Advertisement

Soil amendments for cadmium phytostabilization by five marigold cultivars

  • Alapha Thongchai
  • Weeradej MeeinkuirtEmail author
  • Puntaree Taeprayoon
  • John Pichtel
Research Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, ornamental plants have come under investigation as phytoremediation agents. In addition to reducing contaminant concentrations in soil, such plants support local economies by serving social (e.g., religious) and decorative purposes. Greenhouse studies investigated the phytostabilization potential of soil cadmium (Cd) by five cultivars of marigold (Tagetes erecta), a common ornamental flower in Asia. The effects of organic (cattle manure and pig manure) and inorganic (leonardite and Osmocote®) amendments in supporting plant growth and enhancing Cd uptake were also examined. Marigold cultivars Babuda and Sunshine grown in soil supplemented with pig manure produced the greatest biomass and experienced greatest Cd accumulation and flower production. In all treatments, plant parts accumulated Cd in the following order: root > shoot ≈ flower. Furthermore, Babuda and Sunshine cultivars had a high phytostabilization potential as evidenced by translocation factors < 1 and bioconcentration factors > 1 for roots. It is proposed that Babuda and Sunshine marigold cultivars be applied toward Cd phytostabilization while enhancing local economies as an ornamental species.

Keywords

Cadmium Phytostabilization Marigolds Greenhouse experiment Babuda Sunshine 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding from Yala Rajabhat University is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Ahmad AA, Radovich TJK, Nguyen H, Uyeda J, Arakaki A, Cadby J, Paull R, Sugano J, Teves G (2016) Use of organic fertilizers to enhance soil fertility, plant growth, and yield in a tropical environment. In: Larramendy ML, Soloneski S (eds) Organic fertilizers-from basic concepts to applied outcomes http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/50720.pdf Google Scholar
  2. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson HM, Quarmby JA (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA, AWWA & WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation) (2005) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker AJM, Brooks RR (1989) Terrestrial higher plants which hyper accumulate metallic elements –Reviews of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1:81–126Google Scholar
  5. Black GR (1965) Bulk Density: Method of Soil Analysis. In: Monograph No. 9 Part I. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosiacki M (2008) Accumulation of cadmium in selected species of ornamental plants. Acta Sci Pol 7:21–31Google Scholar
  7. Bot A, Benites J (2005) The importance of soil organic matter. In: FAO Soils Bulletin 80. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. Brady NC, Weil RR (2002) The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soil. Soil Sci 59:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bremmer JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandra R, Addussalam AK, Salim N, Puthur JT (2010) Distribution of bio-accumulated Cd and Cr in two Vigna species and the associated histological variations. J Stress Physiol Biochem 6:4–12Google Scholar
  12. Chang E, Chung R, Tsai Y (2007) Effect of different application rates of organic fertilizer on soil enzyme activity and microbial population. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng S, Hseu Z (2002) In-situ immobilization of cadmium and lead by different amendment in two contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 140:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chintakovid W, Visoottiviseth P, Khokiattiwong S, Lauengsuchonkul S (2008) Potential of the hybrid marigold for arsenic phytoremediation and income generation of remediators in Ron Phibun District, Thailand. Chemosphere 70:1532–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coelho LC, Bastos ARR, Pinho PJ, Souza GA, Carvalho JG, Coelho VAT, Oliveira LCA, Domingues RR, Faquin V (2017) Marigold (Tagetes erecta): the potential value in the phytoremediation of chromium. Pedosphere 27:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooke JA, Johnson MS (2002) Ecological restoration of land with particular reference to the mining of metals and industrial minerals: a review of theory and practice. Environ Rev 10:41–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Das M, Maiti SK (2007) Metal mine waste and phytoremediation: a review. Asian J Water Environ Pollut 4:169–176Google Scholar
  18. Dharma-Wardana MWC (2018) Fertilizer usage and cadmium in soils, crops and food. Environ Geochem Health 40:2739–2759.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0140-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elouear Z, Bouhamed F, Boujelben N, Bouzid J (2016) Application of sheep manure and potassium fertilizer to contaminated soil and its effect on zinc, cadmium and lead accumulation by alfalfa plants. Sust Environ Res 26:131–135Google Scholar
  20. Gopal R, Khurana N (2011) Effect of heavy metal pollutants on sunflower. African J Plant Sci 5:531–536Google Scholar
