Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 8875–8884 | Cite as

Antioxidant properties and instrumental quality characteristics of spray dried Pangasius visceral protein hydrolysate prepared by chemical and enzymatic methods

  • Mohammad Aman Hassan
  • Martin Xavier
  • Subodh Gupta
  • Binaya Bhusan Nayak
  • Amjad Khansaheb BalangeEmail author
Research Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

Fish protein hydrolysates are digested form of protein with various bioactive properties where, the cleavages of molecular bonds of proteins can be broken by the enzymatic and chemical process. In this study, antioxidant properties of spray dried protein hydrolysate prepared from Pangasius viscera by using enzymatic (papain and pepsin), and chemical methods (hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide) were evaluated. Among the different treatments, pepsin-derived visceral protein hydrolysate showed the maximum antioxidant activity when used at higher concentrations. Essential amino acids (EAA) and hydrophobic amino acids are higher in papain-derived visceral protein hydrolysate. In pepsin-derived visceral protein hydrolysate, major proportion was contributed by glycine (Gly), glutamine (Glu), proline (Pro), and asparagine (Asp). Higher amount of aromatic amino acids are found in alkali-derived FVPH. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of pepsin fish visceral protein hydrolysate showed better globular structure than the other treatments. It can be concluded that among the different treatments, the visceral protein hydrolysate prepared with pepsin had better overall quality regarding antioxidant properties and papain in nutritional point of view.

Keywords

Pangasius viscera Antioxidant activity Amino acid FTIR SEM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Director, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai. The Maulana Azad National Fellowship given by UGC, India, to the first author is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Al-Jowder O, Defernez M, Kemsley EK, Wilson RH (1999) Mid-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics for the authentication of meat products. J Agric Food Chem 47(8):3210–3218Google Scholar
  2. Amiza MA, Kong YL, Faazaz AL (2012) Effects of degree of hydrolysis on physicochemical properties of Cobia (Rachycentron canadum) frame hydrolysate. Int Food Res J 19(1):199–206Google Scholar
  3. Barth A (2007) Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Bioenergetics 1767:1073–1101Google Scholar
  4. Binsan W, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, Roytrakul S, Tanaka M, Kishimura H (2008) Antioxidative activity of Mungoong, an extract paste, from the cephalothorax of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Food Chem 106(1):185–193Google Scholar
  5. Bougatef A, Hajji M, Balti R, Lassoued I, Triki-Ellouz Y, Nasri M (2009) Antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activities of smooth hound (Mustelus mustelus) muscle protein hydrolysates obtained by gastrointestinal proteases. Food Chem 114(4):1198–1205Google Scholar
  6. Bougatef A, Nedjar-Arroume N, Manni L, Ravallec R, Barkia A, Guillochon D, Nasri M (2010) Purification and identification of novel antioxidant peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of sardinelle (Sardinella aurita) by-products proteins. Food Chem 118(3):559–565Google Scholar
  7. Chalamaiah M, Hemalatha R, Jyothirmayi T (2012) Fish protein hydrolysates: proximate composition, amino acid composition, antioxidant activities and applications: a review. Food Chem 135(4):3020–3038Google Scholar
  8. Chang CY, Wu KC, Chiang SH (2007) Antioxidant properties and protein compositions of porcine haemoglobin hydrolysates. Food Chem 100(4):1537–1543Google Scholar
  9. Chen X, Ru Y, Chen F, Wang X, Zhao X, Ao Q (2013) FTIR spectroscopic characterization of soy proteins obtained through AOT reverse micelles. Food Hydrocoll 31(2):435–437Google Scholar
  10. Chi CF, Cao ZH, Wang B, Hu FY, Li ZR, Zhang B (2014) Antioxidant and functional properties of collagen hydrolysates from Spanish mackerel skin as influenced by average molecular weight. Molecules 19(8):11211–11230Google Scholar
  11. Cumby N, Zhong Y, Naczk M, Shahidi F (2008) Antioxidant activity and water-holding capacity of canola protein hydrolysates. Food Chem 109(1):144–148Google Scholar
  12. Dhanabalan V, Xavier M, Kannuchamy N, Asha KK, Singh CB, Balange A (2017) Effect of processing conditions on degree of hydrolysis, ACE inhibition, and antioxidant activities of protein hydrolysate from Acetes indicus. Environ Sci Pollut R 24(26):21222–21232Google Scholar
  13. Elavarasan K, Shamasundar BA, Badii F, Howell N (2016) Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity and structural properties of oven-and freeze-dried protein hydrolysate from fresh water fish (Cirrhinus mrigala). Food Chem 206:210–216Google Scholar
  14. Galla NR, Pamidighantam PR, Akula S, Karakala B (2012) Functional properties and in vitro antioxidant activity of roe protein hydrolysates of Channa striatus and Labeo rohita. Food Chem 135(3):1479–1484Google Scholar
  15. Gómez-Ruiz JÁ, López-Expósito I, Pihlanto A, Ramos M, Recio I (2008) Antioxidant activity of ovine casein hydrolysates: identification of active peptides by HPLC–MS/MS. Eur Food Res Technol 227(4):1061–1067Google Scholar
  16. Guerard F, Guimas L, Binet A (2002) Production of tuna waste hydrolysates by a commercial neutral protease preparation. J Mol Catal B Enzym 19:489–498Google Scholar
  17. Hassan MA, Deepitha RP, Xavier KM, Gupta S, Nayak BB, Balange AK (2018) Evaluation of the properties of spray dried visceral protein hydrolysate from Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1978) extracted by enzymatic and chemical methods. Waste Biomass Valor:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0302-1
  18. Hernández-Ledesma B, Miralles B, Amigo L, Ramos M, Recio I (2005) Identification of antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory peptides in fermented milk. J Sci Food Agric 85(6):1041–1048Google Scholar
  19. Ishida Y, Fujita T, Asai K (1981) New detection and separation method for amino acid by high-preformance liquid chromatogaphy. J Chromatogr 204:143–148Google Scholar
  20. Jamdar SN, Rajalakshmi V, Pednekar MD, Juan F, Yardi V, Sharma A (2010) Influence of degree of hydrolysis on functional properties, antioxidant activity and ACE inhibitor activity of peanut protein hydrolysate. Food Chem 121(1):178–184Google Scholar
  21. Jamilah B, Tan KW, Hartina MU, Azizah A (2011) Gelatins from three cultured freshwater fish skins obtained by liming process. Food Hydrocoll 25(5):1256–1260Google Scholar
  22. Je JY, Qian ZJ, Lee SH, Byun HG, Kim SK (2008) Purification and antioxidant properties of big eye tuna (Thunnus obesus) dark muscle peptide on free radical-mediated oxidative systems. J Med Food 11(4):629–637Google Scholar
  23. Jiang H, Tong T, Sun J, Xu Y, Zhao Z, Liao D (2014) Purification and characterization of antioxidative peptides from round scad (Decapterus maruadsi) muscle protein hydrolysate. Food Chem 154:158–163Google Scholar
  24. Jun SY, Park PJ, Jung WK, Kim SK (2004) Purification and characterization of an antioxidative peptide from enzymatic hydrolysate of yellow fin sole (Limanda aspera) frame protein. Eur Food Res Technol 219(1):20–26Google Scholar
  25. Kim SK, Mendis E (2006) Bioactive compounds from marine processing by-products–a review. Food Res Int 39(4):383–393Google Scholar
  26. Kim SY, Je JY, Kim SK (2007) Purification and characterization of antioxidant peptide from hoki (Johnius belengerii) frame protein by gastrointestinal digestion. J Nutr Biochem 18(1):31–38Google Scholar
  27. Kittiphattanabawon P, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, Shahidi F (2012) Gelatin hydrolysate from blacktip shark skin prepared using papaya latex enzyme: antioxidant activity and its potential in model systems. Food Chem 135(3):1118–1126Google Scholar
  28. Klompong V, Benjakul S, Kantachote D, Shahidi F (2007) Antioxidative activity and functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis) as influenced by the degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food Chem 102(4):1317–1327Google Scholar
  29. Klompong V, Benjakul S, Yachai M, Visessanguan W, Shahidi F, Hayes KD (2009) Amino acid composition and antioxidative peptides from protein hydrolysates of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis). J Food Sci 74(2):126–133Google Scholar
  30. Kong J, Yu S (2007) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of protein secondary structures. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 39(8):549–559Google Scholar
  31. Kristinsson HG (1998) Reaction kinetics, biochemical and functional properties of salmon muscle proteins hydrolyzed by different alkaline proteases (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington)Google Scholar
  32. Lee SJ, Kim YS, Hwang JW, Kim EK, Moon SH, Jeon BT, Jeon YJ, Kim JM, Park PJ (2012) Purification and characterization of a novel antioxidative peptide from duck skin by-products that protects liver against oxidative damage. Food Res Int 49(1):285–295Google Scholar
  33. Liceaga-Gesualdo AM, Li-Chan ECY (1999) Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysate from herring (Clupea harengus). J Food Sci 64(6):1000–1004Google Scholar
  34. Luo HY, Wang B, Li ZR, Chi CF, Zhang QH, He GY (2013) Preparation and evaluation of antioxidant peptide from papain hydrolysate of Sphyrna lewini muscle protein. Food Sci and Technol 51(1):281–288Google Scholar
  35. Nasri R, Younes I, Jridi M, Trigui M, Bougatef A, Nedjar-Arroume N, Karra-Châabouni M (2013) ACE inhibitory and antioxidative activities of Goby (Zosterissessor ophiocephalus) fish protein hydrolysates: effect on meat lipid oxidation. Food Res Int 54(1):552–561Google Scholar
  36. Ovissipour M, Abedian A, Motamedzadegan A, Rasco B, Safari R, Shahiri H (2009) The effect of enzymatic hydrolysis time and temperature on the properties of protein hydrolysates from Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) viscera. Food Chem 115(1):238–242Google Scholar
  37. Park PJ, Jung WK, Nam KS, Shahidi F, Kim SK (2001) Purification and characterization of antioxidative peptides from protein hydrolysate of lecithin-free egg yolk. J Am Oil Chem Soc 78(6):651–656Google Scholar
  38. Pihlanto-Leppälä A (2000) Bioactive peptides derived from bovine whey proteins: opioid and ace-inhibitory peptides. Trends Food Sci Technol 11(9):347–356Google Scholar
  39. Putra SNKM, Ishak NH, Sarbon NM (2017) Preparation and characterization of physicochemical properties of golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) protein hydrolysate as affected by different proteases. Bio Agri Biotechnol 13:123–128Google Scholar
  40. Qian ZJ, Je JY, Kim SK (2007) Antihypertensive effect of angiotensin I converting enzyme-inhibitory peptide from hydrolysates of bigeye tuna dark muscle, Thunnus obesus. J Agric Food Chem 55(21):8398–8403Google Scholar
  41. Qian J, Tang Q, Cronin B, Markovich R, Rustum A (2008) Development of a high performance size exclusion chromatography method to determine the stability of Human Serum Albumin in a lyophilized formulation of Interferon alfa-2b. J Chromatogr A 1194(1):48–56Google Scholar
  42. Ranathunga S, Rajapakse N, Kim SK (2006) Purification and characterization of antioxidative peptide derived from muscle of conger eel (Conger myriaster). Eur Food Res Technol 222(3-4):310–315Google Scholar
  43. Riisom T, Sims RJ, Fioriti JA (1980) Effect of amino acids on the autoxidation of safflower oil in emulsions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 57(10):354–359Google Scholar
  44. Rosenberg M, Young SL (1993) Whey proteins as microencapsulating agents. Microencapsulation of anhydrous milkfat-structure evaluation. Food Struct 12(1):4Google Scholar
  45. Sarmadi BH, Ismail A (2010) Antioxidative peptides from food proteins: a review. Peptides 31(10):1949–1956Google Scholar
  46. Sathivel S, Prinyawiwatkul W, King JM, Grimm CC, Lloyd S (2003) Oil production from catfish viscera. J Am Oil Chem Soc 80(4):377–382Google Scholar
  47. Sathivel S, Smiley S, Prinyawiwatkul W, Bechtel PJ (2005) Functional and nutritional properties of red salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) enzymatic hydrolysates. J Food Sci 70(6)Google Scholar
  48. Shahidi F, Zhong Y (2010) Novel antioxidants in food quality preservation and health promotion. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 112(9):930–940Google Scholar
  49. Shahidi F, Han XQ, Synowiecki J (1995) Production and characteristics of protein hydrolysates from capelin (Mallotus villosus). Food Chem 53(3):285–293Google Scholar
  50. Shimada K, Fujikawa K, Yahara K, Nakamura T (1992) Antioxidative properties of xanthan on the autoxidation of soybean oil in cyclodextrin emulsion. J Agric Food Chem 40(6):945–948Google Scholar
  51. Tan ES, Ying-Yuan N, Gan CY (2014) A comparative study of physicochemical characteristics and functionalities of pinto bean protein isolate (PBPI) against the soybean protein isolate (SPI) after the extraction optimisation. Food Chem 152:447–455Google Scholar
  52. Tang CH, Peng J, Zhen DW, Chen Z (2009) Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) protein hydrolysates. Food Chem 115(2):672–678Google Scholar
  53. Tannenbaum SR, Ahern M, Bates RP (1970) Solubilization of fish protein concentrate. I. An alkaline process. Food Technol 24(5):604Google Scholar
  54. Tanuja S, Viji P, Zynudheen AA, Joshy C (2012) Composition, functional properties and antioxidative activity of hydrolysates prepared from the frame meat of Striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus). Egypt J Biol 14(1):27–35Google Scholar
  55. Tsugita A, Scheffler JJ (1982) A rapid method for acid hydrolysis of protein with a mixture of trifluoroacetic acid and hydrochloric acid. The FEBS J 124(3):585–588Google Scholar
  56. Uchida K, Kawakishi S (1992) Sequence-dependent reactivity of histidine-containing peptides with copper (II)/ascorbate. J Agric Food Chem 40(1):13–16Google Scholar
  57. Wasswa J, Tang J, Gu XH, Yuan XQ (2007) Influence of the extent of enzymatic hydrolysis on the functional properties of protein hydrolysate from grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) skin. Food Chem 104(4):1698–1704Google Scholar
  58. Wu HC, Chen HM, Shiau CY (2003) Free amino acids and peptides as related to antioxidant properties in protein hydrolysates of mackerel (Scomber austriasicus). Food Res Int 36(9):949–957Google Scholar
  59. Zhu K, Zhou H, Qian H (2006) Antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activities of wheat germ protein hydrolysates (WGPH) prepared with alcalase. Process Biochem 41(6):1296–1130Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Aman Hassan
    • 1
  • Martin Xavier
    • 1
  • Subodh Gupta
    • 2
  • Binaya Bhusan Nayak
    • 1
  • Amjad Khansaheb Balange
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Post-Harvest Technology, FRHPHM DivisionICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries EducationMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Fish Nutrition, Biochemistry and Physiology DivisionICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries EducationMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations