Advertisement

3-year noise monitoring and strategic noise mapping in an extended motorway

  • Anastasia K. PaschalidouEmail author
  • Pavlos Kassomenos
  • Fotini Chonianaki
  • Thalia Valkouma
Research Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

It is well known that the quality of the acoustic environment is very often degraded by major environmental interventions such as extended motorways. Considering this, the European Union has imposed relevant legislation on its member states to monitor these environmental changes/interventions and to develop strategic noise maps and action plans, in order to protect the natural and human environment. Egnatia Odos is a major motorway that crosses northern Greece and connects the country with the main European Motorway network. In the present work, the results of an extended traffic noise measuring campaign at selected sections of the Egnatia motorway are presented, together with the strategic noise maps and calculations of the population exposure. It was concluded that, although the noise levels in the countryside were low, in the suburban areas near the city of Thessaloniki the traffic noise was reported high during both the day and night. However, the extent of the traffic noise issue was found considerably greater during night-time. The number of exceedances was rather limited, though a considerable amount of population (11.5% and 5.4% during the day and night, respectively) seems to be affected by relatively high noise levels, highlighting the importance of traffic noise monitoring.

Keywords

Traffic noise Egnatia motorway Noise exposure Lden Lnight 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Egnatia Odos S.A. for providing the data used in this study.

References

  1. Allen RW, Davies H, Cohen MA, Mallach G, Kaufman JD, Adar SD (2009) The spatial relationship between traffic-generated air pollution and noise in 2 US cities. Environ Res 109 (3):334–342.Google Scholar
  2. Ascari E, Licitra G, Teti L, Cerchiai M (2015) Low frequency noise impact from road traffic according to different noise prediction methods. Sci Total Environ 505:658–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atmaca E, Peker I, Altin A (2005) Industrial noise and its effects on humans. Pol J Environ Stud 14(6):721–726Google Scholar
  4. Babisch W (2008) Road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. Noise Health 10:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babisch W (2011) Cardiovascular effects of noise in J.O. In: Nriagu (ed) Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, vol 1. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babisch W, van Kamp I (2009) Exposure-response relationship of the association between aircraft noise and the risk of the hypertension. Noise Health 11:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Babisch W, Buele B, Schust M, Kersten N, Ising H (2005) Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infraction. Epidemiology 16(1):33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balkenhol N, Waits LP (2009) Molecular road ecology: exploring the potential of genetics for investigating transportation impacts on wildlife. Mol Ecol 18(20):4151–4164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, Stansfeld S (2014) Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet 383(9925):1325–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bunn F, Zannin PHT (2016) Assessment of railway noise in an urban setting. Appl Acoust 104:16–23 COM/2017/0151 final. European Commission 2017. Report From The Commission To The European Parliament And The Council On the Implementation of the Environmental Noise Directive in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 2002/49/ECCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise - Declaration by the Commission in the Conciliation Committee on the Directive relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise.Google Scholar
  12. Fidell S, Barber DS, Schultz TJ (1993) Updating dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise. J Acoust Soc Am 89:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fredianelli L, Carpita S, Licitra G (2019a) A procedure for deriving wind turbine noise limits by taking into account annoyance. Sci Total Environ 648:728–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredianelli L, Del Pizzo A, Licitra G (2019b) Recent developments in sonic crystals as barriers for road traffic noise mitigation. Environments 6(2):14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gagliardi P, Fredianelli L, Simonetti D, Licitra G (2017) ADS-B system as a useful tool for testing and redrawing noise management strategies at Pisa Airport. Acta Acust united Ac 103(4):543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guski R, Schreckenberg D, Schuemer R (2017) WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(12):1539.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iglesias-Merchan C, Diaz-Balteiro L, Solino M (2015) Transportation planning and quiet natural areas preservation: aircraft overflights noise assessment in a National Park. Transport Res D-Tr E 41:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamrah A, Al-Omari A, Sharabi R (2006) Evaluation of traffic noise pollution in Amman, Jordan. Environ Monit Assess 120:499–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang L, Kang J (2016) Effect of traffic noise on perceived visual impact of motorway traffic. Landsc Urban Plan 150:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang L, Kang J (2017) Perceived integrated impact of visual intrusion and noise of motorways: influential factors and impact indicators. Transport Res D- Tr E 57:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang L, Kang J, Schroth O (2015) Prediction of the visual impact of motorways in GIS. Environ Impact Assess Rev 55:59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klæboe R, Engelien E, Steinnes M (2006) Context sensitive noise mapping impact. Appl Acoust 67:620–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lercher P, Evans GW, Meis M (2003) Ambient noise and cognitive processes among primary schoolchildren. Environment and Behavior 35:725–735Google Scholar
  24. Licitra G, Cerchiai M, Teti L, Ascari E, Fredianelli L (2015) Durability and variability of the acoustical performance of rubberized road surfaces. Appl Acoust 94:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Licitra G, Ascari E, Fredianelli L (2017) Prioritizing process in action plans: a review of approaches. Current Pollution Reports 3(2):151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meline J, van Hulst A, Thomas F, karusisi N, Chaix B (2013) Transportation noise and annoyance related to road traffic in French RECORD study. Int J Health Geogr 12:44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Minichilli F, Gorini F, Ascari E, Bianchi F, Coi A, Fredianelli F, Licitra G, Manzoli F, Mezzasalma L, Cori L (2018) Annoyance judgment and measurements of environmental noise: a focus on Italian secondary schools. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(2).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020208
  28. Murphy E, King EA, Rice HJ (2009) Estimating human exposure to transport noise in central Dublin Ireland. Environ Int 35:298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paschalidou AK, Kassomenos P, Chonianaki F (2019) Strategic noise maps and actions plans for the reduction of population exposure in a Mediterranean port city. Sci Total Environ 654:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roswall N, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Ketzel M, Gammelmark A, Overvad K, Olsen A, Sorensen M (2017) Long-term residential road traffic noise and NO2 exposure in relation to risk of incident myocardial infarction-A Danish cohort study. Environ Res 156:80–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roswall N, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Jensen SS, Tjonneland A, Sorensen M (2018) Long-term exposure to residential railway and road traffic noise and risk for diabetes in a Danish cohort. Environ Res 160:292–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schultz TJ (1978) Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J Acoust Soc Am 64:377–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sygna K, Aasvang GM, Aamodt G, Oftedal B, Krog NH (2014) Road traffic noise, sleep and mental health. Environ Res 131:17–24Google Scholar
  34. Vienneau D, Schindler C, Perez L, Probst-Hensch N, Roosli M (2015) The relationship between transportation noise exposure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. Environ Res 138:372–380Google Scholar
  35. Vogiatzis K (2015) Environmental noise and air pollution monitoring in the Athens Ring road (‘Attiki Odos’): an important parameter for a sustainable urban development. Int J Sustain Dev Plan 10(4):528–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Welch D, Shepherd D, Dirks KN, McBride D, Marsh S (2013) Road traffic noise and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study. Noise Health 15(65):224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. WHO-JRC (2011) Burden of disease from environmental noise - quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe, European Centre for Environmental Health and JRC, EUGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural ResourcesDemocritus University of ThraceOrestiadaGreece
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  3. 3.Edt, GENV Geomatics and ENVironmetal applications partnershipAthensGreece
  4. 4.Egnatia Odos S.A.ThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations