Advertisement

Impact of carrier on ammonia and organics removal from zero-discharge marine recirculating aquaculture system with sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR)

  • Jin Li
  • Weiqiang Zhu
  • Huiyu Dong
  • Zhenlin Yang
  • Peiyu Zhang
  • Zhimin QiangEmail author
Water Environmental Pollution and State of the Art Treatment Technologies
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Marine recirculating aquaculture system (MRAS) is an effective technology that provides sustainable farming of food fish globally. However, dissolved organics material (chemical oxygen demand, COD) and especially ammonia are produced from uneaten feed and metabolic wastes of fish. To purify the MRAS water, this study adopted a sequencing biofilm batch reactor (SBBR) and comparatively investigated the performances of four different carriers on ammonia and COD removal. Results indicated that the NH4+-N removal rates were 0.045 ± 0.05, 0.065 ± 0.008, 0.089 ± 0.005, and 0.093 ± 0.003 kg/(m3·d), and the COD removal rates were 0.019 ± 0.010, 0.213 ± 0.010, 0.255 ± 0.015, and 0.322 ± 0.010 kg/(m3·d) in the SBBRs packed with porous plastic, bamboo ring, maifan stone, and ceramsite carriers, respectively. Among the four carriers, ceramsite exhibited the best performance for both NH4+-N (80%) and COD (33%) removal after the SBBR reached the steady-state operation conditions. For all carriers studied, the NH4+-N removal kinetics could be well simulated by the first-order model, and the NH4+-N and COD removal rates were logarithmically correlated with the carrier’s specific surface area. Due to its high ammonia removal, stable performance and easy operation, the ceramsite-packed SBBR is feasible for MRAS water treatment.

Keywords

Sequencing biofilm batch reactor (SBBR) Carrier Marine recirculating aquaculture system (MRAS) Water treatment, ammonia 

Notes

Funding information

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878362), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M610410, 2018 T110665), and State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (18K02ESPCR).

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4887_MOESM1_ESM.docx (854 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 853 kb)

References

  1. APHA (1998) Standard Methods for Water and Wastewater Examination. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Badiola M, Mendiola D, Bostock J (2012) Recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) analysis: main issues on management and future challenges. Aquac Eng 51:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen H, Hu HY, Chen QQ, Shi ML, Jin RC (2016) Successful start-up of the anammox process: influence of the seeding strategy on performance and granule properties. Bioresour Technol 211:594–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng Z, Hu X (2017) Performance and degradation mechanism of a sequencing batch biofilm reactor combined with an electrochemical process for the removal of low concentrations of cefuroxime. Chem Eng J 320:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cytryn E, Minz D, Gelfand I, Neori A, Gieseke A, de Beer D, van Rijn J (2005) Sulfide-oxidizing activity and bacterial community structure in a fluidized bed reactor from a zero-discharge mariculture system. Environ Sci Technol 39(6):1802–1810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Díaz V, Ibáñez R, Gómez P, Urtiaga AM, Ortiz I (2012) Kinetics of nitrogen compounds in a commercial marine recirculating aquaculture system. Aquac Eng 50:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. FAO (2014) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonzalez-Silva BM, Jonassen KR, Bakke I, Østgaard K, Vadstein O (2016) Nitrification at different salinities: biofilm community composition and physiological plasticity. Water Res 95:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham DW, Knapp CW, van Vleck ES, Bloor K, Lane TB, Graham CE (2007) Experimental demonstration of chaotic instability in biological nitrification. ISME J 1(5):385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu H, Han H, Wang W, Wang B, Li Y (2011) Effect of coal gangue-fly ash ceramic (CFC) media on municipal wastewater treatment in a pre-denitrification biological aerated filter. Desalin Water Treat 31(1−3):372−378Google Scholar
  11. Jin Y, Ding D, Feng C, Tong S, Suemura T, Zhang F (2012) Performance of sequencing batch biofilm reactors with different control systems in treating synthetic municipal wastewater. Bioresour Technol 104:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuhn DD, Drahos DD, Marsh L, Flick GJ (2010) Evaluation of nitrifying bacteria product to improve nitrification efficacy in recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquac Eng 43(2):78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar VJR, Joseph V, Philip R, Singh ISB (2010) Nitrification in brackish water recirculating aquaculture system integrated with activated packed bed bioreactor. Water Sci Technol 61(3):797–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar VJR, Sukumaran V, Achuthan C, Joseph V, Philip R, Singh ISB (2013) Molecular characterization of the nitrifying bacterial consortia employed for the activation of bioreactors used in brackish and marine aquaculture systems. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 78:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis WM, Morris DP (1986) Toxicity of nitrite to fish: a review. Trans Am Fish Soc 115:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li J, Elliott D, Nielsen M, Healy MG, Zhan X (2011) Long-term partial nitrification in an intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treating ammonium-rich wastewater under controlled oxygen-limited conditions. Biochem Eng J 55(3):215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li J, Zhu WQ, Dong H, Wang D (2017) Performance and kinetics of ANAMMOX granular sludge with pH shock in a sequencing batch reactor. Biodegradation 28(4):245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ling J, Chen S (2005) Impact of organic carbon on nitrification performance of different biofilters. Aquac Eng 33(2):150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Masłoń A, Tomaszek JA (2015) A study on the use of the BioBall® as a biofilm carrier in a sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour Technol 196:577–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohan SV, Rao NC, Sarma PN (2007) Low-biodegradable composite chemical wastewater treatment by biofilm configured sequencing batch reactor (SBBR). J Hazard Mater 144(1-2):108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nijhof M, Bovendeur J (1990) Fixed film nitrification characteristics in sea-water recirculation fish culture systems. Aquaculture 87(2):133–143Google Scholar
  22. Pfeiffer TJ, Wills PS (2011) Evaluation of three types of structured floating plastic media in moving bed biofilters for total ammonia nitrogen removal in a low salinity hatchery recirculating aquaculture system. Aquac Eng 45(2):51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prehn J, Waul CK, Pedersen LF, Arvin E (2012) Impact of water boundary layer diffusion on the nitrification rate of submerged biofilter elements from a recirculating aquaculture system. Water Res 46(11):3516–3524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prosser BL, Taylor D, Dix BA, Cleeland R (1987) Method of evaluating effects of antibiotics on bacterial biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31(10):1502–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pulvenis JF (2009) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. http://www.fao.org/fishery/sofia/en (online)
  26. Pungrasmi W, Phinitthanaphak P, Powtongsook S (2016) Nitrogen removal from a recirculating aquaculture system using a pumice bottom substrate nitrification-denitrification tank. Ecol Eng 95:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schreier HJ, Mirzoyan N, Saito K (2010) Microbial diversity of biological filters in recirculating aquaculture systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21(3):318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seo JK, Jung IH, Kim MR, Kim BJ, Nam SW, Kim SK (2001) Nitrification performance of nitrifiers immobilized in PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) for a marine recirculating aquarium system. Aquac Eng 24(3):181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stickney RR (2000) Encyclopedia of aquaculture. J Aquac Res Dev Vol 156:69–70Google Scholar
  30. Tal Y, Schreier HJ, Sowers KR, Stubblefield JD, Place AR, Zohar Y (2009) Environmentally sustainable land-based marine aquaculture. Aquaculture 286(1−2):28−35Google Scholar
  31. Thauer RK, Jungermann K, Decker K (1977) Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 41(1):100−180Google Scholar
  32. Wu S, Yue Q, Qi Y, Gao B, Han S, Yue M (2011) Preparation of ultra-lightweight sludge ceramics (ULSC) and application for pharmaceutical advanced wastewater treatment in a biological aerobic filter (BAF). Bioresour Technol 102(3):2296–2300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang ZL, Zhu WQ, Yu DS, Bo YT, Li J (2019) Enhanced carbon and nitrogen removal performance of simultaneous anammox and denitrification (SAD) with mannitol addition treating saline wastewater. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 94(2):377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zheng D, Chang Q, Li Z, Gao M, She Z, Wang X, Guo L, Zhao Y, Jin C, Gao F (2016) Performance and microbial community of a sequencing batch biofilm reactor treating synthetic mariculture wastewater under long-term exposure to norfloxacin. Bioresour Technol 222:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu WQ, Li J, Dong HY, Wang D, Zhang PY (2017a) Nitrogen removal performance and operation strategy of anammox process under temperature shock. Biodegradation 28(4):261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu WQ, Zhang PY, Dong HY, Li J (2017b) Effect of carbon source on nitrogen removal in anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) process. J Biosci Bioeng 123(4):497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu WQ, Li J, Dong HY, Wang D, Zhang PY (2017c) Effect of influent substrate ratio on anammox granular sludge: performance and kinetics. Biodegradation 28(5−6): 437−452Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringQingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Department of Bioscience Engineering, Research Group of Sustainable Energy, Air and Water TechnologyUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-environmental SciencesUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations