Characterizing interactions of socioeconomic development and environmental impact at a watershed scale
- 83 Downloads
Worldwide socioeconomic development has resulted in huge irretrievable environmental problems in various ecosystems. This study employed seven coastal watersheds in two provinces, Zhejiang and Fujian, China forming a gradient to testify the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) interactions between socioeconomic development and environmental impact at a watershed scale. Annual socioeconomic indicators, including gross domestic product (GDP) and its components, registered population (agricultural and non-agricultural population), and electricity consumption, and annual discharges of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonium were collected at a county level, and land use pattern to generate watershed level dataset in the period of 2011–2016. Results indicated that non-agricultural GDP per capita of the non-agricultural population and discharge of COD or ammonium per unit of total GDP were top-ranked pair-indicators significantly fitting the EKC model instead of the classic GDP per capita and pollutants. The development of seven selected watersheds have passed the turning point of the EKC and entered impact-reducing development stages along the EKC, i.e., the three Zhejiang watersheds are at the low-impact development stage, the Huotong Stream watershed from Fujian province was at impact-declining development stage right, and other three Fujian watersheds were at medium-impact development stage. In term of the environmental impact indicator, pollutant discharge per unit of total GDP serves as a development impact indictor per se. These findings might provide an EKC-based approach to support and strategize the watershed management for sustainable development in the world.
KeywordsEnvironmental Kuznets curve (EKC) Socioeconomic development Chemical oxygen demand (COD) Ammonium Watershed
This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571483, 41661144033, 41371474).
- Capps KA, Bentsen CN, Ramirez A (2016) Poverty, urbanization, and environmental degradation: urban streams in the developing world. Freshw Sci 35:429–435Google Scholar
- Gao JB, Wu Q, Li QL, Ma J, Xu QF, Groffman PM, Yu S (2013) Preliminary results from monitoring of stream nitrogen concentrations, denitrification and nitrification potentials in an urbanizing watershed in Xiamen, Southeast China. Inter J Sustain Develop World Ecol 20:223–230Google Scholar
- Gergel S, Bennett EM, Greenfield BK, King S, Overdevest CA, Stumborg B (2004) A test of the environmental Kuznets curve using long-term watershed inputs. Ecol Indic 14:555–570Google Scholar
- Kijima M, Nishide K, Ohyama A (2010) Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: a survey. J Econ Dyn Control 34:1187–1201Google Scholar
- Lin QY, Yu S (2018) Losses of natural coastal wetlands by land conversion and ecological degradation in the urbanizing Chinese coast. Sci Rep 8:15046Google Scholar
- Paul M, Rajib MA, Ahiablame L (2016) Spatial and temporal evaluation of hydrological response to climate and land use change in three South Dakota watersheds. JAWRA 53:69–88Google Scholar
- Pyle E, Ward RC, McBride G, Huser B (2001) Establishing watershed management in law: New Zealand’s experience. JAWRA 37:783–793Google Scholar
- Ruhl JB, Lant C, Loftus T, Kraft S, Adams J, Duram LA (2003) Proposal for a model state watershed management act. Environ Law 33:929–947Google Scholar