Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 7677–7687 | Cite as

Does asymmetric nexus exist between agricultural land and the housing market? Evidence from non-linear ARDL approach

  • Gizem UzunerEmail author
  • Andrew Alola Adewale
Research Article

Abstract

Expectedly, urbanization is often associated with constant degradation of natural habitat. In most cases, as demand for housing increases, natural habitat like agricultural land, forestry, and water bodies gradually gives way to building structures. Against this backdrop, the current study investigates the asymmetric nexus of agricultural land and housing market vis-à-vis house prices. The study employed the yearly data from 1976 to 2015 for the case of Sweden and used economic policy uncertainty (EPU) as a control variable in non-linear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) approach. The finding notes a significant and positive short- and long-run relationship between housing price and agricultural land especially when there is a negative shock on agricultural land. But when there is a negative shock on EPU, the impact on housing price is significant and negative for both short run and long run. While an asymmetric long-run relationship is significant and positive between EPU and housing price, such significant occurrence do not exist for agricultural land. Hence, in meeting housing demand and mitigating an escalated growth in house prices, implementation of effective land use policy is encouraged.

Keywords

Agricultural land House prices Economic policy uncertainty Cointegration NARDL 

JEL classification

C32 Q15 R31 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors’ gratitude is extended to Prof. Mehmet Balcilar for his kind mentorship as well as prospective editor and reviewers that will/have spared time to guide toward a successful publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Akaike H (1981) Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econ 16(1):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alola AA, Alola UV (2018) Agricultural land usage and tourism impact on renewable energy consumption among Coastline Mediterranean Countries. Energy Environ. 0958305X18779577Google Scholar
  3. André C, Bonga-Bonga L, Gupta R, Muteba Mwamba JW (2017) Economic policy uncertainty, US real housing returns and their volatility: a nonparametric approach. J Real Estate Res 39(4):493–513Google Scholar
  4. Andreas Claussen C (2013) Are Swedish houses overpriced? Int J Hous Mark Anal 6(2):180–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aoki K, Proudman J, Vlieghe G (2004) House prices, consumption, and monetary policy: a financial accelerator approach. J Financ Intermed 13(4):414–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atterhög M, Lind H (2004) How does an increased competition on the housing market affect rents? An empirical study concerning Sweden. Hous Stud 19(1):107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aye GC (2018) Causality between economic policy uncertainty and real housing returns in emerging economies: a cross-sample validation approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, (just-accepted)Google Scholar
  8. Aye GC, Balcilar M, Bosch A, Gupta R (2014) Housing and the business cycle in South Africa. J Policy Model 36(3):471–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker SR, Bloom N, Davis SJ (2016) Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(4):1593–1636Google Scholar
  10. Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal 19(3):267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bao H, Peng Y (2016) Effect of land expropriation on land-lost farmers’ entrepreneurial action: a case study of Zhejiang Province. Habitat Int 53:342–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barry M, Roux L (2016) Land ownership and land registration suitability theory in state-subsidized housing in two South African towns. Habitat Int 53:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bengtsson B (2001) Housing as a social right: implications for welfare state theory. Scand Polit Stud 24(4):255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernanke BS (1983) Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. Q J Econ 98(1):85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burnside C, Eichenbaum M, Rebelo S (2016) Understanding booms and busts in housing markets. J Polit Econ 124(4):1088–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canarella G, Miller S, Pollard S (2012) Unit roots and structural change: an application to US house price indices. Urban Stud 49(4):757–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Case KE, Shiller RJ (1988) The efficiency of the market for single-family homesGoogle Scholar
  18. Case KE, Quigley JM, Shiller RJ (2005) Comparing wealth effects: the stock market versus the housing market. Adv Macroecon 5(1)Google Scholar
  19. Cesa-Bianchi A (2013) Housing cycles and macroeconomic fluctuations: a global perspective. J Int Money Financ 37:215–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cesa-Bianchi A, Cespedes LF, Rebucci A (2015) Global liquidity, house prices, and the macroeconomy: evidence from advanced and emerging economies. J Money Credit Bank 47(S1):301–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen Y, Chen Z, Xu G, Tian Z (2016) Built-up land efficiency in urban China: insights from the general land use plan (2006–2020). Habitat Int 51:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cho SH, Bowker JM, Park WM (2006) Measuring the contribution of water and green space amenities to housing values: an application and comparison of spatially weighted hedonic models. J Agric Resour Econ 485–507Google Scholar
  23. Christou C, Gupta R, Hassapis C (2017) Does economic policy uncertainty forecast real housing returns in a panel of OECD countries? A Bayesian approach. Q Rev Econ Finance 65:50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chuai X, Huang X, Wu C, Li J, Lu Q, Qi X, Zhang M, Zuo T, Lu J (2016) Land use and ecosystems services value changes and ecological land management in coastal Jiangsu, China. Habitat Int 57:164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Crotty J (2009) Structural causes of the global financial crisis: a critical assessment of the “new financial architecture”. Camb J Econ 33(4):563–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Du H, Ma Y, An Y (2011) The impact of land policy on the relation between housing and land prices: evidence from China. Q Rev Econ Finance 51(1):19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Economic Policy Uncertainty index (2018). http://www.policyuncertainty.com/. Accessed 15 Aug 2018
  28. Estrella A, Mishkin FS (1998) Predicting US recessions: Financial variables as leading indicators. Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1):45–61Google Scholar
  29. European Union (EU) (2018) Eurostat. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Main_Page. Accessed 15 Aug 2018
  30. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2018) http://www.fao.org/home/en/. Accessed 20 May 2018
  31. Goodhart C, Hofmann B (2008) House prices, money, credit, and the macroeconomy. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(1):180–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hiller N, Lerbs OW (2016) Ageing and urban house prices. Reg Sci Urban Econ 60:276–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katrakilidis C, Trachanas E (2012) What drives housing price dynamics in Greece: new evidence from asymmetric ARDL cointegration. Econ Model 29(4):1064–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kishor NK, Marfatia HA (2017) The dynamic relationship between housing prices and the macroeconomy: evidence from OECD countries. J Real Estate Financ Econ 54(2):237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kok N, Monkkonen P, Quigley JM (2014) Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: an intra-metropolitan analysis. J Urban Econ 81:136–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lu X, Kuang B, Li J (2017) Regional difference decomposition and policy implications of China’s urban land use efficiency under the environmental restriction. Habitat InternationalGoogle Scholar
  37. Mankiw NG, Weil DN (1989) The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market. Reg Sci Urban Econ 19(2):235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69(6):1519–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nyakabawo W, Miller SM, Balcilar M, Das S, Gupta R (2015) Temporal causality between house prices and output in the US: a bootstrap rolling-window approach. N Am J Econ Financ 33:55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Öhman P, Yazdanfar D (2018) Bank lending and housing prices in Sweden. Int J Hous Mark AnalGoogle Scholar
  41. Ongan S, Gocer I (2017) The relationships between home prices, financial literacy and economic policy uncertainty: empirical evidence from the US housing market. J Appl Econ Bus Res 7(4)Google Scholar
  42. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018) http://www.oecd.org/. Accessed 25 May 2018
  43. Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1998) An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econom Soc Monogr 31:371–413Google Scholar
  44. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ouattara B (2004) Modelling the long run determinants of private investment in Senegal (No. 04/05). Credit Research PaperGoogle Scholar
  46. Shahbaz M, Van Hoang TH, Mahalik MK, Roubaud D (2017) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ 63:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shen X, Huang X, Li H, Li Y, Zhao X (2018) Exploring the relationship between urban land supply and housing stock: evidence from 35 cities in China. Habitat Int 77:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shiller RJ (2012) The subprime solution: how today’s global financial crisis happened, and what to do about it. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  49. Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, NY, p 281–314Google Scholar
  50. Sirmans S, Macpherson D, Zietz E (2005) The composition of hedonic pricing models. J Real Estate Lit 13(1):1–44Google Scholar
  51. Su D, Li X, Lobonţ OR, Zhao Y (2016) Economic policy uncertainty and housing returns in Germany: evidence from a bootstrap rolling window. Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics : Journal of Economics and Business 34(1):43–61Google Scholar
  52. The World Bank (Housing Finance) (2018) http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialsector/brief/housing-finance. Accessed 25 May 2018
  53. Tse RY (1998) Housing price, land supply and revenue from land sales. Urban Stud 35(8):1377–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations (World Population Prospects) (2017) http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/index.shtml. Accessed 20 May 2018
  55. World Development Indicator (World Bank) (2018) https://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed 20 May 2018
  56. Zhang X, Wu Y, Shen L (2011) An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: a study of capital cities and municipalities in China. Habitat Int 35(1):141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang H, Li L, Hui ECM, Li V (2016) Comparisons of the relations between housing prices and the macroeconomy in China’s first-, second-and third-tier cities. Habitat Int 57:24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhong T, Chen Y, Huang X (2016) Impact of land revenue on the urban land growth toward decreasing population density in Jiangsu Province, China. Habitat Int 58:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zivot E, Andrews DWK (2002) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20(1):25–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsEastern Mediterranean UniversityVia Mersin 10Turkey

Personalised recommendations