Emergy-based environmental accounting of one mining system

  • Hengyu Pan
  • Yong GengEmail author
  • Xu Tian
  • Jeffrey Wilson
  • Wei Chen
  • Shaozhuo Zhong
  • Xiaoqian Song
Research Article


Metal production from mineral resources is crucial for economic development. However, most mining activities usually target short-term financial benefits, rather than long-term consideration on ecological sustainability. To better understand the impact of metal production, systematic evaluation methods should be applied to complement current economic accounting tools. Under such a circumstance, this study proposes an emergy-based metal production evaluation framework, taking a life cycle perspective from the formation of mineral deposit to the final production of metal. Ecosystem service loss, CO2 emissions, and emissions’ impact are quantified, evaluating the comprehensive performance of a lead and zinc production system in Yunnan Province of China. The results show that minerals contribute significantly to the formation of lead and zinc production; however, emergy received in terms of money substantially undervalues environmental work associated with production. Such a metal production system relies heavily on nonrenewable resources and put enormous pressures on local ecosystems. The beneficiation subsystem generates the highest negative impact per emergy output, followed by the smelting and refining subsystem and the underground mining subsystem. From climate change point of view, producing 1 ton of lead bullion leads to 1.79E+03 kg CO2eq. Electricity use contributes a dominated share to the total CO2 emission of all subsystems. In addition, lead recycling can greatly reduce the overall CO2 emission, indicating that it is necessary to build up a regional lead collection and recycling system. Finally, several policy suggestions are raised by considering the local realities, aiming to promote sustainable development of this industry.


Environmental accounting Emergy analysis CO2 emission Lead and zinc Governance 


Funding information

This study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (71690241, 71810107001, 71325006, 71704104,), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities through Shanghai Jiao Tong University (16JCCS04), the Shanghai Municipal Government (17XD1401800), and Yunnan Provincial Research Academy of Environmental Science.


  1. Ali SH, Giurco D, Arndt N, Nickless E, Brown G, Demetriades A, Durrheim R, Enriquez MA, Kinnaird J, Littleboy A, Meinert LD, Oberhänsli R, Salem J, Schodde R, Schneider G, Vidal O, Yakovleva N (2017) Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature 543:367–372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida CMVB, Madureira MA, Bonilla SH, Giannetti BF (2013) Assessing the replacement of lead in solders: effects on resource use and human health. J Clean Prod 47:457–464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andri I, Lacarri B, Andri I (2017) The impact of renovation measures on building environmental performance: an emergy approach. 162:776–790.
  4. Bartelmus P (2014) Environmental-economic accounting: progress and digression in the SEEA revisions. Rev Income Wealth 60:887–904. Google Scholar
  5. Bastianoni S, Campbell DE, Ridolfi R, Pulselli FM (2009) The solar transformity of petroleum fuels. Ecol Model 220:40–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandt-Williams SL (2002) Folio #4. (2nd Printing). Emergy of Florida Agriculture. Handbook of emergy evaluation. A compendium of data for emergy computation. Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown MT, Bardi E (2001) Emergy of ecosystems folio #3. Compend Data Emergy Comput 94Google Scholar
  8. Brown MT, Buranakarn V (2003) Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options. Resour Conserv Recycl 38:1–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown MT, Ulgiati S (2010) Updated evaluation of exergy and emergy driving the geobiosphere: a review and refinement of the emergy baseline. Ecol Model 221:2501–2508. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown MT, Ulgiati S (2016) Assessing the global environmental sources driving the geobiosphere: a revised emergy baseline. Ecol Model 339:126–132. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown MT, Raugei M, Ulgiati S (2012) On boundaries and “investments” in emergy synthesis and LCA: a case study on thermal vs. photovoltaic electricity. Ecol Indic 15:227–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell DE (1998) Emergy analysis of human carrying capacity and regional sustainability: an example using the state of Maine. In: Environmental monitoring and assessment. pp. 531–569.
  13. Campbell ET, Tilley DR (2014) Valuing ecosystem services from Maryland forests using environmental accounting. Ecosyst Serv 7:141–151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen W, Liu W, Geng Y, Ohnishi S, Sun L, Han W, Tian X, Zhong S (2016) Life cycle based emergy analysis on China’s cement production. J Clean Prod 131:272–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen W, Zhong S, Geng Y, Chen Y, Cui X, Wu Q, Pan H, Wu R, Sun L, Tian X (2017) Emergy based sustainability evaluation for Yunnan Province, China. J Clean Prod 162:1388–1397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. China Nonferrous Metals Industry Yearbook (2006–2017) Nonferrous Metals Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Cohen MJ, Sweeney S, Brown MT (2007) Computing the unit emergy value of crustal elements. Emergy Synth 4:16.1–16.12Google Scholar
  18. Cooke JA, Johnson MS (2002) Ecological restoration of land with particular reference to the mining of metals and industrial minerals: a review of theory and practice. Environ Rev 10:41–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L, Hussain S, Kumar P, McVittie A, Portela R, Rodriguez LC, ten Brink P, van Beukering P (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1:50–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Vilbiss CD, Brown MT (2015) New method to compute the emergy of crustal minerals. Ecol Model 315:108–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dewulf J, Boesch ME, De Meester B, Van Der Vorst G, Van Langenhove HR, Hellweg S, Huijbregts MAJ (2007) Cumulative exergy extraction from the naural environment (CEENE): a comprahensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. Environ Sci Technol 41:8477–8483. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Du Z, Lin B (2018) Analysis of carbon emissions reduction of China’s metallurgical industry. J Clean Prod 176:1177–1184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gan Y, Griffin WM (2018) Analysis of life-cycle GHG emissions for iron ore mining and processing in China—uncertainty and trends. Resour Pol 58:90–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geng Y, Zhang P, Ulgiati S, Sarkis J (2010) Emergy analysis of an industrial park: the case of Dalian. China Sci Total Environ 408:5273–5283. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geng Y, Sarkis J, Ulgiati S, Zhang P (2013) Measuring China’s circular economy. Science 339:1526–1527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geng Y, Sarkis J, Ulgiati S (2016) Sustainability, well-being, and the circular economy in China and worldwide. Science 351(6278):73–76Google Scholar
  28. Geng Y, Tian X, Sarkis J, Ulgiati S (2017) China-USA trade: indicators for equitable and environmentally balanced resource exchange. Ecol Econ 132:245–254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geng Y, Sarkis J, Bleischwizt R (2019) How to globalize the circular economy. Nature 565:153–155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000) The eco-indicator 99: a DamageOriented method for life cycle impact assessment: methodology report. Pre. Consultans, AmersfoortGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubacek K, Guan D, Barrett J, Wiedmann T (2009) Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: ecological and water footprints. J Clean Prod 17:1241–1248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ingwersen WW (2011) Emergy as a life cycle impact assessment Indicator: a gold mining case study. J Ind Ecol 15:550–567. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. IPCC (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)Google Scholar
  34. IPCC (2018) GLOBAL WARMING OF 1.5 °C. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)Google Scholar
  35. Jamali-Zghal N, Le Corre O, Lacarrière B (2014) Mineral resource assessment: compliance between emergy and exergy respecting Odum’s hierarchy concept. Ecol Model 272:208–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krausmann F, Gingrich S, Eisenmenger N, Erb KH, Haberl H, Fischer-Kowalski M (2009) Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecol Econ 68:2696–2705. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li Z, Du H, Xiao Y, Guo J (2017) Carbon footprints of two large hydro-projects in China: life-cycle assessment according to ISO/TS 14067. Renew Energy 114:534–546. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liang Y, Yu B, Wang L (2019) Costs and benefits of renewable energy development in China’s power industry. Renew Energy 131:700–712. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu J, Diamond J (2008) Revolutionizing China’s environmental protection. Science (80-. ). 319:37–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu G, Yang Z (2018) Emergy theory and practice: ecological environmental accounting and urban green management. Science press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  41. Liu G, Yang Z, Chen B, Ulgiati S (2014) Emergy-based dynamic mechanisms of urban development, resource consumption and environmental impacts. Ecol Model 271:90–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis/millennium ecosystem assessment. World Health 1134:25–60. Google Scholar
  43. Meillaud F, Gay JB, Brown MT (2005) Evaluation of a building using the emergy method. In: Solar Energy. pp. 204–212.
  44. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic China (2002) Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838–2002.(in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic China (2012) Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB3095–2012). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  46. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016) China Statistical Yearbook 2015Google Scholar
  47. NDRC (2011) Guildelines for provincal greenhouse gas inventories. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  48. Norgate TE, Jahanshahi S, Rankin WJ (2007) Assessing the environmental impact of metal production processes. J Clean Prod 15:838–848. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting. Emergy and environmental decision making. John Wiley Sons, INC 370.
  50. Odum HT (2000) Folio #2 Emergy of global processes. Handb Emergy Eval 1–40Google Scholar
  51. Odum HT (2007) Environment, power and society for the twenty-first century: the hierarchy of energy. Energy 432.
  52. Odum HT, Brown MT, Brandt-Williams S (2000) Handbook of emergy evaluation folio #1: introduction and global budget. Univ. Florida, GainesvGoogle Scholar
  53. Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Xiao Y, Polasky S, Liu J, Xu W, Wang Q, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Rao E, Jiang L, Lu F, Wang X, Yang G, Gong S, Wu B, Zeng Y, Yang W, Daily GC (2016) Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science (80-. ) 352:1455–1459. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pan H, Zhang X, Wang Y, Qi Y, Wu J, Lin L, Peng H, Qi H, Yu X, Zhang Y (2016a) Emergy evaluation of an industrial park in Sichuan Province, China: a modified emergy approach and its application. J Clean Prod 135:105–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pan H, Zhang X, Wu J, Zhang Y, Lin L, Yang G, Deng S, Li L, Yu X, Qi H, Peng H (2016b) Sustainability evaluation of a steel production system in China based on emergy. J Clean Prod 112:1498–1509. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pan H, Geng Y, Jiang P, Dong H, Sun L, Wu R (2018) An emergy based sustainability evaluation on a combined landfill and LFG power generation system. Energy 143:310–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pan H, Geng Y, Dong H, Ali M, Xiao S (2019) Sustainability evaluation of secondary lead production from spent lead acid batteries recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 140:13–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pulselli RM, Simoncini E, Pulselli FM, Bastianoni S (2007) Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: Em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability. Energy Build 39:620–628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pulselli RM, Simoncini E, Ridolfi R, Bastianoni S (2008) Specific emergy of cement and concrete: an energy-based appraisal of building materials and their transport. Ecol Indic 8:647–656. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. SEEA Central Framework (2012) System of environmental-economic accounting: a central framework, White cover publicationGoogle Scholar
  61. Shan Y, Guan D, Zheng H, Ou J, Li Y, Meng J, Mi Z, Liu Z, Zhang Q (2018) China CO2 emission accounts 1997-2015. Sci Data 5:1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shao S, Liu J, Geng Y, Miao Z, Yang Y (2016) Uncovering driving factors of carbon emissions from China’s mining sector. Appl Energy 166:220–238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sun L, Zhang C, Li J, Zeng X (2016) Assessing the sustainability of lead utilization in China. J Environ Manag 183:275–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tian X, Wu Y, Hou P, Liang S, Qu S, Xu M, Zuo T (2017) Environmental impact and economic assessment of secondary lead production: comparison of main spent lead-acid battery recycling processes in China. J Clean Prod 144:142–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ukidwe NU, Bakshi BR (2004) Thermodynamic accounting of ecosystem contribution to economic sectors with application to 1992 U.S. economy. Environ Sci Technol 38:4810–4827. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ulgiati S, Brown MT (2002) Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions: the case of electricity production. J Clean Prod 10:335–348. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang L, Zhang J, Ni W (2005) Emergy evaluation of eco-Industrial Park with power plant. Ecol Model 189:233–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yu X, Geng Y, Dong H, Fujita T, Liu Z (2016) Emergy-based sustainability assessment on natural resource utilization in 30 Chinese provinces. J Clean Prod 133:18–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang B, Chen B (2016) Sustainability accounting of a household biogas project based on emergy. Appl Energy 194:819–831. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang X, Jiang W, Deng S, Peng K (2009) Emergy evaluation of the sustainability of Chinese steel production during 1998-2004. J Clean Prod 17:1030–1038. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang X, Yang L, Li Y, Li H, Wang W, Ye B (2012) Impacts of lead/zinc mining and smelting on the environment and human health in China. Environ Monit Assess 184:2261–2273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang W, Yang J, Wu X, Hu Y, Yu W, Wang J, Dong J, Li M, Liang S, Hu J, Kumar RV (2016) A critical review on secondary lead recycling technology and its prospect. Renew Sust Energ Rev 61:108–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang X, Shen J, Wang Y, Qi Y, Liao W, Shui W, Li L, Qi H, Yu X (2017) An environmental sustainability assessment of China’s cement industry based on emergy. Ecol Indic 72:452–458. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhao Y, Wen Q, Ai J (2010) Ecosystem service value of forests in Yunnan province. For Res 23:184–190 (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.China Institute for Urban GovernanceShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityMinhangPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological SecurityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics of ShandongShandong Institute of Business and TechnologyYantaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations