Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 19, pp 19729–19737 | Cite as

Application of MgO-modified palygorskite for nutrient recovery from swine wastewater: effect of pH, ions, and organic acids

  • Hao Wang
  • Xuejiang WangEmail author
  • Jianfu Zhao
Research Article
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, MgO-modified palygorskite (MgO-PAL) was used for simultaneous recovery of ammonia nitrogen (AN) and phosphate, and the effects of pH, ions, and organic acids on nutrient recovery were investigated. The highest removal amount of AN and phosphate separately reached 42.6 mg/g and 69.8 mg/g at pH of 9.0, 0.6 g/L dosage of modified palygorskite, and 180 min of the reaction time. MgO-PAL provided a wide range of pH (3–9) for nutrient removal. Mg released concentration was tested to investigate the removal mechanisms. The individual presence of four cations (K+, Ca2+, Na+, and Mg2+) showed negative effect on AN removal at different mass concentrations. However, those cations, except Na+, exhibited positive influence on phosphate removal. Compared with SO42−, CO32−showed more negative effect on nutrient removal due to the reaction between Mg2+ and CO32−. The results showed that the nutrient removal amount and the morphology and composition of collected products were not affected in the presence of acetic acid. Citric acid, humic acid, and fulvic acid displayed the inhibition effects on the morphology of the crystallized products.

Keywords

Palygorskite Struvite MgO pH Ions Organic acids 

Notes

Funding information

The authors wish to acknowledge the supporting of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571301, No. 21777120, and No. 51678421).

Supplementary material

11356_2019_5254_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.2 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1.22 mb)

References

  1. Antonini S, Arias MA, Eichert T, Clemens J (2012) Greenhouse evaluation and environmental impact assessment of different urine-derived struvite fertilizers as phosphorus sources for plants. Chemosphere 89:1202–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Darwish M, Aris A, Puteh MH, Jusoh MNH, Abdul Kadir A (2017) Waste bones ash as an alternative source of P for struvite precipitation. J Environ Manage 203:861–866Google Scholar
  3. Di Iaconi C, Pagano M, Ramadori R, Lopez A (2010) Nitrogen recovery from a stabilized municipal landfill leachate. Bioresour Technol 101:1732–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doyle JD, Parsons SA (2002) Struvite formation, control and recovery. Water Res 36:3925–3940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrari S, Silva M, Guarino M, Berckmans D (2008) Analysis of cough sounds for diagnosis of respiratory infections in intensive pig farming. Trans ASABE 51:1051–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guggenheim S, Krekeler MPS (2011) Chapter 1 - The structures and microtextures of the palygorskite–sepiolite group minerals. In: Emilio G, Arieh S (eds) Developments in Clay Science. Elsevier, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  7. Huang HM, Xu CL, Zhang W (2011) Removal of nutrients from piggery wastewater using struvite precipitation and pyrogenation technology. Bioresour Technol 102:2523–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang H, Xiao D, Zhang Q, Ding L (2014a) Removal of ammonia from landfill leachate by struvite precipitation with the use of low-cost phosphate and magnesium sources. J Environ Manag 145:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang HM, Xiao D, Pang R, Han CC, Ding L (2014b) Simultaneous removal of nutrients from simulated swine wastewater by adsorption of modified zeolite combined with struvite crystallization. Chem Eng J 256:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krahenbuhl M, Etter B, Udert KM (2016) Pretreated magnesite as a source of low-cost magnesium for producing struvite from urine in Nepal. Sci Total Environ 542:1155–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lei LC, Li XJ, Zhang XW (2008) Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions using microwave-treated natural Chinese zeolite. Sep Purif Technol 58:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu Y, Kwag JH, Kim JH, Ra C (2011) Recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus by struvite crystallization from swine wastewater. Desalination 277:364–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakakubo T, Tokai A, Ohno K (2012) Comparative assessment of technological systems for recycling sludge and food waste aimed at greenhouse gas emissions reduction and phosphorus recovery. J Clean Prod 32:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Romero-Guiza MS, Astals S, Chimenos JM, Martinez M, Mata-Alvarez J (2014) Improving anaerobic digestion of pig manure by adding in the same reactor a stabilizing agent formulated with low-grade magnesium oxide. Biomass and Bioenergy 67:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruiz-Hitzky E, Aranda P, Álvarez A, Santarén J, Esteban-Cubillo A (2011) Chapter 17 - Advanced materials and new applications of sepiolite and palygorskite. In: Emilio G, Arieh S (eds) Developments in Clay Science. Elsevier, p 393–452Google Scholar
  16. Ryu HD, Lim CS, Kim YK, Kim KY, Lee SI (2012) Recovery of struvite obtained from semiconductor wastewater and reuse as a slow-release fertilizer. Environ Eng Sci 29:540–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seckler MM, Bruinsma OSL, Van Rosmalen GM (1996) Calcium phosphate precipitation in a fluidized bed in relation to process conditions: a black box approach. Water Res 30:1677–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shih Y-J, Abarca RRM, de Luna MDG, Huang Y-H, Lu M-C (2017) Recovery of phosphorus from synthetic wastewaters by struvite crystallization in a fluidized-bed reactor: effects of pH, phosphate concentration and coexisting ions. Chemosphere 173:466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shuali U, Nir S, Rytwo G (2011) Chapter 15 - Adsorption of surfactants, dyes and cationic herbicides on sepiolite and palygorskite: modifications, applications and modelling. In: Emilio G, Arieh S (eds) Developments in Clay Science. Elsevier, p 351–374Google Scholar
  20. Song YH, Hahn HH, Hoffmann E, Weidler PG (2006) Effect of humic substances on the precipitation of calcium phosphate. J Environ Sci 18:852–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Song Y, Yuan P, Zheng B, Peng J, Yuan F, Gao Y (2007a) Nutrients removal and recovery by crystallization of magnesium ammonium phosphate from synthetic swine wastewater. Chemosphere 69:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Song YH, Donnert D, Berg U, Weidler PG, Nueesch R (2007b) Seed selections for crystallization of calcium phosphate for phosphorus recovery. J Environ Sci 19:591–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Song YH, Dai YR, Hu Q, Yu XH, Qian F (2014) Effects of three kinds of organic acids on phosphorus recovery by magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP) crystallization from synthetic swine wastewater. Chemosphere 101:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Song WL, Li ZP, Liu F, Ding Y, Qi PS, You H, Jin C (2018) Effective removal of ammonia nitrogen from waste seawater using crystal seed enhanced struvite precipitation technology with response surface methodology for process optimization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:628–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stolzenburg P, Capdevielle A, Teychene S, Biscans B (2015) Struvite precipitation with MgO as a precursor: application to wastewater treatment. Chem Eng Sci 133:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Su C-C, Dulfo LD, Dalida MLP, Lu M-C (2014) Magnesium phosphate crystallization in a fluidized-bed reactor: effects of pH, Mg:P molar ratio and seed. Sep Purif Technol 125:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun Z, Qu X, Wang G, Zheng S, Frost RL (2015) Removal characteristics of ammonium nitrogen from wastewater by modified Ca-bentonites. Appl Clay Sci 107:46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taddeo R, Kolppo K, Lepistö R (2016) Sustainable nutrients recovery and recycling by optimizing the chemical addition sequence for struvite precipitation from raw swine slurries. J Environ Manag 180:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uludag-Demirer S, Demirer GN, Frear C, Chen S (2008) Anaerobic digestion of dairy manure with enhanced ammonia removal. J Environ Manag 86:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Der Houwen JAM, Valsami-Jones E (2001) The application of calcium phosphate precipitation chemistry to phosphorus recovery: the influence of organic ligands. Environ Technol 22:1325–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Venkatesha TG, Nayaka YA, Chethana BK (2013) Adsorption of Ponceau S from aqueous solution by MgO nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 276:620–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang H, Wang X, Xia P, Song J, Ma R, Jing H, Zhang Z, Cheng X, Zhao J (2017) Eco-friendly synthesis of self-existed magnesium oxide supported nanorod-like palygorskite for enhanced and simultaneous recovery of nutrients from simulated wastewater through adsorption and in-situ struvite formation. Appl Clay Sci 135:418–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weast RC (1990) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilsenach JA, Schuurbiers CAH, van Loosdrecht MCM (2007) Phosphate and potassium recovery from source separated urine through struvite precipitation. Water Res 41:458–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yin HB, Kong M (2014) Simultaneous removal of ammonium and phosphate from eutrophic waters using natural calcium-rich attapulgite-based versatile adsorbent. Desalination 351:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu RT, Ren HQ, Wang YR, Ding LL, Geng JJ, Xu K, Zhang Y (2013) A kinetic study of struvite precipitation recycling technology with NaOH/Mg(OH)(2) addition. Bioresour Technol 143:519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu RT, Ren HQ, Wu JC, Zhang XX (2017) A novel treatment processes of struvite with pretreated magnesite as a source of low-cost magnesium. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:22204–22213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou H, Murray HH (2011) Chapter 10 - Overview of Chinese palygorskite clay resources—their geology, mineralogy, depositional environment, applications and processing. In: Emilio G, Arieh S (eds) Developments in Clay Science. Elsevier, p 239–263Google Scholar
  39. Zhou Z, Hu L, Ren WC, Zhao YZ, Jiang LM, Wang LC (2015) Effect of humic substances on phosphorus removal by struvite precipitation. Chemosphere 141:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangdong Guangye Environmental Protection Industry Group Company LimitedGuangye Institute of Environmental Engineering TechnologyGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations