Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 8212–8225 | Cite as

Electrokinetic remediation of antibiotic-polluted soil with different concentrations of tetracyclines

  • Binxu Li
  • Zhiguo Zhang
  • Yanlin Ma
  • Yanling Li
  • Changxiong Zhu
  • Hongna LiEmail author
Research Article
  • 181 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated the efficacy of electrokinetic remediation of soils polluted with different concentrations of tetracyclines (TCs). Three widely used TCs (oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, and tetracycline) were selected, and concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 50 mg/kg (C0, C5, C10, C20, C50) were selected for comparison. Antibiotic-polluted soils with no electric field served as controls. The average removal rates of TCs in different treatments ranged from 25 to 48% after 7-day remediation. The contributing ratios of electrokinetics to TCs removal varied from 22 to 84%. The concentrations of NH4+ increased in soils and electrolytes, which indicated the decomposition of TCs in the electric field. The highest removal amount of TCs was obtained in the C50 treatment, due to efficient reactions of TCs with oxidative radicals generated during the electrolysis. The fluctuant range of pH in the electrolytes was decreased with increasing concentration of TCs, while the soil pH was increased. The removal rate of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) in the C5 treatment was significantly higher than that in other treatments. The abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) increased with the concentrations of TCs in soils. It might result from the induction of increasing selective pressure of antibiotics. Significant removal of ARGs occurred in the C50 treatment (38–60%). In terms of controlling ARB and ARGs, which were more resistant, the electrokinetic technology showed advantageous effects. Above all, electrokinetic technology provides an effective remediation method, especially for TC-polluted soil with a concentration of 20–50 mg/kg.

Keywords

Electrokinetic treatment Antibiotic-resistant bacteria Antibiotic-resistant fungi Antibiotic-resistant actinomycetes Antibiotic resistance genes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST (YESS) (2018QNRC001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 51308537).

Supplementary material

11356_2019_4294_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol 27:2638–2647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agerso Y, Bruun MS, Dalsgaard I, Larsen JL (2007) The tetracycline resistance gene tet(E) is frequently occurring and present on large horizontally transferable plasmids in Aeromonas spp. from fish farms. Aquaculture 266:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander J, Knopp G, Dötsch A, Wieland A, Schwartz T (2016) Ozone treatment of conditioned wastewater selects antibiotic resistance genes, opportunistic bacteria, and induce strong population shifts. Sci Total Environ 559:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alshawabkeh A, Acar Y (1992) Removal of contaminants from soils by electrokinetics: a theoretical treatise. Environ Lett 27:1835–1861Google Scholar
  5. Andreottola G, Ferrarese E (2008) Application of advanced oxidation processes and electrooxidation for the remediation of river sediments contaminated by PAHs. Environ Lett 43:1361–1372Google Scholar
  6. Anja K, Ute H, Kristina K, Marc L, Sören TB, Michael S, Berndtmichael W (2011) Influence of difloxacin-contaminated manure on microbial community structure and function in soils. Biol Fertil Soils 47:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arikan OA, Sikora LJ, Mulbry W, Khan SU, Foster GD (2007) Composting rapidly reduces levels of extractable oxytetracycline in manure from therapeutically treated beef calves. Bioresour Technol 98:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bankar AV, Kumar AR, Zinjarde SS (2009) Environmental and industrial applications of Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:847–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackwell PA, Holten Lützhøft HC, Ma HP, Halling-Sørensen B, Boxall AB, Kay P (2004) Ultrasonic extraction of veterinary antibiotics from soils and pig slurry with SPE clean-up and LC-UV and fluorescence detection. Talanta 64:1058–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackwell PA, Kay P, Boxall A (2007) The dissipation and transport of veterinary antibiotics in a sandy loam soil. Chemosphere 67:292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boleas S, Alonso C, Pro J, Fernández C, Carbonell G, Tarazona JV (2005) Toxicity of the antimicrobial oxytetracycline to soil organisms in a multi-species-soil system (MS.3) and influence of manure co-addition. J Hazard Mater 122:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonmati M, Ceccanti B, Nanniperi P (1991) Spatial variability of phosphatase, urease, protease, organic carbon and total nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 23:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brinzila CI, Pacheco MJ, Ciríaco L, Ciobanu RC, Lopes A (2012) Electrodegradation of tetracycline on BDD anode. Chem Eng J 209:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen C, Li J, Chen P, Rui D, Zhang p LX (2014) Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistances in soils from wastewater irrigation areas in Beijing and Tianjin, China. Environ Pollut 193:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dantas G, Sommer MOA, Oluwasegun RD, Church GM (2008) Bacteria subsisting on antibiotics. Science 320:100–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dao TH, Tran TT, Nguyen VR, Pham TNM, Vu CM, Pham TD (2018) Removal of antibiotic from aqueous solution using synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles: characteristics and mechanisms. Environ Earth Sci 77:359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deng Y, Zhang Y, Ael-L H, Liu R, Yang M (2010) Cell surface properties of five polycyclic aromatic compound-degrading yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:1933–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Girardi C, Greve J, Lamshoft M, Fetzer I, Miltner A, Schaffer A, Kastner M (2011) Biodegradation of ciprofloxacin in water and soil and its effects on the microbial communities. J Hazard Mater 198:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomes HI, Dias-Ferreira C, Ribeiro AB (2012) Electrokinetic remediation of organochlorines in soil: enhancement techniques and integration with other remediation technologies. Chemosphere 87:1077–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo S, Fan R, Li T, Hartog N, Li F, Yang X (2014) Synergistic effects of bioremediation and electrokinetics in the remediation of petroleum-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 109:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halling-Sørensen B, Lykkeberg A, Ingerslev F, Blackwell P, Tjørnelund J (2003) Characterisation of the abiotic degradation pathways of oxytetracyclines in soil interstitial water using LC–MS–MS. Chemosphere 50:1331–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kämpfer P, Witzenberger R, Denner EB, Busse HJ, Neef A (2002) Sphingopyxis witflariensis sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:2029–2034Google Scholar
  23. Kim S, Aga D (2007) Potential ecological and human health impacts of antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant bacteria from wastewater treatment plants. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 10:559–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones and other waste water contaminants in US streams 1999–2000. A national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leininger S, Urich T, Schloter M, Schwark L, Qi J, Nicol GW, Prosser JI, Schuster SC, Schleper C (2006) Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils. Nature 442:806–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li H, Zhu X, Ni J (2010) Inactivation of Escherichia coli in Na2SO4 electrolyte using boron-doped diamond anode. Electrochim Acta 56:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li J, Shao B, Shen J, Wang S, Wu Y (2013) Occurrence of chloramphenicol-resistance genes as environmental pollutants from swine feedlots. Environ Sci Technol 47:2892–2897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li H, Long Y, Zhu X, Tian Y, Ye J (2017) Influencing factors and chlorinated byproducts in electrochemical oxidation of bisphenol A with boron-doped diamond anodes. Electrochim Acta 246:1121–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li H, Li B, Ma J, Ye J, Guo P, Li L (2018a) Fate of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in the electrokinetic treatment of antibiotic-polluted soil. Chem Eng J 337:584–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li H, Li B, Zhang Z, Tian Y, Ye J, Lv X, Zhu C (2018b) Factors influencing the removal of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes by the electrokinetic treatment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 160:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li H, Li B, Zhang Z, Zhu C, Tian Y, Ye J (2018c) Evolution of microbial communities during electrokinetic treatment of antibiotic-polluted soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 148:842–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindsey ME, Meyer M, Thurman EM (2001) Analysis of trace levels of sulfonamide and tetracycline antimicrobials in groundwater and surface water using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 73:4640–4646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu F, Ying G, Feng H (2012) Changes in functional diversity of soil microbial community with addition of antibiotics sulfamethoxazole and chlortetracycline. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:1615–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu S, Wu P, Yu L, Li L, Gong B, Zhu N, Dang Z, Yang C (2017) Preparation and characterization of organo-vermiculite based on phosphatidylcholine and adsorption of two typical antibiotics. Appl Clay Sci 137:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maki T, Hasegawa H, Kitami H, Fumoto K, Munekage Y, Ueda K (2006) Bacterial degradation of antibiotic residues in marine fish farm sediments of Uranouchi Bay and phylogenetic analysis of antibiotic-degrading bacteria using 16S rDNA sequences. Fish Sci 72:811–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mao X, Han FX, Shao X, Guo K, Mccomb J, Arslan Z, Zhang Z (2016) Electro-kinetic remediation coupled with phytoremediation to remove lead, arsenic and cesium from contaminated paddy soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 125:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mathers JJ, Flick SC, Cox LA (2011) Longer-duration uses of tetracyclines and penicillins in U.S. food-producing animals: indications and microbiologic effects. Environ Int 37:991–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mcardell CS, Molnar E, Suter MJ, Giger W (2003) Occurrence and fate of macrolide antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants and in the Glatt Valley watershed, Switzerland. Environ Sci Technol 37:5479–5486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mena E, Villasenor J, Canizares P, Rodrigo MA (2016a) Effect of electric field on the performance of soil electro-bioremediation with a periodic polarity reversal strategy. Chemosphere 146:300–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mena E, Villasenor J, Canizares P, Rodrigo MA (2016b) Influence of electric field on the remediation of polluted soil using a biobarrier assisted electro-bioremediation process. Electrochim Acta 190:294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miao L, Feng C, Zhang Z, Rui Z, Lei X, Chen R, Sugiura N (2010) Application of an electrochemical-ion exchange reactor for ammonia removal. Electrochim Acta 55:159–164Google Scholar
  42. Oka H, Ito Y, Matsumoto H (2000) Chromatographic analysis of tetracycline antibiotics in foods. J Chromatogr A 882:109–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Page MM (2002) Electroremediation of contaminated soils. J Environ Eng 128:208–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pham TD, Bui TT, Nguyen VT, Bui TKV, Tran TT, Phan QC, Pham TD, Hoang TH (2018) Adsorption of polyelectrolyte onto nanosilica synthesized from rice husk: characteristics, mechanisms, and application for antibiotic removal. Polymers 10:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Probstein RF, Hicks RE (1993) Removal of contaminants from soils by electric fields. Science 260:498–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pruden A, Pei R, Storteboom H, Carlson KH (2006) Antibiotic resistance genes as emerging contaminants: studies in Northern Colorado. Environ Sci Technol 40:7445–7450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reyes C, Fernández J, Freer J, Mondaca MA, Zaror C, Malato S, Mansilla HD (2008) Degradation and inactivation of tetracycline by TiO2 photocatalysis. J Photochem PhotobiolA Chem 184:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Risco C, Lopez-Vizcaino R, Saez C, Yustres A, Canizares P, Navarro V, Rodrigo MA (2016) Remediation of soils polluted with 2,4-D by electrokinetic soil flushing with facing rows of electrodes: a case study in a pilot plant. Chem Eng J 285:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rodrigo MA, Oturan N, Oturan MA (2014) Electrochemically assisted remediation of pesticides in soils and water: a review. Chem Rev 114:8720–8745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rysz M, Alvarez PJJ (2004) Amplification and attenuation of tetracycline resistance in soil bacteria: aquifer column experiments. Water Res 38:3705–3712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh R, Singh S, Parihar P, Singh VP, Prasad SM (2015) Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 112:247–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sun W, Qian X, Gu J, Wang XJ, Duan ML (2016) Mechanism and effect of temperature on variations in antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion of dairy manure. Sci Rep 6:30237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thielebruhn S, Beck IC (2005) Effects of sulfonamide and tetracycline antibiotics on soil microbial activity and microbial biomass. Chemosphere 59:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vedenyapina MD, Borisova DA, Strel’tsova ED, Rakishev AK, Vedenyapin AA (2014) Electrochemical degradation and mineralization of tetracycline on a boron-doped diamond electrode. Russ Chem Bull 63:1843–1847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang FH, Qiao M, Lv ZE, Guo GX, Jia Y, Su YH, Zhu YG (2014) Impact of reclaimed water irrigation on antibiotic resistance in public parks, Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 184:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu JG, Jiang YX, Zha LY, Ye ZM, Zhou ZF, Ye JF, Zhou HW (2010) Tetracycline degradation by ozonation, and evaluation of biodegradability and toxicity of ozonation byproducts. Can J Civ Eng 37:1485–1491Google Scholar
  57. Yang QX, Zhang J, Zhu KF, Zhang H (2009) Influence of oxytetracycline on the structure and activity of microbial community in wheat rhizosphere soil. J Environ Sci 21:954–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang H, Liu F, Wu X, Zhang J, Zhang D (2010) Degradation of tetracycline in aqueous medium by electrochemical method. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 4:568–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang Y, Geng J, Ma H, Ren H, Xu K, Ding L (2016) Characterization of microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes in activated sludge under tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole selection pressure. Sci Total Environ 571:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhou X, Qiao M, Wang FH, Zhu YG (2017) Use of commercial organic fertilizer increases the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes and antibiotics in soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:701–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhu YG, Johnson TA, Su JQ, Qiao M, Guo GX, Stedtfeld RD, Hashsham SA, Tiedje JM (2013) Diverse and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese swine farms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:3435–3440CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Binxu Li
    • 1
  • Zhiguo Zhang
    • 1
  • Yanlin Ma
    • 1
  • Yanling Li
    • 1
  • Changxiong Zhu
    • 1
  • Hongna Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in AgricultureChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesHaidian DistrictChina

Personalised recommendations