  21. Grant GA, Bailey LD, McLaughlin MJ, Singh BR (1999) Management factors which influence cadmium concentrations in crops. In: McLaughlin MJ, Singh BR (eds) Cadmium in soils and plants. Kluwer Academic Publication, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  22. Han SH, An JY, Hwang J, Kim SB, Park BB (2016) The effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on the growth and nutrient concentrations of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera Lin.) in a nursery system. Forest Sci Technol 12:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haque MA, Monayem M, Hossain S, Alam M (2012) Economics of marigold cultivation in some selected areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Agric Res 37:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hattab N, Motelica-Heino M, Faure O, Bouchardon JL (2015) Effect of fresh and mature organic amendments on the phytoremediation of technosols contaminated with high concentrations of trace elements. J Environ Manag 159:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. He QB, Singh BR (1993) Plant availability of cadmium in soil, I Extractable cadmium in newly and long-term cultivated soils. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 43:134–141Google Scholar
  26. Hladun K, Parker DR, Trumble JT (2015) Cadmium, copper and lead accumulation and bioconcentration in the vegetative and reproductive organs of Raphanus sativus: Implications for plant performance and pollination. J Chem Ecol 41:386–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu J, Wu FY, Wu SC, Sun XL, Lin XG, Wong MH (2013) Phytoavailability and phytovariety codetermine the bioaccumulation risk of heavy metal from soils, focusing on Cd-contaminated vegetable farms around the Pearl River Delta, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 91:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kabata-Pendias A (2001) Trace Elements in Soil and Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  29. Karamanos RE (2013) Nutrient uptake and metabolism in crops. Prairie Soil Crop J 6:52–63Google Scholar
  30. Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF (1982) Lithium, sodium and potassium. In: Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  31. Lai HY, Juang KW, Chen ZS (2010) Large-area experiment on uptake of metals by twelve plants growing in soils contaminated with multiple metals. Int J Phytoremdiat 12:785–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laxen DPH (1985) Trace metal adsorption/coprecipitation on hydrous ferric oxide under realistic conditions. Water Res 19:1229–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu YT, Chen ZS, Hong CY (2011) Cadmium-induced physiological response and antioxidant enzyme changes in the novel cadmium accumulator, Tagetes patula. J Hazard Mater 189:724–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loosemore N, Straczek A, Hinsinger P, Jaillard B (2004) Zinc mobilisation from a contaminated soil by three genotypes of tobacco as affected by soil and rhizosphere pH. Plant Soil 260:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lux A, Martinka M, Vaculík M, White PJ (2011) Root responses to cadmium in the rhizosphere: a review. J Exp Bot 62:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meeinkuirt W, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Tanhan P, Chaiyarat R (2012) Phytostabilization of lead by various tree species using pot and field trial experiments. Int J Phytoremdiat 14:925–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meeinkuirt W, Kruatrachue M, Pichtel J, Phusantisampan T, Saengwilai P (2016) Influence of organic amendments on phytostabilization of Cd-contaminated soil by Eucalyptus camaldulensis. ScienceAsia 42:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendes AMS, Duda GP, do Nascimento CWA, Silva MO (2006) Bioavailability of cadmium and lead in a soil amended with phosphorus fertilizers. Sci Agric 63:328–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meshkatalsadat MH, Safaei-Ghomi J, Moharramipour S, Naseri M (2010) Chemical characterization of Tagetes minuta L. cultivated in South West of Iran by nano scale injection. Dig J Nanomater Bios 5:101–106Google Scholar
  40. Moreno JL, Ondoño S, Torres I, Bastida F (2017) Compost, leonardite, and zeolite impacts on soil microbial community under barley crops. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17:214–230Google Scholar
  41. Nakbanpote W, Meesungnoen O, Prasad MNV (2016) Potential of ornamental plants for phytoremediation of heavy metals and income generation. In: Prasad MNV (ed) Bioremediation and bioeconomy. Elsevier, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  42. Ogbonnaya U, Semple KT (2013) Impact of biochar on organic contaminants in soil: a tool for mitigating risk. Agron 3:349–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Method of analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  44. Paz-Ferreiro J, Lu H, Fu S, Méndez A, Gasco G (2014) Use of phytoremediation and biochar to remediate heavy metal polluted soils: a review. Solid Earth 5:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Phusantisampan T, Meeinkuirt W, Saengwilai P, Pichtel J, Chaiyarat R (2016) Phytostabilization potential of two ecotypes of Vetiveria zizanioides in cadmium-contaminated soils: greenhouse and field experiments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:20027–20038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pichtel J, Bradway D (2007) Conventional crops and organic amendments for Pb, Cd and Zn treatment at a severely contaminated site. Bioresour Technol 99:1242–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pierzynski GM, Erickson LE, Lambert M, Hetrick BAD, Sweeney DW (2002) Phytostabilization of metal mine tailings using tall fescue. Prac Period Hazard Toxic Radio Waste Manage 6:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prasad MNV, Nakbanpote W, Sebastian A, Natthawoot P, Phadermrod C (2015) Phytomanagement of Padaeng zinc mine waste, Mae Sot district, Tak province, Thailand. In: Hakeem KR, Sabir M, Ozturk M, Murmut A (eds) Soil remediation and plants. Academic Press, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  49. Putwattana N, Kruatrachue M, Kumsopa A, Pokethitiyook P (2015) Evaluation of organic and inorganic amendments on maize growth and uptake of Cd and Zn from contaminated paddy soils. Int J Phytoremediat 17:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rhoades JD, Loveday J (1990) Salinity in irrigated agriculture. In Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Agron Monogr 30:1089–1142Google Scholar
  51. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Agriculture Handbook 60, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richter RC, Nóbrega JA, Pirola C (2016) Think blank: clean chemistry tools for atomic spectroscopy. Milestone Srl, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  53. Saengwilai P, Meeinkuirt W, Pichtel J, Koedrith P (2017) Influence of amendments on Cd and Zn uptake and accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:15756–15767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saxena S, Srivastava A, Singh VP, Singh UP (2012) Potentiality of marigold for lead phytoextraction from artificially contaminated soil. Ecol Environ Conserv 18:671–675Google Scholar
  55. Schnitzer M (1982) Organic matter characterization. In: Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Method of analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  56. Shahid M, Sabir M, Ali MA, Ghafoor A (2014) Effect of organic amendments on phytoavailability of nickel and growth of berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum) under nickel contaminated soil conditions. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 26:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singh V, Singh B, Kaul VK (2003) Domestication of wild marigold (Tagetes minuta L.) as a potential economic crop in Western Himalaya and North Indian plains. Econ Bot 57:535–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (1996) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Book series No.5. Soil Science Society of America, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  59. Sricoth T, Meeinkuirt W, Saengwilai P, Pichtel J, Taeprayoon P (2018) Aquatic plants for phytostabilization of cadmium and zinc in hydroponic experiments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:14964–14976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sriprachote A, Pengprecha S, Pengprecha P, Kanyawongha P, Ochiai K, Matoh T (2014) Assessment of cadmium and zinc contamination in the soils around Pha Te Village, Mae Sot District, Tak Province, Thailand. Appl Environ Res 36:67–79Google Scholar
  61. Srivastava S, Prakash S, Srivastava MM (1999) Chromium mobilization and plant availability-the impact of organic complexing ligands. Plant Soil 212:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swaddiwudhipong W, Limpatanachote P, Mahasakpan P, Krintratun S, Punta B, Funkhiew T (2012) Progress in cadmium-related health effects in persons with high environmental exposure in northwestern Thailand: a five-year follow-up. Environ Res 112:194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taranaki Regional Council (TRC) (2005) Cadmium in Taranaki soil: an assessment of cadmium accumulation in Taranaki soils from the application of superphosphate fertilizer. Taranaki Regional Council, StratfordGoogle Scholar
  64. Uminska R (1993) Cadmium contents of cultivated soils exposed to contamination in Poland. Environ Geochem Hlth 15:15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walkley A, Black CA (1934) An examination of degradation method for determining soil organic matter: a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wei S, Zhou Q, Zhan J, Wu Z, Sun T, Lyubu Y, Prasad MNV (2010) Poultry manured Bidens tripartite L. extracting Cd from soil–potential for phytoremediating Cd contaminated soil. Bioresour Technol 101:8907–8910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wenzel WW, Blum WEH, Brandstetter A, Jockwer F, Kochl A, Oberforster M, Oberlander HE, Riedler C, Roth K, Vladeva I (1996) Effects of soil properties and cultivar on cadmium accumulation in wheat grain. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 159:609–614Google Scholar
  68. Zeng P, Guo Z, Cao X, Xiao X, Liu Y, Shi L (2018) Phytostabilization potential of ornamental plants grown in soil contaminated with cadmium. Int J Phytoremediat 20:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang H, Chen J, Zhu L, Yang G, Li D (2014) Transfer of cadmium from soil to vegetable in the Pearl River Delta area, South China. PlosOne 9:e108572.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alapha Thongchai
    • 1
  • Weeradej Meeinkuirt
    • 2
    Email author
  • Puntaree Taeprayoon
    • 2
  • John Pichtel
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Science Technology and AgricultureYala Rajabhat UniversityYalaThailand
  2. 2.Mahidol University, Nakhonsawan CampusNakhonsawanThailand
  3. 3.Natural Resources and Environmental ManagementBall State UniversityMuncieUSA

Personalised recommendations