed column sorption of borate onto pomegranate seed powder-PVA beads: a response surface methodology approach. Toxicol Environ Chem 96:837–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Öztürk N, Kavak D (2004) Boron removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on waste sepiolite and activated waste sepiolite using full factorial design. Adsorption 10:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reid R (2010) Can we really increase yields by making crop plants tolerant to boron toxicity? Plant Sci 178:9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruiz M, Roset L, Demey H, Castro S, Sastre A, Pérez J (2013a) Equilibrium and dynamic studies for adsorption of boron on calcium alginate gel beads using principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS). Mater Werkst 44:410–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruiz M, Tobalina C, Demey-Cedeño H, Barron-Zambrano JA, Sastre A (2013b) Sorption of boron on calcium alginate gel beads. React Funct Polym 73:653–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sasmaz A, Obek E (2009) The accumulation of arsenic, uranium, and boron in Lemna gibba L. exposed to secondary effluents. Ecol Eng 35:1564–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schoderboeck L, Mühlegger S, Losert A, Gausterer C, Hornek R (2011) Effects assessment: boron compounds in the aquatic environment. Chemosphere 82:483–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Surendran U, Sandeep O, Joseph E (2016) The impacts of magnetic treatment of irrigation water on plant, water and soil characteristics. Agric Water Manag 178:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tatar ŞY, Öbek E (2014) Potential of Lemna gibba L. and Lemna minor L. for accumulation of boron from secondary effluents. Ecol Eng 70:332–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tu KL, Nghiem LD, Chivas AR (2010) Boron removal by reverse osmosis membranes in seawater desalination applications. Sep Purif Technol 75:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Türker OC (2018) Simultaneous boron (B) removal and electricity generation from domestic wastewater using duckweed-based wastewater treatment reactors coupled with microbial fuel cell. J Environ Manag 228:20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Türker OC, Baran T (2017) Evaluation and application of an innovative method based on various chitosan composites and Lemna gibba for boron removal from drinking water. Carbohydr Polym 166:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Türker OC, Baran T (2018) A combination method based on chitosan adsorption and duckweed (Lemna gibba L.) phytoremediation for boron (B) removal from drinking water. Int J Phytoremediation 20:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Türker OC, Vymazal J, Türe C (2014) Constructed wetlands for boron removal: a review. Ecol Eng 64:350–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wei Y-T, Zheng Y-M, Chen JP (2011) Design and fabrication of an innovative and environmental friendly adsorbent for boron removal. Water Res 45:2297–2305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolska J, Bryjak M (2013) Methods for boron removal from aqueous solutions—a review. Desalination 310:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu M, Bai X, Pei L, Pan H (2016) A research on application of water treatment technology for reclaimed water irrigation. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:15930–15937CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Onur Can Türker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anıl Yakar
    • 2
  • Cengiz Türe
    • 2
  • Çağdaş Saz
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Science and Letters, Department of BiologyAksaray UniversityAksarayTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Science, Department of BiologyEskişehir Technical UniversityEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations