Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 4618–4632 | Cite as

Calcium ion incorporated hydrous iron(III) oxide: synthesis, characterization, and property exploitation towards water remediation from arsenite and fluoride

  • Abir Ghosh
  • Suparna Paul
  • Sayan Bhattacharya
  • Palani Sasikumar
  • Krishna BiswasEmail author
  • Uday Chand GhoshEmail author
Research Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Calcium ion-incorporated hydrous iron(III) oxide (CIHIO) samples have been prepared aiming investigation of efficiency enhancement on arsenic and fluoride adsorption of hydrous iron(III) oxide (HIO). Characterization of the optimized product with various analytical tools confirms that CIHIO is microcrystalline and mesoporous (pore width, 26.97 Å; pore diameter, 27.742 Å with pore volume 0.18 cm3 g−1) material. Increase of the BET surface area (> 60%) of CIHIO (269.61 m2 g−1) relative to HIO (165.6 m2 g−1) is noticeable. CIHIO particles are estimated to be ~ 50 nm from AFM and TEM analyses. Although the pH optimized for arsenite and fluoride adsorptions are different, the efficiencies of CIHIO towards their adsorption are very good at pH 6.5 (pHzpc). The adsorption kinetics and equilibrium data of either tested species agree well, respectively, with pseudo-second order model and Langmuir monolayer adsorption phenomenon. Langmuir capacities (mg g−1at 303 K) estimated are 29.07 and 25.57, respectively, for arsenite and fluoride. The spontaneity of adsorption reactions (ΔG0 = − 18.02 to − 20.12 kJ mol−1 for arsenite; − 0.2523 to − 3.352 kJ mol−1 for fluoride) are the consequence of entropy parameter. The phosphate ion (1 mM) compared to others influenced adversely the arsenite and/or fluoride adsorption reactions. CIHIO (2.0 g L−1) is capable to abstract arsenite or fluoride above 90% from their solution (0 to 5.0 mg L−1). Mechanism assessment revealed that the adsorption of arsenite occurs via chelation, while of fluoride occurs with ion-exchange.

Keywords

Adsorption Arsenite Ca2+-incorporated ferric oxide Characterization Fluoride 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the Principal, Maharaja Manindra Chandra College for providing laboratory facilities, and Presidency University for extending some research facilities. One of the authors (KB) is thankful to UGC for the financial support [F.PSW-087/15-16 (ERO)] of this work, and PS is thankful to W.B. State DHESTBT [211(Sanc.)/ST/P/S&T/15G-14/2017] for financial support.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3872_MOESM1_ESM.docx (70 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 70 kb)

References

  1. Addo Ntim S, Mitra S (2012) Adsorption of arsenic on multiwall carbon nanotube–zirconia nanohybrid for potential drinking water purification. J Colloid Interface Sci 375:154–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.01.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali I (2012) New generation adsorbents for water treatment. Chem Rev 112:5073–5091.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300133d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babel S (2003) Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. J Hazard Mater 97:219–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00263-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babic BM, Milonjic JM, Kaludierovic VB (1999) Point of zero charge and intrinsic equilibrium constants of activated carbon cloth. Carbon 37:477–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu T, Ghosh UC (2011) Arsenic(III) removal performances in the absence/presence of groundwater occurring ions of agglomerated Fe(III)–Al(III) mixed oxide nanoparticles. J Ind Eng Chem 17:834–844.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2011.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu T, Gupta K, Ghosh UC (2010) Equilibrium and thermodynamics on arsenic(III) sorption reaction in the presence of background ions occurring in groundwater with nanoparticle agglomerates of hydrous iron(III) + chromium(III) mixed oxide . J Chem Eng Data 55:2039–2047.  https://doi.org/10.1021/je901010x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biswas K, Bandhoyapadhyay D, Ghosh UC (2007a) Adsorption kinetics of fluoride on iron(III)-zirconium(IV) hybrid oxide. Adsorption 13:83–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-007-9000-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biswas K, Saha SK, Ghosh UC (2007b) Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by a synthetic iron(III)−Aluminum(III) mixed oxide. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:5346–5356.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061401b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biswas K, Gupta K, Ghosh UC (2009) Adsorption of fluoride by hydrous iron(III)–tin(IV) bimetal mixed oxide from the aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 149:196–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.09.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biswas K, Debnath S, Ghosh UC (2010) Physicochemical aspects on fluoride adsorption for removal from water by synthetic hydrous iron(III) – chromium(III) mixed oxide. Sep Sci Technol 45:472–485.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390903526667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cadaval TRS Jr, Dotto GL, Pinto LAA (2015) Equilibrium isotherms, thermodynamics and kinetic studies for the adsorption of food azo dyes onto chitosan films. Chem Eng Commun 202:1316–1323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2014.934449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cao C-Y, Cui Z-M, Chen C-Q et al (2010) Ceria hollow nanospheres produced by a template-free microwave-assisted hydrothermal method for heavy metal ion removal and catalysis. J Phys Chem C 114:9865–9870.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp101553x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandra V, Park J, Chun Y et al (2010) Water-dispersible magnetite-reduced graphene oxide composites for arsenic removal. ACS Nano 4:3979–3986.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1008897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaturvedi AK, Yadava KP, Pathak KC, Singh VN (1990) Defluoridation of water by adsorption on fly ash. Water Air Soil Pollut 49:51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen L, He B-Y, He S et al (2012) Fe―Ti oxide nano-adsorbent synthesized by co-precipitation for fluoride removal from drinking water and its adsorption mechanism. Powder Technol 227:3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clesceri LS, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation (eds) (1998) Standard methods: for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th. edn. American Public Health Ass, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Crittenden JC, Borchardt JH, Harza MW (eds) (2012) MWH’s water treatment: principles and design, 3rd. edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  18. Deschamps E, Ciminelli VST, Höll WH (2005) Removal of As(III) and As(V) from water using a natural Fe and Mn enriched sample. Water Res 39:5212–5220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dey S, Goswami S, Ghosh UC (2004) Hydrous ferric oxide (HFO)—a scavenger for fluoride from contaminated water. Water Air Soil Pollut 158:311–323.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000044854.71497.b6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fallahzadeh RA, Miri M, Taghavi M et al (2018) Spatial variation and probabilistic risk assessment of exposure to fluoride in drinking water. Food Chem Toxicol 113:314–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fan X (2003) Adsorption kinetics of fluoride on low cost materials. Water Res 37:4929–4937.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fornaro T, Burini D, Biczysko M, Barone V (2015) Hydrogen-bonding effects on infrared spectra from anharmonic computations: uracil–water complexes and uracil dimers. J Phys Chem A 119:4224–4236.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frantz TS, Silveira N Jr, Quadro MS, Andreazza R, Barcelos AA, Cadaval TRS Jr, Pinto LAA (2017) Cu(II) adsorption from copper mine water by chitosan films and the matrix effects. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:5908–5917.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8344-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghosh UC, Bandyopadhyay D, Manna B, Mandal M (2006) Hydrous Iron(III)-Tin(IV) Binary mixed oxide: arsenic adsorption behaviour from aqueous solution. Water Quality Research Journal 41:198–209.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2006.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghosh A, Chakrabarti S, Biswas K, Ghosh UC (2014) Agglomerated nanoparticles of hydrous Ce(IV)+Zr(IV) mixed oxide: preparation, characterization and physicochemical aspects on fluoride adsorption. Appl Surf Sci 307:665–676.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gupta VK, Ali I, Saini VK (2007) Defluoridation of wastewaters using waste carbon slurry. Water Res 41:3307–3316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta K, Biswas K, Ghosh UC (2008) Nanostructure iron(III)−zirconium(IV) binary mixed oxide: synthesis, characterization, and physicochemical aspects of arsenic(III) sorption from the aqueous solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:9903–9912.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie8002107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta K, Maity A, Ghosh UC (2010) Manganese associated nanoparticles agglomerate of iron(III) oxide: synthesis, characterization and arsenic(III) sorption behavior with mechanism. J Hazard Mater 184:832–842.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gupta VK, Ali I, Saleh TA et al (2012) Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling—an overview. RSC Adv 2:6380.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra20340e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall KR, Eagleton LC, Acrivos A, Vermeulen T (1966) Pore- and solid-diffusion kinetics in fixed-bed adsorption under constant-pattern conditions. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 5:212–223.  https://doi.org/10.1021/i160018a011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jing C, Cui J, Huang Y, Li A (2012) Fabrication, characterization, and application of a composite adsorbent for simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:714–720.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am2013322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ku Y, Chiou H-M (2002) The adsorption of fluoride ion from aqueous solution by activated alumina. Water Air Soil Pollut 133:349–361.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012929900113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar E, Bhatnagar A, Ji M et al (2009) Defluoridation from aqueous solutions by granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). Water Res 43:490–498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lai YD, Liu JC (1996) Fluoride removal from water with spent catalyst. Sep Sci Technol 31:2791–2803.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496399608000827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Z, Deng S, Yu G et al (2010) As(V) and As(III) removal from water by a Ce–Ti oxide adsorbent: behavior and mechanism. Chem Eng J 161:106–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.04.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li H, Li W, Zhang Y et al (2011a) Chrysanthemum-like α-FeOOH microspheres produced by a simple green method and their outstanding ability in heavy metal ion removal. J Mater Chem 21:7878.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm10979k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li W, Cao C-Y, Wu L-Y et al (2011b) Superb fluoride and arsenic removal performance of highly ordered mesoporous aluminas. J Hazard Mater 198:143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li M, Wang C, O’Connell MJ, Chan CK (2015) Carbon nanosphere adsorbents for removal of arsenate and selenate from water. Environ Sci Nano 2:245–250.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EN00204K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li W, Chen D, Xia F et al (2016) Extremely high arsenic removal capacity for mesoporous aluminium magnesium oxide composites. Environ Sci Nano 3:94–106.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EN00171D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li J, Gyoten H, Sonoda A et al (2017) Removal of trace arsenic to below drinking water standards using a Mn–Fe binary oxide. RSC Adv 7:1490–1497.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA26806D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu H, Deng S, Li Z et al (2010) Preparation of Al–Ce hybrid adsorbent and its application for defluoridation of drinking water. J Hazard Mater 179:424–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maliyekkal SM, Sharma AK, Philip L (2006) Manganese-oxide-coated alumina: a promising sorbent for defluoridation of water. Water Res 40:3497–3506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Manna BR, Dey S, Debnath S, Ghosh UC (2003) Removal of arsenic from groundwater using crystalline hydrous ferric oxide (CHFO). Water Qual Res J Can 38:193–210.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2003.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayadevi S (1996) Adsorbents for the removal of fluoride from water. Ind Chem Engg Sect A 38:155–157Google Scholar
  45. Medellin-Castillo NA, Leyva-Ramos R, Ocampo-Perez R et al (2007) Adsorption of fluoride from water solution on bone char. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:9205–9212.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie070023n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milonlic SK (2007) A consideration of the correct calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. J Serb Chem Soc 72(12):1363–1367.  https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC0712363M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miri M, Bhatnagar A, Mahdavi Y et al (2018) Probabilistic risk assessment of exposure to fluoride in most consumed brands of tea in the Middle East. Food Chem Toxicol 115:267–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mohan D, Pittman CU (2007) Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—a critical review. J Hazard Mater 142:1–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mukhopadhyay K, Ghosh A, Das SK et al (2017) Synthesis and characterisation of cerium( iv )-incorporated hydrous iron( iii ) oxide as an adsorbent for fluoride removal from water. RSC Adv 7:26037–26051.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA00265C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patel G, Pal U, Menon S (2009) Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by CaO nanoparticles. Sep Sci Technol 44:2806–2826.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390903014425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paul B, Parashar V, Mishra A (2015) Graphene in the Fe 3 O 4 nano-composite switching the negative influence of humic acid coating into an enhancing effect in the removal of arsenic from water. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol 1:77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EW00034J Google Scholar
  52. Pendergast MM, Hoek EMV (2011) A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energy Environ Sci 4:1946.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00541j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raichur A, Jyoti Basu M (2001) Adsorption of fluoride onto mixed rare earth oxides. Sep Purif Technol 24:121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00219-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rongshu W, Haiming L, Ping N, Ying W (1995) Study of a new adsorbent for fluoride removal from waters. Water Qual Res J Can 30:81–88.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.1995.012 Google Scholar
  55. Saha I, Gupta K, Chakraborty S et al (2014) Synthesis, characterization and As(III) adsorption behavior of β-cyclodextrin modified hydrous ferric oxide. J Ind Eng Chem 20:1741–1751.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saha I, Ghosh A, Nandi D et al (2015) β-Cyclodextrin modified hydrous zirconium oxide: Synthesis, characterization and defluoridation performance from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 263:220–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saha I, Kanrar S, Gupta K et al (2016) Tuned synthesis and characterizational insight into β-cyclodextrin amended hydrous iron-zirconium hybrid oxide: a promising scavenger of fluoride in aqueous solution. RSC Adv 6:93842–93854.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA16567B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sanchooli Moghaddam M, Rahdar S, Taghavi M (2016) Cadmium removal from aqueous solutions using saxaul tree ash. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 35:8Google Scholar
  59. Siddiqui AH (1955) Fluorosis in Nalgonda District, Hyderabad-Deccan. Br Med J 2:1408–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sivasamy A, Singh KP, Mohan D, Maruthamuthu M (2001) Studies on defluoridation of water by coal-based sorbents. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76:717–722.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17:517–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taghavi M, Ehrampoush MH, Ghaneian MT et al (2018a) Application of a Keggin-type heteropoly acid on supporting nanoparticles in photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous solutions. J Clean Prod 197:1447–1453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taghavi M, Ghaneian TM, Ehrampoush HM, Tabatabaee M, Afsharnia M, Alami A, J M (2018b) Feasibility of applying the LED-UV-induced TiO2/ZnO-supported H3PMo12O40 nanoparticles in photo catalytic degradation of aniline. Environ Monit Assess 190:188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6565-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tian Y, Wu M, Liu R et al (2011) Modified native cellulose fibers—a novel efficient adsorbent for both fluoride and arsenic. J Hazard Mater 185:93–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Viswanathan N, Sundaram CS, Meenakshi S (2009) Sorption behaviour of fluoride on carboxylated cross-linked chitosan beads. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 68:48–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang B, Wu H, Yu L et al (2012) Template-free formation of uniform urchin-like α -FeOOH hollow spheres with superior capability for water treatment. Adv Mater 24:1111–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang S, Gao B, Zimmerman AR et al (2015) Removal of arsenic by magnetic biochar prepared from pinewood and natural hematite. Bioresour Technol 175:391–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. World Health Organization (ed) (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang X, Wang X, Feng Y et al (2013) Removal of multifold heavy metal contaminations in drinking water by porous magnetic Fe 2 O 3 @AlO(OH) superstructure. J Mater Chem A 1:473–477.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TA00594H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang J, Zhang H, Yu M et al (2014) High-content, well-dispersed γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles encapsulated in macroporous silica with superior arsenic removal performance. Adv Funct Mater 24:1354–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201302561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yavuz CT, Mayo JT, Yu WW et al (2006) Low-field magnetic separation of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanocrystals. Science 314:964–967.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yu X-Y, Xu R-X, Gao C et al (2012) Novel 3D hierarchical cotton-candy-like CuO: surfactant-free solvothermal synthesis and application in As(III) removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:1954–1962.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am201663d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhong L-S, Hu J-S, Liang H-P et al (2006) Self-assembled 3D flowerlike iron oxide nanostructures and their application in water treatment. Adv Mater 18:2426–2431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200600504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhong L-S, Hu J-S, Wan L-J, Song W-G (2008) Facile synthesis of nanoporous anatase spheres and their environmental applications. Chem Commun:1184.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b718300c

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abir Ghosh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Suparna Paul
    • 4
    • 5
  • Sayan Bhattacharya
    • 3
  • Palani Sasikumar
    • 2
  • Krishna Biswas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Uday Chand Ghosh
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryMaharaja Manindra Chandra CollegeKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryPresidency UniversityKolkataIndia
  3. 3.School of Ecology and Environmental StudiesNalanda UniversityRajgirIndia
  4. 4.Department of ChemistryNational Institute of TechnologyDurgapurIndia
  5. 5.CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering research instituteDurgapurIndia

Personalised recommendations