Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 8111–8124 | Cite as

Modeling the relationship between gross capital formation and CO2 (a)symmetrically in the case of Pakistan: an empirical analysis through NARDL approach

  • Zia Ur RahmanEmail author
  • Manzoor Ahmad
Research Article

Abstract

This paper tries to ensure the relationship between gross capital formation (GCF) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the case of Pakistan for the period 1980–2016 by employing Non-Linear Auto Regressive Distribution Lag (NARDL) model under the expansion of Environmental Kuznets hypothesis (EKC) while controlling for coal and oil consumption variables as a potential factors of CO2 emissions. Our main objective is to check whether or not the effect of changes in GCF on CO2 emissions is asymmetric or symmetric for Pakistan that is among one of the main contributors to CO2 emissions in Asia, as the emissions were grown by 15.6 million tonnes or 8.5% increase in percentage terms in 2016. Our result confirms the existence of an asymmetric effect of GCF shocks on CO2 emissions both in the short and long-terms. Moreover, our empirical finding also suggests that coal and oil consumptions have a significant contribution to CO2 emissions both in the short and long-terms. Further, our results also significantly support the existence of the EKC hypothesis both in the long and short-terms. That confirms the inverted U-shaped connection among per capita growth and CO2 emissions in Pakistan. In the last, our study suggests that the implementation and use of clean energies and technologies are vital for controlling pollution in Pakistan.

Keywords

CO2 Gross capital formations EKC hypothesis Coal consumption Oil consumption NARDL approach 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our extreme gratitude to the anonymous reviewer(s) and editors for their valuable and insightful comments and suggestions on the first draft of this article.

References

  1. Abdouli M, Hammami S (2016) Economic growth, FDI inflows and their impact on the environment: an empirical study for the MENA countries. In: Quality & quantity. Springer, Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0298-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdouli M, Hammami S (2017) Investigating the causality links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment and economic growth in MENA countries. Int Bus Rev Elsevier Ltd. 26(2):264–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acharyya J (2009) Fdi, growth and the environment: evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. J Econ Dev 43(1):2009Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad N, Liangsheng D, Jiye L, Wang J, Li HZ, Hashmi MZ (2017) Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: is there any environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Elsevier B.V. 123:164–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmad M, Khan Z, Rahman ZU, Khan S (2018) Does financial development asymmetrically affect CO2 emissions in China: an application of nonlinear autoregressive distribution lag (NARDL) model. Carbon Management.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1529998
  6. Alam MS, Paramati SR (2015) Do oil consumption and economic growth intensify environmental degradation? Evidence from developing economies. Appl Econ. Routledge 47(48):5186–5203.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1044647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alam MM, Md WM, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic.Elsevier Ltd. 70:466–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ali S, Waqas H, Ahmad N (2015) Analyzing the dynamics of energy consumption, liberalization, financial development, poverty and carbon emissions in Pakistan. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 5(4):166–183Google Scholar
  9. Alkhathlan K, Javid M (2013) Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: an aggregate and disaggregate analysis. Energy Policy Elsevier 62:1525–1532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Alshehry AS, Belloumi M (2015) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: the case of Saudi Arabia. Renew Sust Energ Rev Elsevier 41:237–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sust Energy Rev 68 Elsevier(October 2015):808–824.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Appiah MO (2018) Investigating the multivariate granger causality between energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Ghana. Energy Policy Elsevier Ltd. 112(April 2017):198–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Assareh E, Nedaei M (2017) A metaheuristic approach to forecast the global carbon dioxide emissions. Int J Environ Stud Routledge 7233:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2017.1374075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baek J (2016) A new look at the FDI-income-energy-environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy Elsevier 91:22–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev Elsevier 54:838–845.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bilgin MH, Gozgor G, Keung C, Lau M, Sheng X (2018) The effects of uncertainty measures on the price of gold. Int Rev Financ Anal 58(March):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blanco L, Gonzalez F, Ruiz I (2012) The impact of FDI on CO2 emissions in Latin America. Oxf Dev Stud 41:104–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bloch H, Bloch H, Ra S, Salim R (2012) Coal consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth in China: empirical evidence and policy responses coal consumption, CO 2 emission and economic growth in China: empirical evidence and policy responses. Energy Economics Elsevier B.V. 34(2):518–528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bouri E, Gupta R, Lahiani A, Shahbaz M (2018) Testing for asymmetric nonlinear short- and long-run relationships between bitcoin, aggregate commodity and gold prices. Resources Policy Elsevier Ltd 57:224–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. BP Energy Economics. 2018. 2018 BP energy outlook, 125. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2018.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2018
  21. Broock WA, Scheinkman JA, Dechert WD, LeBaron B (1996) A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econ Rev 15(3):197–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bukhari N, Shahzadi K, Shakil Ahmad M (2014) Consequence of FDI on CO2 emissions in case of Pakistan. 20(9):1183–1189.  https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.20.09.13595
  23. Chandia, Khurram Ejaz, Ifra Gul, Saira Aziz, Binesh Sarwar, and Salman Zulfiqar. 2018. An analysis of the association among carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic performance: an econometric model 3004 (May). Taylor & Francis.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457930
  24. Cook S, Fosten J (2018) Replicating rockets and feathers. Energy Econ. Elsevier B.V.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.021
  25. Dar JA, Asif M (2017) Is financial development good for carbon mitigation in India? A regime shift-based cointegration analysis. Carbon Management Taylor & Francis 8(5–6):435–443.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1396841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Esso LJ, Keho Y (2016) Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: cointegration and causality evidence from selected African countries. Energy Elsevier Ltd 114:492–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Farhani S, Mrizak S, Chaibi A, Rault C (2014) The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainability: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy Elsevier 71(2008):189–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Farooqi A (2015) Arsenic and fluoride contamination: remedies of arsenic problem and environmental legislation in Pakistan regarding arsenic. Springer Nature.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2298-9_7
  29. Fei L, Dong S, Xue L, Liang Q, Yang W (2011) Energy consumption-economic growth relationship and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy Elsevier 39(2):568–574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gökmenoğlu K, Taspinar N (2016) The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey 8199 (March).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1119876
  31. Gokmenoglu KK, Sehnaz Z, Taspinar N (2015) The export-led growth: a case study of Costa Rica. Procedia Economics and Finance Elsevier B.V. 25(May):471–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00759-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guesmi K, Dhaoui A, Goutte S, Abid I (2018) Journal of international financial markets, institutions & money on the determinants of industry-CDS index spreads: evidence from a nonlinear setting. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.01.005
  33. Huang M, Wang B (2016) Factors influencing CO2 emissions in China based on Grey relational analysis. Energy Sources, Part a: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects Taylor & Francis 38(4):555–561.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2013.802073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ibrahiem DM (2017) Environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis for carbon dioxide emissions in Egypt no. November 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2016.10001598
  35. Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions : a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy Elsevier 37(12):5167–5172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Javid M, Sharif F (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev Elsevier 54:406–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model Elsevier B.V. 44:97–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katircioğlu ST, Taşpinar N (2017) Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68(August 2016):572–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Elsevier Ltd 74(C):595–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lapinskienė G, Peleckis K, Slavinskaitė N (2017) Energy consumption, economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union countries. J Bus Econ Manag 18(6):1082–1097.  https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1393457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lau L-s, Choong C-k, Eng Y-k (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? no. 1998:2009–11Google Scholar
  42. Le T-h, Quah E (2018) Income level and the emissions, energy, and growth nexus: evidence from Asia and the Pacific. International Economics CEPII (Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales), a center for research and expertise on the world economy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.03.002
  43. Mensi W, Shahzad SJH, Hammoudeh S, Al-Yahyaee KH (2017) Asymmetric impacts of public and private investments on the non-oil GDP of Saudi Arabia. Int Econ Elsevier Ltd 156(October):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2017.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mirza FM, Kanwal A (2017) Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Pakistan: dynamic causality analysis. Renew Sust Energy Rev Elsevier Ltd 72(October 2016):1233–1240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy Elsevier 38(1):661–666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Narayan PK, Saboori B, Soleymani A (2016) Economic growth and carbon emissions. Economic Modelling Elsevier B.V. 53:388–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neequaye NA, Oladi R (2015) Environment, growth, and FDI revisited. Int Rev Econ Financ Elsevier Inc. 39:47–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Omri A, Khuong D, Rault C 2014. “Causal Interactions between CO 2 Emissions, FDI, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Dynamic Simultaneous-Equation Models.” Economic Modelling 42. Elsevier BV 382–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.026
  49. Pakistan Economic survey (2017–18) Chapter 1, growth and investmentGoogle Scholar
  50. Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy Elsevier Ltd 36(1):685–693.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pesaran, M.H., Y. Shin, and R.J. Smith (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326Google Scholar
  52. Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Polic Elsevier 51:184–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sapkota P, Bastola U (2017) Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Econ Elsevier BV 64:206–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev Elsevier 25:109–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O (2015) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ Elsevier B.V. 51:275–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, Bhattacharya M (2017) The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. Singap Econ Rev 62(04):929–957.  https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590817400331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shahzad SJH, Kumar RR, Zakaria M, Hurr M (2017) Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renew Sust Energ Rev Elsevier 70(July 2016):185–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, pp 281–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shin C, Baek J, Heo E (2018) Do oil price changes have symmetric or asymmetric effects on Korea’s demand for imported crude oil? Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy Taylor & Francis 13(1):6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1374489 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sifat IM, Mohamad A (2018) Trading aggression when price limit hits are imminent: NARDL based intraday investigation of magnet effect. J Behav Exp Financ. Elsevier B.V.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2018.01.007
  61. Sinha A, Shahbaz M (2018) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renew Energy Elsevier Ltd 119:703–711.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy Elsevier B.V. 124:706–719.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sun C, Zhang F, Meilian X (2017) Investigation of pollution haven hypothesis for China: an ARDL approach with breakpoint unit root tests. Journal of Cleaner Production Elsevier Ltd 161:153–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy Elsevier Ltd 79:447–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tugcu CT, Topcu M (2018) Total, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth: revisiting the issue with an asymmetric point of view. Energy Elsevier Ltd 152:64–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang Y, Chen L, Kubota J (2016) The relationship between urbanization, energy use and carbon emissions: evidence from a panel of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. J Clean Prod Elsevier Ltd 112:1368–1374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. WDI (2018) World development indicators, Pakistan. World Bank 2018 http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/. Accessed 16 Aug 2018
  68. Wood R, Hertwich EG (2017) Environmental impacts of capital. Research and Analysis Wiley 22(1):55–67.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zaman K, el Moemen MA (2017) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic development: evaluating alternative and plausible environmental hypothesis for sustainable growth. Renew Sust Energy Rev Elsevier Ltd 74(November 2015):1119–1130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Keming Y (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model Elsevier B.V. 58:237–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PhD Scholar in Research School for Southeast Asian StudiesXiamen UniversityXiamenChina
  2. 2.PhD Scholar at the School of Economics, Department of Industrial EconomicsNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations