Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 18, pp 18615–18623 | Cite as

New ecological dam for sediment and overlying water pollution treatment based on microbial fuel cell principle

  • Ren-yu Wang
  • Hai-xia Li
  • Xiao-qian Peng
  • Guang-yi ZhangEmail author
  • Li-ying Zhang
Research Article
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, a new ecological dam based on the microbial fuel cell principle (MFCED) was designed to remove pollutants from river sediments and water bodies. Sediment organics were better removed in the MFCED mode in comparison with the other two modes (ecological dam with open circuit (OCED) and ecological dam filled with gravel in cathode chamber (GMFCED)). The difference of nitrogen source in water had little effect on the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) (70–80%), while nitrate was more readily removed in the MFCED. The voltage curve and power curve were measured to understand the bioelectricity generation of MFCED. During the stable operation phase of MFCED, the voltage was stabilized between 0.09–0.15 V. The results of high-throughput sequencing indicated that the anode and cathode diversities of MFCED were more than the other systems, and the species diversity of the anode was more than that of the cathode in the MFCED.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell Nitrogen removal Organic pollutant removal Microbial community 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Also, the authors express gratitude to the Modern Analysis and Computing Center of Zhengzhou University for the various material analyses offered in this study.

Funding information

Support was by Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (Grant No. 2015ZX07204-002-004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21806145).

References

  1. Auerbach DA, Deisenroth DB, Mcshane RR, Mccluney KE, Poff LR (2014) Beyond the concrete: accounting for ecosystem services from free-flowing rivers. Ecosystem Services 10:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batonneau Y, Bremard C, Gengembre L et al (2008) Speciation of PM10 sources of airborne nonferrous metals within the 3-km zone of lead/zinc smelters. Environ Sci Technol 38(20):5281–5289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booki M, Shaoan C, Logan BE (2005) Electricity generation using membrane and salt bridge microbial fuel cells. Water Res 39(9):1675–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao W, Zhang H, Wang Y, Pan J (2012) Bioremediation of polluted surface water by using biofilms on filamentous bamboo. Ecol Eng 42:146–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao W, Wang Y, Sun L, Jiang J, Zhang Y (2016) Removal of nitrogenous compounds from polluted river water by floating constructed wetlands using rice straw and ceramsite as substrates under low temperature conditions. Ecol Eng 88:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen WY (2017) Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: a hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China). Landsc Urban Plan 157:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding J, Jiang Y, Fu L, Liu Q, Peng Q, Kang M (2015) Impacts of land use on surface water quality in a subtropical river basin&58; a case study of the Dongjiang River basin, southeastern China. Water 7(8):4427–4445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doherty L, Zhao Y, Zhao X, Wang WJCEJ (2015) Nutrient and organics removal from swine slurry with simultaneous electricity generation in an alum sludge-based constructed wetland incorporating microbial fuel cell technology. Chem Eng J 266(266):74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Everard M, Moggridge HL (2012) Rediscovering the value of urban rivers. Urban Ecosystems 15(2):293–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang Z, Song HL, Ning C, Li XNJBT (2013) Performance of microbial fuel cell coupled constructed wetland system for decolorization of azo dye and bioelectricity generation. Bioresour Technol 144(Complete):165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gong X, Huang D, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang R, Wan J, Zhang C, Cheng M, Qin X, Xue W (2017) Stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron mediated cadmium accumulation and oxidative damage of Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich cultivated in cadmium contaminated sediments. Environ Sci Technol 51(19):11308–11316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang DY, Zhou SG, Chen Q, Zhao B, Yuan Y, Zhuang LJCEJ (2011) Enhanced anaerobic degradation of organic pollutants in a soil microbial fuel cell. Chem Eng J 172(2):647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang D, Xue W, Zeng G, Wan J, Chen G, Huang C, Zhang C, Cheng M, Xu P (2016) Immobilization of cd in river sediments by sodium alginate modified nanoscale zero-valent iron: impact on enzyme activities and microbial community diversity. Water Res 106:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ieropoulos IA, Greenman J, Melhuish C, Hart JJE, Technology M (2005) Comparative study of three types of microbial fuel cell. Enzym Microb Technol 37(2):238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keylock CJO (2005) Simpson diversity and the Shannon–Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. OIKOS 109(1):203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kong D, Yun H, Cui D, Qi M, Shao C, Cui D, Ren N, Liang B, Wang A (2017) Response of antimicrobial nitrofurazone-degrading biocathode communities to different cathode potentials. Bioresour Technol 241:951–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li XN, Song HL, Li W, Lu XW, Nishimura O (2010) An integrated ecological floating-bed employing plant, freshwater clam and biofilm carrier for purification of eutrophic water. Ecol Eng 36(4):382–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li WW, Sheng GP, Liu XW, Yu HQ (2011) Recent advances in the separators for microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 102(1):244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu S, Song H, Wei S, Fei Y, Li XJBT (2014) Bio-cathode materials evaluation and configuration optimization for power output of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland—microbial fuel cell systems. Bioresour Technol 166(166C):575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Logan BE, Bert H, René R et al (2006) Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 40(17):5181–5192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu H, Oehmen A, Virdis B, Keller J, Yuan Z (2006) Obtaining highly enriched cultures of Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphates through alternating carbon sources. Water Res 40(20):3838–3848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ni Z, Wu X, Li L, Lv Z, Zhang Z, Hao A, Iseri Y, Kuba T, Zhang X, Wu WM, Li C (2018) Pollution control and in situ bioremediation for lake aquaculture using an ecological dam. J Clean Prod 172:2256–2265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oon YL, Ong SA, Ho LN, Wong YS, Oon YS, Lehl HK, Thung WE (2015) Hybrid system up-flow constructed wetland integrated with microbial fuel cell for simultaneous wastewater treatment and electricity generation. Bioresour Technol 186:270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ouyang T, Zhu Z, Kuang Y (2005) River water quality and pollution sources in the Pearl River Delta, China. J Environ Monit 7(7):664–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patil SA, Surakasi VP, Koul S, Ijmulwar S, Vivek A, Shouche YS, Kapadnis BP (2009) Electricity generation using chocolate industry wastewater and its treatment in activated sludge based microbial fuel cell and analysis of developed microbial community in the anode chamber. Bioresour Technol 100(21):5132–5139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sander HA, Zhao C (2015) Urban green and blue: who values what and where? Land Use Policy. Land Use Policy 42(42):194–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun L, Liu Y, Jin H (2009) Nitrogen removal from polluted river by enhanced floating bed grown canna. Ecol Eng 35(1):135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang X, Feng Y, Ren N, Wang H, Lee H, Li N, Zhao Q (2009) Accelerated start-up of two-chambered microbial fuel cells: effect of anodic positive poised potential. Electrochim Acta 54(3):1109–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang Z, Zheng Y, Xiao Y, Wu S, Wu Y, Yang Z, Zhao F (2013) Analysis of oxygen reduction and microbial community of air-diffusion biocathode in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 144(1):74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang J, Tang L, Zhao L, Zhang ZJE (2019) Efficiency investigation on energy harvesting from airflows in HVAC system based on galloping of isosceles triangle sectioned bluff bodies. Energy 172:1066–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xia J, Zhai X, Zeng S, Zhang Y (2014) Systematic solutions and modeling on eco-water and its allocation applied to urban river restoration: case study in Beijing, China. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 14(1):39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xue W, Huang D, Zeng G, et al. (2017) Nanoscale zero-valent iron coated with rhamnolipid as an effective stabilizer for immobilization of Cd and Pb in river sediments. J Hazard Mater 341Google Scholar
  33. Xue W, Peng Z, Huang D, Zeng G, Wan J, Xu R, Cheng M, Zhang C, Jiang D, Hu Z (2018) Nanoremediation of cadmium contaminated river sediments: microbial response and organic carbon changes. J Hazard Mater 359:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yakar A, Türe C, Türker OC, Vymazal J, Saz Ç (2018) Impacts of various filtration media on wastewater treatment and bioelectric production in up-flow constructed wetland combined with microbial fuel cell (UCW-MFC). Ecol Eng 117:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ye S, Zeng G, Wu H, Zhang C, Dai J, Liang J, Yu J, Ren X, Yi H, Cheng M, Zhang C (2017a) Biological technologies for the remediation of co-contaminated soil. Crit Rev Biotechnol 37(8):1062–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ye S, Zeng G, Wu H, Zhang C, Liang J, Dai J, Liu Z, Xiong W, Wan J, Xu P, Cheng M (2017b) Co-occurrence and interactions of pollutants, and their impacts on soil remediation—a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47(16):1528–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ye S, Zeng G, Wu H, Liang J, Zhang C, Dai J, Xiong W, Song B, Wu S, Yu J (2019) The effects of activated biochar addition on remediation efficiency of co-composting with contaminated wetland soil. Resour Conserv Recycl 140:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang B, Zhao H, Shi C, Zhou S, Ni JJ, Jo CT, Biotechnology B (2010) Simultaneous removal of sulfide and organics with vanadium(V) reduction in microbial fuel cells. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84(12):1780–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang G, Yu L, Liu P, Fan Z, Li T, Chen T, Zhang X (2017) Ammonium removal by native microbes and activated sludge within the Jialu River basin and the associated microbial community structures. Water Sci Technol 76(11–12):3358–3367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao F, Yang W, Zeng Z, Li H, Yang X, He Z, Gu B, Rafiq MT, Peng H (2012) Nutrient removal efficiency and biomass production of different bioenergy plants in hypereutrophic water. Biomass Bioenergy 42:212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhong D, Liao X, Liu Y, Zhong N, Xu YJBT (2018) Enhanced electricity generation performance and dye wastewater degradation of microbial fuel cell by using a petaline NiO@ polyaniline-carbon felt anode. Bioresour Technol 258:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou H, Shi P, Wang JA, Yu D, Gao L (2011) Rapid urbanization and implications for river ecological services restoration: case study in Shenzhen, China. J Urban Plann Dev 137(2):121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ren-yu Wang
    • 1
  • Hai-xia Li
    • 1
  • Xiao-qian Peng
    • 1
  • Guang-yi Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Li-ying Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Water Conservancy and EnvironmentZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations