Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 18, pp 18162–18180 | Cite as

Field investigation of temporal variation of volatile organic compounds at a landfill in Hangzhou, China

  • Qiao Wang
  • Xinru Zuo
  • Min Xia
  • Haijian XieEmail author
  • Feiyu He
  • Siliang Shen
  • Abdelmalek Bouazza
  • Lili Zhu
Research Article
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

Variation of volatile organic compound (VOC) concentration and composition in an active landfill were monitored by a developed static chamber for 2 years. The landfill gas from 82 sampling points including 70 points on working face, 8 points on geomembrane (GMB), and 4 points on final cover were analyzed for VOCs by GC-MS. Twenty-eight types of VOCs were detected, including terpenes, sulfur compounds, aromatics, hydrocarbon, oxygenated compounds, aldehyde compounds, and halogenated compounds. Terpenes were the dominant VOCs recorded in the spring, autumn, and winter seasons, whereas sulfur compounds dominated in the summer season. Limonene, ethyl alcohol, and acetone were identified as the main VOCs emitted from the waste working face of the landfill. Limonene dominated the terpenes with a maximum concentration of 43.29 μg m−3 in the autumn season. Limonene was also the dominant VOC escaping from the defects of geomembrane temporary cover reaching an average concentration 38 μg m−3. The defects of geomembranes can be a great emission source of VOCs. Emission rate of limonene was 2.24 times higher than that on the working face. VOC concentrations on the final cover can be 166 times less than those obtained on the working face. VOC emitted from the landfill did not represent a health threat for human health. However, concentrations of methyl mercaptan and ethanethiol on the working face were 3.4–22.8 times greater than their odor threshold, which were the main compounds responsible for odor nuisance. Results obtained from CALPUFF model indicated that methyl mercaptan and ethanethiol would not be a nuisance for the residents around the landfill. However, these compounds are harmful to the workers on the landfill.

Keywords

Air pollution Volatile organic compounds Limonene Odor Landfill gas Cover system Geomembrane 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41672288, 51478427, 51278452, and 51008274), the National Key R&D program (grant no. 2018YFC1802303), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 2017QNA4028), and Zhejiang Provincial Public Industry Research Project (grant no. 2015C31005) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Abuel-Naga HM, Bouazza A (2009) Numerical characterization of advective gas flow through GM/GCL composite liners having a circular defect in the geomembrane. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(11):1661–1671Google Scholar
  2. Agapiou A, Vamvakari JP, Andrianopoulos A, Pappa A (2016) Volatile emissions during storing of green food waste under different aeration conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(9):8890–8901Google Scholar
  3. Allen MR, Braithwaite A, Hills CC (1997) Trace organic compounds in landfill gas at seven UK waste disposal sites. Environ Sci Technol 31(4):1054–1061Google Scholar
  4. Avaliani SL, Balter BM, Balter DB, Faminskaya MV, Revich BA, Stalnaya MV (2016) Air pollution source identification from odor complaint data. Air Qual Atmos Health 9(2):179–192Google Scholar
  5. Blount BC, Kobelski RJ, McElprang DO, Ashley DL, Morrow JC, Chambers DM, Cardinali FL (2006) Quantification of 31 volatile organic compounds in whole blood using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 832(2):292–301Google Scholar
  6. Bouazza A, Vangpaisal T (2006) Laboratory investigation of gas leakage rate through a GM/GCL composite liner due to a circular defect in the geomembrane. Geotext Geomembr 24(2):110–115Google Scholar
  7. Bouazza A, Vangpaisal T (2007) Gas transmissivity at the interface of a geomembrane and the geotextile cover of a partially hydrated geosynthetic clay liner. Geosynth Int 14(5):316–319Google Scholar
  8. Bouazza A, Vangpaisal T, Abuel-Naga H, Kodikara J (2008) Analytical modelling of gas leakage rate through a geosynthetic clay liner-geomembrane composite liner due to a circular defect in the geomembrane. Geotext Geomembr 26(2):122–129Google Scholar
  9. Chemel C, Riesenmey C, Batton-Hubert M, Vaillant H (2012) Odour-impact assessment around a landfill site from weather-type classification, complaint inventory and numerical simulation. J Environ Manag 93(1):85–94Google Scholar
  10. Chen Z, Gong H, Jiang R, Jiang Q, Wu W (2010) Overview on LFG projects in China. Waste Manag 30(6):1006–1010Google Scholar
  11. Chiriac R, Morais JDA, Carre J, Bayard R, Chovelon JM, Gourdon R (2011) Study of the VOC emissions from a municipal solid waste storage pilot-scale cell: comparison with biogases from municipal waste landfill site. Waste Manag 31(11):2294–2301Google Scholar
  12. Davoli E, Gangai ML, Morselli L, Tonelli D (2003) Characterisation of odorants emissions from landfills by SPME and GC/MS. Chemosphere 51(5):357–368Google Scholar
  13. Di Y, Liu J, Liu J, Liu S, Yan L (2013) Characteristic analysis for odor gas emitted from food waste anaerobic fermentation in the pretreatment workshop. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 63(10):1173–1181Google Scholar
  14. Dincer F, Odabasi M, Muezzinoglu A (2006) Chemical characterization of odorous gases at a landfill site by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1122(1):222–229Google Scholar
  15. Ding Y, Cai C, Hu B, Xu Y, Zheng X, Chen Y, Wu W (2012) Characterization and control of odorous gases at a landfill site: a case study in Hangzhou, China. Waste Manag 32(2):317–326Google Scholar
  16. Duan Z, Lu W, Li D, Wang H (2014) Temporal variation of trace compound emission on the working surface of a landfill in Beijing, China. Atmos Environ 88:230–238Google Scholar
  17. EEA-European Environment Agency, 2008. Directive 2008/50/EC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008L0050&from=en last access 27/04/2018
  18. Eitzer BD (1995) Emissions of volatile organic chemicals from municipal solid waste composting facilities. Environ Sci Technol 29(4):896–902Google Scholar
  19. European Council BS EN 13725 (2003) Air quality Determination of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometryGoogle Scholar
  20. Fang JJ, Yang N, Cen DY, Shao LM, He PJ (2012) Odor compounds from different sources of landfill: characterization and source identification. Waste Manag 32(7):1401–1410Google Scholar
  21. Fielder HM, Palmer SR, Poonking C, Moss N, Coleman G (2001) Addressing environmental health concerns near Trecatti landfill site, United Kingdom. Arch Environ Health: Int J 56(6):529–535Google Scholar
  22. Gallego E, Perales JF, Roca FJ, Guardino X (2014) Surface emission determination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from a closed industrial waste landfill using a self-designed static flux chamber. Sci Total Environ 47:587–599Google Scholar
  23. González CRN, Björklund E, Forteza R, Cerdà V (2013) Volatile organic compounds in landfill odorant emissions on the island of Mallorca. Int J Environ Anal Chem 93(4):434–449Google Scholar
  24. Guarriello NS (2007) Determining emissions from landfills and creating odor buffer distances. Florida State University, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  25. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China (2008). Guidelines for environmental impact assessment atmospheric environment. (HJ2.2-2008). Beijing: Standards Press of ChinaGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo H, Duan Z, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Mustafa MF, Lu W, Wang H (2017) Characteristics of volatile compound emission and odor pollution from municipal solid waste treating/disposal facilities of a city in eastern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(22):18383–18391Google Scholar
  27. Hamoda MF (2006) Air pollutants emissions from waste treatment and disposal facilities. J Environ Sci Health A 41(1):77–85Google Scholar
  28. Holmes NS, Morawska L (2006) A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmos Environ 40(30):5902–5928Google Scholar
  29. U S EPA, 2015. CALPUFF Modeling System. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/dispersion_prefrec.htm#calpuff
  30. Hudson N, Ayoko GA (2008) Odour sampling. 2. Comparison of physical and aerodynamic characteristics of sampling devices: a review. Bioresour Technol 99(10):3993–4007Google Scholar
  31. Jones DD, Rowe RK (2016) BTEX migration through various geomembranes and vapor barriers. J Geotech Geoenviron 142(10):04016044Google Scholar
  32. Keller AP (1988) Trace constituents in landfill gas, Task report on inventory and assessment of cleaning technologies. Final report, may 1984–February 1987 (no. PB-88-217021/XAB). SCS Engineers, Inc., Covington, KY (USA)Google Scholar
  33. Kreith F (1995) In: Handbook of solid waste management. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1211–1213Google Scholar
  34. Lazarus, S. B., Tsourdos, A., Zbikowski, R., and White, B. A. (2008). Unstructured environmental mapping using low cost sensors. IEEE international conference on networking, sensing and control (pp.1080-1085). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Y, Lu W, Li D, Guo H, Caicedo L, Wang C, Xu S, Wang H (2015) Estimation of volatile compounds emission rates from the working face of a large anaerobic landfill in China using a wind tunnel system. Atmos Environ 111:213–221Google Scholar
  36. Liu Y, Lu W, Guo H, Ming Z, Wang C, Xu S, Liu Y, Wang H (2016) Aromatic compound emissions from municipal solid waste landfill: emission factors and their impact on air pollution. Atmos Environ 139:205–213Google Scholar
  37. Lu W, Duan Z, Dong L, Jimenez LMC, Liu Y, Guo H, Wang HT (2015) Characterization of odor emission on the working face of landfill and establishing of odorous compounds index. Waste Manag 42:74–81Google Scholar
  38. McWatters RS, Rowe RK (2009) Transport of volatile organic compounds through PVC and LLDPE geomembranes from both aqueous and vapour phases. Geosynth Int 16(6):468–481Google Scholar
  39. McWatters RS, Rowe RK (2010) Diffusive transport of VOCs through LLDPE and two coextruded geomembranes. J Geotech Geoenviron 136(9):1167–1177Google Scholar
  40. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China (MHPRC) (2011) Sanitary standards of using food additives (GB 2760-2011). Standards Press of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  41. National Environmental Protection Agency of China (NEPAC) (1996) Emission standards for odor pollutants (GB 14554-1993). Standards Press of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  42. Obersky L, Rafiee R, Cabral AR, Golding SD, Clarke WP (2018) Methodology to determine the extent of anaerobic digestion, composting and CH4 oxidation in a landfill environment. Waste Manag 76:364–373Google Scholar
  43. Parker, T., Dottridge, J., and Kelly, S. (2002). Investigation of the composition and emissions of trace components in landfill gas. Environment agency, R&D technical report P1-438/TRGoogle Scholar
  44. Pasquill F (1961) The estimation of the dispersion of windborne material. Aust Meteorol Mag 90:33–49Google Scholar
  45. Pierucci P, Porazzi E, Martinez MP, Adani F, Carati C, Rubino FM, Colombi A, Calcaterra E, Benfenati E (2005) Volatile organic compounds produced during the aerobic biological processing of municipal solid waste in a pilot plant. Chemosphere 59:423–430Google Scholar
  46. Sadowska-Rociek A, Kurdziel M, Szczepaniec-Cięciak E, Riesenmey C, Vaillant H, Batton-Hubert M, Piejko K (2009) Analysis of odorous compounds at municipal landfill sites. Waste Manag Res 27(10):966–975Google Scholar
  47. Saldarriaga JF, Aguado R, Morales GE (2014) Assessment of VOC emissions from municipal solid waste composting. Environ Eng Sci 31(6):300–307Google Scholar
  48. Scaglia B, Orzi V, Artola A, Font X, Davoli E, Sanchez A, Adani F (2011) Odors and volatile organic compounds emitted from municipal solid waste at different stage of decomposition and relationship with biological stability. Bioresour Technol 102(7):4638–4645Google Scholar
  49. Schroth MH, Eugster W, Gómez KE, Gonzalez-Gil G, Niklaus PA, Oester P (2012) Above- and below-ground methane fluxes and methanotrophic activity in a landfill-cover soil. Waste Manag 32(5):879–889Google Scholar
  50. Scire JS, Strimaitis DG, Yamartino RJ (2000) A user’s guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model (version 5.0). Earth Tech Inc., Concord, MA http://www.src.com/calpuff/download/CALPUFF_UsersGuide.pdf Google Scholar
  51. Senevirathna DG, Achari G, Hettiaratchi JP (2006) A laboratory evaluation of errors associated with the determination of landfill gas emissions. Can J Civ Eng 33(3):240–244Google Scholar
  52. Shafi S, Sweetman A, Hough RL, Smith R, Rosevear A, Pollard SJ (2006) Evaluating fugacity models for trace components in landfill gas. Environ Pollut 144(3):1013–1023Google Scholar
  53. Shin HC, Park JW, Park K, Song HC (2002) Removal characteristics of trace compounds of landfill gas by activated carbon adsorption. Environ Pollut 119(2):227–236Google Scholar
  54. Sokhi, R., Fisher, B., Lester, A., McCrae, I., Bualert, S., and Sootornstit, N. (1998). Modelling of air quality around roads. In proc of 5th Int. Conf. On Harmonisation with AtmosphericGoogle Scholar
  55. Staley BF, Xu F, Cowie SJ, Barlaz MA, Hater GR (2006) Release of trace organic compounds during the decomposition of municipal solid waste components. Environ Sci Technol 40(19):5984–5991Google Scholar
  56. Statheropoulos M, Agapiou A, Pallis G (2005) A study of volatile organic compounds evolved in urban waste disposal bins. Atmos Environ 39(26):4639–4645Google Scholar
  57. Sun Y, Yue D, Li R, Yang T, Liu S (2015) Assessing the performance of gas collection systems in select Chinese landfills according to the LandGEM model: drawbacks and potential direction. Environ Technol 36(23):2912–2918Google Scholar
  58. Tagaris E, Sotiropoulou REP, Pilinis C, Halvadakis CP (2003) A methodology to estimate odors around landfill sites: the use of methane as an odor index and its utility in landfill siting. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53(5):629–634Google Scholar
  59. Talaiekhozani A, Bagheri M, Goli A, Khoozani MRT (2016) An overview of principles of odor production, emission, and control methods in wastewater collection and treatment systems. J Environ Manag 170:186–206Google Scholar
  60. Úbeda, Y., Ferrer, M., Sanchis, E., Calvet, S., Nicolas, J., Lopez, P.A., (2010). Evaluation of odor impact from a landfill area and a waste treatment facility through the application of two approaches of a Gaussian dispersion model. In: 2010 International congress on environmental modelling and software modelling for environment’s sake. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  61. US EPA (2015) CALPUFF modeling system. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/dispersion_prefrec.htm#calpuffGoogle Scholar
  62. US-EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (1999). Compendium method TO-14. determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ambient air using specially prepared canisters with subsequent analysis by gas chromatographyGoogle Scholar
  63. Vallejo MD, Baena CA (2007) Toxicologı’a Ambiental. Wills Ltd., ColombiaGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang X, Wu T (2008) Release of isoprene and monoterpenes during the aerobic decomposition of orange wastes from laboratory incubation experiments. Environ Sci Technol 42(9):3265–3270Google Scholar
  65. World Health Organization (WHO) (1987) Air quality guidelines for Europe. Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu T, Wang X (2015) Emission of oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) during the aerobic decomposition of orange wastes. J Environ Sci 33:69–77Google Scholar
  67. Wu T, Wang X, Li D, Yi Z (2010) Emission of volatile organic sulfur compounds (VOSCs) during aerobic decomposition of food wastes. Atmos Environ 44(39):5065–5071Google Scholar
  68. Xie H, Jiang Y, Zhang C, Feng S (2015a) An analytical model for volatile organic compound transport through a composite liner consisting of a geomembrane, a GCL and a soil liner. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(4):2824–2836Google Scholar
  69. Xie H, Jiang Y, Zhang C, Feng S (2015b) Steady-state analytical models for performance assessment of landfill composite liners. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(16):12198–12214Google Scholar
  70. Zhan LT, Xu H, Chen YM, Lü F, Lan JW, Shao LM, Lin WA, He PJ (2017) Biochemical, hydrological and mechanical behaviors of high food waste content MSW landfill: preliminary findings from a large-scale experiment. Waste Manag 63:27–40Google Scholar
  71. Zhang H, Schuchardt F, Li G, Yang J, Yang Q (2013) Emission of volatile sulfur compounds during composting of municipal solid waste (MSW). Waste Manag 33(4):957–963Google Scholar
  72. Zou SC, Lee SC, Chan CY, Ho KF, Wang XM, Chan LY, Zhang ZX (2003) Characterization of ambient volatile organic compounds at a landfill site in Guangzhou, South China. Chemosphere 51(9):1015–1022Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiao Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xinru Zuo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Min Xia
    • 1
    • 2
  • Haijian Xie
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Feiyu He
    • 1
    • 2
  • Siliang Shen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abdelmalek Bouazza
    • 3
  • Lili Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations