Advertisement

Increasing water and energy efficiency in university buildings: a case study

  • Fernanda RodriguesEmail author
  • Armando Silva-Afonso
  • Armando Pinto
  • Joaquim Macedo
  • António Silva Santos
  • Carla Pimentel-Rodrigues
Local, Regional and Global Best Practice for Water
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Nowadays, humanity is consuming unsustainably the planet’s resources. In the scope of energy resource consumption, e.g., the intense use of fossil fuels has contributed to the acceleration of climate changes on the planet, and the overriding need to increase energy efficiency in all sectors is now widely recognized, aiming to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions by 69% in 2030. Largely due to climate changes, water has also become a critical resource on the planet and hydric stress risk will rise significantly in the coming decades. Accordingly, several countries will have to apply measures to increase water efficiency in all sectors, including at the building level. These measures, in addition to reducing water consumption, will contribute to the increase of energy efficiency and to the decrease of GHG emissions, especially of CO2. Therefore, the nexus water energy in buildings is relevant because the application of water efficiency measures can result in a significant contribution to improve buildings’ energy efficiency and the urban water cycle (namely in abstraction, treatment, and pumping). For Mediterranean climate, there are few studies to assess the extent and impact of this nexus. This study presents the assessment of water-energy nexus performed in a university building located in a mainland Portugal central region. The main goals are to present the results of the water and energy efficiency measures implemented and to assess the consequent reduction of water, above 37%, and energy (30%) consumption, obtained because of the application of water-efficient devices and highly efficient light systems in the building. The water efficiency increase at the building level represents at the urban level an energy saving in the water supply system of 406 kWh/year, nearly 0.5% of the building energy consumption, with a consequent increase in the energy efficiency and in the reduction of GHG emissions. Complementarily, other energy-efficient measures were implemented to reduce the energy consumption. As the building under study has a small demand of domestic hot water with no hydro pressure pumps and has a small water-energy nexus, it was concluded that the significant reduction of the building energy consumption did not influence the indoor comfort.

Keywords

Water-energy nexus Water efficiency Buildings Sustainability 

Notes

References

  1. Adeyeye, K. (2014). Water efficiency in buildings: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons Inc, ISBN: 978-1-118-45657-6Google Scholar
  2. Assaf S, Nour M (2015) Potential of energy and water efficiency improvement in Abu Dhabi’s building sector - analysis of Estidama pearl rating system. Renew Energy 82:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benromdhane S (2015) Energy efficiency through integrated environmental management. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:7973–7979.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4424-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertone E, Stewart R, Sahin O, Alam M, Zou P, Buntine C, Marshall C (2018) Guidelines, barriers and strategies for energy and water retrofits of public buildings. J Clean Prod 174:1064–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CEN (2007). Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. Brussels, Belgium, AugustGoogle Scholar
  6. CEN (2011). EN 12464-1. Light and lighting of work places: part 1 indoor work places. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamiche A, Stambouli A, Samir F (2016) A review of the water-energy nexus. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iacomussi P, Radis M, Rossi G (2015) Visual comfort with LED lighting. Energy Procedia 78:729–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jingyu L, Wen Z, Xiaodong C (2016) Fuzzy logic controller for energy savings in a smart LED lighting system considering lighting comfort and daylight. Energy Build 127:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kenway S, Lant P, Priestley A, Daniels P (2011) The connection between water and energy in cities – a review. Water Sci Technol 63(9):1983–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kibert, C. (2016). Sustainable construction. John Wiley & Sons inc. ISBN: 978-1-119-05517-4Google Scholar
  12. Mantravadi B, Kishore R, Anbu SP, Kalai B (2015) Power generation by high head water in a building using micro hydro turbine-a greener approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5317-6
  13. Mariano, N., Rodrigues, F., Silva-Afonso, A. (2011). Water efficiency in buildings: a contribute to energy efficiency. In: CIB W062 (eds.): Water supply and drainage for buildings. Proc. 37th Symposium CIB W062, Aveiro, Portugal, 25–28 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  14. Matos C, Sampaio A, Bentes I (2010) Possibilities of greywater reuse in non-potable in situ urban applications, according with its quality and quantity. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 7(6):499–508 ISSN: 1790-5079Google Scholar
  15. Park H, Kim W (2018) Water industry: water-energy-health nexus. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:1013–1014.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3529-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pelli T, Hitz H (2000) Energy indicators and savings in water supply. J Am Water Works Assoc 92:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pimentel-Rodrigues, C., Silva-Afonso, A. (2009). Water efficiency of products. Outcome of applying a certification and labelling system in Portugal, In: CIB W062 (eds.): Water supply and drainage for buildings. Proc. 35th Symposium CIB W062, Dusseldorf, Germany, 7-9 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  18. Pinto A, Rodrigues F, Mota A (2017a) Geothermal contribution on southern Europe climate for energy efficiency of university buildings. Winter season. Energy Procedia 134:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinto, A.; Silva Afonso, A.; Silva Santos, A.; Pimentel Rodrigues, C.; Rodrigues, F. (2017b). Nexus water energy for hotel sector efficiency. Energy Procedia, vol. 111, pag 215–225Google Scholar
  20. Portilla, C., Gomes, R., Silva-Afonso, A., Pimentel-Rodrigues, C., Tobatr, F. (2018). Water efficiency evaluation model in non-residential buildings. Case study: university buildings of Quito - Ecuador, In Anais do CIB W062 2018 – Water supply and drainage for buildings. Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal, 28 to 30 de AugustGoogle Scholar
  21. Silva-Afonso, A. (2014). The bathroom of the future: its contribution to sustainability, In: CIB W062 (eds.): Water supply and drainage for buildings. Proc. 40th Symposium CIB W062, São Paulo, Brazil, 7-10 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  22. Silva-Afonso, A., Abrantes, V. (2008). Water-efficiency in the housing sector. The implementation of certification and labelling measures in Portugal, In: IAHS (eds.): World congress on housing science. Proc. XXXVI IAHS – National Housing Programs/New Visions, Kolkata, India, 3–7 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  23. Silva-Afonso, A., Pimentel-Rodrigues, C. (2010). Water efficiency of products. The Portuguese system of certification and labelling. J AWWA (American Water Works Association) Volume 102, n° 2 (February 2010), 52–56Google Scholar
  24. Silva-Afonso A, Pimentel-Rodrigues C (2011) The importance of water efficiency in buildings in Mediterranean countries; The Portuguese experience. Int Jour of Syst Appl Eng & Devel 5(2):17–24Google Scholar
  25. Silva-Afonso, A., Pimentel-Rodrigues, C. (2013). Measures of water efficiency in buildings. Comfort and performance issues, XXXIX IAHS – World congress on housing science (Changing needs, adaptive buildings, smart cities), Milano, Italy, 17 - 20 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva-Afonso A, Rodrigues F, Pimentel-Rodrigues C (2011) Water efficiency in buildings: assessment of its impact on energy efficiency and reducing GHG emissions, Recent researches in energy & environment (6th IASME/WSEAS international conference on energy & environment – EE’11). WSEAS Press, Cambridge ISSN 1792-8230. ISBN 978-960-474-274-5. 191-195Google Scholar
  27. Silva-Afonso, A., Bernardo, J., Pimentel-Rodrigues, C. (2013). Implications of reduced flush volumes in building drainage: an experimental study, In: CIB W062 (eds.): Water supply and drainage for buildings. Proc. 39th Symposium CIB W062, Nagano, Japan, 17-19 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith C.; Parmenter K. (2016). Building and site energy audits. Energy Management Principles (Second Edition), 69–93. ISBN: 978-0-128-02506-2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RISCO, Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.ANQIP – Portuguese Association for Quality and Efficiency in Building ServicesOperational Centre of the University of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  3. 3.LNEC, Civil Engineering National LaboratoryLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations