Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 10159–10173 | Cite as

Systematic study on the reduction efficiency of ascorbic acid and thiourea on selenate and selenite at high and trace concentrations

  • Gongli Zhang
  • Mario Alberto GomezEmail author
  • Shuhua Yao
  • Xu Ma
  • Shifen Li
  • Xuan Cao
  • Shuyan Zang
  • Yongfeng JiaEmail author
Research Article
  • 135 Downloads

Abstract

Selenate (Se(VI)) and selenite (Se(IV)) are common soluble wastewater pollutants in natural and anthropogenic systems. We evaluated the reduction efficiency and removal of low (0.02 and 2 mg/L) and high (20 and 200 mg/L) Se(IV)(aq) and Se(VI)(aq) concentrations to elemental (Se0) via the use of ascorbic acid (AA), thiourea (TH), and a 50–50% mixture. The reduction efficiency of AA with Se(IV)(aq) to nano- and micro-crystalline Se0 was ≥ 95%, but ≤ 5% of Se(VI)(aq) was reduced to Se(IV)(aq) with no Se0. Thiourea was able to reduce ≤ 75% of Se(IV)(aq) to bulk Se0 at lower concentrations but was more effective (≥ 90%) at higher concentrations. Reduction of Se(VI)(aq)→Se (IV)(aq) with TH was ≤ 75% at trace concentrations which steadily declined as the concentrations increased, and the products formed were elemental sulfur (S0) and SnSe8−n phases. The reduction efficiency of Se(IV)(aq) to bulk Se0 upon the addition of AA+TH was ≤ 81% at low concentrations and ≥ 90% at higher concentrations. An inverse relation to what was observed with Se(IV)(aq) was found upon the addition of AA+TH with Se(VI)(aq). At low Se(VI)(aq) concentrations, AA+TH was able to reduce more effectively (≤ 61%) Se(VI)(aq)→Se(IV)(aq)→Se0, while at higher concentrations, it was ineffective (≤ 11%) and Se0, S0, and SnSe8−n formed. This work helps to guide the removal, reduction effectiveness, and products formed from AA, TH, and a 50–50% mixture on Se(IV)(aq) and Se(VI)(aq) to Se0 under acidic conditions and environmentally relevant concentrations possibly found in acidic natural waters, hydrometallurgical chloride processing operations, and acid mine drainage/acid rock drainage tailings.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Ascorbic acid Thiourea Selenium Chloride Reduction Acidic ambient conditions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We like to thank Yi-hang Duan at the Institute of Applied Ecology for the use of Raman and ATR-IR instruments. We also like to thank Chunxiang Gao at the SYUCT for the collection of the XRD data and Guangzhou Weiping Technology Service Co., Ltd. for TEM analysis. Finally, the authors would like to thank Baiyi Wang and Bing Han at SYUCT for additional experimental work used in the revision of this manuscript. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 41703129 and the National Key R&D Program of China No. 2017 YFD 0800301.

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4383_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.9 mb)
Supplementary material The supporting information contains 6 Tables and 9 Figures not included in the main body of the text but discussed in the body of the manuscript. (DOCX 2974 kb)

References

  1. Adams MD (2016) Gold ore processing: project development and operations, Second edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam ISBN: 978-0-444-63658-4Google Scholar
  2. Alía JM, Edwards HGM, Fernández A, García-Navarro FJ, Prieto M (1999) FT-Raman spectra of cis–bis (thiourea) selenium(II) chloride and bromide. J Mol Struct 510:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks SB, Banks D (2001) Abandoned mines drainage: impact assessment and mitigation of discharges from coal mines in the UK. Eng Geol 60(1–4):31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benguerel E, Seyer N, Geoffroy N, Le Regent A (2010) Upgrading the selenium removal process for CEZinc’s acid plant effluents. In: Centomo L (ed) Zinc and Lead Metallurgy. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum, Vancouver, pp 131–139Google Scholar
  5. Bruggeman C, Maes A, Vancluysen J, Vandemussele P (2005) Selenite reduction of boom clay: effect of FeS2, clay minerals and dissolved organic matter. Environ Pollut 137:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman PM, Adams WJ, Brooks M, Delos CG, Luoma SN, Maher WA, Ohlendorf HM, Presser TS, Shaw DP (2010) Ecological assessment of selenium in the aquatic environment. A SETAC Pellston Workshop. SETAC, PensacolaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chappell MA, Seiter JM, Bednar AJ, Price CL, Averett D, Lafferty B, Tappero R, Stanley JS, Kennedy AJ, Steevens JA, Zhou P, Morikawa E, Merchan G, Roy A (2014) Stability of solid-phase selenium species in fly ash after prolonged submersion in natural river system. Chemosphere 95:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CH2M Hill (2013) NAMC White Paper Report Addendum Selenium Treatment; Technical addendum; CH2M Hill:Englewood, CO, USA, 29 March pp. 1–68Google Scholar
  9. De Coninck WO (1905) Action of dextrose on selenious acid. CR Hbd Acad Sci 141:1234–1235Google Scholar
  10. Dinh QT, Li Z, Tran TAT, Wang D, Liang D (2017) Role of organic acids on the bioavailability of selenium in soil: a review. Chemosphere 184:618–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Egiebor NO, Oni B (2007) Acid rock drainage formation and treatment: a review. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 2:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Estevez H, Garcia-Lidon JC, Luque-Garcia JL, Camara C (2014) Effects of chitosan-modified selenium nanoparticles on cell proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle pattern in HepG2 cells: comparison with other selenospecies. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 122:184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission (1998) Council directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Off J Eur Communities pp 32–54. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31998L0083
  14. Ezhuthupurakkal PB, Polaki LR, Arumugam S, Ariraman S, Venugopal S, Chinnasamy T (2017) Selenium nanoparticles synthesized in aqueous extract of Allium sativum perturbs the structural integrity of calf thymus DNA through intercalation and groove binding. Mater Sci Eng C 74:597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Favorito JE, Luxton TP, Eick MJ, Grossl PR (2017) Selenite speciation in phosphate mine soils and evaluation of a sequential extraction procedure using XAFS. Environ Pollut 229:911–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernádez-Martínez A, Charlet L (2009) Selenium environmental cycling and bioavailability: a structural chemist point of view. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 8:81–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geoffroy N (2011) Selenium removal from aqueous solutions. Ph.D. Thesis. McGill UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Geoffroy N, Benguerel E, Demopoulos GP (2008) Precipitation from weak acidic solutions using sodium dithionite and sodium sulphide. In: Centomo L (ed) Zinc and Lead Metallurgy. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum, Winnipeg, pp 295–305Google Scholar
  19. Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) (2009) Literature review of treatment technologies to remove selenium from mining influenced water. Prepared for Teck Coal Limited, Calgary, AB. 0842–0034Google Scholar
  20. Goldhaber SB (2003) Trace element risk assessment: essentiality vs. toxicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 38(2):232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gray NF (1996) The use of an objective index for the visual assessment of the contamination of surface water and groundwater by acid mine drainage. Water Environ J 10(5):332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greald F, Combs J, Gray WP (1998) Chemopreventive agents: selenium. Pharmacol Ther 79(3):179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall RA, Jones WE, Subramanian KN (1980) Process for removal of selenium and tellurium from copper bearing liquors. Canadian Patent 1081470Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton SJ (2004) Review of selenium toxicity in the aquatic food chain. Sci Total Environ 326(1–3):1–31Google Scholar
  25. Harris B, White C (2011a) A non-cyanide route for processing of refractory gold ores and concentrates. In: Alta conference 2011, pp 18Google Scholar
  26. Harris B, White C (2011b) Process for the recovery of gold from an ore in chloride medium with a nitrogen species. WO 2001/100821 A1Google Scholar
  27. Hassan RM (1991) Kinetics and mechanism of selenium (IV) oxidation of ascorbic acid in aqueous perchlorate solutions. Croat Chem Acta 64(2):229–236Google Scholar
  28. Hemalatha T, Krithiga G, Kumar BS, Sastry TP (2014) Preparation and characterization of hydroxyapatite-coated selenium nanoparticles and their interaction with osteosarcoma (SaOS-2) cells. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett) 27(6):1152–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hollander ML, Yurii E (1956) Recovery of selenate values contained in sulfuric acid solutions. US Patent 2834652Google Scholar
  30. Hyvarinen O, Hamalainen M, Lamberg P, Lippo J (2004) Recovering gold from copper concentrate via the HydroCopper process. JOM 56(8):57–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jain R, Matassa S, Singh S, van Hullebusch ED, Esposito G, Lens PNL (2016) Reduction of selenite to elemental selenium nanoparticles by activated sludge. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1193–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2005) Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci Total Environ 338:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kapoor A, Tanjore S, Viraraghavan T (1995) Removal of selenium from water and wastewater. Int J Environ Stud 49:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kharaka YK, Ambats G, Presser TS (1996) Removal of selenium from contaminated agricultural drainage water by nanofiltration membranes. Appl Geochem 11:797–802Google Scholar
  35. Khamkhash A, Srivastava V, Ghosh T, Akdogan G, Ganguli R, Aggarwal S (2017) Mining-related selenium contamination in Alaska, and the state of current knowledge. Minerals 7:46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kora AJ, Rastogi L (2016) Biomimetic synthesis of selenium nanoparticles by pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853: an approach for conversion of selenite. J Environ Manag 181:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koyama K, Kobayashi M, Tsunashima A (2000) Removal of selenium in effluents of metal refineries by chemical reduction using solid iron. In: Young C (ed) minor elements 2000: processing and environmental aspects of as, Sb, se, Te, and bi. Society for Mining, metallurgy, and exploration, Inc., Littleton, pp 363–370Google Scholar
  38. Laitnen R, Steudel R (1980) Vibrational spectroscopic investigations of SnSe8-n molecules. J Mol Struct 68:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lemly AD (2004) Aquatic selenium pollution is a global environmental safety issue. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 59:44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levine VE (1934) Precipitation and color reaction for ascorbic acid: specificity of acidified sodium selenite solution. Proc Soc Exp Biol 35:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liddell KS, Adams MD (2012) Kell hydrometallurgical process for extraction of platinum group metals and base metals from flotation concentrates. J S Afr Inst Min Metall Trans 112:31–36Google Scholar
  42. Lyubenova L, Sabodash X, Schroder P, Michalke B (2015) Selenium species in the roots and shoots of chickpea plants treated with different concentrations of sodium selenite. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(21):16978–16986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marchant WN, Dannenberg RO, Brooks PT (1978) Selenium removal from acidic waste water using zinc reduction and lime neutralization. US Bureau of Mines, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
  44. Matos-Reyes MN, Cervera ML, Campos RC, de la Guardia M (2010) Total content of as, Sb, Se, Te and Bi in Spanish vegetables, cereals and pulses and estimation of the contribution of these foods to the Mediterranean daily intake of trace elements. Food Chem 122(1):188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayhew K, Coy MC, Mean R, Woeller J (2013) Teck’s CESL copper process: a commercial ready concentrate leach alternative. In: Presented at Copper 2013. http://www.cesl.com
  46. McCloskey J, Twidwell L, Park B, Fallon M (2008) Removal of selenium oxyanions from industrial scrubber waters utilizing elemental iron. In: Young CA, Taylor PR, Anderson CG (Eds.), Hydrometallurgy 2008: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME), Colorado, USA, pp. 140–148Google Scholar
  47. Misra GJ, Tandon JP (1967) Gravimetric determination of selenium using copper chloride as reducing agent. Indian J Chem 5(11):560–562Google Scholar
  48. Monteith G, Houlachi G, Pineau M, Laliberté M (2000) Development, testing and full-scale operation of a new treatment method for Selenium removal from acidic effluents. In: Dutrizac J, Gonzales JA, Henke DM, James SE, Siegmund AHJ (eds) Lead-zinc 2000. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Pittsburg, pp 879–880Google Scholar
  49. Moyes J (1999) The Intec copper process demonstration plant operating experience and results from the 1999 campaign. In: copper concentrate treatment short course, unpublished presentation given at copper 99, Phoenix, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  50. MSE (2000) Issues identification and technology prioritization report: Selenium. EPA Mine Waste Technology Program (MWTP): Volume VII, MWTP-106. 118pGoogle Scholar
  51. Murphy AP (1988) Removal of selenate from water by chemical reMurphy, A.P. Method of selectively removing selenium ions from duction. Ind Eng Chem 27:187–191Google Scholar
  52. Muscatello JR, Belknao AM, Janz DM (2008) Accumulation of selenium in aquatic systems downstream of a uranium mining operation in Northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Environ Pollut 156:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Natasha SM, Niazi NK, KhalidS MB, Bibi I, Rashid MI (2018) A critical review of selenium biogeochemical behaviour in soil-plant system with an inference to human health. Environ Pollut 234:915–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nordstrom DK, Alpers CN, Ptacek CJ, Blowes DW (2000) Negative pH and extremely acidic mine waters from iron mountain, California. Environ Sci Technol 34:254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oremland RS, Herbel MJ, Blum JD, Langley S, Beveridge TJ, Ajayan PM, Sutton T, Ellis AV, Curran S (2004) Structural and spectral features of selenium nanospheres produced by se-respiring bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(1):52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pefait P, Simon L, Genin JR (2000) Reduction of SeO4 2− anions and anoxic formation of iron(II)-iron(III) hydroxy-selenate green rust. Environ Sci Technol 34:819–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peng A, Xu LQ (1987) The effects of humic acid on the chemical and biological properties of selenium in the environment. Sci Total Environ 64:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pettine M (2013) The reaction of selenium(IV) with ascorbic acid: its relevance in aqueous and soil systems. Chemosphere 90:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Qin HB, Zhu JM, Lin ZQ, Xu WP, Tan DC, Zheng LR, Takahashi Y (2017a) Selenite speciation in seleniferious agricultural soils under different cropping systems using sequential extraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Environ Pollut 225:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Qin HJ, Li JX, Yang HY, Pan BC, Zhang WM, Guan XH (2017b) Coupled effect of ferrous ion and oxygen on the electron selectivity of zerovalent iron for selenate sequestration. Environ Sci Technol 51:5090–5097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Qiu JH, Wang QQ, Ma YN, Yang LM, Huang BL (2006) On-line pre-reduction of Se(VI) by thiourea for selenium speciation by hydride generation. Spectrochim Acta 61B:803–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rayman MP (2000) The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 356:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sandy T, DiSante C (2010) Review of available technologies for the removal of selenium from water. Prepared for the north American metals council-selenium working group, Washington D.C., CH2M HILL June, 1-233Google Scholar
  64. Santos S, Ungureanu G, Boaventura R, Botelho C (2015) Selenium contaminated waters: an overview of analytical methods, treatment options and recent advances in sorption methods. Sci Total Environ 521-522:246–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Severs K (1999) Technological advances in treating copper concentrates: the Intec copper process. In: paper presented at the 128th SME meeting, Denver, Colorado, march, 1999Google Scholar
  66. Shaker AM (1996) Kinetics of the reduction of Se(IV) to Se-Sol. J Colloid Interface Sci 180:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Staicu LC, van Hullebusch ED, Oturan M, Ackerson CJ, Lens PNL (2015) Removal of colloidal biogenic selenium from wastewater. Chemosphere 125:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steinberg NA, Oremland RS (1990) Dissimilatory selenate reduction potentials in a diversity of sediment types. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:3550–3557Google Scholar
  69. Taylor JB, Reynolds LP, Redmer DA, Caton JS (2009) Maternal and fetal tissue selenium loads in nulliparous ewes fed supranutritional and excessive selenium during mid- to late pregnancy. J Anim Sci 87:1828–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tomicek O (1927) Determination of selenium and of tellurium by means of titanium trichloride. Bull Soc Chim 41:1389–1399Google Scholar
  71. Tuzen M, Sari A (2010) Biosorption of selenium from aqueous solution by green algae (Cladophora hutchinsiae) biomass: equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies. Chem Eng J 158:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Twidwell L, McCloskey J, Miranda P, Gale M (2000) Technologies and potential technologies for removing selenium from process and mine wastewater. In young, C.A. (Eds.), minor elements (2000): processing and environmental aspects of as, Sb, se, Te, and bi: proceedings and environmental aspects of as, Sb, se, Te and bi. Symposium. Society for Mining, metallurgy, and exploration (SME), Salt Lake City, USA, pp. 53–66Google Scholar
  73. Uggerud H, Lund W (1995) Use of thiourea in the determination of arsenic(III), antimony, bismuth, selenium, and tellurium by hydride generation ICP-AES. J Anal At Spectrom 10:405–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ullal H, Liu G, Yousaf B, Ali MU, Abbas Q, Munir MAM, Mian MM (2018) Development of selenium exposure and health risk in daily foodstuffs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 149:291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. USEPA (2002) Development document for final effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the iron and steel manufacturing point source category. EPA 821-R-02-004. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  76. USEPA (2009) National primary drinking water regulations, list of contaminants and their (MCLs). EPA 816-F-09-0004. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang D, Dinh QT, Thu TTA, Zhou F, Yang W, Wang M, Song W, Liang D (2018) Effect of selenium-enriched organic material amendment on selenium fraction transformation and biovailability in soil. Chemosphere 199:417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ward AT (1968) Raman spectroscopy of sulfur, sulfur-selenium, and sulfur-arsenic mixtures. J Phys Chem 72(12):4133–4139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wasewar KL, Prasad B, Gulipalli S (2009) Adsorption of selenium using bagasse fly ash. Clean (Weinh) 37:534–543Google Scholar
  80. Welna M, Szymczycha-Madeja A, Pohl P (2014) Optimization of sample preparation of carrot fruit juice for determination of antimony, arsenic, and selenium by hydride generation-inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Anal Lett 47:2104–2119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Welna M, Szymczycha-Madeja A, Pohl P (2017) Critical evaluation of strategies for single and simultaneous determinations of As, Bi, Sb, and Se by hydride generation inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Talanta 167:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking water quality. 4th ed. Geneva. https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/dwq_guidelines/en/
  83. Winand R (1991) Chloride hyrometallurgy. Hydrometallurgy 27:285–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu L (2004) Review of 15 years of research on ecotoxicology and remediation of land contaminated by agricultural drainage sediment rich in selenium. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yadak SK, Singh I, Singh D, Han SD (2005) Selenium status in soils of northern districts of India. J Environ Manag 75(2):129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yoon IH, Bang S, Kim KW, Kim MG, Park SY, Choi WK (2016) Selenate removal by zero-valent iron in oxic conditions: the role of Fe(II) and selenate removal mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1081–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang N, Fu N, Fang Z, Feng Y, Ke L (2011) Simultaneous multi-channel hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry determination of arsenic, bismuth, tellurium and selenium in tea leaves. Food Chem 124:1185–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environment ProtectionShenyang University of Chemical TechnologyShenyangChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied EcologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations