Advertisement

Assessing climate change impacts on pearl millet under arid and semi-arid environments using CSM-CERES-Millet model

  • Asmat Ullah
  • Ahmad Ishfaq Email author
  • Ashfaq Ahmad
  • Tasneem Khaliq
  • Umer Saeed
  • M. Habib-ur-Rahman
  • Jamshad Hussain
  • Shafqat Ullah
  • Gerrit Hoogenboom
Research Article

Abstract

Climate change adversely affects food security all over the world, especially in developing countries where the increasing population is confronting food insecurity and malnutrition. Crop models can assist stakeholders for assessment of climate change in current and future agricultural production systems. The aim of this study was to use of system analysis approach through CSM-CERES-Millet model to quantify climate change and its impact on pearl millet under arid and semi-arid climatic conditions of Punjab, Pakistan. Calibration and evaluation of CERES-Millet were performed with the field observations for pearl millet hybrid 86M86. Mid-century (2040–2069) climate change scenarios for representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and RCP 8.5 were generated based on an ensemble of selected five general circulation models (GCMs). The model was calibrated with optimum treatment (15-cm plant spacing and 200 kg N ha−1) using field observations on phenology, growth and grain yield. Thereafter, pearl millet cultivar was evaluated with remaining treatments of plant spacing and nitrogen during 2015 and 2016 in Faisalabad and Layyah. The CERES-Millet model was calibrated very well and predicted the grain yield with 1.14% error. Model valuation results showed that there was a close agreement between the observed and simulated values of grain yield with RMSE ranging from 172 to 193 kg ha−1. The results of future climate scenarios revealed that there would be an increase in Tmin (2.8 °C and 2.9 °C, respectively, for the semi-arid and arid environment) and Tmax (2.5 °C and 2.7 °C, respectively, for the semi-arid and arid environment) under RCP4.5. For RCP8.5, there would be an increase of 4 °C in Tmin for the semi-arid and arid environment and an increase of 3.7 °C and 3.9 °C in Tmax, respectively, for the semi-arid and arid environment. The impacts of climate changes showed that pearl millet yield would be reduced by 7 to 10% under RCPs 4.5 and 8.5 in Faisalabad and 10 to 13% in Layyah under RCP 4.5 and 8.5 for mid-century. So, CSM-CERES-Millet is a useful tool in assessing the climate change impacts.

Keywords

Climate change impact assessment System analysis research CSM-CERES-Millet 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author (Asmat Ullah, drasmatu@gmail.com) acknowledges the support of field staff of Agronomic Research Station, Karor (Layyah) & Land Utilization Office Staff, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan, who helped in the execution of research experiments. Ullah, A. is thankful to Pioneer Pakistan Seed Limited for timely supply of pearl millet seed (86M86). Heartfelt thanks to affiliated faculty, K. Grace Crummer (Coordinator) and other staff at the Institute for Sustainable Food Systems (ISFS), University of Florida, Gainesville, USA for their help from time to time. The author is also grateful to the Higher Education Commission, Government of Pakistan for the award of fellowship to visit the University of Florida, USA. We are thankful to the anonymous reviewers, responsible editor and editorial staff for quick response in processing this manuscript successfully.

References

  1. Ahmad I, Saeed U, Fahad M et al (2018a) Yield forecasting of spring maize using remote sensing and crop modeling in Faisalabad-Punjab Pakistan. J Indian Soc Remote Sens:1–11Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad I, Wajid SA, Ahmad A, et al (2018b) Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen requirements for maize through empirical modeling in semi-arid environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–11Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed I, ur Rahman MH, Ahmed S et al (2018) Assessing the impact of climate variability on maize using simulation modeling under semi-arid environment of Punjab, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–18Google Scholar
  4. Akponikpe PBI, Gerard B, Bielders CL (2014) Soil water crop modeling for decision support in millet-based systems in the Sahel: a challenge. African J Agri Res 9(22):1700–1713Google Scholar
  5. Christianson CB, Bationo A, Henao J, Vlek PLG (1990) Fate and efficiency of N fertilizers applied to pearl millet in Niger. Plant Soil 125:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper P, Rao KPC, Singh P, et al (2009) Farming with current and future climate risk: Advancing a’Hypothesis of Hope’for rainfed agriculture in the semi-arid tropics. J SAT Agric Res 7:1–19Google Scholar
  7. Downing TE (2013) Climate change and world food security. Springer Science & Business Media, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.KGoogle Scholar
  8. Fatondji D, Bationo A, Tabo R, et al (2012) Water use and yield of millet under the Zai system: understanding the processes using simulation. In: Improving soil fertility recommendations in Africa using the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT). Springer, p 77–100Google Scholar
  9. Fechter J (1993) The simulation of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) growth under the environmental conditions of southwestern Niger, West Africa. Ph.D. thesis, Universitaat Hohenheim, Institute fur Bodenkunde und Standorslehre, p 121Google Scholar
  10. Fechter J, Allison BE, Sivakumar MVK, et al (1991) An evaluation of the SWATRER and, CERES-Millet models for southwest NigerGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer G, Shah M, Tubiello FN, Van Velhuizen H (2005) Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990–2080. Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci 360:2067–2083Google Scholar
  12. Fussell LK, Pearson CJ, Norman MJT (1980) Effect of temperature during various growth stages on grain development and yield of Pennisetum americanum. J Exp Bot 31:621–633Google Scholar
  13. Garcia-Huidobro J, Monteith JL, Squire GR (1982) Time, temperature and germination of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. & H.) I. Constant temperature. J Exp Bot 33:288–296Google Scholar
  14. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science (80- ) 327:812–818Google Scholar
  15. Government of Pakistan (2017) Economic survey of Pakistan. Econ Advis Wing, Financ Div Govt Pakistan 29–30Google Scholar
  16. Hafner H, Bley J, Bationo A et al (1993) Long-term nitrogen balance for pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) in an acid sandy soil of Niger. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenkd 156:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haussmann BIG, Boureima SS, Kassari IA et al (2007) Mechanisms of adaptation to climate variability in West African pearl millet landraces–a preliminary. J SAT Agric Res 3:1–3Google Scholar
  18. Hoogenboom G (2000) Contribution of agrometeorology to the simulation of crop production and its applications. Agric For Meteorol 103:137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoogenboom G, Jones JW, Wilkens PW, et al (2015) Decision Support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT). Version 4.6. DSSAT Foundation, Prosser, WAGoogle Scholar
  20. Howden SM, Soussana J-F, Tubiello FN, et al (2007) Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19691–19696Google Scholar
  21. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. working group I contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report—changes to the underlying scientific/technical assessmentGoogle Scholar
  22. Jagtap SS, Abamu FJ, Kling JG (1999) Long-term assessment of nitrogen and variety technologies on attainable maize yields in Nigeria using CERES-maize. Agric Syst 60:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones PG, Thornton PK (2002) Spatial modeling of risk in natural resource management. Conserv Ecol, p 5Google Scholar
  24. Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH et al (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang Y, Khan S, Ma X (2009) Climate change impacts on crop yield, crop water productivity and food security–A review. Prog Nat Sci 19:1665–1674Google Scholar
  26. Knox J, Hess T, Daccache A, Wheeler T (2012) Climate change impacts on crop productivity in Africa and South Asia. Environ Res Lett 7:34032Google Scholar
  27. Lobell DB, Burke MB (2008) Why are agricultural impacts of climate change so uncertain? The importance of temperature relative to precipitation. Environ Res Lett 3:34007Google Scholar
  28. MacCarthy DS, Vlek PLG, Fosu-Mensah BY (2012) The response of maize to N fertilization in a sub-humid region of Ghana: understanding the processes using a crop simulation model. In: Improving soil fertility recommendations in Africa using the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT). Springer, p 61–75Google Scholar
  29. Mavromatis T, Boote KJ, Jones JW et al (2001) Developing genetic coefficients for crop simulation models with data from crop performance trials. Crop Sci 41:40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell RAC, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SP, et al (1993) Effects of increased CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and yield of winter wheat at two levels of nitrogen application. Plant Cell Environ 16:521–529Google Scholar
  31. O’Leary GJ, Joshi NL, Van Oosterom EJ (2008) A simulation study of the response of plant-type and nitrogen fertilization on the grain yield of pearl millet. Ann Arid Zone 47:121–137Google Scholar
  32. Ong CK, Monteith JL (1985) Response of pearl millet to light and temperature. F Crop Res 11:141–160Google Scholar
  33. Pale S, Mason SC, Galusha TD (2003) Planting time for early-season pearl millet and grain sorghum in Nebraska. Agron J 95:1047–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wajid A, et al (2017) Application of CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton model for cultivars and optimum planting dates: Evaluation in changing semi-arid climateGoogle Scholar
  35. Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wang X et al (2018) Multi-model projections of future climate and climate change impacts uncertainty assessment for cotton production in Pakistan. Agric For Meteorol 253:94–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reddy AA, Rao PP, Yadav OP, et al (2013) Prospects for kharif (rainy season) and summer pearl millet in Western India. Working Paper Series no. 36Google Scholar
  37. Ritchie JT, Alagarswamy G (1989) Simulation of sorghum and pearl millet phenologyGoogle Scholar
  38. Ritchie JT, Singh U, Godwin DC, Bowen WT (1998) Cereal growth, development and yield. In: Understanding options for agricultural production. Springer, p 79–98Google Scholar
  39. Ruane AC, Goldberg R, Chryssanthacopoulos J (2015) Climate forcing datasets for agricultural modeling: Merged products for gap-filling and historical climate series estimation. Agric For Meteorol 200:233–248Google Scholar
  40. Ruane AC, McDermid SP (2017) Selection of a representative subset of global climate models that captures the profile of regional changes for integrated climate impacts assessment Earth Perspect 4:1Google Scholar
  41. Rosenzweig C, Jones JW, Hatfield JL et al (2013) The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric For Meteorol 170:166–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanders JH, Shapiro BI, Ramaswamy S (1996) The economics of agricultural technology in semiarid sub-Saharan Africa. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  43. Saseendran SA, Ma L, Nielsen DC et al (2005) Simulating planting date effects on corn production using RZWQM and CERES-Maize models. Agron J 97:58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schlenker W, Lobell DB (2010) Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture. Environ Res Lett 5:14010Google Scholar
  45. Singh P, Boote KJ, Kadiyala MDM et al (2017) An assessment of yield gains under climate change due to genetic modification of pearl millet. Sci Total Environ 601:1226–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Soler CMT, Maman N, Zhang X et al (2008) Determining optimum planting dates for pearl millet for two contrasting environments using a modelling approach. J Agric Sci 146:445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sultan B, Roudier P, Quirion P et al (2013) Assessing climate change impacts on sorghum and millet yields in the Sudanian and Sahelian savannas of West Africa. Environ Res Lett 8:14040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor KE, Balaji V, Hankin S, et al (2011) CMIP5 data reference syntax (DRS) and controlled vocabularies. In: PCMDIGoogle Scholar
  49. Thornton PK, Bowen WT, Ravelo AC et al (1997) Estimating millet production for famine early warning: an application of crop simulation modelling using satellite and ground-based data in Burkina Faso. Agric For Meteorol 83:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Toure HA, Serme I, Traore K, Kyei-Baffour N (2018) Assessment of the changes in the yields of millet crop under different scenarios of climate change using DSSAT model. Int J Biol Chem Sci 12:363–380Google Scholar
  51. Tsuji GY, Uehara G, Balas S (1994) DSSAT Version 3, vol. 2Google Scholar
  52. Ullah A, Ahmad A, Khaliq T, Akhtar J (2017) Recognizing production options for pearl millet in Pakistan under changing climate scenarios. J Integr Agric 16:762–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change 109:5Google Scholar
  54. Wafula BM (1995) Applications of crop simulation in agricultural extension and research in Kenya. Agric Syst 49:399–412Google Scholar
  55. Wilby RL, Charles SP, Zorita E, et al (2004) Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from statistical downscaling methodsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ayub Agricultural Research InstituteFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.Institute for Sustainable Food SystemsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of AgronomyMNS-University of AgricultureMultanPakistan
  5. 5.Pakistan Meteorology DepartmentMultanPakistan

Personalised recommendations