Advertisement

Chitosan-iron oxide hybrid composite: mechanism of hexavalent chromium removal by central composite design and theoretical calculations

  • Pricila Maria Batista Chagas
  • Aline Aparecida Caetano
  • Marco Aurélio Rossi
  • Mateus Aquino Gonçalves
  • Teodorico de Castro Ramalho
  • Angelita Duarte Corrêa
  • Iara do Rosário GuimarãesEmail author
Research Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the synthesis of iron oxide stabilized by chitosan was carried out for the application and optimization in the removal process of aqueous Cr(VI) by central composite design (CCD). The calculation of these effects allowed to know, quantitatively, the variables and the interaction between them that could affect the Cr(VI) removal process. It was also verified that the most favorable conditions for chromium removal were the following: pH 5.0, Cr(VI) concentration of 130 mg L−1, adsorbent mass of 5 mg, and Fe(II) content of 45% (w/w) in the CT-Fe beads. The adsorption kinetics performed under these conditions showed that the chitosan/iron hybrid composite is an adsorbent material with high chromium removal capacity (46.12 mg g−1). It was found that all variables were statistically significant. However, it was observed that the variable that most affected Cr(VI) removal was the pH of the solution, followed by the concentration of chromium ions in solution and the interaction between them. Therefore, the studied experimental conditions are efficient in chromium adsorption, besides the operational simplicity coming from statistical design. Theoretical calculations showed that the most stable chitosan was that with Fe(II) in the structure, that is, in the reaction mechanism, there is no competition of Fe(II) with Cr(III, VI) in the available sites of chitosan. Thus, the theoretical calculations show that the proposed Cr(VI) removal is effective.

Keywords

Cr(VI) adsorption Central composite design Theoretical calculations Adsorption mechanism Operational simplicity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank CAPES, FAPEMIG, CNPq, the Postgraduate Program in Agrochemistry/UFLA, and Rede Mineira de Química.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4545_MOESM1_ESM.docx (119 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 118 kb)

References

  1. APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashraf A, Bibi I, Niazi NK, Ok YS, Murtaza G, Shahid M, Kunhikrishnan A, Li DW, Mahmood T (2017) Chromium(VI) sorption efficiency of acid-activated banana peel over organo-montmorillonite in aqueous solutions. Int J Phytoremediation 19:605–613.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2016.1256372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beheshti H, Irani M, Hosseini L, Rahimi A, Aliabadi M (2016) Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using chitosan/MWCNT/Fe3O4 composite nanofibers-batch and column studies. Chem Eng J 284:557–564.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatti IA et al (2017) Chromium adsorption using waste tire and conditions optimization by response surface methodology. J Environ Chem Eng 5(3):2740–2751.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bibi I, Niazi NK, Choppala G, Burton ED (2018) Chromium(VI) removal by siderite (FeCO3) in anoxic aqueous solutions: an X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigation. Sci Total Environ 640:1424–1431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd GE, Adamson AW, Myers LS (1947) The exchange adsorption of ions from aqueous solutions by organic zeolites 2. J Am Chem Soc 69:2836–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bozorgi M, Abbasizadeh S, Samani F, Mousavi SE (2018) Performance of synthesized cast and electrospun PVA/chitosan/ZnO–NH2 nano-adsorbents in single and simultaneous adsorption of cadmium and nickel ions from wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:17457–17472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1936-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Branca C, D'Angelo G, Crupi C, Khouzami K, Rifici S, Ruello G, Wanderlingh U (2016) Role of the OH and NH vibrational groups in polysaccharide-nanocomposite interactions: a FTIR-ATR study on chitosan and chitosan/clay films. Polymer 99:614–622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buerge IJ, Hug SJ (1999) Influence of mineral surfaces on Chromium(VI) reduction by Iron(II). Environ Sci Technol 33(23):4285–4291.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es981297s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chagas PMB, Torres JA, Silva MC, Correa AD (2015) Immobilized soybean hull peroxidase for the oxidation of phenolic compounds in coffee processing wastewater. Int J Biol Macromol 81:568–575.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chagas PMB, de Carvalho LB, Caetano AA, Nogueira FGE, Corrêa AD, Guimarães I d R (2018) Nanostructured oxide stabilized by chitosan: hybrid composite as an adsorbent for the removal of chromium (VI). J Environ Chem Eng 6(1):1008–1019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.01.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiron N, Guilet R, Deydier E (2003) Adsorption of Cu(II) and Pb(II) onto a grafted silica: isotherms and kinetic models. Water Res 37:3079–3086.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00156-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi C, Nam JP, Nah JW (2016) Application of chitosan and chitosan derivatives as biomaterials. J Ind Eng Chem 33:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente – CONAMA (Brasil) (2011) Resolução n° 430 que altera a resolução n° 537, de 13 de maio de 2011. Dispõe sobre a classificação dos corpos d’água e diretrizes ambientais para o seu enquadramento, bem como estabelece as condições e padrões de lançamento de efluentes, dá outras Providências. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 18 mar. seção 3, p. 7Google Scholar
  15. Cornell RM, Schuwertmann U (2003) The iron oxides, 3th edn. J. Wiley-VCH, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunha GD et al (2016) Recycling of chromium wastes from the tanning industry to produce ceramic nanopigments. Green Chem 18(19):5342–5356.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC01562J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinker MK, Kulkarni PS (2015) Recent advances in silica-based materials for the removal of hexavalent chromium: a review. J Chem Eng Data 60(9):2521–2540.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.5b00292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gyliene O et al (2014) Influence of dissolved oxygen on Fe(II) and Fe(III) sorption onto chitosan. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 461:151–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.07.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haldorai Y, Rengaraj A, Ryu T, Shin J, Huh YS, Han YK (2015) Response surface methodology for the optimization of lanthanum removal from an aqueous solution using a Fe3O4/chitosan nanocomposite. Mater Sci Eng B 195:20–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2015.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hao C, Yang Y, Shen Y, Feng F, Wang X, Zhao Y, Ge C (2016) Liquid phase-based ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of G-ZnO nanocomposites and its sunlight photocatalytic activity. Mater Des 89:864–871.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hua M, Zhang SJ, Pan BC, Zhang WM, Lv L, Zhang QX (2012) Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: a review. J Hazard Mater 211:317–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keith TA (2010) Aimall (version 10.05.04), TKGristmill software, Overland Park KS. http://aim.tkgristmill.com/
  23. Kim MK, Sundaram KS, Iyengar GA, Lee KP (2015) A novel chitosan functional gel included with multiwall carbon nanotube and substituted polyaniline as adsorbent for efficient removal of chromium ion. Chem Eng J 267:51–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koch U, Popelier PLA (1995) Characterization of C-H-O hydrogen-bonds on the basis of the charge-density. J Phys Chem 99:9747–9754.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j100024a016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee CG, Lee S, Park JA, Park C, Lee SJ, Kim SB, An B, Yun ST, Lee SH, Choi JW (2017) Removal of copper, nickel and chromium mixtures from metal plating wastewater by adsorption with modified carbon foam. Chemosphere 166:203–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li LL, Fan LL, Sun M, Qiu HM, Li XJ, Duan HM, Luo CN (2013) Adsorbent for chromium removal based on graphene oxide functionalized with magnetic cyclodextrin-chitosan. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 107:76–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lingamdinne LP, Chang YY, Yang JK, Singh J, Cho EH, Shiratani M, Koduru JR, Attri P (2017) Biogenic reductive preparation of magnetic inverse spinel iron oxide nanoparticles for the adsorption removal of heavy metals. Chem Eng J 307:74–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lu J, Xu K, Yang J, Hao Y, Cheng F (2017) Nano iron oxide impregnated in chitosan bead as a highly efficient sorbent for Cr(VI) removal from water. Carbohydr Polym 173:28–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.05.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lv XS, Xu J, Jiang GM, Xu XH (2011) Removal of chromium(VI) from wastewater by nanoscale zero-valent iron particles supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chemosphere 85:1204–1209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madala S, Nadavala SK, Vudagandla S, Boddu VM, Abburi K (2017) Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics of Cadmium (II) biosorption on to composite chitosan biosorbent. Arab J Chem 10:S1883–S1S93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neese F (2012) The ORCA program system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 233:73–78.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neto BB, Scarminio IS, Bruns RE (2010) Como Fazer Experimentos. Editora Bookman, 4ª EdiçãoGoogle Scholar
  33. Nunes CA, Freitas MP, Pinheiro ACM, Bastos SC (2012) Chemoface: a novel free user-friendly interface for chemometrics. J Braz Chem Soc 23:2003–2010.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532012005000073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pasquini C (2003) Near infrared spectroscopy: fundamentals, practical aspects and analytical applications. J Braz Chem Soc 14:198–219.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532003000200006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prado C, Ponce SC, Pagano E, Prado FE, Rosa M (2016) Differential physiological responses of two Salvinia species to hexavalent chromium at a glance. Aquat Toxicol 175:213–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prahas D, Kartika Y, Indraswati N, Ismadji S (2008) Activated carbon from jackfruit peel waste by H3PO4 chemical activation: pore structure and surface chemistry characterization. Chem Eng J 140:32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.08.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qin JX, Tan P, Jiang Y, Liu XQ, He QX, Sun LB (2016) Functionalization of metal-organic frameworks with cuprous sites using vapor-induced selective reduction: efficient adsorbents for deep desulfurization. Green Chem 18:3210–3215.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC00613B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rakkapao N, Vao-soongnern V, Masubuchi Y, Watanabe H (2011) Miscibility of chitosan/poly(ethylene oxide) blends and effect of doping alkali and alkali earth metal ions on chitosan/PEO interaction. Polymer 52:2618–2627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.03.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rossi LM, Costa NJS, Silva FP, Wojcieszak R (2014) Magnetic nanomaterials in catalysis: advanced catalysts for magnetic separation and beyond. Green Chem 16:2906–2933.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4GC00164H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sahu PK, Sahu PK, Gupta SK, Agarwal DD (2014) Chitosan: an efficient, reusable, and biodegradable catalyst for green synthesis of heterocycles. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:2085–2091.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie402037d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sampaio CD, Frota LS, Magalhaes HS, Dutra LMU, Queiroz DC, Araujo RS, Becker H, de Souza JRR, Ricardo N, Trevisan MTS (2015) Chitosan/mangiferin particles for Cr(VI) reduction and removal. Int J Biol Macromol 78:273–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sen Gupta S, Bhattacharyya KG (2011) Kinetics of adsorption of metal ions on inorganic materials: a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 162:39–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shahid M, Shamshad S, Rafiq M, Khalid S, Bibi I, Niazi NK, Dumat C, Rashid MI (2017) Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: a review. Chemosphere 178:513–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shekari H, Sayadi MH, Rezaei MR, Allahresani A (2017) Synthesis of nickel ferrite/titanium oxide magnetic nanocomposite and its use to remove hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. Surf and Interf 8:199–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2017.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sikder MT, Mihara Y, Islam MS, Saito T, Tanaka S, Kurasaki M (2014) Preparation and characterization of chitosan-caboxymethyl-beta-cyclodextrin entrapped nanozero-valent iron composite for Cu (II) and Cr (IV) removal from wastewater. Chem Eng J 236:378–387.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simonin JP (2016) On the comparison of pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order rate laws in the modeling of adsorption kinetics. Chem Eng J 300:254–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh N, Ahmad A (2010) Spectrophotometric and spectroscopic studies of charge transfer complex of 1-Naphthylamine as an electron donor with picric acid as an electron acceptor in different polar solvents. J Mol Struct 977:197–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.05.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Su CM (2017) Environmental implications and applications of engineered nanoscale magnetite and its hybrid nanocomposites: a review of recent literature. J Hazard Mater 322:48–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tahar LB, Oueslati MH, Abualreish MJA (2018) Synthesis of magnetite derivatives nanoparticles and their application for the removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 512:115–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Talebi M, Abbasizadeh S, Keshtkar AR (2017) Evaluation of single and simultaneous thorium and uranium sorption from water systems by an electrospun PVA/SA/PEO/HZSM5 nanofiber. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:340–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tehrani MM, Abbasizadeh S, Alamdari A, Mousavi SE (2017) Prediction of simultaneous sorption of copper(II), cobalt(II) and zinc(II) contaminants from water systems by a novel multi-functionalized zirconia nanofiber. Desalin Water Treat 62:403–417.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vieira RS, Meneghetti E, Baroni P, Guibal E, de la Cruz VMG, Caballero A, Rodriguez-Castellon E, Beppu MM (2014) Chromium removal on chitosan-based sorbents - An EXAFS/XANES investigation of mechanism. Mater Chem Phys 146:412–417.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.03.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang KP, Liu Q (2014) Chemical structure analyses of phosphorylated chitosan. Carbohydr Res 386:48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2013.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanit Eng Div 89:31–60Google Scholar
  56. World Health Organization (WHO) (2004) Organization, Guidelines for drinking — water quality, 3rd edn. WHO, Geneva, p 515Google Scholar
  57. Wibowo E, Rokhmat M, Khairurrijal S, Abdullah M (2017) Reduction of seawater salinity by natural zeolite (Clinoptilolite): adsorption isotherms, thermodynamics and kinetics. Desalination 409:146–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wu YH, Ming Z, Yang SX, Fan Y, Fang P, Sha HT, Cha LG (2017) Adsorption of hexavalent chromium onto Bamboo Charcoal grafted by Cu2+-N-aminopropylsilane complexes: optimization, kinetic, and isotherm studies. J Ind Eng Chem 46:222–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.10.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xiao YZ, Liang HF, Wang ZC (2013) MnFe2O4/chitosan nanocomposites as a recyclable adsorbent for the removal of hexavalent chromium. Mater Res Bull 48:3910–3915.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.05.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yan H, Yang H, Li AM, Cheng RS (2016) pH-tunable surface charge of chitosan/graphene oxide composite adsorbent for efficient removal of multiple pollutants from water. Chem Eng J 284:1397–1405.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yao W, Rao PH, Lo IMC, Zhang WQ, Zheng WR (2014) Preparation of cross-linked magnetic chitosan with quaternary ammonium and its application for Cr(VI) and P(V) removal. J Environ Sci 26:2379–2386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ye Y, Jiang Z, Xu Z, Zhang X, Wang D, Lv L, Pan B (2017) Efficient removal of Cr(III)-organic complexes from water using UV/Fe(III) system: negligible Cr(VI) accumulation and mechanism. Water Res 126:172–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang L, Luo HJ, Liu PP, Fang W, Geng JJ (2016) A novel modified graphene oxide/chitosan composite used as an adsorbent for Cr(VI) in aqueous solutions. Int J Biol Macromol 87:586–596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhu GC, Liu JF, Yin J, Li ZW, Ren BZ, Sun YJ, Wan P, Liu YS (2016) Functionalized polyacrylamide by xanthate for Cr (VI) removal from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 288:390–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhurko GA, Zhurko DA (2015) Chemcraft program, Academic version. http://www.chemcraftprog.com

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pricila Maria Batista Chagas
    • 1
  • Aline Aparecida Caetano
    • 1
  • Marco Aurélio Rossi
    • 1
  • Mateus Aquino Gonçalves
    • 2
  • Teodorico de Castro Ramalho
    • 2
  • Angelita Duarte Corrêa
    • 3
  • Iara do Rosário Guimarães
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratório de Catálise Ambiental e Novos Materiais, Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade Federal de LavrasLavrasBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratório de Análise Computacional, Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade Federal de LavrasLavrasBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Bioquímica, Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade Federal de LavrasLavrasBrazil

Personalised recommendations