Efficient removal of Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) from wastewater and natural water using submersible device Research Article First Online: 07 January 2019 Abstract
In this study, a simple submersible device was tested to remove and recover Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) from model wastewater and real natural water. To obtain this device, fine particles (< 0.1 mm) of a new hybrid adsorbent based on the mesoporous carbon and Fenton-modified humic acids were fixed onto a highly porous polymeric matrix. The hybrid adsorbent was characterized by various methods. The main mechanism for Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) adsorption by the hybrid adsorbent is chemosorption by surface functional groups, the total concentration of which was found to be 1.56 mmol g
−1. The adsorption capacity depends on pH, and at pH 6.0, it has the following order (mmol g −1): Cu(II) (1.14) > Pb(II) (0.86) > Zn(II) (0.59) > Cd(II) (0.50). The possibility of applying a submersible device for the removal and recovery of these metals from multi-metal wastewaters and reservoirs was studied. A high efficiency of metal removal (95–99.9%) and recovery (85–99%) from wastewater remained in at least six consecutive adsorption–desorption cycles. Effective removal of metals from the water of a contaminated reservoir contributed to the rapid restoration of the phytoplankton organisms after their oppression by metals. Thus, the use of a submerged device with the new hybrid adsorbent can be an effective way of remediating wastewaters and natural waters contaminated with metals. Keywords Hybrid adsorbent Metal-contaminated water Remediation Submersible device
Responsible editor: Angeles Blanco
Notes Funding information
We thank the Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations and the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (grant No. 17-05-00623) for funding this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abate G, Masini J (2001) Acid-basic and complexation properties of a sedimentary humic acid. A study on the Barra Bonita Reservoir of Tietê River, São Paulo State. J Braz Chem Soc 12(1):109–116
CrossRef Google Scholar
Abdolali A, Ngo H, Guo W et al (2014) Development and evaluation of a new multi-metal binding biosorbent. Bioresour Technol 160:98–106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.038 CrossRef Google Scholar
Bailey S, Olin T, Bricka R et al (1999) A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 33:2469–2479
CrossRef Google Scholar
Carolin C, Kumar P, Saravanan A et al (2017) Efficient techniques for the removal of toxic heavy metals from aquatic environment: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 5:2782–2799.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.029 CrossRef Google Scholar
De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M et al (2016) Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain Mater Technol 9:10–40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
Dubey S, Banerjee S, Upadhyay S et al (2017) Application of common nano-materials for removal of selected metallic species from water and wastewaters: a critical review. J Mol Liq 240:656–677.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.05.107 CrossRef Google Scholar
Feng Y, Gong J-L, Zeng G-M, Niu QY, Zhang HY, Niu CG, Deng JH, Yan M (2010) Adsorption of Cd(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solutions using magnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as adsorbents. Chem Eng J 162:487–494.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.049 CrossRef Google Scholar
Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manag 92:407–418.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ge F, Li M-M, Ye H, Zhao BX (2012) Effective removal of heavy ions Cd
from aqueous solution by polymer-modified magnetic nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 211-212:366–372.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmat.2011.12.013 CrossRef Google Scholar
Guo X, Zhang S, Shan X (2008) Adsorption of metal ions on lignin. J Hazard Mater 151:134–142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.065 CrossRef Google Scholar
Gupta V, Carrott PJM, Ribeiro Carrott MML et al (2009) Low-cost adsorbents: growing approach to wastewater treatment—a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:783–842.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380801977610 CrossRef Google Scholar
Gustafsson J (2013) Visual MINTEQ Ver. 3.0. 2012. Available:
Han W, Fu F, Cheng Z, Tang B, Wu S (2016) Studies on the optimum conditions using acid-washed zero-valent iron/aluminum mixtures in permeable reactive barriers for the removal of different heavy metal ions from wastewater. J Hazard Mater 302:437–446.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmat.2015.09.041 CrossRef Google Scholar
Iqbal M, Saeed A, ZafarI S (2007) Hybrid biosorbent: an innovative matrix to enhance the biosorption of Cd(II) from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 148:47–55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.009 CrossRef Google Scholar
Jiuhui Q (2008) Research progress of novel adsorption processes in water purification: a review. J Environ Sci 20:1–13
CrossRef Google Scholar
Kurniavan T, Chan G, Lo W et al (2006) Comparison of low-cost adsorbents for treating wastewaters laden with heavy metals, Science Tot. Environment 366:409–426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j/scitoten.2005.10.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
Liu J-F, Zhao Z-S, Jiang G-B (2008) Coating Fe
magnetic nanoparticles with humic acid for high efficient removal of heavy metals in water. Environ Sci Technol 42:6949–6954.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es800924c CrossRef Google Scholar
Lopez-Mancisidor P, Carbonell G, Fernandez C et al (2008) Ecological impact of repeated applications of chlorpyrifos on zooplankton community in mesocosms under Mediterranean conditions. Ecotoxicology 17:811–825.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-008-0239-4 CrossRef Google Scholar
Mishra A, Tripathi B, Rai A (2015) Enhanced biosorption of metal ions from wastewater by Fenton modified
dried biomass. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3443–3456.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0708-7 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ngomsik A, Bee A, Draye M et al (2005) Magnetic nano-and microparticles for metal removal and environmental applications: a review. C R Chimie 8:963–970
CrossRef Google Scholar
Pan B, Pan B, Zhang W, Lv L, Zhang Q, Zheng S (2009) Development of polymeric and polymer-based hybrid adsorbents for pollutants removal from waters. Chem Eng J 151:19–29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.036 CrossRef Google Scholar
Pehlivan E, Arslan G (2006) Comparison of adsorption capacity of young brown coals and humic acids prepared from different coal mines in Anatolia. J Hazard Mater B138:401–408.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.063 CrossRef Google Scholar
Pertusatti J, Prado A (2007) Buffer capacity of humic acid: thermodynamic approach. J Colloid Interface Sci 314:484–489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.06.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
Qu X, Alvarez P, Li Q (2013) Application of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 47:3931–3946.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 CrossRef Google Scholar
Shujuan M, Pan Z, Zhang W et al (2012) Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: a review. J Hazard Mater 211–212:317–331.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
Smolyakov B, Sagidullin A (2017) Hybrid adsorbent for removal of Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) from waters using submersible device. Chem Sci Intern J 20(3):1–17.
https://doi.org/10.9734/CSJI/2017/36823 CrossRef Google Scholar
Smolyakov B, Ryzhikh A, Romanov R (2010) The fate of Cu, Zn, and Cd in the initial stage of water system contamination: the effect of phytoplankton activity. J Hazard Mater 184:819–825.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmat.2010.08.115 CrossRef Google Scholar
Smolyakov B, Sagidullin A, Bychkov A et al (2015) Humic-modified natural and synthetic carbon adsorbents for the removal of Cd(II) from aqueous solutions. J Environ Chem Eng 3:1939–1946.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.07.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
Smolyakov B, Sagidullin A, Chikunov A (2017) Removal of Cd(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions using humic-modified moss (
). J Environ Chem Eng 5:1915–1020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.01.022 CrossRef Google Scholar
Turner B, Fein J (2006) Protofit: a program for determining surface protonation constants from titration data. Comput Geosci 32:1344–1356
CrossRef Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011) Code of Federal Regulation, Chapter 1, Part 433. Available:
Urazova T, Bychkov A, Lomovskii O (2014) Mechanochemical modification of the structure of brown coal humic acids for preparing a sorbent for heavy metals. Russ J Appl Chem 87(5):650–655.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427214050206 CrossRef Google Scholar
Vijayaraghavan K, Balasubramanian R (2015) Is biosorption suitable for decontamination of metal-bearing wastewaters? A critical review on the state-of-the-art of biosorption processes and future directions. J Environ Manag 160:283–296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.030 CrossRef Google Scholar
Vorotnikov B, Kuskovsky V, Anoshin G (1999) Peculiarities of chemical composition of natural waters of the Novosibirskoye reservoir. Obskoy Vestnik 3:48–61 (in Russian)
Wang X, Guo Y, Yang L et al (2012) Nanomaterials as sorbents to remove heavy metal ions in wastewater treatment. J Environ Anal Toxicol 2:154.
https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0525.1000154 CrossRef Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2008) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to Third Edition 1. WHO, Geneva (recommendation)
Zhang S, Zhang Y, Bi G, Liu J, Wang Z, Xu Q, Xu H, Li X (2014) Mussel-inspired polydopamine biopolymer decorated with magnetic nanoparticles for multiple pollutants removal. J Hazard Mater 270:27–34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmat.2014.01.039 CrossRef Google Scholar
Zherebtsov S, Malyshenko N, Bryukhovetskaya L et al (2015) Modified humic acids from lignite. Coke Chem 58(10):400–403.
https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X15100099 CrossRef Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018