Advertisement

An application of advanced hair-save processes in leather industry as the reason of formation of keratinous waste: few peculiarities of its utilisation

  • Virgilijus ValeikaEmail author
  • Justa Širvaitytė
  • Danguolė Bridžiuvienė
  • Jurgita Švedienė
Short Research and Discussion Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

The application of more environmentally friendly hide and skin unhairing technologies in leather processing results in a significant increase in keratin waste. There are currently two most promising hair-saving unhairing methods: enzymatic and hair immunisation. The complete use of hair-saving unhairing methods in the leather industry will lead to the formation of approximately 143 thousand tons of hair/wool waste annually, which will require disposal. The disposal of keratin wastes from the leather industry has not been adequately studied, bearing in mind the possible amount of such wastes that will be produced in the future. Unfortunately, existing studies pay little attention to the method of unhairing, even though the unhairing method has a vast influence on the properties of keratin in the obtained hair/wool wastes. Accordingly, the present research is an attempt to establish how the differently obtained keratin wastes behave following disposal. The obtained results have shown that waste wool is characterised by different behaviour during burial in soil, and the behaviour depends on the method of unhairing. This proposition is valid for waste wool bioresistance as well. It was concluded that the deterioration of any sort of keratinous waste from the leather industry should be investigated thoroughly before disposal by burial in landfills.

Keywords

Leather Keratin wastes Unhairing Wool Biodegradation Fungi 

Notes

References

  1. Andrioli E, Petry L, Gutterres M (2015) Environmentally friendly hide unhairing: enzymatic-oxidative unhairing as an alternative to use of lime and sodium sulfide. Process Saf Environ 93:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrena R, Pagans E, Artola A, Vazquez F, Sanchez A (2007) Co-composting of hair waste from the tanning industry with de-inking and municipal wastewater sludges. Biodegradation 18:257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-006-9060-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Błyskal B (2009) Fungi utilizing keratinous substrates. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 63:631–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broda J, Przybylo S, Kobiela-Mendrek K, Binias D, Rom M, Grzybowska-Pietras J, Laszczak R (2016) Biodegradation of sheep wool geotextiles. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 115:31–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantera CS (2001) Hair-saving unhairing process Part 2. Immunization phenomenon. J Soc Leather Technol Chem 85:47–51Google Scholar
  6. Castiello D, Puccini M, Shelly D, Vitolo S (2007) Studies of mono and divalent cations effects on hair immunization. J Am Leather Chem Assoc 102:341–346Google Scholar
  7. Catalan E, Komilis D, Sanchez A (2017) Solid-state fermentation and composting as alternatives to treat hair waste: a life-cycle assessment comparative approach. Waste Manag Res 35:786–790.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X17709909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Medeiros IP, Rozental S, Costa AS, Macrae A, Hagler AN, Ribeiro JRA, Vermelho AB (2016) Biodegradation of keratin by Trichosporum loubieri RC-S6 isolated from tannery/leather waste. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 115:199–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. del Rey R, Uris A, Alba J, Candelas P (2017) Characterization of sheep wool as a sustainable material for acoustic applications. Materials 10:1277.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH (2007) Compendium of Soil Fungi. 2nd edn. IHW-Verlag, EchingGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang Z, Zhang J, Liu BH, Du GC, Chen J (2013) Biodegradation of wool waste and keratinase production in scale-up fermenter with different strategies by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BBE11-1. Bioresour Technol 140:286–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frendrup W (2000). Hair-save unhairing methods in leather processing (report), US/RAS/92/120. Regional Programme for Pollution Control in the Tanning Industry in South-East Asia, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 12 September 2000, http://footwearsinfoline.tripod.com/hairsave_unhairing.pdf. Accessed 17 August 2018
  13. Fujii K, Kai Y, Matsunobu S, Sato H, Mikami A (2013) Isolation of digested sludge-assimilating fungal strains and their potential applications. J Appl Microbiol 115:718–726.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghosh A, Collie SR (2014) Keratinous materials as novel absorbent systems for toxic pollutants. Def Sci J 64:209–221.  https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.64.7319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorecki RS, Gorecki MT (2010) Utilization of waste wool as substrate amendment in pot cultivation of tomato, sweet pepper, and eggplant. Pol J Environ Stud 19:1083–1087Google Scholar
  16. Gousterova A, Braikova D, Goshev I, Christov P, Tishinov K, Vasileva-Tonkova E, Haertle T, Nedkov P (2005) Degradation of keratin and collagen containing wastes by newly isolated thermoactinomycetes or by alkaline hydrolysis. Lett Appl Microbiol 40:335–340.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01692.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. GОSТ USSR 28206-89 (1990) Basic environmental testing procedures. Part 2. Tests. Test J. and quidance: Mouldgrowth; http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-28206-89 Accessed 17 August 2018
  18. GОSТ USSR 9.048-89 (1989) Unified system of corrosion and ageing protection. Technical items. Methods of laboratory tests for mould resistance; http://gostexpert.ru/data/files/9.048-89/ae0dd3a988848ba7a2e011600921d0dd.pdf. Accessed 17 August 2018
  19. Heidemann E (1993) Fundamentals of leather manufacture. Eduard Roether KG, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  20. Inacio FD, Martins AF, Contato AG, Brugnari T, Peralta RM, de Souza CGM (2018) Biodegradation of human keratin by protease from the basidiomycete Pleurotus pulmonarius. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 127:124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanagaraj J (2009) Cleaner leather processing by using enzymes: a review. Advanced Biotech 9:13–18Google Scholar
  22. Karthikeyan R, Balaji S, Sehgal PK (2007) Industrial applications of keratins–a review. J Sci Ind Res 66:710–715Google Scholar
  23. Khandelwal HB, More SV, Kalal KM, Laxman RS (2014) Eco-friendly enzymatic dehairing of skins and hides by C-brefeldianus protease. Clean Technol Envir 17:393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim J-D (2003) Keratinolytic activity of five Aspergillus species isolated from poultry farming soil in Korea. Mycobiology 31:157–161.  https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2003.31.3.157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korniłłowicz-Kowalska T, Bohacz J (2011) Biodegradation of keratin waste: theory and practical aspects. Waste Manag 31:1689–1701.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laba W, Chorazyk D, Pudlo A, Trojan-Piegza J, Piegza M, Kancelista A, Kurzawa A, Zuk I, Kopec W (2017) Enzymatic degradation of pretreated pig bristles with crude keratinase of Bacillus cereus PCM 2849. Waste and Biomass Valorization 8:527–537.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9603-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lange L, Huang YH, Busk PK (2016) Microbial decomposition of keratin in nature-a new hypothesis of industrial relevance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:2083–2096.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7262-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchisio VF (2000) Keratinophilic fungi: their role in nature and degradation of keratinic substrates. In: Kushwaha RKS, Guarro J (eds) Biology of dermatophytes and other Keratinophilic Fungi. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología, Bilbao, pp 86–92Google Scholar
  29. Martinez-Alvarez O, Chamorro S, Brenes A (2015) Protein hydrolysates from animal processing by-products as a source of bioactive molecules with interest in animal feeding: a review. Food Res Int 73:204–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muhsin TM, Hadi RB (2001) Degradation of keratin substrates by fungi isolated from sewage sludge. Mycopathologia 154:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Onyuka AS, Bates M, Attenburrow G, Covington AD, Antunes APM (2012) Parameters for composting tannery hair waste. J Am Leather Chem Assoc 107:159–166Google Scholar
  32. Paulauskiene T (2018) Ecologically friendly ways to clean up oil spills in harbor water areas: crude oil and diesel sorption behavior of natural sorbents. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:9981–9991.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1316-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prasanthi N, Bhargavi S, Machiraju PVS (2016) Chicken feather waste – a threat to the environment. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science. Eng Technol 5:16759–16764.  https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0509188 Google Scholar
  34. Prochon M, Ntumba YHT (2015) Effects of biopolymer keratin waste sources in XNBR compounds. Rubber Chem Technol 88:258–275.  https://doi.org/10.5254/rct.15.85948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prochon M, Przepiorkowska A, Yves-Herve Y, Ntumba T (2016) A new generation of elastomers containing innovative biopolymers. J Soc Leather Technol Chem 100:8–18Google Scholar
  36. Ranjithkumar A, Durga J, Ramesh R, Sundar VJ, Rose C, Muralidharan C (2017) Studies on alkaline protease from Bacillus crolab MTCC 5468 for applications in leather making. J Am Leather Chem Assoc 112:232–239Google Scholar
  37. Rouse JG, Van Dyke ME (2010) A review of keratin-based biomaterials for biomedical applications, materials, 3:999-1014,  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3020999
  38. Sharma S, Gupta A (2016) Sustainable management of keratin waste biomass: applications and future perspectives. Braz Arch Biol Technol 59:e16150684.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2016150684 Google Scholar
  39. Singh I (2014) Extracellular keratinase of some dermatophytes, their telemorphs and related keratinolytic fungi. European J of Exp Biol 4:57–60Google Scholar
  40. Sirvaityte J, Beleska K, Alaburdaite R, Komiciute I, Valeika V (2017) Immunization effect of sodium aluminate on wool. Fibres Text East Eur 25:42–46.  https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.4626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sirvaitytė J, Beleska K, Valeikiene V, Plavan V, Valeika V (2015) Immunization action of sodium silicate on hair: part 2 Hair-save process based on lime substitution by sodium silicate. J Soc Leather Technol Chem 99:231–237Google Scholar
  42. Tesfaye T, Sithole B, Ramjugernath D (2017) Valorisation of chicken feathers: a review on recycling and recovery route-current status and future prospects. Clean Technol Envir 19:2363–2378.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1443-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trade and Markets Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2013, World Statistical Compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear 1993-2012, http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/COMM_MARKETS_MONITORING/Hides_Skins/Documents/COMPENDIUM2013.pdf. Accessed 17 August 2018
  44. Valeika V, Beleska K, Sirvaityte J (2012) Alkaline-free method of hide preparation to tanning. Braz J Chem Eng 29:315–323.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322012000200012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valeika V, Beleska K, Sirvaityte J, Alaburdaite R, Valeikiene V (2015) Immunization action of sodium silicate on hair. J Soc Leather Technol Chem 99:223–230Google Scholar
  46. Vasileva-Tonkova E, Gousterova A, Neshev G (2009) Ecologically safe method for improved feather wastes biodegradation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 63:1008–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Villa ALV, Aragão MRS, dos Santos EP, Mazotto AM, Zingali RB, de Souza EP, Vermelho AB (2013) Feather keratin hydrolysates obtained from microbial keratinases: effect on hair fiber. BMC Biotechnol 13:13–15, (18), Article number 15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang H, Jin XY, Wu HB (2016) Adsorption and desorption properties of modified feather and feather/polypropylene melt-blown filter cartridge of lead ion (Pb2+). J Ind Text 46:852–867.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zeng A, Qi L (2014) Application and properties of modified wool keratin composites as film-forming agent for leather finishing. J Soc Leather Technol Chem 98:269–274Google Scholar
  50. Zeng YH, Yang Q, Wang YN, Zhou JF, Shi B (2016) Neutral protease assisted low-sulfide hair-save unhairing based on pH-sensitivity of enzyme. J Am Leather Chem Assoc 111:345–353Google Scholar
  51. Zhang JW, Han ZW, Teng B, Chen WY (2017) Biodeterioration process of chromium tanned leather with Penicillium sp. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 116:104–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zheljazkov VD, Stratton GW, Pincock J, Butler S, Jeliazkova EA, Nedkov NK, Gerard PD (2009) Wool-waste as organic nutrient source for container-grown plants. Waste Manag 29:2160–2164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zoccola M, Montarsolo A, Mossotti R, Patrucco A, Tonin C (2015) Green hydrolysis as an emerging technology to turn wool waste into organic nitrogen fertilizer. Waste and Biomass Valorization 6:891–897.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-015-9393-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical and Inorganic ChemistryKaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania
  2. 2.JSC Plungės kooperatinė prekyba “Viciunai group”PlungeLithuania
  3. 3.Laboratory of Biodeterioration ResearchNature Research CentreVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations