Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 7463–7475 | Cite as

Efficient removal of oxytetracycline from aqueous solution by a novel magnetic clay–biochar composite using natural attapulgite and cauliflower leaves

  • Zhaowei WangEmail author
  • Xing Yang
  • Tingting Qin
  • Guiwei Liang
  • Yan Li
  • Xiaoyun Xie
Research Article

Abstract

A novel magnetic attapulgite–biochar composite (MABC) derived from natural attapulgite, cauliflower leaves, and FeCl3 was successfully prepared as a low-cost adsorbent for oxytetracycline (OTC) removal from aqueous solution. Characterization experiments by different techniques suggested that attapulgite clay particles and Fe3O4 nanoparticles were successfully covered on the MABC surface. Compared with the pristine biochar (CLB) and attapulgite–biochar composite (ABC), MABC had the largest surface area, well-developed pore structure, and more surface oxygen-containing functional groups which could interact with organic pollutant via hydrogen bonding, π–π electron coupling, complexation, and ion exchange. The maximum adsorption capacity of MABC by the Langmuir model was 33.31 mg/g, which was dramatically higher than that of CLB and ABC. The effects of solution initial pH had little difference on the adsorption of OTC because of the buffering effect. Adsorbent-regeneration studies of MABC exhibited good reusability and separation property. All the results indicated that MABC could be used as a potential adsorbent because of its easy preparation and separation, high efficiency, wide pH range application, and abundant and cheap raw materials in the global ecosystem.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Biochar Attapulgite Composite Oxytetracycline Adsorption 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by Gansu Natural Science Fund, China (17JR5RA218), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities at Lanzhou University (lzujbky-2017-212).

References

  1. Abdelhafez AA, Li J-H (2016) Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by using biochars derived from sugar cane bagasse and orange peel. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 61:367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ankley GT, Brooks BW, Huggett DB, Sumpter AJP (2007) Repeating history: pharmaceuticals in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 41(24):8211–8217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boxall ABA, Kolpin DW, Hallingsørensen B, Tolls J (2003) Peer reviewed: are veterinary medicines causing environmental risks? Environ Sci Technol 37(15):286(A)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brigante M, Pecini E, Avena M (2016) Magnetic mesoporous silica for water remediation: synthesis, characterization and application as adsorbent of molecules and ions of environmental concern. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 230:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchberger WW (2011) Current approaches to trace analysis of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment. J Chromatogr A 1218(4):603–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadaval TRS, Dotto GL, Pinto LAA (2014) Equilibrium isotherms, thermodynamics, and kinetic studies for the adsorption of food azo dyes onto chitosan films. Chem Eng Commun 202(10):1316–1323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2014.934449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao X, Ma L, Gao B, Harris W (2009) Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environ Sci Technol 43(9):3285–3291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandraiah MR (2016) Facile synthesis of zero valent iron magnetic biochar composites for Pb(II) removal from the aqueous medium. Alex Eng J 55(1):619–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen B-L, Zhou D-D, Zhu L-Z (2008) Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 42(14):5137–5143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen B-L, Chen Z-M, Lv S-F (2011) A novel magnetic biochar efficiently sorbs organic pollutants and phosphate. Bioresour Technol 102(2):716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Da’na E, Sayari A (2011) Adsorption of copper on amine-functionalized SBA-15 prepared by co-condensation: equilibrium properties. Chem Eng J 166(1):445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong L, Lin L, Li Q-Y, Huang Z, Tang X-Q, Wu M, Li C, Cao X-H, Scholz M (2018) Enhanced nitrate-nitrogen removal by modified attapulgite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron treating simulated groundwater. J Environ Manag 213:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esfandiyari T, Nasirizadeh N, Ehrampoosh MH, Tabatabaee M (2017) Characterization and absorption studies of cationic dye on multi walled carbon nanotube–carbon ceramic composite. J Ind Eng Chem 46:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faheem YH, Liu J, Shen J-Y, Sun X-Y, Li J-S, Wang L-J (2016) Preparation of MnOx-loaded biochar for Pb2+ removal: adsorption performance and possible mechanism. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 66:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan S-S, Wang Y, Wang Z, Tang J, Li X-D (2017) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by sewage sludge-derived biochar: adsorption kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics and mechanism. J Environ Chem Eng 5(1):601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao J, Shi Y-Y, Zhou H-F, Ren X-Q, Ji H (2016) Application of modified attapulgite in phthalate acid ester-contaminated soil: effects on phthalate acid ester dissipation and the composition of soil microbial community. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:15175–15182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hao Y-M, Wang Z, Gou J-J, Dong S-Y (2015) Highly efficient adsorption and removal of Chrysoidine Y from aqueous solution by magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite. Arab J Chem  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.07.013
  18. Huang P, Ge C, Feng D, Yu H, Luo J, Li J, Strong PJ, Sarmah AK, Bolan NS, Wang H (2018) Effects of metal ions and pH on ofloxacin sorption to cassava residue-derived biochar. Sci Total Environ 616–617:1384–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jing X-R, Wang Y-Y, Liu W-J, Wang Y-K, Jiang H (2014) Enhanced adsorption performance of tetracycline in aqueous solutions by methanol-modified biochar. Chem Eng J 248:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalderis D, Kayan B, Akay S, Kulaksız E, Gözmen B (2017) Adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol on paper sludge/wheat husk biochar: process optimization and comparison with biochars prepared from wood chips, sewage sludge and hog fuel/demolition waste. J Environ Chem Eng 5(3):2222–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larsson DGJ, de PC, Paxeus N (2007) Effluent from drug manufactures contains extremely high levels of pharmaceuticals. J Hazard Mater 148(3):751–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li W-P, Lin J-C, Huang K (2014) Analysis about present status of global cauliflower production and its trade (in Chinese). China Veg 1(9):5–10Google Scholar
  23. Li X-L, Lu H-J, Zhang Y, He F, Jing L-Y, He X-H (2016) Fabrication of magnetic alginate beads with uniform dispersion of CoFe2O4 by the polydopamine surface functionalization for organic pollutants removal. Appl Surf Sci 389:567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li H-Q, Hu J-T, Meng Y, Su J-H, Wang X-J (2017a) An investigation into the rapid removal of tetracycline using multilayered graphene-phase biochar derived from waste chicken feather. Sci Total Environ 603–604:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X-L, Lu H-J, Zhang Y, He F (2017b) Efficient removal of organic pollutants from aqueous media using newly synthesized polypyrrole/CNTs-CoFe2O4 magnetic nanocomposites. Chem Eng J 316:893–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Y, Wang Z-W, Xie X-Y, Zhu J-M, Li R-N, Qin T-T (2017c) Removal of norfloxacin from aqueous solution by clay-biochar composite prepared from potato stem and natural attapulgite. Colloids Surf A – Physicochem Eng Asp 514:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Y-X, Pei G-P, Qiao X-L, Zhu Y, Li H (2018) Remediation of cadmium contaminated water and soil using vinegar residue biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:15754–15764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu W-J, Zeng F-X, Jiang H, Zhang X-S (2011) Preparation of high adsorption capacity bio-chars from waste biomass. Bioresour Technol 102:8247–8252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu P, Liu W-J, Jiang H, Chen J-J, Li W-W, Yu H-Q (2012) Modification of bio-char derived from fast pyrolysis of biomass and its application in removal of tetracycline from aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol 121:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu Y, Zhang Z-H, Wang P, Dong Y-H (2016) Surface charge modification of chloromethylated polystyrene beads with NaH for the removal of sulfamonomethoxine. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 65:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mandal S, Sarkar B, Bolan N, Sik OY, Naidu R (2017) Enhancement of chromate reduction in soils by surface modified biochar. J Environ Manag 186:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milonjic S (2007) A consideration of the correct calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. J Serbian Chem Soc 72(12):1363–1367.  https://doi.org/10.2298/jsc0712363m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mohan D, Singh P, Sarswat A, Steele PH, Pittman CUJ (2015) Lead sorptive removal using magnetic and nonmagnetic fast pyrolysis energy cane biochars. J Colloid Interf Sci 448:238–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ocampo-Péreza R, Leyva-Ramosa R, Rivera-Utrillab J, Flores-Canob JV, Sánchez-Polo M (2015) Modeling adsorption rate of tetracyclines on activated carbons from aqueous phase. Chem Eng Res and Des 104:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oladipo AA, Ifebajo AO (2018) Highly efficient magnetic chicken bone biochar for removal of tetracycline and fluorescent dye from wastewater: two-stage adsorber analysis. J Environ Manag 209:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pavan FA, Lima EC, Dias SL, Mazzocato AC (2008) Methylene blue biosorption from aqueous solutions by yellow passion fruit waste. J Hazard Mater 150(3):703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng X, Hu X, Fu D, Lam FLY (2014) Adsorption removal of acid black 1 from aqueous solution using ordered mesoporous carbon. Appl Surf Sci 294:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pezoti O, Cazetta AL, Bedin KC, Souza LS, Martins AC, Silva TL, Santos Júnior OO, Visentainer JV, Almeida VC (2016) NaOH-activated carbon of high surface area produced from guava seeds as a high-efficiency adsorbent for amoxicillin removal: kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Chem Eng J 288:778–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qin T-T, Wang Z-W, Xie X-Y, Xie C-R, Zhu J-M, Li Y (2017) A novel biochar derived from cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) roots could remove norfloxacin and chlortetracycline efficiently. Water Sci Technol 76(12):3307–3318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reguyal F, Sarmah AK (2018) Adsorption of sulfamethoxazole by magnetic biochar: effects of pH, ionic strength, natural organic matter and 17α-ethinylestradiol. Sci Total Environ 628–629:722–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reguyal F, Sarmah AK, Gao W (2017) Synthesis of magnetic biochar from pine sawdust via oxidative hydrolysis of FeCl2 for the removal sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 321:868–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saber-Samandari S, Joneidi-Yekta H, Mohseni M (2017) Adsorption of anionic and cationic dyes from aqueous solution using gelatin-based magnetic nanocomposite beads comprising carboxylic acid functionalized carbon nanotube. Chem Eng J 308:1133–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheikhmohammadi A, Mohseni SM, Khodadadi R, Sardar M, Abtahi M, Mahdavi S, Abtahi M, Mahdavi S, Keramati H, Dahaghin Z, Rezaei S, Almasian M, Sarkhosh M, Faraji M, Nazari S (2017) Application of graphene oxide modified with 8-hydroxyquinoline for the adsorption of Cr (VI) from wastewater: optimization, kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies. J Mol Liq 233:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sinegani AAS, Emtiazi G, Shariatmadari H (2005) Sorption and immobilization of cellulase on silicate clay minerals. J Colloid Interf Sci 290(1):39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun K, Ro K, Guo M-X, Novak J, Mashayekhi H, Xing B (2011) Sorption of bisphenol A, 17alpha-ethinyl estradiol and phenanthrene on thermally and hydrothermally produced biochars. Bioresour Technol 102(10):5757–5763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun Y-N, Gao B, Yao Y, Fang J, Zhang M, Zhou Y-M, Chen H, Yang L-Y (2014) Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chem Eng J 240:574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taheran M, Naghdi M, Brar SK, Knystautas EJ, Verma M, Ramirez AA, Surampalli RY, Valero JR (2016) Adsorption study of environmentally relevant concentrations of chlortetracycline on pinewood biochar. Sci Total Environ 571:772–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Travlou NA, Kyzas GZ, Lazaridis NK, Deliyanni EA (2013) Graphite oxide/chitosan composite for reactive dye removal. Chem Eng J 217:256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang H-Y, Gao B, Wang S-S, Fang J, Xue Y-W, Yang K (2015) Removal of Pb(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions by biochar derived from KMnO4 treated hickory wood. Bioresour Technol 197:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watkinson AJ, Murby EJ, Costanzo SD (2007) Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling. Water Res 41(18):4164–4176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu C, Cui M-Q, Xue S-G, Li W-C, Huang L, Jiang X-X, Qian Z-Y (2018) Remediation of arsenic-contaminated paddy soil by iron-modified biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:20792–20801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu X-B, Hu X, Ding Z-H, Chen Y-J, Gao B (2017) Waste-art-paper biochar as an effective sorbent for recovery of aqueous Pb(II) into value-added PbO nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 308:863–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang W-B, Lu Y-P, Zheng F-F, Xue X-X, Li N, Liu D-M (2012) Adsorption behavior and mechanisms of norfloxacin onto porous resins and carbon nanotube. Chem Eng J 179:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yao Z-Y, Wang L-H, Qi J-H (2009) Biosorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution using a bioenergy forest waste: Xanthoceras sorbifolia seed coat. CLEAN-Soil Air Water 37(8):642–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yao Y, Gao B, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR, Cao X-D, Pullammanappallil P, Yang L-Y (2011) Biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings: characterization and phosphate removal potential. Bioresour Technol 102(10):6273–6278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yao Y, Gao B, Fang J, Zhang M, Chen H, Zhou Y-M, Creamer AE, Sun Y-N, Yang L-Y (2014) Characterization and environmental applications of clay–biochar composites. Chem Eng J 242:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, Spokas K (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag 36:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yin Z-H, Liu Y-G, Liu S-B, Jiang L-H, Tan X-F, Zeng G-M, Li M-F, Liu S-J, Tian S-R, Fang Y (2018) Activated magnetic biochar by one-step synthesis: enhanced adsorption and coadsorption for 17β-estradiol and copper. Sci Total Environ 639:1530–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yu F, Chen J-H, Chen L, Huai J, Gong W-Y, Yuan Z-W, Wang J-H, Ma J (2012) Magnetic carbon nanotubes synthesis by Fenton's reagent method and their potential application for removal of azo dye from aqueous solution. J Colloid Interf Sci 378(1):175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yu F, Li Y, Han S, Ma J (2016) Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from aqueous solution using carbon materials. Chemosphere 153:365–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhaowei Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xing Yang
    • 1
  • Tingting Qin
    • 1
  • Guiwei Liang
    • 1
  • Yan Li
    • 1
  • Xiaoyun Xie
    • 1
  1. 1.Gansu Key Laboratory for Environmental Pollution Prediction and Control, College of Earth and Environmental SciencesLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations