Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 9161–9173 | Cite as

Regeneration of 4-chlorophenol from spent powdered activated carbon by ultrasound

  • Tingting Zhang
  • Yanling Yang
  • Xing Li
  • Nan Wang
  • Zhiwei ZhouEmail author
Research Article
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Ultrasound-assisted regeneration of powdered activated carbon (PAC) saturated with 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) was investigated in this work. The variables, i.e., acoustic frequency, density levels, regenerating solution species, spent PAC mass, and the number of repeated cycle, were optimized. The UV–Vis spectra, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), and pore structure analysis were used to characterize the regenerated PAC as compared to the virgin and spent PAC. The adsorption experiments indicated that the adsorption kinetics of 4-CP fitted well with the pseudo-second-order model, and the main chemisorption process was nonlinear and heterogeneous. The desorption results showed that the optimized regenerated conditions were identified as 40 kHz of frequency, 0.18 W/mL of sonication intensity, 0.1 M NaOH and 50% (v/v) ethyl alcohol mixture of regeneration solution, and 1 g/L of saturated PAC mass. Under this condition, the regeneration efficiency reached up to 86.81%. Hydroxylated oxidation products especially benzoquinone and hydroquinone were formed during ultrasound regeneration. Ultrasound mainly acted on surface functionalities, mesopores, and macropores of PAC through the hydroxyl radical oxidization resulted from the cavitation effect.

Keywords

Powdered activated carbon Regeneration Ultrasound Adsorption–desorption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to give our sincere thanks to the peer reviewers for their suggestions.

Funding information

The study received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778012).

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4392_MOESM1_ESM.docx (679 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 679 kb)

References

  1. Abramov OV (1999) High-intensity ultrasonics: theory and industrial applications. Appl Ind Phys:80–82Google Scholar
  2. Azizian S, Niknam Z, Rombi E (2012) Adsorption of pentafluorophenol onto powdered, granular, and cloth activated carbons. J Disper Sci Technol 33:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bian WJ, Song XH, Liu DQ, Zhang J, Chen XH (2011) The intermediate products in the degradation of 4-chlorophenol by pulsed high voltage discharge in water. J Hazard Mater 192:1330–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breitbach M, Bathen D, Schmidt-Traub H (2002) Desorption of a fixed-bed adsorber by ultrasound. Ultrasonics 40:679–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breitbach M, Bathen D, Schmidt-Traub H (2003) Effect of ultrasound on adsorption and desorption processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:5635–5646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen SY, His HC, Shih MY (2018) Bioregeneration of spent mercury bearing sulfur-impregnated activated carbon adsorbent. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5095–5104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi AES, Roces S, Dugos N, Arcega A, Wan MW (2017) Adsorptive removal of dibenzothiophene sulfone from fuel oil using clay material adsorbents. J Clean Prod 161:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng D, Tan H, Deventer JSJV (2003) Ultrasonic elution of gold from activated carbon. Miner Eng 16:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghaedi H, Ayoub M, Sufian S, Lal B, Uemuraa Y (2017) Thermal stability and FT-IR analysis of phosphonium-based deep eutectic solvents with different hydrogen bond donors. J Mol Liq 242:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guilane S, Hamdaoui O (2016) Regeneration of exhausted granular activated carbon by low frequency ultrasound in batch reactor. Desalin Water Treat 57:15826–15834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guilane S, Handaoui O (2016) Ultrasound-assisted regeneration of granular activated carbon saturated by 4-chlorophenol in batch-loop reactor. Desalin Water Treat 57:17262–17270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo D, Shi Q, He B, Yuan X (2011) Different solvents for the regeneration of the exhausted activated carbon used in the treatment of coking wastewater. J Hazard Mater 186:1788–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall KR, Eagleton LC, Acrivos A, Vermeulen T (1966) Pore- and solid-diffusion kinetics in fixed-bed adsorption under constant-pattern conditions. Ind Eng Chem Fundamen 5:212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamdaoui O, Naffrechoux E (2007a) An investigation of the mechanisms of ultrasonically enhanced desorption. AICHE J 53:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamdaoui O, Naffrechoux E (2007b) Modeling of adsorption isotherms of phenol and chlorophenols onto granular activated carbon. Part II. Models with more than two parameters. J Hazard Mater 147:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamdaoui O, Naffrechoux E, Tifouti L, Petrier C (2003) Effects of ultrasound on adsorption-desorption of p-chlorophenol on granular activated carbon. Ultrason Sonochem 10:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamdaoui O, Naffrechoux E, Suptil J, Fachinger C (2005) Ultrasonic desorption of p-chlorophenol from granular activated carbon. Chem Eng J 106:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He X, Elkouz M, Inyang Dickenson ME, Wert EC (2017) Ozone regeneration of granular activated carbon for trihalomethane control. J Hazard Mater 326:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hou L, Wang L, Royer S, Zhang H (2016) Ultrasound-assisted heterogeneous Fenton-like degradation of tetracycline over a magnetite catalyst. J Hazard Mater 302:458–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeong B, Min-Seok O, Park HM, Park C, Kim EJ, Hong SW (2017) Elimination of microcystin-LR and residual Mn species using permanganate and powdered activated carbon: oxidation products and pathways. Water Res 114:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jin JW, Li YN, Zhang JY, Wu SC, Cao YC, Liang P, Zhang J, Wong MH, Wang MY, Shan SD, Christie P (2016) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on properties and environmental safety of heavy metals in biochars derived from municipal sewage sludge. J Hazard Mater 320:417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jing GH, Zhou ZM, Song L, Dong MX (2011) Ultrasound enhanced adsorption and desorption of chromium (VI) on activated carbon and polymeric resin. Desalination 279:423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joseph L, Boateng LK, Flora JRV, Park Y, Son A, Badawy M, Yoon Y (2013) Removal of bisphenol A and 17 alpha-ethinyl estradiol by combined coagulation and adsorption using carbon nanomaterials and powdered activated carbon. Sep Purif Technol 107:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Juang RS, Lin SH, Cheng CH (2006) Liquid-phase adsorption and desorption of phenol onto activated carbons with ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 13:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaustubha M, Debabrata D, Manindra NB (2008) Treatment of phenolic wastewater in a novel multi-stage external loop airlift reactor using activated carbon. Sep Purif Technol 58:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim SH, Ngo HH, Shon HK, Vigneswaran S (2008) Adsorption and photocatalysis kinetics of herbicide onto titanium oxide and powdered activated carbon. Sep Purif Technol 58:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Korkut O, Sayan E, Lacin O, Bayrak B (2010) Investigation of adsorption and ultrasound assisted desorption of lead (II) and copper (II) on local bentonite: a modelling study. Desalination 259:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ledesma B, Román S, Álvarez-Murillo A, Sabio E, González-García CM (2014) Fundamental study on the thermal regeneration stages of exhausted activated carbons: kinetics. J Therm Anal Calorim 115:537–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li QM, Qi YS, Gao CZ (2015) Chemical regeneration of spent powdered activated carbon used in decolorization of sodium salicylate for the pharmaceutical industry. J Clean Prod 86:424–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lim JL, Okada M (2005) Regeneration of granular activated carbon using ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 12:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu C, Sun YK, Wang DY, Sun ZH, Chen M, Zhou Z, Chen W (2017) Performance and mechanism of low-frequency ultrasound to regenerate the biological activated carbon. Ultrason Sonochem 34:142–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McQuillan RV, Stevens GW, Mumford KA (2018) The electrochemical regeneration of granular activated carbons: a review. J Hazard Mater 355:34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meng ZL, Zhou ZW, Zheng D, Liu LJ, Dong J, Yang YL, Li X, Zhang TT (2018) Optimizing dewaterability of drinking water treatment sludge by ultrasound treatment: correlations to sludge physicochemical properties. Ultrason Sonochem 45:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nath K, Bhakhar MS (2011) Microbial regeneration of spent activated carbon dispersed with organic contaminants: mechanism, efficiency, and kinetic models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:534–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pastranamartínez LM, Lópezramón MV, Morenocastilla C (2009) Adsorption and thermal desorption of the herbicide fluroxypyr on activated carbon fibers and cloth at different pH values. J Colloid Interface Sci 331:2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Qian M, Ramirez A, Das A, StJohn DH (2010) The effect of solute on ultrasonic grain refinement of magnesium alloys. J Cryst Growth 312:2267–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rae J, Ashokkumar M, Eulaerts O, Sonntag CV, Reisse J, Grieser F (2005) Estimation of ultrasound induced cavitation bubble temperatures in aqueous solutions. Ultrason Sonochem 12:325–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodríguez I, Llompart M, Cela R (2000) Solid-fase extration of phenols. J Chromatogr A 885:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Román S, Ledesma B, González JF, Al-Kassir A, Engo G, Álvarez MA (2013) Two stage thermal regeneration of exhausted activated carbons. Steam gasification of effluents. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 103:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salvador F, Jiménez CS (1996) A new method for regenerating activated carbon by thermal desorption with liquid water under subcritical conditions. Carbon 34:511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schneider P (1995) Adsorption isotherms of microporous-mesoporous solids revisited. Appl Catal A-Gen 129:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shao SL, Cai LY, Li K, Li JY, Du X, Li GB, Liang H (2017) Deposition of powdered activated carbon (PAC) on ultrafiltration (UF) membrane surface: influencing factors and mechanisms. J Membr Sci 530:104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Show KY, Mao T, Lee DJ (2007) Optimisation of sludge disruption by sonication. Water Res 41:4741–4747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suzuki M (1990) Regeneration of spent adsorbent, chapter 9. In: Suzuki M (ed) Adsorption engineering (chemical engineering monographs) 25. Kodansha & Elsevier, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  45. Tan IAW, Ahmad AL, Hameed BH (2009) Adsorption isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamics and desorption studies of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol on oil palm empty fruit bunch-based activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 164:473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Temel NK, Sökmen M (2011) New catalyst systems for the degradation of chlorophenols. Desalination 281:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xing X, Feng C (2018) Enhancing CO2 desorption from crude oil by ultrasound. Ultrasonics 84:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yagmur E, Turkoglu S, Banford A, Aktas Z (2017) The relative performance of microwave regenerated activated carbons on the removal of phenolic pollutants. J Clean Prod 149:1109–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yao Y (2016) Enhancement of mass transfer by ultrasound: application to adsorbent regeneration and food drying/dehydration. Ultrason Sonochem 31:512–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tingting Zhang
    • 1
  • Yanling Yang
    • 1
  • Xing Li
    • 1
  • Nan Wang
    • 1
  • Zhiwei Zhou
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Architecture and Civil engineeringBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations