Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated sediments by persulfate oxidation and determination of degradation product cytotoxicity based on HepG2 and ZF4 cell lines
This study evaluated the use of magnetite (Fe3O4), carbon black (CB), and Fe3O4-CB composites activated by persulfate (PS) at circumneutral pH to oxidize polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in marine sediments. In addition, the in vitro cytotoxic activity and apoptotic response of the obtained degradation products were investigated. Chemical analyses showed that the total PAH concentration was 26,263 ng/g for sediment samples from an industrial port area. Highly toxic BaP was the main contributor to the TEQ in sediments. Source analyses demonstrated that the PAHs in the sediment were derived from coal combustion. In this study, we found that the PS oxidation processes effectively degrade PAHs at concentration levels of 1.7 × 10−5 M at pH 6.0. The 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was employed to assess the cytotoxicity of the PAH degradation products before and after Fe3O4/PS, CB/PS, and Fe3O4-CB/PS oxidation treatment using a human hepatoma carcinoma cell line (HepG2) and a zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryonic cell line (ZF4). Each sample extract showed a marked dose-related response, with the cell viability reduced by 82% in the case of HepG2 and 58% in the case of ZF4 at 100 μg/mL after the Fe3O4-CB/PS process. The PAH degradation products had different effects on the cell morphologies of the two cell lines. The results suggested that the ZF4 cell model is more sensitive than HepG2 to the toxicity of the PAH samples.
KeywordsPersulfate Magnetite Carbon black Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Cytotoxicity HepG2 cells ZF4 cells MTT assay
This study is financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, under contract nos. MOST 106-2221-E-992-302-MY3 and 106-2221-E-992-303-MY3.
- Benitez-Trinidad AB, Herrera-Moreno JF, Vázquez-Estrada G, Verdín-Betancourt FA, Sordo M, Ostrosky-Wegman P, Bernal-Hernández YY, Medina-Díaz IM, Barrón-Vivanco BS, Robledo-Marenco ML, Salazar AM, Rojas-García AE (2015) Cytostatic and genotoxic effect of temephos in human lymphocytes and HepG2 cells. Toxicol in Vitro 29:779–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hung CM, Chen CW, Jhuang YJ, Dong CD (2016) Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles: characterization and performance exemplified by the degradation of methylene blue in the presence of persulfate. J Adv Oxid Technol 19:43–51Google Scholar
- Long ER, MacDonald DD, Smith SL, Calder ED (1995) Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ Manage 19:81–97Google Scholar
- Potratz S, Jungnickel H, Grabiger S, Tarnow P, Otto W, Fritsche E, Bergen MV, Luch A (2016) Differential cellular metabolite alterations in HaCaT cells caused by exposure to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-binding polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons chrysene, benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[a,l]pyrene. Toxicol Rep 3:763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang S, Sheng Y, Feng M, Leszczynski J, Wang L, Tachikawa H, Yu H (2007) Light-induced cytotoxicity of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the US EPA priority pollutant list in human skin HaCaT keratinocytes: relationship between phototoxicity and excited state properties. Environ Toxicol 22:318–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yadav IC, Devi NL, Li J, Zhang G (2018) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in house dust and surface soil in major urban regions of Nepal: Implication on source apportionment and toxicological effect. Sci Total Environ 616–617:223–235Google Scholar