Effectiveness of China’s protected areas in reducing deforestation
Protected areas (PAs) are considered a cornerstone of biodiversity conservation, and the number and extent of PAs are expanding rapidly worldwide. While designating more land as PAs is important, concerns about the degree to which existing PAs are effective in meeting conservation goals are growing. Unfortunately, conservation effectiveness of PAs and its underlying determinants are often unclear across large spatial scales. Using PAs in China as an example, we evaluated the effectiveness of 472 PAs established before 2000 in reducing deforestation between 2000 and 2015. Our results show that the majority (71%) of the PAs were effective in reducing deforestation. Without their establishment, deforestation within the PAs would have increased by about 50% (581 km2), with about 1271 megaton of carbon per year not being sequestered. We also found some attributes of PAs, including surrounding deforestation level, roughness of terrain, and travel time to the nearest city, are significantly related to their effectiveness in reducing deforestation. Our findings highlight the need of systematically evaluating the effectiveness of PAs and incorporating this effectiveness into conservation planning and management to more fully realize the goals of PAs not only in China but also around the world.
KeywordsEcological performance Nature reserves Deforestation Carbon Conservation planning
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
This study was funded by the US National Science Foundation (# 130313), Michigan AgBioResearch, Environmental Science and Policy Program at Michigan State University and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#41571517).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Boori M, Voženílek V, Burian J (2014) Land cover disturbance due to tourism in Czech Republic. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Innovations in Bio-Inspired Computing and Applications IBICA 2014. Springer, pp 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2014.12.002
- Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque JF, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Morcillo MH, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vie JC, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y (2015) Catalogue of life China: 2015 annual checklist. Science Press, Beijing. http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2015/ Google Scholar
- Geldmann J, Coad L, Barnes M, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Knights K, Leverington F, Cuadros IC, Zamora C, Woodley S, Burgess ND (2015) Changes in protected area management effectiveness over time: a global analysis. Biol Conserv 191:692–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, Kommareddy A, Egorov A, Chini L, Justice CO, Townshend JRG (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342:850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hengl T, Mendes de Jesus J, Heuvelink GBM, Ruiperez Gonzalez M, Kilibarda M, Blagotić A, Shangguan W, Wright MN, Geng X, Bauer-Marschallinger B, Guevara MA, Vargas R, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Leenaars JGB, Ribeiro E, Wheeler I, Mantel S, Kempen B (2017) SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS One 12:e0169748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hockings M (2006) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. IUCNGoogle Scholar
- Hull V, Xu W, Liu W, Zhou S, Viña A, Zhang J, Tuanmu MN, Huang J, Linderman M, Chen X, Huang Y, Ouyang Z, Zhang H, Liu J (2011) Evaluating the efficacy of zoning designations for protected area management. Biol Conserv 144:3028–3037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IUCN and UNEP-WCMC (2017) World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA): June 2017 IUCN and UNEP-WCMCGoogle Scholar
- IUCN World Park Congress (2014) A strategy of innovative approaches and recommendations to reach conservation goals in the next decade, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- Nelson A (2008) Travel time to major cities: a global map of accessibility. http://forobs.jrc.ec.europa.eu/products/gam/
- Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Xiao Y, Polasky S, Liu J, Xu W, Wang Q, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Rao E, Jiang L, Lu F, Wang X, Yang G, Gong S, Wu B, Zeng Y, Yang W, Daily GC (2016) Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 352:1455–1459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- The Forest Resources Assessment Programme (2015) FRA 2015 terms and definitions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome ItalyGoogle Scholar
- UNEP-WCMC, IUCN (2016) Protected Planet Report 2016. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge UK and Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Venter O, Fuller RA, Segan DB, Carwardine J, Brooks T, Butchart SHM, di Marco M, Iwamura T, Joseph L, O'Grady D, Possingham HP, Rondinini C, Smith RJ, Venter M, Watson JEM (2014) Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biol 12:e1001891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Viña A, Liu J (2017) Hidden roles of protected areas in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecosphere 8, e01864-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1864
- WCS, CIESIN (2005) Last of the Wild Project, Version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): Global Human Influence Index (HII) Dataset (Geographic). NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, NYGoogle Scholar
- Xu W, Xiao Y, Zhang J, Yang W, Zhang L, Hull V, Wang Z, Zheng H, Liu J, Polasky S, Jiang L, Xiao Y, Shi X, Rao E, Lu F, Wang X, Daily GC, Ouyang Z (2017) Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620503114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar