Backward and forward multilevel indicators for identifying key sectors of China’s intersectoral CO2 transfer network
- 6 Downloads
Many countries face a dilemma of economic growth and carbon emission mitigation, which is highly associated with energy consumption. In order to initiate effective policies for controlling carbon emissions, it is important to identify the key sectors in the value chain, thus proposing corresponding measures. To date, however, energy and carbon emissions have been studied mainly from a production or consumption perspective, with important interactions between sectors being seldom considered. In response, a new CO2 flow model is presented in which input-output analysis and network theory are combined with multilevel indicators to identify the key sectors affecting carbon emissions in terms of total, immediate, and mediative centrality effects. The model is demonstrated with an analysis of 2007 and 2012 China sectoral data, showing that Production & Supply of Electric Power, Steam and Hot Water (PESH), Nonmetal Mineral Products (NMMP), and Coal Mining & Dressing (CMDG) played key roles in China’s carbon transfer network; the roles of Electronic & Telecommunications Equipment (ETET), Instruments & Office Machinery (IOMY), and Electric Equipment & Machinery (EEMY) had the largest immediacy effect; and, acting as key transmission sectors, PESH, Smelting & Pressing of Metals (SPOM), and NMMP controlled a large share of CO2 transfer. The measures used are closely related to, and provide new insights into, the traditional indicators of sector centrality. At the same time, the proposed multilevel indicators are supplements for techniques that aim to instruct sector-level carbon mitigation policies.
KeywordsCarbon emissions Environmental input-output analysis Network theory Key sectors
We appreciate the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 71834005).
- Blöchl F, Theis FJ, Vega-Redondo F, Fisher EON (2011) Vertex centralities in input-output networks reveal the structure of modern economies. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 83. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.046127
- Dietzenbacher E, Romero Luna I, Bosma NS (2005) Using average propagation lengths to identify production chains in the andalusian economy. Estud Econ Aplicada 23(2):405–422Google Scholar
- Garcia Muñiz AS (2015) Input-output linkages and network contagion in Greece: Demand and supply view. Appl Econ Int Dev 15(2):35–52Google Scholar
- Guan D, Peters GP, Weber CL, Hubacek K (2009) Journey to world top emitter: An analysis of the driving forces of China’s recent CO2 emissions surge. Geophys Res Lett 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036540
- Kemeny JG, Snell JL (1960) Finite markov chains. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
- Liu Z, Guan D, Wei W, Davis SJ, Ciais P, Bai J, Peng S, Zhang Q, Hubacek K, Marland G, Andres RJ, Crawford-Brown D, Lin J, Zhao H, Hong C, Boden TA, Feng K, Peters GP, Xi F, Liu J, Li Y, Zhao Y, Zeng N, He K (2015) Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Nature 524(7565):335–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rasmussen PN (1956) Studies in inter-sectoral relations. Einar Harcks, North-HollandGoogle Scholar
- Shan Y, Guan D, Zheng H, Ou J, Li Y, Meng J, Mi Z, Liu Z, Zhang Q (2018) China CO 2 emission accounts 1997-2015. Scientific Data 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.201
- Zhang Q, Xu J, Wang Y, Hasanbeigi A, Zhang W, Lu H, Arens M (2018b) Comprehensive assessment of energy conservation and CO2 emissions mitigation in China’s iron and steel industry based on dynamic material flows. Appl Energy 209:251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar