Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 4654–4666 | Cite as

Influence of electronic cigarette vaping on the composition of indoor organic pollutants, particles, and exhaled breath of bystanders

  • Barend L. van DroogeEmail author
  • Esther Marco
  • Noemi Perez
  • Joan O. Grimalt
Research Article


The changes of particles and organic pollutants in indoor atmospheres as consequence of vaping with electronic cigarettes have been analyzed. Changes in the composition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath of non-smoking volunteers present in the vaping environments have also been studied. The exposure experiments involved non-vaping (n = 5) and vaping (n = 5) volunteers staying 12 h together in a room (54 m2) without external ventilation. The same experiment was repeated without vaping for comparison. Changes in the distributions of particles in the 8–400 nm range were observed, involving losses of nucleation-mode particles (below 20 nm) and increases of coagulation processes leading to larger size particles. In quantitative terms, vaping involved doubling the indoor concentrations of particles smaller than 10 μm, 5 μm, and 1 μm observed during no vaping. The increase of particle mass concentrations was probably produced from bulk ingredients of the e-liquid exhaled by the e-cigarette users. Black carbon concentrations in the indoor and outdoor air were similar in the presence and absence of electronic cigarette emissions. Changes in the qualitative composition of PAHs were observed when comparing vaping and non-vaping days. The nicotine concentrations were examined separately in the gas and in the particulate phases showing that most of the differences between both days were recorded in the former. The particulate phase should therefore be included in nicotine monitoring during vaping (and smoking). The concentration increases of nicotine and formaldehyde were small when compared with those described in other studies of indoor atmospheres or health regulatory thresholds. No significant changes were observed when comparing the concentrations of exhaled breath in vaping and no vaping days. Even the exhaled breath nicotine concentrations in both conditions were similar. As expected, toluene, xylenes, benzene, ethylbenzene, and naphthalene did not show increases in the vaping days since combustion was not involved.


Volatile organic compounds Electronic cigarettes Indoor air pollution Atmospheric particles Exhaled breath Nicotine Formaldehyde Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Vaping Black carbon 



Partial funding from EU projects HEALS (FP7-ENV-2013-603946), NEUROSOME (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2017 SEP-210411486), and EPPA S.A has been received.


  1. Abidin ZN, Abidin ZE, Zulkifli A, Karuppiah K, Norkhadijah S, Ismail S, Siddiq A (2017) Electronic cigarettes and indoor air quality: a review of studies using human volunteers. Rev Environ Health 32:235–244Google Scholar
  2. Andreae MO (2013) The aerosol nucleation puzzle. Science 339:911–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baek SO, Kim YS, Perry R (1997) Indoor air quality in homes, offices and restaurants in Korean urban areas—indoor/outdoor relationships. Atmos Environ 31:529–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballbè M, Martínez-Sánchez JM, Sureda X, Fu M, Pérez-Ortuño R, Pascual JA, Saltó E, Fernández E (2017) Cigarettes vs. e-cigarettes: passive exposure at home measured by means of airborne marker and biomarkers. Environ Res 135:76–80Google Scholar
  5. Batterman S, Jia CR, Hatzivasilis G (2007) Migration of volatile organic compounds from attached garages to residences: a major exposure source. Environ Res 104:224–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bekanntmachung des Umweltbundesamtes (2008) Vergleichswerte für flüchtige organische Verbindungen (VOC und Aldehyde) in der Innenraumluft von Haushalten in Deutschland Ergebnisse des repräsentativen Kinder-Umwelt-Surveys (KUS) des Umweltbundesamtes. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 51:109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolte G, Heitmann D, Kiranoglu M, Schierl R, Diemer J, Koerner W, Fromme H (2008) Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in German restaurants, pubs and discotheques. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 18:262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen R, Aherrera A, Isichei C, Olmedo P, Jarmul S, Cohen JE, Navas-Acien A, Rule AM (2018) Assessment of indoor air quality at an electronic cigarette (vaping) convention. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 28:522–529.
  9. Chuang JC, Mack GA, Kuhlman MR, Wilson NK (1991) Polycyclic aromatic-hydrocarbons and their derivatives in indoor and outdoor air in an 8-home study. Atmos Environ 25:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colard S, O’Connell G, Verron T, Cahours X, Pritchard JD (2015) Electronic cigarettes and indoor air quality: a simple approach to modeling potential bystander exposures to nicotine. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:282–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Czogala J, Goniewicz ML, Fidelus B, Zielinska-Danch W, Travers MJ, Sobczak A (2014) Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 16:655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodson RE, Levy JI, Sprengler JD, Shine JP, Bennett DH (2008) Influence of basement, garages and common hallways on indoor residential volatile organic compound concentrations. Atmos Environ 42:1569–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards RD, Schweizer C, Jantunen M, Lai HK, Bayer-Oglesby L, Katsouyanni K, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Saarela K, Sram R, Künzli N (2005) Personal exposures to VOC in the upper end of the distribution—relationships to indoor, outdoor and workplace concentrations. Atmos Environ 39:2299–2307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EU. Directive 2008/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of May 2008Google Scholar
  15. EU. Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3rd of April 2014Google Scholar
  16. European Commission (2005) Critical appraisal of the setting and implementation of indoor exposure limits in the EU. Brussels, European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Accessed 14 Dec 2018
  17. Fernandez E, Ballbe M, Sureda X, Fu M, Salto E, Martinez-Sanchez JM (2015) Particulate matter from electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and observational study. Curr Environ Health Rep 2:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer PH, Hoek G, van Reeuwijk H, Briggs DJ, Lebret E, van Wijnen JH, Kingham S, Elliot PE (2000) Traffic-related differences in outdoor and indoor concentrations of particles and volatile organic compounds in Amsterdam. Atmos Environ 34:3713–3722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fontal M, van Drooge BL, Lopez JF, Fernandez P, Grimalt JO (2015) Broad spectrum analysis of polar and apolar organic compounds in submicron atmospheric particles. J Chromatrogr A 1404:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fromme H, Lahrz T, Piloty M, Gebhardt H, Oddoy A, Rüden H (2004) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons inside and outside of apartments in an urban area. Sci Total Environ 326:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fromme H, Heitmann D, Dietrich S (2008) Air quality in schools—classroom levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), volatile organic compounds (VOC), aldehydes, endotoxins and cat allergen. Gesundheitswesen 70:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo H, Lee SC, Chan LY, Li WM (2004) Risk assessment of exposure to volatile organic compounds in different indoor environments. Environ Res 94:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gustafson P, Östman C, Sällsten G (2008) Indoor levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in homes with or without wood burning for heating. Environ Sci Technol 42:5074–5080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison RM, Delgado-Saborit JM, Baker SJ, Aquilina N, Meddings C, Harrad S, Matthews I, Vardoulakis S, Anderson HR (2009) Measurement and modeling of exposure to selected air toxics for health effects studies and verification by biomarkers. Boston, MA, Health Effects Institute (HEI Research Report 143). Accessed 14 Dec 2018
  25. Jantunen M, Hänninen O, Katsouyanni K, Knöppel H, Künzli N, Lebret E, Maroni M, Saarela K, Sram RJ, Zmirou D (1998) Air pollution exposure in European cities: the EXPOLIS study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 8:495–518Google Scholar
  26. Jia CR, Batterman S, Godwin C (2008) VOCs in industrial, urban and suburban neighbourhoods—part 1: indoor and outdoor concentrations, variation and risk drivers. Atmos Environ 42:2083–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jurvelin J, Vartiainen M, Jantunen M, Pasanen P (2001) Personal exposure levels and microenvironmental concentrations of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 51:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kauneliene V, Meisutovic-Akhtarieva M, Martuzevicius D (2018) A review of the impacts of tobacco heating system on indoor air quality versus conventional pollution sources. Chemosphere 206:568–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim YH, Kim KH (2015) A novel method to quantify the emission and conversion of VOCs in the smoking of electronic cigarettes. Sci Rep 5:16383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim YM, Harrad S, Harrison RM (2001) Concentrations and sources of VOCs in urban domestic and public microenvironments. Environ Sci Technol 35:997–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kingham S, Briggs D, Elliot P, Fischer P, Lebret E (2000) Spatial variations in the concentrations of traffic-related pollutants in indoor and outdoor air in Huddersfield, England. Atmos Environ 34:905–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirchner S, Arenes JF, Cochet C, Derbez M, Duboudin C, Elias P, Gregoire A, Jédor B, Lucas JP, Pasquier N, Pigneret M, Ramalho O (2007) Etat de la qualité de l’air dans les logements français. Environ Risq Santé 6:259–269Google Scholar
  33. Kotzias D, Geiss O, Tirendi S, Barrero-Moreno J, Reina V, Gotti A, Cimino G, Marafante E, Sarigiannis D, Casati B (2009) Exposure to multiple air contaminants in public buildings, schools and kindergartens: the European indoor air monitoring and exposure assessment (AIRMEX) study. Fres Environ Bull 18:670–681Google Scholar
  34. Kraev TA, Adamkiewicz G, Hammond SK, Sprengler JD (2009) Indoor concentrations of nicotine in low-income, multi-unit housing: associations with smoking behaviours and housing characteristics. Tob Control 18:438–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kulmala M, Kerminen VM (2008) On the formation and growth of atmospheric nanoparticles. Atmos Res 90(2–4):132–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leung PL, Harrison PM (1998) Evaluation of personal exposure to monoaromatic hydrocarbons. Occup Environ Med 55:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Logue J, Sleiman M, Montesinos VN, Russell ML, Litter MI, Benowitz NL, Gundel LA, Destaillats H (2017) Emissions from electronic cigarettes: assessing vapers´ intake of toxic compounds, secondhand exposure, and associated health impacts. Environ Sci Technol 51:9271–9279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Long GA (2014) Comparison of select analytes in exhaled aerosol from e-cigarettes with exhaled smoke from a conventional cigarette and exhaled breaths. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:11177–11191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Madureira J, Paciência I, Rufo J, Ramos E, Barros H, Teixeira JP, de Oliveira Fernandes E (2015) Indoor air quality in schools and its relationship with children’s respiratory symptoms. Atmos Environ 118:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maloney JC, Thompson MK, Oldham MJ, Stiff CL, Lilly PD, Patskan GJ, Shafer KH, Sarkar MA (2015) Insights from two industrial hygiene pilot e-cigarette passive vaping studies. J Occup Environ Hyg 13:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marco E, Grimalt JO (2015) A rapid method for the chromatographic analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of tobacco and electronic cigarette smoke. J Chromatogr A 1410:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maroni M, Seifert B, Lindvall T (eds) (1995) A comprehensive reference book. Air quality monographs, vol 3. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam, p 17Google Scholar
  43. McAuley TR, Hopke PK, Zhao J, Babaian S (2012) Comparison of the effects of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke on indoor air quality. Inhal Toxicol 24:850–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Melstrom P, Koszowski B, Thanner MH, Hoh E, King B, Bunell R, McAfee T (2017) Measuring PM2.5, ultrafine particles, nicotine air and wipe samples following the use of electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 19:1055–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Minoia C, Magnaghi S, Micoli G, Fiorentino ML, Turci R, Angeleri S, Berri A (1997) Determination of environmental reference concentration of six PAHs in urban areas (Pavia, Italy). Sci Total Environ 198:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mitra S, Ray B (1995) Patterns and sources of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives in indoor air. Atmos Environ 29:3345–3356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mortamais M, Pujol J, van Drooge BL, Macià D, Martínez-Vilavella G, Reynes C, Sabatier R, Rivas I, Grimalt JO, Forns J, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, Querol X, Sunyer J (2017) Effect of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on basal ganglia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in primary school children. Environ Int 105:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Naumova YY, Eisenreich SJ, Turpin BJ, Weisel CP, Morandi MT, Colome SD, Totten LA, Stock TH, Winer AM, Alimokhtari S, Kwon J, Shendell D, Jones J, Maberti S, Wall SJ (2002) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the indoor and outdoor air of three cities in the US. Environ Sci Technol 36:2552–2559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Connell G, Colard S, Cahours X, Pritchard J (2015) An assessment of indoor air quality before, during and after unrestricted use of e-cigarettes in a small room. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:4889–4907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pey J, van Drooge BL, Ripoll A, Moreno T, Grimalt JO, Querol X, Alastuey A (2013) An evaluation of mass, number concentration, chemical composition and types of particles in a cafeteria before and after antismoking law. Particuology 11:527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pisinger C (2015) A systematic review of health effects of electronic cigarettes. WHO. Accessed 14 Dec 2018
  52. Polosa R, Cibella F, Caponnetto P, Maglia M, Prosperini U, Russo C, Tashkin D (2017) Health impact of e-cigarettes: a prospective 3.5-year study of regular daily users who have never smoked. Sci Rep 7:13825.
  53. Protano C, Avino P, Manigrasso M, Vivaldi V, Perna F, Valeriani F, Vitali M (2018) Environmental electronic vape exposure from four different generations of electronic cigarettes: airborne particulate matter levels. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Raw GJ, Coward SK, Brown VM, Crump DR (2004) Exposure to air pollutants in English homes. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 14:S85–S94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rivas I, Viana M, Moreno T, Pandolfi M, Amato F, Reche C, Bouso L, Àlvarez-Pedrerol M, Alastuey A, Sunyer J, Querol X (2014) Child exposure to indoor and outdoor air pollutants in schools in Barcelona, Spain. Environ Int 69:200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rupert AA, De Marco C, Saffari A, Pozzi P, Mazza R, Veronese C, Angelloti G, Munarini E, Ogliari AC, Westerdahl D, Hasheminassab S, Shafer MM, Schauer JJ, Repace J, Sioutas C, Boffi R (2017) Environmental pollution and emission factors of electronic cigarettes, heat-not-burn tobacco products, and conventional cigarettes. Aerosol Sci Technol 51:674–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saarela K, Tirkkonen T, Laine-Ylijoki J, Jurvelin J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Jantunen M (2003) Exposure of population and microenvironmental distributions of volatile organic compound concentrations in the EXPOLIS study. Atmos Environ 37:5563–5575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schober W, Szendrei K, Matzen W, Osiander-Fuchs H, Heitmann D, Schettgen T, Jörres RA, Fromme H (2014) Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) impairs indoor air quality and increases FeNO levels of e-cigarette consumers. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217:628–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schripp T, Markewitz D, Uhde E, Salthammer T (2013) Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping. Indoor Air 23:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sexton K, Mongin SJ, Adgate JL, Pratt GC, Ramachandran G, Stock TH, Morandi MT (2007) Estimating volatile organic compound concentrations in selected microenvironments using time–activity and personal exposure data. J Toxicol Environ Health A 70:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Siegel M (1993) Involuntary smoking in the restaurant workplace. A review of employee exposure and health effects. J Am Med Assoc 270:490–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sleiman M, Logue JM, Montesinos VN, Russell ML, Litter MI, Gundel LA, Destaillats H (2017) Emissions from electronic cigarettes: key parameters affecting the release of harmful chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 50:9644–9651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soule EK, Maloney SF, Spindie TR, Rudy AK, Hiler MM, Cobb CO (2017) Electronic cigarette use and indoor air quality in a natural setting. Tob Control 26:109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van Drooge BL, Grimalt JO (2015) Particle size-resolved source apportionment of primary and secondary organic tracer compounds at urban and rural locations in Spain. Atmos Chem Phys 15:7735–7752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Drooge BL, Lopez JL, Grimalt JO (2012) Influences of natural emission sources (wildfires and Saharan dust) on the urban organic aerosol in Barcelona (Western Mediterranean basis) during a PM event. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:4159–4167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. van Winkle MR, Scheff PA (2001) Volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and elements in the air of ten urban homes. Indoor Air 11:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vartiainen E, Kulmala M, Ruuskanen TM, Taipale R, Rinne J, Vehkamäki H (2006) Formation and growth of indoor air aerosol particles as a result of d-limonene oxidation. Atmos Environ 40:7882–7892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. World Health Organization (1989) Indoor air quality: organic pollutants. Euro reports Studies 111. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen Accessed 14 Dec 2018
  69. World Health Organization (2010) In: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (ed) WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants. Copenhagen. Accessed 14 Dec 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations