Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 8125–8135 | Cite as

Effect of Vicia faba L. var. minor and Sulla coronaria (L.) Medik associated with plant growth-promoting bacteria on lettuce cropping system and heavy metal phytoremediation under field conditions

  • Omar Saadani
  • Salwa Harzalli Jebara
  • Imen Challougui Fatnassi
  • Manel Chiboub
  • Khediri Mannai
  • Imen Zarrad
  • Moez JebaraEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Researches involving the use of association between legumes and PGPBs (plant growth-promoting bacteria) in heavy metal phytoremediation process were mainly performed for soils highly contaminated. However, even in agriculture soils, with moderate or low contamination levels, plants can accumulate high rates of heavy metals. So, food chain contamination by these metals presents a real threat to animal and human health. This work aimed to evaluate the use of two legumes/PGPB symbioses; Vicia faba var. minor and Sulla coronaria have been inoculated with specific heavy metal-resistant inocula in a crop rotation system with Lactuca sativa as a following crop, in order to assess their effects on soil fertility, lettuce yield, and heavy metal content. Our results showed that legume inoculation significantly enhanced their biomass production, nitrogen and phosphorus content. The use of our symbioses as green manure before lettuce cultivation, as a rotation cropping system, affected positively soil fertility. In fact, we recorded a higher organic matter content, with rapid decomposition in the soil of inoculated plots. Besides, results demonstrated a greater nitrogen and phosphorus content in this soil, especially in the plot cultivated with inoculated V. faba var. minor. The improvement of soil fertility enhanced lettuce yield and its nitrogen and phosphorus content. Moreover, inoculated legumes extracted and accumulated more heavy metals than non-inoculated legumes. Our symbioses play the role of organic trap for heavy metals, making them unavailable for following crops. These facts were supported by lettuce heavy metal content, showing a significant decrease in metal accumulation, mainly zinc and cadmium, in edible parts. Results showed the usefulness of the studied symbioses, as a main part of a rotation system with lettuce. Our symbioses can be suggested for agriculture soil phytoremediation, aiming to enhance non-legume crop yield and limit heavy metal translocation to food chain.

Keywords

Crop rotation Heavy metal Legume Lettuce PGPBs Phytoremediation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Bechir Ben Aicha and Nour El Houda Romdhane for their help and advice during the field experimentation. The authors also thank Ms. Fatma Lazreg Bouazizi for English editing.

Funding

This work was supported by the Center of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria and Regional Office of Agriculture Development of Monastir. This research work is carried out within the framework of a MOBIDOC thesis funded by the EU-PASRI program.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Balkhair KS, Ashraf MA (2015) Field accumulation risks of heavy metals in a soil and vegetable crop irrigated with sewage water in western region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci 23:S32–S44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouajila K, Jeddi F, Ben Taamallah H, Jedidi N, Sanaa M (2014) Effets de la composition chimique et biochimique des résidus de cultures sur leur décomposition dans un sol limono-argileux du semi aride (Chemical and biochemical composition’s effect of crop residues on their decomposition in semi-arid). J Mater Environ Sci 5:159–166Google Scholar
  3. Bowman RA, Moir JO (1993) Basic EDTA as an extractant for soil organic phosphorus. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57(6):1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiboub M, Saadani O, Fatnassi IC, Abdelkrim S, Abid G, Jebara M, Jebara SH (2016) Characterization of efficient plant-growth-promoting bacteria isolated from Sulla coronaria resistant to cadmium and to other heavy metals. C R Biol 339:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiboub M, Jebara SH, Saadani O, Fatnassi IC, Abdelkerim S, Jebara M (2018) Physiological responses and antioxidant enzyme changes in Sulla coronaria inoculated by cadmium resistant bacteria. J Plant Res 131(1):99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dary M, Chamber-Pérez MA, Palomares AJ, Pajuelo E (2010) “In situ” phytostabilisation of heavy metal polluted soils using Lupinus luteus inoculated with metal resistant plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria. J Hazard Mater 177:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehsan M, Lara Viveros FM, Hernández VE, Barakat MA, Ortega AR, Maza AV, Monter JV (2015) Zinc and cadmium accumulation by Lupinus uncinatus Schldl. grown in nutrient solution. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fatnassi CI, Chiboub M, Saadani O, Jebara M, Harzalli Jebara S (2013) Phytostabilization of moderate copper contaminated soils using co-inoculation of Vicia faba with plant growth promoting bacteria. J Basic Microbiol 53:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fatnassi CI, Chiboub M, Jebara M, Jebara HS (2014) Bacteria associated with different legume species grown in heavy-metal contaminated soils. Int J Agric Policy Res 2:460–467Google Scholar
  10. Fatnassi IC, Chiboub M, Saadani O, Jebara M, Jebara SH (2015) Impact of dual inoculation with Rhizobium and PGPR on growth and antioxidant status of Vicia faba L. under copper stress. C R Biol 338:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fontes RLF, Pereira JMN, Neves JCL (2014) Uptake and translocation of Cd and Zn in two lettuce cultivars. Ann Brazilian Acad Sci 86:907–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu J, Zhou Q, Liu J , Liu W, Wang T, Zhang Q, Jiang G (2008) High levels of heavy metals in rice (Oryza sativa L.) from a typical E-waste recycling area in southeast China and its potential risk to human health. Chemosphere 71:1269–1275Google Scholar
  13. Gerhardt KE, Huang XD, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2009) Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: potential and challenges. Plant Sci 176:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giller K E (2001) Nitrogen fixation in tropical cropping systems. In: Giller KE (ed) Cabi Series, 2nd edn. CABI Publishing series, Wallingford (United Kingdom), p 423Google Scholar
  15. Hao X, Taghavi S, Xie P, Orbach MJ, Alwathnani HA, Rensing C, Wei G (2014) Phytoremediation of heavy and transition metals aided by legume-rhizobia symbiosis. Int J Phytoremediation 16:179–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He CQ, Tan GE, Liang X, Du W, Chen YL, Zhi GY, Zhu Y (2010) Effect of Zn-tolerant bacterial strains on growth and Zn accumulation in Orychophragmus violaceus. Appl Soil Ecol 44(1): 1–5Google Scholar
  17. Jebara SH, Fatnassi IC, Abdelkrim SA, Saadani O, Chiboub M, Abid G, Jebara M (2017) Potentialities and limit of legume-plant growth promoting bacteria symbioses use in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. Int J Plant Biol Res 5:1077Google Scholar
  18. Ju W, Liu L, Fang L, Cui Y, Duan C, Wu H (2019) Impact of co-inoculation with plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobium on the biochemical responses of alfalfa-soil system in copper contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 167:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kjeldahl J (1883) A new method for the determination of nitrogen in organic matter. Z Anal Chem 22:366–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar A, Singh VK, Tripathi V, Singh PP, Singh AK (2018) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): perspective in agriculture under biotic and abiotic stress. In: R Prasad, SS Gill, N Tuteja (eds) Crop improvement through microbial biotechnology. Elseiver, p 333–342Google Scholar
  21. Lebrazi S, Fikri-Benbrahim K (2018) Rhizobium-legume symbioses: heavy metal effects and principal approaches for bioremediation of contaminated soil. In: Legumes for soil health and sustainable management. Springer, Singapore, pp 205–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu L, Hu L, Tang J, Li Y, Zhang Q, Chen X (2012) Food safety assessment of planting patterns of four vegetable-type crops grown in soil contaminated by electronic waste activities. J Environ Manag 93:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch MJ, Mulvaney MJ, Hodges SC, Thompson TL, Thomason WE (2016) Decomposition, nitrogen and carbon mineralization from food and cover crop residues in the central plateau of Haiti. Springerplus 5(973):973.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2651-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martínez-Alcalá I, Clemente R, Bernal MP (2012) Efficiency of a phytoimmobilisation strategy for heavy metal contaminated soils using white lupin. J Geochem Explor 123:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martinez-Hidalgo P, Hirsch AM (2017) The nodule microbiome: N2-fixing rhizobia do not live alone. Phytobiomes 1(2):70–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murungu FS, Chiduza C, Muchaonyerwa P, Mnkeni PNS (2011) Decomposition, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization from winter-grown cover crop residues and suitability for a smallholder farming system in South Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 89:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available P in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Department of Agriculture Circular 939. Government Printing Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Oves M, Saghir Khan, Huda Qari, Nadeen Felemban and Almeelbi (2016) Heavy metals: biological importance and detoxification strategies. Bioremediat Biodegrad 7: 2Google Scholar
  29. Puschenreiter M, Horak O, Friesl W, Hartl W (2005) Low-cost agricultural measures to reduce heavy metal transfer into the food chain—a review. Plant Soil Environ 51:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rao DLN (2014) Recent advances in biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 80:359–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saadani O, Fatnassi IC, Chiboub M, Abdelkrim S, Barhoumi F, Jebara M, Jebara SH (2016) In situ phytostabilisation capacity of three legumes and their associated plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPBs) in mine tailings of northern Tunisia. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 130:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scheid S, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Schulin R, Nowack B (2009) Accumulation and solubility of metals during leaf litter decomposition in non-polluted and polluted soil. Eur J Soil Sci 60(4):613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shah Z, Shah SH, Peoples MB, Schwenke GD, Herridge DF (2003) Crop residue and fertiliser N effects on nitrogen fixation and yields of legume-cereal rotations and soil organic fertility. F Crop Res 83:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thilakarathna MS, McElroy MS, Chapagain T, Papadopoulos YA, Raizada MN (2016) Belowground nitrogen transfer from legumes to non-legumes under managed herbaceous cropping systems: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trabelsi D, Mengoni A, Ben Ammar H, Mhamdi R (2011) Effect of on-field inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris with rhizobia on soil bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 77:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trabelsi D, Ben Ammar H, Mengoni A, Mhamdi R (2012) Appraisal of the crop-rotation effect of rhizobial inoculation on potato cropping systems in relation to soil bacterial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 54:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ullah A, Heng S, Munis MFH, Fahad S, Yang X (2015) Phytoremediation of heavy metals assisted by plant growth promoting (PGP) bacteria: a review. Environ Exp Bot 117:28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Kessel C, Hartley C (2000) Agricultural management of grain legumes: has it led to an increase in nitrogen fixation? F Crop Res 65:165–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vincent JM (1970) A manual for the practical study of root-nodule bacteria. IBP handbook. Blakwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p 15Google Scholar
  40. Volesky B (2007) Biosorption and me. Water Res 41:4017–4029Google Scholar
  41. Watanabe FS, Olsen SR (1965) Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from the soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 29:677–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wubs ERJ, van der Putten WH, Bosch M, Bezemer TM (2016) Soil inoculation steers restoration of terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Plants 2:16107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yadav SK (2010) Heavy metals toxicity in plants: an overview on the role of glutathione and phytochelatins in heavy metal stress tolerance of plants. South African J Bot 76:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yu L, Zhu J, Huang Q, Su D, Jiang R, Li H (2014) Application of a rotation system to oilseed rape and rice fields in Cd-contaminated agricultural land to ensure food safety. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 108:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zaidi A, Wani PA, Khan MS (Eds) (2012) Toxicity of heavy metals to legumes and bioremediation. Dordrecht: Springer  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0730-0
  46. Zhou H, Yang WT, Zhou X, Liu L, Gu JF, Wang WL, Zou JL, Tian T, Peng PQ, Liao BH (2016) Accumulation of heavy metals in vegetable species planted in contaminated soils and the health risk assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030289

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Biotechnology Borj CedriaUniversity Tunis El ManarHammam-LifTunisia
  2. 2.Regional Office of Agriculture Development of MonastirMonastirTunisia

Personalised recommendations