Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 3954–3964 | Cite as

A new thermodynamic approach for struvite product quality prediction

  • Bing Li
  • Irina Boiarkina
  • Wei YuEmail author
  • Brent Young
Research Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Struvite precipitation has drawn much attention in the last decade as a green chemical process for phosphorus removal and recovery. Product purity affects the usefulness, and thus price, of the product when recovered struvite is sold as fertilizer. However, there is currently little research on struvite quality, as well as on models for accurately predicting. This paper presents an alternative approach to the traditional thermodynamic model where the solid with the largest positive saturation index precipitates first, depleting the concentrations of constituent ions before the next solid can precipitate. In the new thermodynamic approach, all solids with a positive saturation index precipitate simultaneously, and deplete the common pool of available ions in tandem. It was validated against experimental data, compared with the traditional thermodynamic models and a previously developed empirical model. The proposed new approach was more accurate than other models, except when both the ammonium nitrogen and magnesium concentrations were very low, a condition not likely to be encountered in industry. Therefore, this model is more suited for predicting the performance of struvite precipitation under varying wastewater conditions.

Keywords

Struvite Thermodynamic model Purity Coprecipitation 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dr Phil Schneider from James Cook University for suggestions on the model development.

References

  1. Ali MI, Schneider PA (2008) An approach of estimating struvite growth kinetic incorporating thermodynamic and solution chemistry, kinetic and process description. Chem Eng Sci 63:3514–3525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett E, Elser J (2011) A broken biogeochemical cycle. Nature 478:29–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhuiyan MH, Mavinic DS, Beckie RD (2007) A solubility and thermodynamic study of struvite. Environ Technol 28(9):1015–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booram CV, Smith RJ, Hazen TE (1975) Crystalline Phosphate Precipitation from Anaerobic Animal Waste Treatment Lagoon Liquors. Trans ASAE 18(2):340–343Google Scholar
  5. Borgerding J (1972) Phosphate deposits in digestion system. J Water Pollut Control 44:813–819Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan JR, Mote CR, Robinson RB (1994) Thermodynamics of Struvite Formation. Trans ASAE 37(2):617–621Google Scholar
  7. Çelen I, Buchanan JR, Burns RT, Robinson RB, Raman DR (2007) Using a chemical equilibrium model to predict amendments required to precipitate phosphorus as struvite in liquid swine manure. Water Res 41:1689–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Childs CW (1970) A potentiometric study of equilibria in aqueous divalent metal orthophosphate solutions. J Inorg Chem 9(11):2465–2469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crutchik D, Sánchez A, Garrido JM (2013) Simulation and experimental validation of multiple phosphate precipitates in a saline industrial wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 118:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ESPP, European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (2015) Proposed EU Fertiliser Regulation criteria for recovered struvite. In: 6Google Scholar
  11. Gadekar S, Pullammanappallil P (2010) Validation and applications of a chemical equilibrium model for struvite precipitation. Environ Model Assess 15:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gustafsson JP (2009) Visual MINTEQ Version 2.52, On-line. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanhoun M, Montastruc L, Azzaro-Pantel C, Biscans B, Frèche M, Pibouleau L (2011) Temperature impact assessment on struvite solubility product: a thermodynamic modeling approach. Chem Eng J 167(1):50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hao XD, Wang CC, Lan L, van Loosdrecht MCM (2008) Struvite formation, analytical methods and effects of pH and Ca2+. Water Sci Technol 58:1687–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harada H, Shimizu Y, Muyagoshi Y, Matsui S, Nagasaka T (2006) Predicting struvite formation for phosphorus recovery from human urine using an equilibrium model. Water Sci Technol 54:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang HM, Li J, Li B, Zhang DD, Zhao N, Tang SF (2019a) Comparison of different K-struvite crystallization processes for simultaneous potassium and phosphate recovery from source-separated urine. Sci Total Environ 651:787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang HM, Zhang DD, Wang WJ, Li B, Zhao N, Li J, Dai H (2019b) Alleviating Na+ effect on phosphate and potassium recovery from synthetic urine by K-struvite crystallization using different magnesium sources. Sci Total Environ 655:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang HM, Li B, Li J, Zhang P, Yu W, Zhao N, Guo G, Young B (2019c) Influence of process parameters on the heavy metal (Zn2+, Cu2+ and Cr3+) content of struvite obtained from synthetic swine wastewater. Environ Pollut.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.046
  19. Hug A, Udert KM (2013) Struvite precipitation from urine with electrochemical magnesium dosage. Water Res 47:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klein S (2005) EES—Engineering Equation Solver. In: F-Chart Software Available from: www.fchart.com Google Scholar
  21. Le Corre KS, Valsami-Jones E, Hobbs P, Parsons SA (2005) Impact of calcium on struvite crystal size, shape and purity. J Cryst Growth:514–522Google Scholar
  22. Lee S-H, Yoo B-H, lim SJ, Kim T-H, Kim S-K, Kim JY (2013) Development and validation of an equilibrium model for struvite formation with calcium co-precipitation. J Cryst Growth 372:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee S-H, Kumar R, Jeon B-H (2016) Struvite precipitation under changing ionic conditions in synthetic wastewater: experiment and modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 474:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, B., 2017. Phosphorus Management and Recovery via Struvite Crystallization in New Zealand (Doctoral Theses). ResearchSpace@Auckland, 2292/34793.Google Scholar
  25. Li B, Boiarkina I, Young B, Yu W (2015) Substance flow analysis of phosphorus within New Zealand and comparison with other countries. Sci Total Environ 527-528:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li B, Boiarkina I, Young B, Yu W (2016) Quantification and mitigation of the negative impact of calcium on struvite purity. Adv Powder Technol 27(6):2354–2362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li B, Boiarkina I, Young B, Yu W, Singhal N (2018) Prediction of future phosphate rock: a demand based model. J Environ Inf 1:41–53Google Scholar
  28. Li B, Boiarkina I, Yu W, Huang HM, Munir T, Wang GQ, Young B (2019) Phosphorous recovery through struvite crystallization: challenges for future design. Sci Total Environ 648:1244–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu XN, Hu ZY, Zhu CY, Wen GQ, Meng XC, Lu J (2013) Influence of process parameters on phosphorus recovery by struvite formation from urine. Water Sci Technol In pressGoogle Scholar
  30. Loewenthal RE, Kornmüller URC, Van Heerden EP (1994) Modelling struvite precipitation in anaerobic treatment systems. Water Sci Technol 30(13):107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mamais D, Pitt PA, Cheng YW, Loiacono J, Jenkins D (1994) Determination of ferric chloride dose to control struvite precipitation in anaerobic sludge digesters. Water Environ Res 66:912–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montastruc L, Azzaro-Pantel C, Biscans B, Cabassud M, Domenech S (2003) A thermochemical approach for calcium phosphate precipitation modeling in a pellet reactor. Chem Eng J 94:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morel FMM (1993) Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  34. Musvoto EV, Wentzel MC, Ekama GA (2000) Integrated chemical–physical processes modelling-II. Simulating aeration treatment of anaerobic digester supernatants. Water Res 34:1857–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson NO, Mikkelsen RL, Hesterberg DL (2003) Struvite precipitation in anaerobic swine lagoon liquid: effect of pH and Mg:P ratio and determination of rate constant. Bioresour Technol 89:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ohlinger KN, Young TM, Schroeder ED (1998) Predicting struvite formation in digestion. Water Res 32(12):3607–3614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider PA, Wallace JW, Tickle JC (2013) Modelling and dynamic simulation of struvite precipitation from source-separated urine. Water Sci Technol 67:2724–2732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shu L, Schneider PA, Jegatheesan V, Johnson J (2006) An economic evaluation of phosphorus recovery as struvite from digester supernatant. Bioresour Technol 97:2211–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snoeyink VL, Jenkins D (1980) Water Chemistry. Wiley, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Tas AC (2009) Monetite (CaHPO4) Synthesis in ethanol at room temperature. J Am Ceram Soc 92:2907–2912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor AW, Frazier AW (1963) Solubility product of magnesium ammonium. Trans Faraday Soc 59:1580–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Udert KM, Larsen TA, Gujerm W (2003) Estimating the precipitation potential in urine-collecting systems. Water Res 37(11):2667–2677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uysal A, Yilmazel YD, Demirer GN (2010) The determination of fertilizer quality of the formed struvite from effluent of a sewage sludge anaerobic digester. J Hazard Mater 181:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang JS, Song YH, Yuan P, Peng JF, Fan MH (2006) Modeling the crystallization of magnesium ammonium phosphate for phosphorus recovery. Chemosphere 65:1182–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Q, Li J, Tang P, Fang L, Poon CS (2018) Sustainable reclamation of phosphorus from incinerated sewage sludge ash as value-added struvite by chemical extraction, purification and crystallization. J Clean Prod 181:717–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical & Materials EngineeringUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations