Advertisement

Probing the affecting factors and decoupling analysis of energy industrial carbon emissions in Liaoning, China

  • Lei Wen
  • Zhiqun ZhangEmail author
Research Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

With the revitalization of the old industrial bases in Northeast China, the development of the energy industry is particularly significative. The purpose of this paper is analyzing the decoupling of carbon emissions and placing emphasis on Liaoning’s energy industry. The researchers used the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) decompose model to take into account carbon emissions in each energy industry and used the Tapio decoupling model from 2000 to 2015 to seek the decoupling states. The main completion of this study are as follows: (1) The EGH and OPC industry are the dominating components of the carbon emissions of the energy industry. The coal and crude oil accounted for 95% of energy industrial consumption; there is great potential for electricity to replace coal and crude oil. (2) The direction of the changes in economic growth, investment structure, investment dependence, and energy structure is the same as industrial carbon emissions. Meanwhile, energy intensity and energy technology are the opposite during the period. (3) The CMW and PGE industry occurred strong decoupling between carbon emissions and economic output since 2005; there is weak decoupling state in other industry. And the PGE and OPC industry occurred recessive coupling and weak negative decoupling between carbon emissions and energy intensity except 2011 and 2012.

Keywords

Carbon emissions Energy use LMDI method Tapio model Energy industry Liaoning Province in China 

Notes

References

  1. Ang BW (2004) Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32(9):1131–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang BW, Liu N (2007) Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach. Energy Policy 35(1):238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carmona R, Hinz J (2011) Risk-neutral models for emission allowance prices and option valuation. Management Science 57(8):1453–1468Google Scholar
  4. Dong B, Zhang M, Mu H, Su X (2016) Study on decoupling analysis between energy consumption and economic growth in Liaoning Province. Energy Policy 97:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Han HB, Zhong ZQ, Yu G, Feng X, Liu SL (2018) Coupling and decoupling effects of agricultural carbon emissions in China and their driving factors. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(25):25280–25293Google Scholar
  6. Jiaxi HU, Guan HY (2018) Research on driving factors of wastewater discharge based on the STIRPAT model and Tapio decoupling model: a case in Chongqing. Environmental Pollution & Control 40(3):355–359Google Scholar
  7. Kim MH, Adilov N (2012) The lesser of two evils: an empirical investigation of foreign direct investment-pollution tradeoff. Appl Econ 44(20):2597–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim HH, Lee H, Lee J (2015) Technology diffusion and host–country productivity in south-south FDI flows ☆. Jpn World Econ 33:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li H, Zhang Z (2018) Mining the intrinsic trends of CO 2, solubility in blended solutions. J CO2 Util 26:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li W, Sun S, Li H (2015) Decomposing the decoupling relationship between energy-related CO2 emissions and economic growth in China. Nat Hazards 79(2):977–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. OECD D (2002) OECD employment outlook: July 2002. Oecd 2002(196):50Google Scholar
  12. Schandl H, Hatfield-Dodds S, Wiedmann T, Geschke A, Cai Y, West J, Newth D, Baynes T, Lenzen M, Owen A (2016) Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 132(1):45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Skårman T, Kindbom K, Danielsson H (2010) Greenhouse gas; IPCC guidelines. https://www.ivl.se/engelska/startpage.4.343dc99d14e8bb0f58bba5.html. Accessed 2010
  14. Sun Q, Shen YZ (2016) Research on coupling degree and influencing factors of regional carbon footprint. Ecological Economy 32(11):75–79Google Scholar
  15. Tapio P (2005) Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp Policy 12(2):137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vehmas J, Luukkanen J, Kaivo-Oja J (2007) Linking analyses and environmental Kuznets curves for aggregated material flows in the EU. J Clean Prod 15(17):1662–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang W, Liu R, Zhang M, Li H (2013) Decomposing the decoupling of energy-related CO2 emissions and economic growth in Jiangsu Province. Energy Sustain Dev 17(1):62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang W, Li M, Zhang M (2017) Study on the changes of the decoupling indicator between energy-related CO2 emission and GDP in China. Energy 128:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhu L, Zhang F, Zhang YC (2018) Influencing factors and decoupling elasticity of China’s transportation carbon emissions.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051157
  20. Wei WU, Hui CY, Bo LS, Chen X (2011) Study on dynamics of freight volume in the Yangtze river delta since the mid-1980s. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin 20(7):843–847Google Scholar
  21. Xu SC, Zhang WW, He ZX, Han HM, Long RY, Chen H (2017) Decomposition analysis of the decoupling indicator of carbon emissions due to fossil energy consumption from economic growth in China. Energ Effic 10(6):1365–1380Google Scholar
  22. Zhang Z (2000) Decoupling China’s carbon emissions increase from economic growth: an economic analysis and policy implications. World Dev 28(4):739–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang YJ, Da YB (2015) The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:1255–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang M, Guo F (2013) Analysis of rural residential commercial energy consumption in China. Energy 52(1):222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang M, Wang W (2013) Decouple indicators on the CO2 emission-economic growth linkage: the Jiangsu Province case. Ecol Indic 32(3):239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang M, Song Y, Su B, Sun X (2015) Decomposing the decoupling indicator between the economic growth and energy consumption in China. Energ Effic 8(6):1231–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementNorth China Electric Power UniversityBaodingChina

Personalised recommendations