Limitations imposed by conventional fine bubble diffusers on the design of a high-loaded membrane bioreactor (HL-MBR)
- 27 Downloads
The operation of membrane bioreactors (MBRs) at higher than usual mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations may enhance the loading rate treatment capacity while minimizing even further the system’s footprint. This requires operating the MBR at the highest possible MLSS concentration and biomass activity (e.g., at high loading rates and low solid retention times (SRTs)). Both a negative effect of the MLSS concentrations and a positive effect of the SRT on the oxygen transfer have been reported when using conventional fine bubble diffusers. However, most of the evaluations have been carried out either at extremely high SRTs or at low MLSS concentrations eventually underestimating the effects of the MLSS concentration on the oxygen transfer. This research evaluated the current limitations imposed by fine bubble diffusers in the context of the high-loaded MBR (HL-MBR) (i.e., high MLSS and short SRT—the latter emulated by concentrating municipal sludge from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) operated at a short SRT of approximately 5 days). The high MLSS concentrations and the short SRT of the original municipal sludge induced a large fraction of mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) in the sludge, promoting a large amount of sludge flocs that eventually accumulated on the surface of the bubbles and reduced the free water content of the suspension. Moreover, the short SRTs at which the original municipal sludge was obtained eventually appear to have promoted the accumulation of surfactants in the sludge mixture. This combination exhibited a detrimental effect on the oxygen transfer. Fine bubble diffusers limit the maximum MLSS concentration for a HL-MBR at 30 g L−1; beyond that point is either not technically or not economically feasible to operate; an optimum MLSS concentration of 20 g L−1 is suggested to maximize the treatment capacity while minimizing the system’s footprint.
KeywordsBubble diffusers High-loaded membrane bioreactor High mixed liquor suspended solids Sludge retention time Sludge stabilization Alpha factor
The authors would like to thank BlueInGreen LLC, and OVIVO Water—MBR systems for their financial support for conducting this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- APHA, AWWA, WEF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington,D.C.Google Scholar
- Benjamin MM, Lawler DF (2013) Water quality engineering: physical/chemical treatment processes. JohnWiley & Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Günder B (2000) The membrane-coupled activated sludge process in municipal wastewater treatment. Technomic Publishing, LancasterGoogle Scholar
- Hai FI, Yamamoto K, Lee C-H (2014) Membrane biological reactors: theory, modeling, design, management and applications to wastewater reuse. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Henkel J (2010) Oxygen transfer phenomena in activated sludge. Dissertation, Technischen Universität DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
- Henze M, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Ekama GA, Brdjanovic D (2008) Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling and design. IWA publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Judd C, Judd S (2011) The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Krampe J (2001) Das SBR-Membranbelebungsverfahren, Stuttgarter Berichte zur Siedlungswasserwirtschaft Band 163. Oldenbourg Verlag, München (in German)Google Scholar
- Livingstone D (2010) Beyond conventional mbrs. Oxygen transfer technology revolutionizing MBR applications. Paper presented at the Membrane Technology conference & expositionGoogle Scholar
- Rodríguez FA, Poyatos JM, Reboleiro-Rivas P, Osorio F, González-López J, Hontoria E (2011) Kinetic study and oxygen transfer efficiency evaluation using respirometric methods in a submerged membrane bioreactor using pure oxygen to supply the aerobic conditions. Bioresour Technol 102(10):6013–6018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rodríguez FA, Reboleiro-Rivas P, Osorio F, Martínez-Toledo MV, Hontoria E, Poyatos JM (2012) Influence of mixed liquid suspended solids and hydraulic retention time on oxygen transfer efficiency and viscosity in a submerged membrane bioreactor using pure oxygen to supply aerobic conditions. Biochem Eng J 60:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2011.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberger S (2003) Charakterisierung von belebtem Schlamm in Membranbelebungsreaktoren zur Abwasserreinigung. Dissertation, Technical University of Berlin (in German)Google Scholar
- Rosso D, Larson LE, Stenstrom MK (2007) Aeration of large-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants: state of the art. Proceedings of the 10th IWA Conference on Design, Operation and Economics of Large Wastewater Treatment Plants, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – USEPA (1989) Fine pore (fine bubble) aeration systems, EPA/625/1-89/023. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
- WEF and ASCE (2001) Aeration: a wastewater treatment process. Water Environment Federation, New YorkGoogle Scholar