Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 5680–5692 | Cite as

Characterizing interactions of socioeconomic development and environmental impact at a watershed scale

  • Tongtong Zhou
  • Wenwen Hu
  • Shen YuEmail author
Research Article
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

Worldwide socioeconomic development has resulted in huge irretrievable environmental problems in various ecosystems. This study employed seven coastal watersheds in two provinces, Zhejiang and Fujian, China forming a gradient to testify the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) interactions between socioeconomic development and environmental impact at a watershed scale. Annual socioeconomic indicators, including gross domestic product (GDP) and its components, registered population (agricultural and non-agricultural population), and electricity consumption, and annual discharges of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonium were collected at a county level, and land use pattern to generate watershed level dataset in the period of 2011–2016. Results indicated that non-agricultural GDP per capita of the non-agricultural population and discharge of COD or ammonium per unit of total GDP were top-ranked pair-indicators significantly fitting the EKC model instead of the classic GDP per capita and pollutants. The development of seven selected watersheds have passed the turning point of the EKC and entered impact-reducing development stages along the EKC, i.e., the three Zhejiang watersheds are at the low-impact development stage, the Huotong Stream watershed from Fujian province was at impact-declining development stage right, and other three Fujian watersheds were at medium-impact development stage. In term of the environmental impact indicator, pollutant discharge per unit of total GDP serves as a development impact indictor per se. These findings might provide an EKC-based approach to support and strategize the watershed management for sustainable development in the world.

Keywords

Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) Socioeconomic development Chemical oxygen demand (COD) Ammonium Watershed 

Notes

Funding information

This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571483, 41661144033, 41371474).

References

  1. Buyantuyev A, Xu PY, Wu JG, Piao SJ, Wang DC (2012) A space-for-time (SFT) substitution approach to studying historical phonological change in urban environment. PLoS One 7:e51260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Capps KA, Bentsen CN, Ramirez A (2016) Poverty, urbanization, and environmental degradation: urban streams in the developing world. Freshw Sci 35:429–435Google Scholar
  3. Castello L, Macedo MN (2016) Large-scale degradation of Amazonian freshwater ecosystem. Glob Chang Biol 22:990–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen NC, Xu L (2017) Relationship between air quality and economic development in the provincial capital cities of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:2928–2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng X, Chen LD, Sun RH, Kong PR (2018) Land use changes and socioeconomic development strongly deteriorate river ecosystem health in one of the largest basins in China. Sci Total Environ 616:376–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung S (2014) Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: evidence from South Korea. J Dev Econ 108(C):222–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Congregado E, Feria-Gallardo J, Colpe AA, Iglesias J (2016) The environmental Kuznets curve and CO2 emissions in the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 233:18407–18420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Du X, Xu D, Fu X, Wu G (2015) An empirical research on the relationship between water environment and economic development in Liaohe River watershed. Acta Ecol Sin 35:1955–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao JB, Wu Q, Li QL, Ma J, Xu QF, Groffman PM, Yu S (2013) Preliminary results from monitoring of stream nitrogen concentrations, denitrification and nitrification potentials in an urbanizing watershed in Xiamen, Southeast China. Inter J Sustain Develop World Ecol 20:223–230Google Scholar
  10. Gergel S, Bennett EM, Greenfield BK, King S, Overdevest CA, Stumborg B (2004) A test of the environmental Kuznets curve using long-term watershed inputs. Ecol Indic 14:555–570Google Scholar
  11. Hong B, Lin QY, Yu S, Chen YS, Chen YM, Chiang PC (2018) Urbanization gradient of selected pharmaceuticals in surface water at a watershed scale. Sci Total Environ 634:448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeffrey JD, Hasler CT, Chapman JM, Cooke SJ, Suski CD (2015) Linking landscape-scale disturbances to stress and condition of fish: implications for restoration and conservation. Integr Comp Biol 55:618–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kijima M, Nishide K, Ohyama A (2010) Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: a survey. J Econ Dyn Control 34:1187–1201Google Scholar
  14. Kappes H, Sundermann A, Haase P (2010) High spatial variability biases the space-for-time approach in environmental monitoring. Ecol Indic 10:1202–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim Y, Tanaka K, Ge CZ (2018) Estimating the provincial environmental Kuznets curve in China: a geographically weighted regression approach. Stoch Env Res Risk A 32:2147–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin QY, Yu S (2018) Losses of natural coastal wetlands by land conversion and ecological degradation in the urbanizing Chinese coast. Sci Rep 8:15046Google Scholar
  17. Marques AC, Fuinhas JA, Leal PA (2018) The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Australia: the environmental Kuznets curve and the decoupling index. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:27283–27296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oraby T, Bauch CT, Anand M (2018) The environmental Kuznets curve fails in a globalized socio-ecological metapopulation: a sustainability game theory approach. Handbook of Statistics 39:315–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ Dev Econ 2:465–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paudel KP, Zapata H, Susanto D (2005) An empirical test of environmental Kuznets curve for water pollution. Environ Resour Econ 31:325–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paul M, Rajib MA, Ahiablame L (2016) Spatial and temporal evaluation of hydrological response to climate and land use change in three South Dakota watersheds. JAWRA 53:69–88Google Scholar
  22. Pyle E, Ward RC, McBride G, Huser B (2001) Establishing watershed management in law: New Zealand’s experience. JAWRA 37:783–793Google Scholar
  23. Ruhl JB, Lant C, Loftus T, Kraft S, Adams J, Duram LA (2003) Proposal for a model state watershed management act. Environ Law 33:929–947Google Scholar
  24. Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018) A review on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 649:128–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1419–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Su SL, Hu YN, Luo FH, Mai GC, Wang YP (2014) Farmland fragmentation due to anthropogenic activity in rapidly developing region. Agric Syst 131:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tarolli P, Sofia G (2016) Human topographic signatures and derived geomorphic processes across landscapes. Geomorphology 255:140–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang TQ, Riti JS, Shu Y (2018) Decoupling emissions of greenhouse gas, urbanization, energy and income: analysis from the economy of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:19845–19858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu Q, Dong Y, Yang R (2018) Urbanization impact on carbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta region: Kuznets curve relationships. J Clean Prod 180:514–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu S, Yu GB, Liu Y, Li GL, Feng S, Wong MH, Wu SC (2012) Urbanization impairs surface water quality: eutrophication and metal stress in the Grand Canal of China. River Res Appl 28:1135–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yu S, Wu Q, Li QL, Gao JB, Lin QY, Ma J, Xu QF, Wu SC (2014) Anthropogenic land uses elevated metal levels in stream water in a long-term monitored urbanizing watershed. Sci Total Environ 488:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yu S, Hong B, Ma J, Chen YS, Xi XP, Gao JB, Hu XQ, Xu XR, Sun YX (2017) Surface sediment quality relative to port activities: a contaminant-spectrum assessment. Sci Total Environ 596:342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou S, Huang YF, Yu BF, Wang GQ (2015) Effects of human activities on the co-environment in the middle Heihe River Basin based on an extended environmental Kuznets curve model. Ecol Eng 75:14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXiamenChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations