Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 3762–3770 | Cite as

Use of mature compost as filter media and the effect of packing depth on hydrogen sulfide removal from composting exhaust gases by biofiltration

  • Jing Yuan
  • Longlong Du
  • Shuyan Li
  • Fan Yang
  • Zhiye Zhang
  • Guoxue LiEmail author
  • Guoying Wang
Research Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the utilization of mature compost as a biofilter medium for the removal of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from the exhaust gases of the composting process. Source-selected kitchen waste from municipal solid waste was composted in a reactor, and the exhaust gas was passed through a biofilter packed with a 1:4 (wet weight) mixture of mature compost and sand. Two treatments were applied under sterilized and unsterilized conditions to quantify the contribution of microbial activity. The effect of packing depth on H2S removal efficiency was also studied. A global H2S removal efficiency of 51% was obtained in the biofilter for loading rates in the range of 0–429 mg H2S m−3 h−1. The adsorption capacity was the main factor affecting H2S removal efficiency, contributing 64.2% to the total removal efficiency, with microbial activity contributing 35.8%. The relationship between the cumulative amount of H2S removed and the packing height was well-described by a linear equation. The equation indicated that 99% H2S removal efficiency could be achieved using a packing height of 96 cm for unsterilized packing material or 158 cm for sterilized packing material.

Keywords

Biofiltration Adsorption capacity Hydrogen sulfide Mature compost Microbial degradation Removal efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. SQ2017YFNC060039). We thank Gareth Thomas, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

References

  1. Anet B, Couriol C, Lendormi T, Cloirec PL (2013) Characterization and selection of packing materials for biofiltration of rendering odourous emissions. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1622–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barona A, Elías A, Amurrio A, Cano I, Arias R (2005) Hydrogen sulphide adsorption on a waste material used in bioreactors. Biochem Eng J 24:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogner J, Ahmed M A, Diaz C, Faaij A, Gao Q, Hashimoto S, Mareckova K, Pipatti, R, Zhang T (2007) Waste management, in Climate change 2007: mitigation, contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[C]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen L, Wu WX (2010) Reduction of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and short-chain fatty acids emission during the sewage sludge composting. Clean-Soil Air Waste 38:998–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung YC, Huang CP, Tseng CP (1996) Operation optimization of Thiobacillus thioparus CH11 biofilter for hydrogen sulfide removal. J Biotechnol 52:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domingo JL, Nadal M (2009) Domestic waste composting facilities: a review of human health risks. Environ Int 35:382–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drennan MF, Distefano TD (2010) Characterization of the curing process from high-solids anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 101:537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elias A, Barona A, Arreguy A, Rios J, Aranguiz I, Peñas J (2002) Evaluation of a packing material for the biodegradation of H2S and product analysis. Process Biochem 37:813–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galera MM, Tuuguu E, Park SJ, Chung WJ (2008) Effects of pollutant concentration ratio on the simultaneous removal of NH3, H2S and toluene gases using rock wool-compost biofilter. J Hazard Mater 152:624–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallastegui G, Munoz R, Barona A, Ibarra-Berastegi G, Rojo N, Elias A (2011) Evaluating the impact of water supply strategies on p-xylene biodegradation performance in an organic media-based biofilter. J Hazard Mater 185:1019–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartikainen T, Martikainen PJ, Olkkonen M, Ruuskanen J (2002) Peat biofilters in long-term experiments for removing odorous sulphur compounds. Water Air Soil Pollut 133:335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hort C, Gracy S, Platel V, Moynault L (2013) A comparative study of two composts as filter media for the removal of gaseous reduced sulfur compounds (RSCs) by biofiltration: application at industrial scale. Waste Manag 33:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaber MB, Anet B, Amrane A, Couriol C, Lendormi T, Cloirec PL, Cogny G, Fillières R (2014) Impact of nutrients supply and pH changes on the elimination of hydrogen sulfide, dimethyl disulfide and ethanethiol by biofiltration. Chem Eng J 258:420–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang X, Tay JH (2011) Removal mechanisms of H2S using exhausted carbon in biofiltration. J Hazard Mater 185:1543–1549Google Scholar
  15. Jiang T, Li GX, Tang Q, Ma XG, Wang G, Schuchardt F (2015) Effects of aeration method and aeration rate on greenhouse gas emissions during composting of pig feces in pilot scale. J Environ Sci 31:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang T, Ma XG, Yang J, Tang Q, Yi ZG, Chen MX, Li GX (2016) Effect of different struvite crystallization methods on gaseous emission and the comprehensive comparison during the composting. Bioresour Technol 217:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Y, Luo WH, Li GX, Wang K, Gong XY (2018) Performance of phosphogypsum and calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer for nitrogen conservation in pig manure composting. Bioresour Technol 250:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin YH, Chen YP, Ho KL, Kee TY, Tseng CP (2013) Large-scale modular biofiltration system for effective odor removal in a composting facility. J Environ Sci Health Part A Toxic Hazard Subst Environ Eng 48:1420–1430Google Scholar
  19. Komilis DP, Ham RK, Park JK (2004) Emission of volatile organic compounds during composting of municipal solid wastes. Water Res 38:1707–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malhautier L, Khammar N, Bayle S, Fanlo J-L (2005) Biofiltration of volatile organic compounds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Medina VF, Webster TS, Devinny JS (1995) Treatment of gasoline residuals by granular activated carbon based biological filtration. J Environ Sci Heal A 30:407–412Google Scholar
  22. Morgan-Sagastume JM, Noyola A (2006) Hydrogen sulfide removal by compost biofiltration: effect of mixing of the filter media on operational factors. Bioresour Technol 97:1546–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mudliar S, Giri B, Padoley K, Satpute D, Dixit R, Bhatt P, Pandey R, Juwarkar A, Vaidya A (2010) Bioreactors for treatment of VOCs and odours—a review. J Environ Manag 91:1039–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pagans E, Font X, Sanchez A (2005) Biofiltration for ammonia removal from composting exhaust gases. Chem Eng J 113:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Park B-G, Shin W, Chung J-S (2009) Simultaneous biofiltration of H2S, NH3 and toluene using cork as a packing material. Korean J Chem Eng 26:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheutz C, Pedicone A, Pedersen GB, Kjeldsen P (2011) Evaluation of respiration in compost landfill biocovers intended for methane oxidation. Waste Manag 31:895–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smet E, Langeenhove HV, Maes K (2000) Abatement of high concentrated ammonia loaded waste gases in compost biofilters. Water Air Soil Pollut 119:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Szanto GL, Hamelers HM, Rulkens WH, Veeken AHM (2007) NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions during passively aerated composting of straw-rich pig manure. Bioresour Technol 98:2659–2670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsai CJ, Chen ML, Ye AD, Chou MS, Shen SH, Mao IF (2008) The relationship of odor concentration and the critical components emitted from food waste composting plants. Atmos Environ 42:8246–8251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu T, Wang XM, Li DJ, Yi ZG (2010) Emission of volatile organic sulfur compounds (VOSCs) during aerobic decomposition of food wastes. Atmos Environ 44:5065–5071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang F, Li GX, Shi H, Wang YM (2015) Effects of phosphogypsum and superphosphate on compost maturity and gaseous emissions during kitchen waste composting. Waste Manag 36:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yuan J, Chadwick D, Zhang DF, Li GX, Chen SL, Luo WH, Du LL, He SZ, Peng SP (2016a) Effects of aeration rate on maturity and gaseous emissions during sewage sludge composting. Waste Manag 56:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yuan J, Du LL, Zhang ZY, Li GX, Zhang DF, Jiang T, Yang QQ (2016b) Effect of mature compost biofilter on removal efficiency of NH3 produced during composting (in Chinese). J Agro-Environ Sci 35:164–171Google Scholar
  34. Yuan J, Yang QQ, Zhang ZY, Li GX, Luo WH, Zhang DF (2015) Use of additive and pretreatment to control odors in municipal kitchen waste during aerobic composting. J Environ Sci 37:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang HY, Li GX, Gu J, Wang GQ, Li YY, Zhang DF (2016) Influence of aeration on volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) and NH3 emissions during aerobic composting of kitchen waste. Waste Manag 58:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang HY, Schuchardt F, Li GX, Yang JB, Yang QQ (2013) Emission of volatile sulfur compounds during composting of municipal solid waste (MSW). Waste Manag 33:957–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Yuan
    • 1
  • Longlong Du
    • 1
  • Shuyan Li
    • 1
  • Fan Yang
    • 2
  • Zhiye Zhang
    • 1
  • Guoxue Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guoying Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental ScienceChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental ProtectionBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations