Advertisement

Using a modified soil quality index to evaluate densely tilled soils with different yields in Northeast China

  • Nan Mei
  • Bin Yang
  • Ping Tian
  • Ying Jiang
  • Pengxiang Sui
  • Daquan Sun
  • Zhenping Zhang
  • Hua QiEmail author
Sustainable Environmental Management
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Northeastern China has long-term densely tilled soils that supply approximately 20% of the annual total national grains. There are very few reports on the agricultural soil quality subjecting to the predatory tillage. Here, the soil quality index (SQI) of a brunisolic soil was calculated using the minimum data set (MDS) and integrated quality index (IQI). The topsoil layer was divided into plow layer (11.9 ± 1.9 cm) and plow pan (11.4 ± 2.6 cm) in fields of high yields (HYB), medium yields (MYB), and low yields (LYB). Our results showed that the MDS of the topsoil layer only contained chemical indicators. The bulk density (BD), as one of the most important soil quality indicators, was found of no significant differences in the topsoil layers. In different layers (i.e., the topsoil layer, plow layer, and plow pan), the value of SQI presented a consistent tendency of HYB > MYB > LYB (p < 0.05). The correlation between SQI and yield was higher in the plow layer (0.60) and plow pan (0.63) than the topsoil layer (0.47). This further verified the reasonability of using soil stratification for SQI calculation. Our findings indicate the potential of using soil quality assessments to examine soil productivity (e.g., fertilizer deficiency) in crop lands with soil stratification.

Keywords

Densely tilled soil Soil properties Minimum data set Soil quality index Critical limit 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the staffs of Zhangzhuang cooperative for providing field supports.

Funding information

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0300801, 2016YFD0300103), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201503116), and the National Science Foundation of China (31700560).

References

  1. Amirinejad AA, Kamble K, Aggarwal P, Chakraborty D, Pradhan S, Mittal RB (2011) Assessment and mapping of spatial variation of soil physical health in a farm. Geoderma 160:292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews SS, Carroll CR (2001) Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecol Appl 11:1573–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Mitchell JP (2002) A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90:25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armenise E, Redmile-Gordon MA, Stellacci AM, Ciccarese A, Rubino P (2013) Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment. Soil Till Res 130:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Askari MS, Holden NM (2014) Indices for quantitative evaluation of soil quality under grassland management. Geoderma 230-231:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Askari MS, Holden NM (2015) Quantitative soil quality indexing of temperate arable management systems. Soil Till Res 150:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aziz I, Mahmood T, Islam KR (2013) Effect of long term no-till and conventional tillage practices on soil quality. Soil Till Res 131:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertolino AVFA, Fernandes NF, Miranda JPL, Souza AP, Lopes MRS, Palmieri F (2010) Effects of plough pan development on surface hydrology and on soil physical properties in Southeastern Brazilian plateau. J Hydrol 393:94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhardwaj AK, Jasrotia P, Hamilton SK, Robertson GP (2011) Ecological management of intensively cropped agro-ecosystems improves soil quality with sustained productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bian D, Jia G, Cai L, Ma Z, Eneji AE, Cui Y (2016) Effects of tillage practices on root characteristics and root lodging resistance of maize. Field Crop Res 185:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biswas S, Hazra GC, Purakayastha TJ, Saha N, Mitran T, Singha Roy S, Basak N, Mandal B (2017) Establishment of critical limits of indicators and indices of soil quality in rice-rice cropping systems under different soil orders. Geoderma 292:34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blake, G. and Hartage, K., 1986.. Methods of soil analysis, part. 1. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Bremner J (1960) Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J Agr Sci 55:11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Andrews SS, Karlen DL (2004) Watershed-scale assessment of soil quality in the loess hills of southwest Iowa. Soil Till Res 78:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaudhari PR, Ahire DV, Ahire VD, Chkravarty M, Maity S (2013) Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of Coimbatore soil. ISRP 3:1–8Google Scholar
  16. Choudhary M, Panday SC, Meena VS, Singh S, Yadav RP, Mahanta D, Mondal T, Mishra PK, Bisht JK, Pattanayak A (2018) Long-term effects of organic manure and inorganic fertilization on sustainability and chemical soil quality indicators of soybean-wheat cropping system in the Indian mid-Himalayas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 257:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornforth I, Walmsley D (1971) Methods of measuring available nutrients in West Indian soils. Plant Soil 35:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Das B, Chakraborty D, Singh VK, Ahmed M, Singh AK, Barman A (2016) Evaluating fertilization effects on soil physical properties using a soil quality index in an intensive rice-wheat cropping system. Pedosphere 26:887–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Obade P, V, Lal R (2014) Soil quality evaluation under different land management practices. Environ Earth Sci 72:4531–4549Google Scholar
  20. de Obade P, V, Lal R (2016) A standardized soil quality index for diverse field conditions. Sci Total Environ 541:424–434Google Scholar
  21. Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  22. Flint, L.E., Flint, A.L., 2002. Porosity. In: Dane, J.H., Top, G.C.(Eds.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods. SSSA Special Publication, Madison, pp.241–253Google Scholar
  23. Floyd CN (1984) Model experiment on the effect of a plough pan on crop yield under differing conditions of soil moisture availability. Soil Till Res 4:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammac WA, Stott DE, Karlen DL, Cambardella CA (2016) Crop, tillage, and landscape effects on near-surface soil quality indices in Indiana. Soil Sci Soc Am J 80:1638–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karlen DL, Ditzler CA, Andrews SS (2003) Soil quality: why and how? Geoderma 114:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karlen DL, Cambardella CA, Kovar JL, Colvin TS (2013) Soil quality response to long-term tillage and crop rotation practices. Soil Till Res 133:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu Z, Zhou W, Li S, He P, Liang G, Lv J, Jin H (2015) Assessing soil quality of gleyed paddy soils with different productivities in subtropical China. Catena 133:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu XB, Zhang XY, Wang YX, Sui YY, Zhang SL, Herbert SJ, Ding G (2010) Soil degradation: a problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China. Plant Soil Environ 56:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Z, Zhou W, Shen J, Li S, He P, Liang G (2014) Soil quality assessment of Albic soils with different productivities for eastern China. Soil Till Res 140:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu J, Wu L, Chen D, Yu Z, Wei C (2018) Development of a soil quality index for Camellia oleifera forestland yield under three different parent materials in Southern China. Soil Till Res 176:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lopes AAC, Gomes de Sousa DM, Chaer GM, Bueno dos Reis Junior F, Goedert WJ, de Carvalho Mendes I (2013) Interpretation of microbial soil indicators as a function of crop yield and organic carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu RK, Shi ZY, Shi JP (2000) Nutrient balance of agroecosystem in six provinces in Southern China. Sci Agric Sin 33:63–67 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Mishra G, Marzaioli R, Giri K, Borah R, Dutta A, Jayaraj RSC (2017) Soil quality assessment under shifting cultivation and forests in Northeastern Himalaya of India. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:1355–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Motsara MR, Roy RN (2008) Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  35. Nafiu A (2006) Soil-phosphorus extraction methodologies: a review. Afr J Agr Res 1:159–161Google Scholar
  36. Nakajima T, Lal R, Jiang S (2015) Soil quality index of a crosby silt loam in central Ohio. Soil Till Res 146:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelson D, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. SSSA Special Publication, Madison, pp 539–579Google Scholar
  38. Ngo-Mbogba M, Yemefack M, Nyeck B (2015) Assessing soil quality under different land cover types within shifting agriculture in South Cameroon. Soil Till Res 150:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nosalewicz A, Lipiec J (2014) The effect of compacted soil layers on vertical root distribution and water uptake by wheat. Plant Soil 375:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olsen S, Sommers L and Page A (1982) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties of phosphorus. ASA Monograph, Bloomsbury, pp. 403–430Google Scholar
  41. Parisi V, Menta C, Gardi C, Jacomini C, Mozzanica E (2005) Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: a new approach in Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peng Y, Yu P, Zhang Y, Sun G, Ning P, Li X, Li C (2012) Temporal and spatial dynamics in root length density of field-grown maize and NPK in the soil profile. Field Crop Res 131:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piao L, Qi H, Li C, Zhao M (2016) Optimized tillage practices and row spacing to improve grain yield and matter transport efficiency in intensive spring maize. Field Crop Res 198:258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pulido M, Schnabel S, Lavado Contador JF, Lozano-Parra J, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Brevik EC, Cerdà A (2017) Reduction of the frequency of herbaceous roots as an effect of soil compaction induced by heavy grazing in rangelands of SW Spain. Catena 158:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raiesi F, Kabiri V (2016) Identification of soil quality indicators for assessing the effect of different tillage practices through a soil quality index in a semi-arid environment. Ecol Indic 71:198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rezaei SA, Gilkes RJ, Andrews SS (2006) A minimum data set for assessing soil quality in rangelands. Geoderma 136:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ritz K, Black HIJ, Campbell CD, Harris JA, Wood C (2009) Selecting biological indicators for monitoring soils: a framework for balancing scientific and technical opinion to assist policy development. Ecol Indic 9:1212–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rojas JM, Prause J, Sanzano GA, Arce OEA, Sánchez MC (2016) Soil quality indicators selection by mixed models and multivariate techniques in deforested areas for agricultural use in NW of Chaco, Argentina. Soil Till Res 155:250–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shukla MK, Lal R, Ebinger M (2006) Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil Till Res 87:194–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sione SMJ, Wilson MG, Lado M, González AP (2017) Evaluation of soil degradation produced by rice crop systems in a Vertisol, using a soil quality index. CATENA 150:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sofi JA, Bhat AG, Kirmai NA, Wani JA, Lone AH, Ganie MA, Dar GI (2016) Soil quality index as affected by different cropping systems in northwestern Himalayas. Environ Monit Assess 188:161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Svoray T, Hassid I, Atkinson PM, Moebius-Clune BN, van Es HM (2015) Mapping soil health over large agriculturally important areas. Soil Sci Soc Am J 79:1420–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor HM, Brar GS (1991) Effect of soil compaction on root development. Soil Till Res 19:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tesfahunegn GB, Tamene L, Vlek PL (2011) Catchment-scale spatial variability of soil properties and implications on site-specific soil management in northern Ethiopia. Soil Till Res 117:124–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vasu D, Singh SK, Ray SK, Duraisami VP, Tiwary P, Chandran P, Nimkar AM, Anantwar SG (2016) Soil quality index (SQI) as a tool to evaluate crop productivity in semi-arid Deccan plateau, India. Geoderma 282:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang Q, Liu J, Wang L (2017) An experimental study on the effects of freeze–thaw cycles on phosphorus adsorption–desorption processes in brown soil. RSC Adv 7:37441–37446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xia M, Zhao B, Hao X, Zhang J (2015) Soil quality in relation to agricultural production in the North China Plain. Pedosphere 25:592–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu JM, Zhang GL, Xie ZM, Lv XN (2010) Indices and assessment of soil quality. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  59. Yang B, Wen X, Sun X (2015) Irrigation depth far exceeds water uptake depth in an oasis cropland in the middle reaches of Heihe River Basin. Sci Pre-UK 5:15206Google Scholar
  60. Yoder RE (1936) A direct method of aggregate analysis of soils and a study of the physical nature of erosion losses 1. Agron J 28:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. You D, Tian P, Sui P, Zhang W, Yang B, Qi H (2017) Short-term effects of tillage and residue on spring maize yield through regulating root-shoot ratio in Northeast China. Sci Pre-UK 7:13314Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nan Mei
    • 1
  • Bin Yang
    • 2
  • Ping Tian
    • 1
  • Ying Jiang
    • 1
  • Pengxiang Sui
    • 1
  • Daquan Sun
    • 3
  • Zhenping Zhang
    • 4
  • Hua Qi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of AgronomyShenyang Agricultural UniversityShenyangChina
  2. 2.CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Agriculture and BioresourcesUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  4. 4.Institute of crop scienceShenyang Academy of Agricultural SciencesLiaoningChina

Personalised recommendations