Advertisement

Removal of azo dye from water via adsorption on biochar produced by the gasification of wood wastes

  • Miguel Antônio Pires Kelm
  • Mário José da Silva Júnior
  • Sávio Henrique de Barros Holanda
  • Caroline Maria Bezerra de AraujoEmail author
  • Romero Barbosa de Assis Filho
  • Emerson Jaguaribe Freitas
  • Diogo Rafael dos Santos
  • Maurício Alves da Motta Sobrinho
Alternative Adsorbent Materials for Application in Processes Industrial
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

It was the aim of this work to evaluate the adsorptive performance of the biochar obtained from the gasification of wood residues onto a solution of Indosol Black NF1200 dye. The study was performed by means of factorial design 22, having as control variables: pH and adsorbent’s granulometry. Batch tests were carried out at 200 rpm for 3 h (T = 28 °C). As output variable, the percentage removal of dye was determined. The best operating conditions were pH = 2 and 100 mesh granulometry. Also, adsorbent dosage studies were carried out, as well as equilibrium and adsorption kinetics. Both kinetics and equilibrium of adsorption tests were proceeded in basic and acid medium. For a basic pH value (pH = 12), it was concluded the equilibrium was reached in about 3 h of experiment, the experimental qmax value was near 12 mg g−1, and the equilibrium data fitted the Langmuir model. On the other hand, for tests with pH = 2, the equilibrium was reached after 5 min of experiment, the experimental qmax value was over 185 mg g−1, and the equilibrium data fitted both the Langmuir and Freundlich models. Thus, the biochar produced via gasification of wood wastes appears to be a promising adsorbent for the removal of azo dyes from textile wastewater, especially when working at lower pH values. Also, for a 10-kg/h consumption of wood residue, approximately 10 kW of energy is generated and 1 kg of biochar is produced, which represents another advantage from the environmentally friendly point of view.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Biochar Wood waste Gasification Indosol black NF1200 Azo dye Textile industry Experimental design Adsorption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the Chemical Engineering Department of the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) and the Laboratory of Clean Technologies (LATECLIM), headed by Professor Dr. José Geraldo de Andrade Pacheco Filho, all located in Pernambuco (Brazil); to the Arconic Alumínio S/A image laboratory; to the Activated Carbon Laboratory—Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB); and to MSc Ana Maria Salgueiro Baptisttella for all the support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure statement

This manuscript has not been published yet, and is currently not under consideration for publication anywhere else.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Khateeb LA, Almotiry S, Salam MA (2014) Adsorption of pharmaceutical pollutants onto graphene nanoplatelets. Chem Eng J 248:191–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alothman ZA (2012) A review: fundamental aspects of silicate mesoporous materials. Materials (Basel) 5:2874–2902.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma5122874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcellos IO, Lima T, Blosfeld AM (2015) Determinação do número de ciclos de reuso do adsorvente cinza de casca de arroz no tratamento de um banho residual de tingimento têxtil. Ecletica Quim 40:1–15Google Scholar
  4. Barros Neto B, Scarminio IS, Bruns RE (1996) Planejamento e otimização de experimentos. Ed. UNICAMP; 2nd Edition; Campinas (São Paulo), pp 1–299Google Scholar
  5. Baseri JR, Palanisamy PN, Sivakumar P (2012) Comparative studies of the adsorption of direct dye on activated carbon and conducting polymer composite. J of Chemistry 9:1122–1134Google Scholar
  6. Benedetti V, Patuzzi F, Baratieri M (2017) Characterization of char from biomass gasification and its similarities with activated carbon in adsorption applications. Appl Energy 227:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer CE, Schmidt-Rohr K, Satrio JA, Brown RC (2009) Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 28:386–396.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvalho TEM, de Fungaro DA, Izidoro JDC (2010) Adsorção do corante reativo laranja 16 de soluções aquosas por zeólita sintética. Quim Nova 33:358–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles G, Smith D (1974) A general treatment and classification of the solute adsortion isotherm. J Colloid Interface Sci 9797:90252Google Scholar
  10. Cychosz KA, Guillet-Nicolas R, García-Martínez J, Thommes M (2017) Recent advances in the textural characterization of hierarchically structured nanoporous materials. Chem Soc Rev 46:389–414.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00391e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demirbas A (2009) Agricultural based activated carbons for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: a review. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djilani C, Zaghdoudi R, Djazi F et al (2015) Adsorption of dyes on activated carbon prepared from apricot stones and commercial activated carbon. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 53:112–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan S, Tang J, Wang Y et al (2016) Biochar prepared from co-pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge and tea waste for the adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solutions: kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic and mechanism. J Mol Liq 220:432–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan S, Wang Y, Wang Z et al (2017) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by sewage sludge-derived biochar: adsorption kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics and mechanism. J Environ Chem Eng 5:601–611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraga TJM, Carvalho MN, Fraga DMDSM, da Silva MDCL, Ferreira JM, Motta Sobrinho MAD (2018) Treated residue from aluminium lamination as adsorbent of toxic reactive dyes–a kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic study. Environm Tech 2018:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1508255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freitas FBA, de Freitas Câmara MY, Freire MDF (2015) Determinação do PCZ de adsorventes naturais utilizados na remoção de contaminantes em soluções aquosas. Blucher Chem Proc 3:8Google Scholar
  18. Giacomni F, Menegazzo MAB, da Silva MG et al (2017) Importância da determinação do ponto de carga zero como característica de tingimento de fibras proteicas. Rev Mater 22:e11827.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-707620170002.0159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Güzel F, Sayğılı H, Akkaya Sayğılı G et al (2017) Optimal oxidation with nitric acid of biochar derived from pyrolysis of weeds and its application in removal of hazardous dye methylene blue from aqueous solution. J Clean Prod 144:260–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heibati B, Rodriguez-Couto S, Al-Ghouti MA et al (2015) Kinetics and thermodynamics of enhanced adsorption of the dye AR 18 using activated carbons prepared from walnut and poplar woods. J Mol Liq 208:99–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.03.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holanda CA, Souza JL, Dos Santos CC et al (2015) Remoção do Corante Têxtil Turquesa de Remazol Empregando Aguapé (Eichhornia crassipes) como Adsorvente. Orbital - Electron J Chem 7:141–154.  https://doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v7i2.622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kilic M, Apaydin-Varol E, Pütün AE (2011) Adsorptive removal of phenol from aqueous solutions on activated carbon prepared from tobacco residues: equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. J Hazard Mater 189:397–403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kołodyńska D, Krukowska J, Thomas P (2017) Comparison of sorption and desorption studies of heavy metal ions from biochar and commercial active carbon. Chem Eng J 307:353–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leechart P, Nakbanpote W, Thiravetyan P (2009) Application of “waste” wood-shaving bottom ash for adsorption of azo reactive dye. J Environ Manag 90:912–920.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leite AJ, Lima EC, Reis GS, Thue PS, Saucier C, Rodembusch FS, Dias SLP, Umpierres CS, Dotto GL (2017) Hybrid adsorbents of tannin and APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane) and their application for the highly efficient removal of acid red 1 dye from aqueous solutions. J Environm Chem Eng 5(5):4307–4318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu J, Li E, You X, Hu C, Huang Q (2016) Adsorption of methylene blue on an agro-waste oiltea shell with and without fungal treatment. Sci Rep 6:38450.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maneerung T, Liew J, Dai Y et al (2016) Activated carbon derived from carbon residue from biomass gasification and its application for dye adsorption: kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. Bioresour Technol 200:350–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maroto-Valer MM, Dranca I, Lupascu T, Nastas R (2004) Effect of adsorbate polarity on thermodesorption profiles from oxidized and metal-impregnated activated carbons. Carbon 42:2655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nautiyal P, Subramanian KA, Dastidar MG (2016) Adsorptive removal of dye using biochar derived from residual algae after in-situ transesterification: alternate use of waste of biodiesel industry. J Environ Manag 182:187–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nobre JRC, Castro JP, Motta JP, Bianchi ML, Trugilo PF, Borges WMF, Moulin JC (2015) Production of activated carbon from the timber residue of the Amazon region. Sci Forestalis 43(108):895–906Google Scholar
  31. Oliveira GFD, Andrade RCD, Trindade MAG, Andrade HMC, Carvalho CTD (2017) Thermogravimetric and spectroscopic study (TG–DTA/FT–IR) of activated carbon from the renewable biomass source babassu. Quim Nova 40(3):284–292.  https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20160191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Regalbuto JR, Robles JO (2004) The engineering of Pt/carbon catalyst preparation. Univ Illinois, Chicago, p 13Google Scholar
  33. Sadaf S, Bhatti HN (2014) Equilibrium modeling for adsorptive removal of indosol black NF dye by low-cost agro-industrial waste: batch and continuous study. Desalin Water Treat 52:4492–4507.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.801797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shahbaz M, yusup S, Inayat A et al (2017) The influence of catalysts in biomass steam gasification and catalytic potential of coal bottom ash in biomass steam gasification: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:468–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silveira Neta JJ, de Silva CJ, Moreira GC et al (2012) Remoção dos corantes Reactive Blue 21 e Direct Red 80 utilizando resíduos de sementes de Mabea fistulifera Mart. como biossorvente. Rev Ambient Água 7:104–119.  https://doi.org/10.4136/1980-993X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW et al (1985) International Union Of Pure Commission On Colloid And Surface Chemistry Including Catalysis-reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619.  https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soares D, Ramos Pacioni T, Di Domenico M et al (2016) Gaseificação de serragem de madeira com vapor de água: estudo cinético. Sci Cum Ind 4:119–124.  https://doi.org/10.18226/23185279.v4iss2p119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Song Y, Xu H, Ren J (2016) Adsorption study for removal of sunset yellow by ethylenediamine-modified peanut husk. Desalin Water Treat 57:17585–17592.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1086897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KS (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 87(9–10):1051–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thue PS, Sophia AC, Lima EC, Wamba AG, Alencar WS, Reis GS, Rodembusch FS, Dias SL (2018) Synthesis and characterization of a novel organic-inorganic hybrid clay adsorbent for the removal of acid red 1 and acid green 25 from aqueous solutions. J Clean Prod 171:30–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tran HN, Chao HP (2018) Adsorption and desorption of potentially toxic metals on modified biosorbents through new green grafting process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:12808–12820.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1295-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu Z, Zhong H, Yuan X et al (2014) Adsorptive removal of methylene blue by rhamnolipid-functionalized graphene oxide from wastewater. Water Res 67:330–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yan Q, Li R, Toghiani H, Cai Z, Zhang J (2015) Synthesis and characterization of carbon nanospheres obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of wood-derived and other saccharides. Tr Ren Energy 1(2):119–128.  https://doi.org/10.17737/tre.2015.1.2.0012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel Antônio Pires Kelm
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mário José da Silva Júnior
    • 2
  • Sávio Henrique de Barros Holanda
    • 2
  • Caroline Maria Bezerra de Araujo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Romero Barbosa de Assis Filho
    • 1
    • 3
  • Emerson Jaguaribe Freitas
    • 4
  • Diogo Rafael dos Santos
    • 4
  • Maurício Alves da Motta Sobrinho
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  3. 3.Instituto Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  4. 4.Activated Carbon LaboratoryUniversidade Federal da ParaíbaJoão PessoaBrazil

Personalised recommendations