Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 18, pp 18565–18582 | Cite as

Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia

  • Zahoor AhmedEmail author
  • Zhaohua Wang
  • Faisal Mahmood
  • Muhammad Hafeez
  • Nazakat Ali
Research Article

Abstract

This study focuses to investigate the relationship between globalization and the ecological footprint for Malaysia from 1971 to 2014. The results of the Bayer and Hanck cointegration test and the ARDL bound test show the existence of cointegration among variables. The findings disclose that globalization is not a significant determinant of the ecological footprint; however, it significantly increases the ecological carbon footprint. Energy consumption and economic growth stimulate the ecological footprint and carbon footprint in Malaysia. Population density reduces the ecological footprint and carbon footprint. Further, financial development mitigates the ecological footprint. The causality results disclose the feedback hypothesis between energy consumption and economic growth in the long run and short run.

Keywords

Ecological footprint Ecological carbon footprint Globalization Malaysia Bayer and Hanck test ARDL 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Philippe Garrigues, and three anonymous reviewers, for providing us highly valuable comments and suggestions which greatly improved this research.

Funding information

The research is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Reference Nos. 2016YFA0602504), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Reference Nos. 91746208, 71774014, 71521002, 71573016, 71403021), Yangtze River Distinguished Professor of MOE, National Social Sciences Foundation (Reference No. 17ZDA065), Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (Reference No. 17YJC630145), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Reference No. 2017M620648), and the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Reference No. 71625003).

References

  1. Ali W, Abdullah A, Azam M (2017) Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Malaysia: fresh evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev Forthcomin 77:0–1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.236 Google Scholar
  2. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy 84:382–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baloch MA, Danish, Meng F (2019a) Modeling the non-linear relationship between financial development and energy consumption: statistical experience from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(9):8838–8846.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04317-9
  4. Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019b) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6199–6208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework Wadham College and Institute of Economics and Statistics , University of Oxford , Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and Research Department , Bank of Spain First version rece. J Time Ser Anal 19:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayer C, Hanck C (2013) Combining non-cointegration tests. J Time Ser Anal 34:83–95.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2012.00814.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bekhet HA, Othman NS (2018) The role of renewable energy to validate dynamic interaction between CO2 emissions and GDP toward sustainable development in Malaysia. Energy Econ 72:47–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boswijk HP (1994) Testing for an unstable root in conditional and structural error correction models. J Econ 63:37–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(93)01560-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charfeddine L (2017) The impact of energy consumption and economic development on Ecological Footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a Markov Switching Equilibrium Correction Model. Energy Econ 65:355–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:138–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charfeddine L, Al-malk AY, Al K (2018) Is it possible to improve environmental quality without reducing economic growth: evidence from the Qatar economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:25–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danish, Baloch MA (2018) Dynamic linkages between road transport energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental quality: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(8):7541–7552.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1072-1
  13. Danish, Zhang B, Wang B, Wang Z (2017) Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 156:855–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203
  14. Danish, Saud S, Baloch MA, Lodhi RN (2018a) The nexus between energy consumption and financial development: estimating the role of globalization in Next-11 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:18651–18661.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2069-0
  15. Danish, Wang B, Wang Z (2018b) Imported technology and CO2 emission in China: collecting evidence through bound testing and VECM approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:4204–4214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.002
  16. Danish, Hassan ST, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019) Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516
  17. Department of Environment (2010) Environmental requirements: a guide for investors. Minist Nat Resour Environ, pp 1–14. http://www.doe.gov.my/eia/environmental-requirements-a-guide-for-investors/
  18. Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doytch N, Uctum M (2016) Globalization and the environmental impact of sectoral FDI. Econ Syst 40:582–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38:1091–1110.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dreher A, Gaston N, Martens WJM (2008) Measuring globalisation: gauging its consequences. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation , estimation , and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ewing B, Moore D, Goldfinger S, Oursler A, Reed A, Wackernagel M (2010) Ecological Footprint Atlas 2010. Global Footprint Network, Oakland. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/uploa/Ecological_Footprint_Atlas_2010.pdf
  24. Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on ecological footprints: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19:863–876.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hafeez M, Chunhui Y, Strohmaier D, Ahmed M, Jie L (2018) Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from One Belt and One Road Initiative region? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(10):9579–9592.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1317-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2018) Economic growth , natural resources , and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2929–2938.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill CWL (2007) International business: competing in the global marketplace, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59:1551–1580.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2938278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahia M, Kadria M, Safouane M et al (2017) Modelling the treatment effect of renewable energy policies on economic growth: evaluation from MENA countries. J Clean Prod 149:845–855.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kwabena Twerefou D, Danso-Mensah K, Bokpin GA (2017) The environmental effects of economic growth and globalization in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel general method of moments approach. Res Int Bus Financ 42:939–949.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lemos MC, Agrawal A (2006) Environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:297–325.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liddle B (2014) Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: evidence from macro-level, cross-country analyses. Popul Environ 35:286–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-013-0198-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Y, Gao C, Lu Y (2017) The impact of urbanization on GHG emissions in China: the role of population density. J Clean Prod 157:299–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lv Z, Xu T (2018) Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? New evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technol Forecast Soc Change 137:340–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martens P, Raza M (2010) Is globalisation sustainable? Sustainability 2:280–293.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su2010280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37:1979–1990.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peow SH (2011) Globalization and the Malaysian experience: upsides and downsides. J Asia Pacific Stud 2:1–27. https://www.japss.org/JAPSMay2011.html Google Scholar
  40. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rudolph A, Figge L (2015) How does globalization affect ecological pressures? A robust empirical analysis using the Ecological Footprint. Working Papers 0599, University of Heidelberg, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  42. Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic 81:348–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) Environmental degradation , economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy 60:892–905.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salahuddin M, Ali MI, Vink N, Gow J (2018) The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2699–2709.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3790-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sapkota P, Bastola U (2017) Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Econ 64:206–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model 35:145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Salah G, Ozturk I (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:325–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Loganathan N (2015) Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecol Indic 52:379–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Sadorsky P (2016a) The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: implications for sustainable development. Energy Econ 55:52–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016b) Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 67:623–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Mahalik MK (2018a) Is globalization detrimental to CO2 emissions in Japan? New threshold analysis. Environ Model Assess 23:557–568.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9584-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Mahalik MK, Hammoudeh S (2018b) Does globalisation worsen environmental quality in developed economies? Environ Model Assess 23:141–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9574-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Mahalik MK, Sadorsky P (2018c) How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analysis. Appl Econ 50:1479–1494.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1366640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24845–24859.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2562-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Solarin SA, Al-mulali U, Ozturk I (2018) Determinants of pollution and the role of the military sector: evidence from a maximum likelihood approach with two structural breaks in the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res online 25:30949–30961.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3060-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uddin GA, Salahuddin M, Alam K, Gow J (2017) Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Indic 77:166–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  59. Xu Z, Baloch MA, Danish Danish, Meng F, Zhang J, Mahmood Z (2018) Nexus between financial development and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:28378–28390. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2876-3
  60. You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73:248–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang N, Yu K, Chen Z (2017) How does urbanization affect carbon dioxide emissions? A cross-country panel data analysis. Energy Policy 107:678–687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Center for Energy and Environmental Policy ResearchBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in BeijingBeijingChina
  4. 4.Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental ManagementBeijingChina
  5. 5.Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of BeijingBeijingChina
  6. 6.Harbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  7. 7.School of Economics and ManagementBeijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT)BeijingChina
  8. 8.Department of Business AdministrationIqra University, Islamabad CampusIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations