Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 19, pp 19795–19803 | Cite as

Derivation of the predicted no-effect concentration for organophosphate esters and the associated ecological risk in surface water in China

  • Liqun Xing
  • Lichao Wang
  • Bin Xu
  • Aimin LiEmail author
Research Article
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Organophosphate esters (OPEs), as re-emerging contaminants considered to be a potential health concern, are ubiquitous in the environment and have been widely investigated. However, little is known on the safe OPE concentrations in the water quality criteria for the protection of the aquatic environment, which is an indispensable part of environmental management. In the present study, aquatic acute and chronic predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) of six frequently detected OPEs were derived from the hazardous concentrations for 5% of species (HC5s), respectively. The acute PNECs for the selected OPEs ranged from 17.70 to 3562 μg/L, while the chronic PNECs ranged from 4.6 × 10−4 to 61.85 μg/L. Among these OPEs, tricresyl phosphate (TCrP) exhibited the lowest acute PNEC, while tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP) presented chronic PNEC, which indicated that it has a higher toxicity effect on the aquatic environment. Furthermore, the aquatic ecological risks of individual OPEs (except for TDCPP) were deemed to be relatively low in Chinese surface water; however, the aquatic ecological risks of TDCPP and ΣOPEs indicated that they have potential adverse effects and should be considered as a potential health concern. The probability of 5% of aquatic organisms being affected by ΣOPEs was in the range of 0.21 to 17.39% based on the joint probability curve method.

Keywords

Organophosphate esters PNEC Species sensitivity distribution Joint probability 

Notes

Funding information

This work was funded by the National Major Project of Science & Technology Ministry of China (No. 2017ZX07602-004).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_5236_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1448 kb)

References

  1. Ahlers J, Riedhammer C, Vogliano M, Ebert RU, Kuhne R, Schuurmann G (2006) Acute to chronic ratios in aquatic toxicity-variation across trophic levels and relationship with chemical structure. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:2937–2945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altenburger R, Backhaus T, Boedeker W, Faust M, Scholze M, Grimme LH (2010) Predictability of the toxicity of multiple chemical mixtures to Vibrio fischeri: mixtures composed of similarly acting chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2341–2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CCME (2007) A protocol for the derivation of water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, ManitobaGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Yu S, Tang S, Li Y, Liu H, Zhang X, Su G, Li B, Yu H, Giesy JP (2016) Site-specific water quality criteria for aquatic ecosystems: a case study of pentachlorophenol for Tai Lake, China. Sci Total Environ 541:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cristale J, Garcia Vazquez A, Barata C, Lacorte S (2013) Priority and emerging flame retardants in rivers: occurrence in water and sediment, Daphnia magna toxicity and risk assessment. Environ Int 59:232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding J, Shen X, Liu W, Covaci A, Yang F (2015) Occurrence and risk assessment of organophosphate esters in drinking water from eastern China. Sci Total Environ 538:959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duran I, Beiras R (2013) Ecotoxicologically based marine acute water quality criteria for metals intended for protection of coastal areas. Sci Total Environ 463:446–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EC (European Commission) (2011) Technical guidance for deriving environmental quality standards, guidance document no. 27, common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC), Technical Report-2011-055Google Scholar
  9. Hose GC, Van Den Brink PJ (2004) Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 47:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang QS, Bu QW, Zhong WJ, Shi KC, Cao ZG, Yu G (2018) Derivation of aquatic predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) for ibuprofen and sulfamethoxazole based on various toxicity endpoints and the associated risks. Chemosphere 193:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li J, Yu N, Zhang B, Jin L, Li M, Hu M, Zhang X, Wei S, Yu H (2014) Occurrence of organophosphate flame retardants in drinking water from China. Water Res 54:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li J, Tang J, Mi W, Tian C, Emeis KC, Ebinghaus R et al (2017) Spatial distribution and seasonal variation of organophosphate esters in air above the Bohai and yellow seas. China Environ Sci Technol 52:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li W, Shi Y, Gao L, Wu C, Liu J, Cai Y (2018) Occurrence, distribution and risk of organophosphate esters in urban road dust in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 241:566–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liang K, Liu J (2016) Understanding the distribution, degradation and fate of organophosphate esters in an advanced municipal sewage treatment plant based on mass flow and mass balance analysis. Sci Total Environ 544:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liang K, Shi F, Liu J (2018) Occurrence and distribution of oligomeric organophosphorus flame retardants in different treatment stages of a sewage treatment plant. Environ Pollut 232:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu YH, Song NH, Guo RX, Xu HZ, Zhang Q, Han ZH et al (2018) Occurrence and partitioning behavior of organophosphate esters in surface water and sediment of a shallow Chinese freshwater Lake (Taihu Lake): implication for eco-toxicity risk. Chemosphere 202:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maltby L, Blake N, Brock TCM, Brink PJVD (2005) Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niu ZG, Du L, li JF, Zhang Y, Lv ZW (2018) Ecological risk assessment of microcystin-LR in the upstream section of the Haihe River based on a species sensitivity distribution model. Chemosphere 193:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peng Y, Fang W, Krauss M, Brack W, Wang Z, Li F, Zhang X (2018) Screening hundreds of emerging organic pollutants (EOPs) in surface water from the Yangtze River Delta (YRD): occurrence, distribution, ecological risk. Environ Pollut 241:484–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ren X, Cao L, Yang Y, Wan B, Wang S, Guo L (2016) In vitro assessment of thyroid hormone receptor activity of four organophosphate esters. J Environ Sci 45:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salamova A, Hermanson MH, Hites RA (2014) Organophosphate and halogenated flame retardants in atmospheric particles from a European Arctic site. Environ Sci Technol 48:6133–6140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shi Y, Gao L, Li W, Wang Y, Liu J, Cai Y (2016) Occurrence, distribution and seasonal variation of organophosphate flame retardants and plasticizers in urban surface water in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 209:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solomon K, Giesy J, Jones P, Katan J, Aharonson N, Cohen E et al (2000) Probabilistic risk assessment of agrochemicals in the environment. Crop Prot 19:649–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Traas, T.P., Bruijn, J.H.M.D. (2001) Guidance document on deriving environmental risk limits. RIVM report 601501012/2001Google Scholar
  25. van der Veen I, de Boer J (2012) Phosphorus flame retardants: properties, production, environmental occurrence, toxicity and analysis. Chemosphere 88:1119–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Verbruggen, E.M.J., Rila, J.P., Traas, T.P., Posthuma-Doodeman, C.J.A.M., Posthumus, R. (2005) Environmental risk limits for several phosphate esters, with possible application as flame retardant. RIVM report 601501024/2005Google Scholar
  27. Wang XW, Liu JF, Yin YG (2011) Development of an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for high throughput determination of organophosphorus flame retardants in environmental water. J Chromatogr A 1218:6705–6711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang S, Wan B, Zhang L, Yang Y, Guo L-H (2014) In vitro inhibition of lysine decarboxylase activity by organophosphate esters. Biochem Pharmacol 92:506–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang RM, Tang JH, Xie ZY, Mi WY, Chen YJ, Wolschke H et al (2015) Occurrence and spatial distribution of organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticizers in 40 rivers draining into the Bohai Sea, North China. Environ Pollut 198:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang G, Shi H, Du Z, Chen H, Peng J, Gao S (2017) Bioaccumulation mechanism of organophosphate esters in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ Pollut 229:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wei GL, Li DQ, Zhuo MN, Liao YS, Xie ZY, Guo TL, Li JJ, Zhang SY, Liang ZQ (2015) Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers: sources, occurrence, toxicity and human exposure. Environ Pollut 196:29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wheeler JR, Grist EPM, Leung KMY, Morritt D, Crane M (2002) Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice. Mar Pollut Bull 45:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xing LQ, Liu HL, Giesy JP, Yu HX (2012a) pH-dependent aquatic criteria for 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol. Sci Total Environ 441:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xing LQ, Liu HL, Giesy JP, Zhang XW, Yu HX (2012b) Probabilistic ecological risk assessment for three chlorophenols in surface waters of China. J Environ Sci 24:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xing LQ, Liu HL, Zhang XW, Hecker M, Giesy JP, Yu HX (2014) A comparison of statistical methods for deriving freshwater quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xing L, Zhang Q, Sun X, Zhu H, Zhang S, Xu H (2018) Occurrence, distribution and risk assessment of organophosphate esters in surface water and sediment from a shallow freshwater Lake, China. Sci Total Environ 636:632–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu FL, Kong XZ, Qin N, He W, Liu WX (2014) Chapter 4-eco-risk assessments for toxic contaminants based on species sensitivity distribution models in Lake Chaohu, China. Develop. Environ. Model, vol 26, pp 75–111Google Scholar
  38. Zeng X, Wu Y, Liu Z, Gao S, Yu Z (2018) Occurrence and distribution of organophosphate ester flame retardants in indoor dust and their potential health exposure risk. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zha DP, Li Y, Yang CM, Yao C (2018) Assessment of organophosphate flame retardants in surface water and sediment from a freshwater environment (Yangtze River, China). Environ Monit Assess 190:222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao JS, Chen BY (2016) Species sensitivity distribution for chlorpyrifos to aquatic organisms: model choice and sample size. Ecotox Environ Safe 125:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao WX, Wang B, Wang YJ, Deng SB, Huang J, Yu G (2017) Deriving acute and chronic predicted no effect concentrations of pharmaceuticals and personal care products based on species sensitivity distributions. Ecotox Environ Safe 144:537–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhong M, Wu H, Mi W, Li F, Ji C, Ebinghaus R, Tang J, Xie Z (2018) Occurrences and distribution characteristics of organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticizers in the sediments of the Bohai and Yellow Seas, China. Sci Total Environ 615:1305–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the EnvironmentNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Nanjing University & Yancheng Academy of Environmental Protection Technology and EngineeringYanchengChina
  3. 3.Nanjing Institute of Environmental SciencesMinistry of Environmental ProtectionNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations